PPT-Quantum information

and the monogamy of entanglement Aram Harrow MIT UCL until Jan 2015 Quantum mechanics QM has also explained the stability of atoms the photoelectric effect e verything else weve looked at. a waveform. Introduction. What’s the problem? . Standard quantum limit (SQL) for force detection. The right wrong story. Beating the SQL. Three strategies. Carlton M. Caves. Center for Quantum Information and Control, University . Michael Ben-Or. The Hebrew University. Michael Rabin’s Birthday Celebration. Randomized Protocols. Power of Randomization. Exponential . speedup for known algorithms. Complexity . – The jury is still out . Aditi. . Sen. (De). Harish-Chandra Research Institute, India. Monogamy of Quantum Correlations. Aditi. . Sen. (De). Harish-Chandra Research Institute, India. Co-workers: . Asutosh. , . Salini. , . Modern Physics. 5/10/11 . Spring 2011. Ben Miller, Alexander . DeCarli. , Kevin Shaw. What is it?. How do particles become Entangled?. Parametric Down Conversion. A laser (usually ultraviolet for its high frequency) sends a photon through a nonlinear crystal such as Beta Barium Borate. Quantum Hamiltonian Complexity. Aram Harrow (MIT). Simons Institute. 16 Jan 2014. Entanglement. Original motivation for quantum computing. [Feynman ‘82]. Nature isn't classical, dammit, and if you want to make a simulation of Nature, you'd better make it quantum mechanical, and by golly it's a wonderful problem, because it doesn't look so easy.. Omar Fawzi (ETH Zürich). Joint work with Winton Brown (University College London). S. Random . unitaries. Encoding for almost any quantum information transmission problem . Entanglement generation. Thermalization. Saikat. . Guha. , . Patrick . Hayden, . Hari. . Krovi. , . Seth . Lloyd, . Cosmo . Lupo. ,. Jeffrey . H. . Shapiro. , . Masahiro. . Takeoka. ,. . Mark M. . Wilde. Phys. . Rev. X . 4. , 011016 (2014). Light: . Quantumness. . of Correlations and their applications. Natalia . Korolkova. , . St Andrews, UK. C. . Croal. , N. Quinn, L. . Mista. *. University of St. Andrews, UK;. *. Palacky. University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. Why a Retreat?. Why a Center?. Transforming Caltech Quantum Science. Pre-historic: Feynman, Thorne, …. Pre-millennial: . Preskill. (1983), . Vahala. (1986), Kimble (1989), . Yeh. (1989), Eisenstein (1996). Dung Nguyen. Chicago 19. th. January. Content. Motivation . Quantum bit (qubit) vs Classical bit (bit). Quantum Computation . Quantum Communication. Conclusion. Motivation. The end of Moore’s law scaling in silicon (because of quantum effects of particle at scale smaller than 7nm).. ’. t understood it.. ”. --Niels Bohr. . The Quantum Information Revolution. . Paul Kwiat. DARPA. Kwiat’s. Quantum. Clan (2012). Graduate Students:. . Rebecca Holmes. . Aditya. Sharma. Fernando . G.S.L. . Brand. ão. University College London. New Perspectives on . Thermalization. , Aspen 2014. p. artially based on joint work with . Aram Harrow . and . Michal . Horodecki. Plan. 1. . ” Workshop is to discuss theoretical and experimental hot issues related to quantum physics, from foundational issues (such as findings and ideas to investigate quantum effects in biological systems. The Workshop is supported by . Part 1. Outline. Introduction. Problems of classical physics. Black-body Radiation. experimental observations. Wien’s displacement law. Stefan – Boltzmann law. Rayleigh - Jeans. Wien’s radiation law.