North Area consolidation - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

North Area consolidation project

EDMS # 1788836

EN Safety Office

Safety

Diagnostic

Why

?

When

?

How

?

Context

No safety

file available

for the existing

North

Area Facility

A consolidation project is starting Input based on safety feedback (R.E.M.) is required = SAFETY DIAGNOSTIC

Safety file v_1.0 new facility

R.E.M part

Safety file v_1.1facility upgrade

R.E.M part

Safety file v_2.0facility consolidated

R.E.M part

Existing facility

Safety file v_1.0

f

acility consolidated

R.E.M part

Safety file v_2.0

facility consolidated

Diagnostic

Diagnostic

Diagnostic

Diagnostic

North Area

EDMS #

1788836

Coupling with the project lifetime

Perform a

diagnostic in line with the project life cycle:

Focused on:

Safety aspect;

Environmental

aspect Based on the experience, the data recorded and the history of the facility

Diagnostic process : 3 steps

Interview

with each system/process

owner based

on 3 criteria:

The

Probability (P)Accident /incident historyInspections reports analysisEvents occurredThe potential Severity (S) of the systemFor the personsFor the environment

For the facilityThe current Level

of control (L)

Rating

of the system on:

Safety aspects (OHS, reliability) Environmental impact

3)

Recommendations for the Conceptual Design Report

SCORE =

P x S x L

Rating Safety aspects :Probability

of

an event related with this system/process (based on accident declaration in the north area on this system/process

) :

1

: No event during the last 5 years3: On average 1 event/ years during the last 5 years5: More than 5 events / years during the last 5

yearsReasonable maximum

Severity in case of an event related with this system/process:

1: Slight injury (1st degree burn, contusion…)

– Hundreds Swiss francs of material damages 5

: Injury with days off (broken legs, 2nd degree burn…)

– Thousands Swiss francs of damages – Lost operation time (in hours)

10: Injury with work disability or fatality (electrocution, fall from height

…) – Hundred thousands Swiss francs of damages – Lost operation time (in days)

Current level of control related to human exposure on this system/process:

1: A safety management system is continuously improving

the OHS level (Safety culture shared by workers, systematic risk assessment, systematic safety feedback; FMEA (

Failure Mode and

Effects Analysis) for each systems…))

3: A safety management system is in place but still have to be improved

(Prevention plan partially in place, no systematic risk assessment is performed, several level of sub-contractors; FMEA not performed…)5

: Non-compliant with the applicable safety rules (Workers not trained properly, procedures are not up to date…)

Safety score

=

P x S

x L

Rating Environmental Impact :Probability of an event related with this system/process (based on accident declaration) :

1: No event during the last 5 years in the north area on this system/process3: On average 1 event/ years

during the last 5 years in the north area on this system/process5: More than 5 events / years during the last 5 years in the north area on this system/processReasonable maximum severity

in case of an event related with this system/process: 1: Minor environmental impact (Increase of electrical consumption, mistake in sorting common waste…)

5

:

Major environmental impact ( < 10 liters of pollution released in the air, water, soil; mistake in sorting chemical waste…) 10: Serious environmental impact( > 10 liters of pollution released in the air, water, soil; abnormal energy consumption…) Current level of control related to human exposure on this system/process:1: A environmental management system is continuously improving the Environmental level (Safety culture shared by workers, systematic waste segregation, emergency procedures known by everyone, systematic environmental impact study…) 3: A safety management system is in place but still have to be improved (Prevention plan partially in place, no systematic risk assessment is performed, several level of sub-contractors…)5: Non-compliant with the applicable safety rules (Workers not trained properly, procedures are not up to date…) Env score = P x S

x L

Sum up :

Diagnostic based on the Records, Experience and Monitoring

(REM) Help to

understand the systems and the processes hazardousness

Get an

overview

of the current situationHelp to make recommendation and prioritiesIndicators allow to monitor the improvement Baseline for the safety management of the projectBaseline for the safety file

edition