305 LEA Determinations Compliance Matrix 355 General Information and Reminders Future Calls The monthly call topics will be on the special education website under the Monthly TA Call tab ID: 704171
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Agenda 3:00 Introductions and ZOOM Webi..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Agenda
3:00 Introductions and ZOOM Webinar reminders
3:05 LEA Determinations: Compliance Matrix
3:55 General Information and Reminders
Future Calls
The monthly call topics will be on the special education website under the “Monthly TA Call” tab
Please submit topics or questions for future calls on our website
Calls will be held on the last Thursday of each month from 3:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. (a reminder email will be sent monthly)
Webinar Reminders
If you have questions during the webinar, please ask them by clicking on the question button.
If you are experiencing any technical difficulties, please let us know by clicking on the chat button.
You can see and hear us, but we are not able to see or hear you.
Slide2Slide3
Compliance Elements: Disproportionality
Priority Area IV: Compliance
Score 4
Score 3
Score 2
Score 1
Score 0
None
1 Year2 Years3 YearsPolicies/ProceduresIndicators 4B: DisciplineThere is no significant difference suspected within the LEA.The LEA has been required to complete the self-assessment for 1 year.The LEA has been required to complete the self-assessment for 2 year.The LEA has been required to complete the self-assessment for 3 or more years. Inappropriate policies, procedures, and practices resulted in the significant difference in discipline.Indicators 9: Disproportionality IdentificationThere is no disproportionate representation suspected within the LEA.The LEA has been required to complete the self-assessment for 1 year.The LEA has been required to complete the self-assessment for 2 year.The LEA has been required to complete the self-assessment for 3 or more years. Inappropriate policies, procedures, and practices resulted in the disproportionate representation in identification.
Indicators 10: Disproportionality in a Specific DisabilityThere is no disproportionate representation suspected within the LEA.The LEA has been required to complete the self-assessment for 1 year.The LEA has been required to complete the self-assessment for 2 year.The LEA has been required to complete the self-assessment for 3 or more years. Inappropriate policies, procedures, and practices resulted in the disproportionate representation in a specific disability.Slide4
Compliance Elements: Implementation of IDEA
Priority Area IV: Compliance
Score 4
Score 3
Score 2
Score 1
Score 0
100- 95%
89-94.99%79 – 88.99%69 – 78.99%0 – 68.99%Indicators 11: Child Find –Timely EvaluationThe LEA meets or exceeds the State target.The LEA is .01% to 6.00% below the State target.The LEA is 6.01% to 16.00% below the State target.The LEA is 16.01% to 26.00% below the State target.The LEA more than 26.00% below the State target. 100- 95%
89-94.99%79 – 88.99%69 – 78.99%0 – 68.99%Indicator 12: Part C to Part B TransitionThe LEA meets or exceeds the State target.
The LEA is .01% to 6.00% below the State target.The LEA is 6.01% to 16.00% below the State target.The LEA is 16.01% to 26.00% below the State target.The LEA more than 26.00% below the State target.
100- 95%
89-94.99%
79 – 88.99%
69 – 78.99%
0 – 68.99%
Indicator 13: Secondary
Transition
The LEA meets or exceeds the State target.
The LEA is .01% to 6.00% below the State target.
The LEA is 6.01% to 16.00% below the State target.
The LEA is 16.01% to 26.00% below the State target.
The LEA more than 26.00% below the State target.Slide5
Compliance Elements: Timely and Accurate
Priority Area IV: Compliance
Score 4
Score 3
Score 2
Score 1
Score 0
State Indicator: Timely and Accurate Reporting
The LEA reported all
requested data/ documents within timelines and all were accurate.1 Component was Late and/or Not Accurate2 Components were Late and/or Not Accurate3 or more Components were Late and/or Not AccurateFailed to Reportone or more required data sets/documents. Cycle 4 Data, includes MySped Resource ReviewCycle 7 Data, includes MySped Resource ReviewMonitoring - correction of non-complianceRequired corrective actions for State Complaints and Due Process Hearings1% Assessment documentsAPR Response TableDisproportionality Self-Assessment and/or Success Gap RubricFiscal Other as deemed necessary
Timely and Accurate Reporting means the LEA has submitted required data sets and documents on time and the information is accurate. Besides the Cycle data, this includes required documentation/activities for all sections of ADE Special Education Unit by due dates.Slide6
Compliance Elements: General Supervision
Priority Area IV: Compliance
Score 4
Score 2
Score 0
None
2 Years
3 or more Years
Long-standing NoncomplianceNo outstanding noncompliance or special conditions imposed on Part B grant. Has non-compliance from the past 2 years and has not demonstrated correction and/or has a special condition imposed on Part B grant. Has noncompliance from 3 or more years-ago and has not demonstrated correction and/or has had special condition imposed on Part B grant for more than 3 years.Slide7
LEA DETERMINATION DEFINED
Meets Requirements:
An LEA’s 2018 Determination is Meets Requirements if the RDA rate is at least 80%
, unless the ADE-SEU has imposed Special Conditions on the LEA’s last three (FFYs 2015, 2016, and 2017) IDEA Part B grant awards, and those Special Conditions are in effect at the time of the 2018 determination.Needs Assistance: An LEA’s 2018 Determination is Needs Assistance if the
RDA rate is at least 60% but less than 80%. A LEA would also be in Needs Assistance if its Compliance Score is 80% or above, but the ADE-SEU has imposed Special Conditions on the LEA’s last three (FFYs 2015, 2016, and 2017) IDEA Part B grant awards, and those Special Conditions are in effect at the time of the 2018 determination. Needs
Intervention: An LEA’s 2018 Determination is Needs Intervention if the RDA rate is less than 60%. Needs Substantial Intervention: The
ADE-SEU did not make a determination of Needs Substantial Intervention for any LEA in 2018. Slide8
OVERALL DETERMINATION
Once the Results percent is calculated and the Compliance percent is calculated the overall determination score can be calculated
For example:
If an LEAs Results percentage is 68 their Results determination is
NEEDS ASSISTANCEIf the LEAs Compliance percentage is 88 their Compliance determination is MEETS REQUIREMENTSResults: 68% * 25% = 17%Compliance: 88% * 75% = 66%
17% + 66% = 83% RDA rate resulting in a determination of MEETS REQUIREMENTSSlide9
Updates
9Slide10
2018
SPECIAL EDUCATION ADMINISTRATORS’ ACADEMY
SEPTEMBER 13 & 14, 2018
HOT SPRINGS CONVENTION CENTER
HOT SPRINGS, ARKANSASSlide11
Recorded webinar
11Slide12
For next year ONLY, grades 3-11 will take DLM literacy and math. Grades 3-10 will take DLM science.
After next year, DLM will be administered in grades 3-10 for literacy, math, and science.
There are no changes in course codes for students who take ACT Aspire.
Tinyurl.com/18-19sped
Look at pages three and four.
2018-2019 Special Education Course (Assessment) CodesSlide13Slide14
DLM Training: Instruction, Not Just Assessment
Commissioner’s Memo
LS-18-060
14Slide15
Science of Reading Requirements
Commissioner’s Memo
LF-18-090
15Slide16
Alternate Pathway to Graduation
16Slide17
Questions?
Next Call
:
May 31, 2018