/
Prospects for imaging prostate cancer with PET/CT and PET/MR Prospects for imaging prostate cancer with PET/CT and PET/MR

Prospects for imaging prostate cancer with PET/CT and PET/MR - PowerPoint Presentation

accouther
accouther . @accouther
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2020-06-24

Prospects for imaging prostate cancer with PET/CT and PET/MR - PPT Presentation

Maurizio Conti Siemens Healthcare Molecular Imaging Knoxville Tennessee USA Mediterranean Thematic Workshops in Advanced Molecular Imaging Alghero September 27 2014 index motivation amp introduction ID: 785548

high pet biopsy prostate pet high prostate biopsy cancer resolution imaging mri sensitivity specific psma uptake reconstruction guided choline

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Prospects for imaging prostate cancer wi..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Prospects for imaging prostate cancer with PET/CT and PET/MR

Maurizio Conti

Siemens Healthcare Molecular Imaging, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA

Mediterranean Thematic Workshops in Advanced Molecular Imaging

Alghero

, September 2-7, 2014

Slide2

index

motivation & introduction

PET tracers for prostate cancer

advances

in PET technology

and new opportunities for PET

improved detectability for prostate cancer lesions

PET/MR for prostate cancer imaging

new directions: a discussion on PET scanner architectures

new directions: guided biopsy

Slide3

Motivation

Prostate cancer is the leading cancer for men in the US (and second for death):

one out of six men

will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in his life;

Accurate localization/staging is the key to success in treatment; The techniques available for detection and localization are very poor, compared to all other major cancers.

Typical prostate cancer path:High PSA“blind” biopsy (false negative 30% !)if positive, prostatectomy + bone scan for metastasis

future of PET in prostate cancer:

Develop high specificity tracers

Develop high performance PET instrumentation

Slide4

Prostate cancer imaging

The holy grail(s) of prostate cancer imaging today:

Specific tracers, high sensitivity and high specificity of the imaging scan

Improve early detection

and localization of small lesion inside prostate and in lymph nodes (support for diagnosis and biopsy and treatment)assess aggressiveness of disease via non-invasive techniques (treatment or active surveillance)

Slide5

Tracers

Slide6

PET tracers for prostate cancer

Tracer

Mechanism

Specificity

Uptake

[

18

F]FDG

Glucose metabolism

Non specific

Low uptake

[

11

C/

18

F]choline

Lipid metabolism

Non specific

High uptake

[

11

C/

18

F]acetate

Non specific

High uptake

[

18

F]

NaF

Calcium analog

Non specific

High uptake

[

11

C]methionine

Amino acid transport

Non specific

High uptake

[

18

F]FACBC

Non specific

High uptake

[

18

F]FLT

Cell proliferation

Non specific

Low uptake

[

18

F]FMAU

Non specific

High uptake

[

18

F]FDHT

Androgen receptor

Specific

High uptake

[

18

F]DCFBC, [

18

F]

DCFPyL

, [

68

Ga]PSMA

PSMA inhibitor

Specific

High uptake

[

64

Cu/

89

Zr]J591, [

89

Zr]5A10, others

Free PSA and PSMA antibodies

Specific

High uptake

Slide7

PSMA tracers

Compound is inhibitor of a specific site in PSMA (high affinity):

It bounds strongly and only to PSMA

Low molecular weight (fast uptake)

*

Banerjee et al.: “Synthesis and Evaluation of Technetium-99m- and Rhenium-Labeled Inhibitors of the Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)”J Med Chem 51, 4504-4517, 2008

** Courtesy of Martin

Pomper

Slide8

A.Afshar-Oromieh

et al.: “Comparison of PET imaging with a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and 18F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer”, EJNMMI 41: 11-20 (2014)* Figure from journal articleR.C.Mease et al.: “N-[N-[(S)-1,3-Dicarboxypropyl]Carbamoyl]-4-[18F]Fluorobenzyl-LCysteine, [18F]DCFBC: A New Imaging Probe for Prostate Cancer”, Clin. Cancer Res. 14: 3036-3043 (2008)* Courtesy of Martin Pomper, private communication

PSMA tracers

Ga68-PSMA

F18-PSMA

F18-choline

Ga68-PSMA

F18-PSMA

Slide9

New prospects for PET

Slide10

“High sensitivity, high resolution PET with high specificity tracers, for early and spatially accurate detection of tumors inside the prostate.”

Objectives:

Better diagnosis and staging: providing a tool for guided biopsy and more accurate assessment of the grade of the disease;

Reduce the need for radical prostatectomy;

Guide the radical prostatectomy, obtaining less positive margins and sparing healthy tissue;Safer diagnosis and staging: reducing the need of "blind" surgical removal of pelvic lymph nodes;Provide more accurate tumor localization information for any localized therapy, in order to achieve more effective and safer therapy.

Vision

Slide11

Typical patient path

high PSA

US-guided

blind biopsy

false positive

true positive

true negative

false negative

no treatment

under treatment

over treatment

treatment

active surveillance

prostatectomy

localized therapy:

BrachyTP, RadioTP, Hadrons, HIFU

monitoring

adjust therapy

PET

PET-guided

biopsy

X

X

PET

PET-aided choice of

treatment

PET positive

Impact of Hi Res PET with highly specific tracer

PET guidance for surgery

accurate monitoring with PET

true negative

no treatment

PET negative

X

X

diagnosis/staging:

high

resolution localization inside

prostate

detection of early metastasis in lymph nodes

biopsy: high

resolution localization inside

prostate

Slide12

High resolution, high sensitivity with

new

PET scanners

Improvements in PET technology in recent years:

scintillation material: LSO (LYSO) -> higher sensitivitysmall crystal detectors -> higher resolutionlong axial coverage (>20cm) -> higher sensitivity

PSF reconstruction -> lower noise, higher contrastTOF reconstruction -> lower noise, faster convergence, better localization accuracynew modality: -> PET/MR PST+TOF: lower noise -> smaller pixel-size and better spatial resolution.

osem 4mm

psf 2mm

psf+tof 2mm

osem 2mm osem+tof 2mm

Slide13

High resolution, high sensitivity with

new

PET

scanners : a simulation

Slide14

Original image

Resample

(2mm pixel)

Deconvolve

(pixel size & filter)

Add lesions

Forward project into sinogram

Apply normalization

-1

& attenuation

Add scatter

Add randoms

Add Poisson noise

reconstruct

New image

Scale to set counts

High resolution, high sensitivity with

new

PET

scanners : a simulation

Slide15

Lesions

Start from clinical

11

C-choline images

Add lesions Lesion intensity: SUV = 4, 6, 8Lesion size: 4 mm, 6 mm, 10 mmForward project, add simulated Scatter, Randoms, Poisson noiseTotal number of netTrues (Trues+Scatter) = 30x106Random Fraction=50%100 or 50 realizationsReconstructionMethod analog to original image for comparison (typically OSEM, 4mm pixel, 21 subsets, 2 iterations, 6mm filter)OSEM+PSF+TOF (2mm pixel, 21 subsets, 2 iterations, <4mm filter)

LesionsCreate lesions in two positions:inside the prostate (to differentiate extra capsule and intra capsule tumors)outside the prostate in the pelvic area (simulate metastasis on lymph nodes)

High resolution, high sensitivity with

new

PET

scanners : a simulation

Slide16

11

C-choline patient with simulated small

lesions: 6mm

lesion, 6:1 contrast

the original PET/CT image, with no simulated lesion;

the simulation with lesions, reconstruction with low resolution OSEM;

the simulation with lesions, PSF+TOF reconstruction with 2mm voxel size

Original reconstruction: OSEM, 5.5x5.5x3.3 mm

3

voxels, 20 subsets, 2 iterations, 6mm filter

Proposed reconstruction: OSEM+PSF+TOF, 2x2x2 mm

3

, 21 subsets, 2 iterations, no filter

(a) (b) (c)

High resolution, high sensitivity with

new

PET

scanners : a simulation

Slide17

LROC curve for all

data (all patients, all lesions)

Higher detectability with high resolution imaging

4mm lesion

6mm lesion

10mm lesion

Numerical observer’s analysis

High resolution, high sensitivity with

new

PET

scanners : a simulation

Slide18

PET + MR: multi parametric MRI

Slide19

PET + MR:

multi parametric MRI

PET + Multi parametric MR:

T2w MRI

(anatomy)

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE) MRI (vascularity)Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) MRI (water diffusion, cell density)Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Imaging (MRSI) (choline/citrate ratio,13C pyruvate/lactate ratio)

synergic contribution to diagnosis !

Slide20

DCE (Dynamic

contrast enhanced

MRI):

Gd

-chelate as contrast agent for angiogenesisS.Verna et al., “Overview of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Management”, AJR 198,1277–1288, 2012

fusedDCE

T2w

PET + MR:

multi parametric MRI

Slide21

DWI (Diffusion

weighted

MRI): restricted

water diffusion in tumor

B. Turbey et al., “Multiparametric 3T Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Cancer: Histopathological Correlation Using Prostatectomy Specimens Processed in Customized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Molds”, Journal of Urology 186, 1818-1824, 2011

T2w

DWI

PET + MR:

multi parametric MRI

Slide22

PET + MR:

multi parametric MRI

MRSI:

(

choline+creatine

)/citrate ratio as a marker of cancerK.L.Zachian et al.,“1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of prostate cancer: Biomarkers for tumorcharacterization”, Cancer Biomarkers 4, 263-276, 2008

Slide23

MRSI: hyperpolarized

13

C

(

13C-pyruvate contrast agent), tracks a dramatic increase in lactate/pyruvate ratio in tumor cellsSimon Hu et al.,“13C-Pyruvate Imaging Reveals Alterations in Glycolysis that Precede c-Myc-Induced Tumor Formation and Regression”, Cell Metabolism 14, 131–142, 2011

Before therapyAfter

therapy

PET + MR:

multi parametric MRI

Slide24

PET+Multi

parametric MR to guide the biopsy

Takei et al., “

A

Case of Multimodality Multiparametric 11C-Choline PET/MR for Biopsy Targeting in Prior Biopsy-Negative Primary Prostate Cancer”, Clinical Nuclear Medicine 37, 918,

2012PET/CT

PET/MR

MultiPar-MR

11

C-choline PET/CT

&

PET/MR

T2w MRI + DWI MRI + DCE

MRI

*Munich, on Siemens

mMR

DWI

DCE

T2w

PET + MR:

multi parametric MRI

Slide25

New directions: PET scanner architectures for imaging

of prostate cancer

Slide26

Question: which approach is most interesting or

effective or realistic ?New directions: PET scanner architectures for imaging

of prostate cancer

a high performance whole

body PET scanner, with classic ring architecture, with top of the line reconstruction: high resolution, high sensitivity, PSF, TOF, optimized protocol for prostate cancerPros: available now, general purpose scannerCons: limited resolution (

4mm), limited sensitivity

the same high performance

whole body PET scanner

with

a high resolution

insert,

with a local

magnification;

Pros

: high res (≤2mm), can use present scanners

Cons

: technical issues, complex reconstruction

a

dedicated

high performance small

diameter PET camera with small scintillating

crystals, with increased sensitivity and resolution.

Pros

:

high

res

(≤

2mm), lower cost than full scannerCons: engineering development, all cost is for urologist

Slide27

New directions: instrumentation for biopsy

TASKS:

Detection and diagnosis

Staging

and characterizationSurgery and biopsy

Slide28

Today

, ultrasound, no information on the location of the tumor, only anatomical information of the shape of prostate

Future

, PET+CT/MR, high resolution information about

the location

of the tumor, fused with the anatomical map*.

* Even choline

could be used: low

specificity

but high sensitivity.

New directions: instrumentation for biopsy

Slide29

“on-line” MR guided biopsy

Slide30

“off-line” MR-US guided biopsy

Registration

method:

MR image is

acquired previously;MR volume is identified;MR-US are registered real time during US-guided biopsy.Rastinehad et al., “Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy”, The Journal of Urology 191, 1749–1754, 2014 Commercial products: Koelis, UroNav, and Artemis

Slide31

Question: which approach is

best to guide a prostate cancer biopsy?New directions: more on biopsy

Method

performance:

sensitivity&localizationtechnical complexitycostUS Poor: blind biopsynoneLow on-line MRHigh: can locate some tumors

lowModerate+: requires to perform biopsy in MR scannerMR+US (MR off-line, registered)Adequate: can locate some tumors but possible registration issueslow-moderateModerate: requires MR scanPET+US (PET off-line, registered)Adequate+: can locate active tumors but possible registration issues

low-moderate

Moderate: requires PET scan

MR+US (simultaneous)

High: can locate some tumors

moderate

Moderate+: requires to perform biopsy in MR scanner

PET+US (simultaneous)

High+: can locate active tumors

very high

High: requires to perform biopsy in PET scanner

MR+PET+US (simultaneous)

Very high: can locate active tumors

+ multimodality synergy

very high

Very high: requires

to perform biopsy in

PET/MR scanner

Slide32

“on-line” PET guided biopsy using magnification probes ?

PET ring

from S.

Majewski

Simultaneous acquisition

method:biopsy probe in PET/MR or PET/CT scanner;US and/or PET and/or MR images are acquired simultaneously;the biopsy can be guided by US-PET-MR

*H

. Wu, Y.C. Tai et al.: “Micro Insert: A Prototype Full-Ring PET Device for Improving the Image Resolution of a Small-Animal PET Scanner”,

J Nucl Med 49, p. 1668,

2008

*J

.

Zhou,

J. Qi, “Theoretical analysis and simulation study of a high-resolution zoom-in PET system”,

Phys

Med

Biol 54, p. 5193, 2009F. Garibaldi et al.: “TOPEM

: A multimodality probe (PET TOF, MRI, and MRS) for diagnosis and follow up of prostate cancer” IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec 2010, p. 2442, 2010

S.

Majewski

et al., “Dedicated mobile PET prostate imager”,

J

Nucl

Med 52 (Suppl. 1),

p.1945

,

2011

Needs:

High resolution, high sensitivity probe:

Small crystals, TOF, magnification

effect*

C

omplex reconstruction algorithm:

Localization of the probe

Attenuation

correction

Anisotropic resolution (artifacts?)

How to do an acceptable PET image in a few seconds?

High sensitivity and TOF?

Better reconstruction algorithms?

Slide33

Thanks!

And thanks to:

Harshali Bal

Lars Eriksson

Hossein JadvarPeter ChoykeStefano FantiMartin PomperStan MajewskiH. Bal et al.,“Improving PET spatial resolution and detectability for prostate cancer imaging”, Phys. Med. Biol. 59, 4411-4426 (2014).M. Conti,“New prospects for PET in prostate cancer imaging: a physicist’s viewpoint”, Eur.J.Nucl.Med.Mol.Imag.Phys.,in press (2014)It is a time of great opportunities for PET imaging of prostate cancer!

Put on your pink glasses!