/
ENDOMETRIAL CANCER Nomonde Mbatani ENDOMETRIAL CANCER Nomonde Mbatani

ENDOMETRIAL CANCER Nomonde Mbatani - PowerPoint Presentation

adia
adia . @adia
Follow
64 views
Uploaded On 2024-01-20

ENDOMETRIAL CANCER Nomonde Mbatani - PPT Presentation

Ca Endometrium Most common female genital tract cancer Developed areas South African females 7 th most common cancer 1163 according to SA National Cancer Registry The good news Prognosis excellent ID: 1041121

cell cancer risk grade cancer cell grade risk survival endometrial benefit study stage patients disease growth type hysterectomy role

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "ENDOMETRIAL CANCER Nomonde Mbatani" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1.

2. ENDOMETRIAL CANCERNomonde Mbatani

3. Ca EndometriumMost common female genital tract cancer – Developed areasSouth African females, 7th most common cancer (1:163) according to SA National Cancer Registry

4.

5. The good newsPrognosis excellent

6. Ca endometriumType 1 Type 2Obese , hyperlipidaemic. Peri - menopausal womanMature womanHyper -estrogenismAtrophic endometriumPrecursor - Atypical hyperplasia (EIN)Serous Intra-epithelial Carcinoma-SIC/ EGD)Low grade. Less invasive at time of surgeryHigh Grade (UPSC, Clear cell, MMMT ?Grade 3)Favourable prognosisPoor prognosisHighly sensitive to progestagensNo response to progestagensIn 80% cases ECIn 15 -20% EC

7. Prognostic factors Uterine factorsHistological type: Endometrioid, Clear cell, UPSCHistological grade: 1, 2 or 3 (Grigsby, Portec)LVSICervix involvementDNA ploidy – Flow CytometryDepth of myometrial invasion Extra –uterine factors: More to do with stage! ROLE OF PATHOLOGIST CRUCIAL!

8.

9. Endometrial Cancer ProfileThe woman with endometrial cancer: Morphological , medical challenge .Pre –operative workup.Anaesthetic assessment ICU bookings

10. Pre-operative AssessmentBloods: FBC, U&E, HIV, δGT, ALPUltra sound: Liver, lymphadenopathyDepth of myometrial invasion – Role of MRIHistological review!

11. SurgeryTAH and BSO – Open / Laparoscopic – Curative for most women (75% - confined to uterus)Laparoscopy: Conversion to open surgery is higher Peritoneal washings – No longer part of stagingCuff of vagina – No evidence

12. Parametrial involvementNot part of FIGO stagingSome data – associated with poorer prognosisRadical Hysterectomy - ? Survival benefit Small study/ retrospective seriesSurvival in those who were offered radical hysterectomy. Selection bias!Parametrial involvement :Associated with increased surgical stageStill do simple Hysterectomy

13. Type 2 CancersAdditional pelvic / para-aortic lymph node dissection (FIGO Staging)Omentectomy: Serous and MMT. Peritoneal spread - ?Benefit

14. LymphadenectomyRoleHysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is the standard surgery followed by RT depending on risk factorsEstablish extra uterine disease – Stage 3 c(1) or 3c(11)What is the extent?Only pelvic nodes done up to common iliacs – Criticism! FIGOGroin nodes? – No!

15. Is there a survival benefit in LND?

16. A study in Treatment of Endometrial Cancer (ASTEC Study)NO!

17. Survival Effect of Para Aortic Lymphadenectomy (SEPAL study) Yes!Intermediate / high risk groupsImproved patient survival (OS) in combined LND group (and chemotherapy, independently).p=0049The higher you go, ……

18. SEPAL

19. SEPAL Study design

20.

21. GSH ProtocolTAH and BSO – For low risk patients (Stage 1) Stage 1a and Grade 1/ 2 and less than 50% invasion Low risk of recurrence (5%) No survival benefit Intermediate risk: Grade 1/ 2 with more than 50% mm involvementGrade 3 or type 2 cancersCervical involvementIf nodes negative: Vault Brachy only vs WPRT, fewer complications for the patient.About 75% patients saved from WPRT

22. Intermediate risk: G. Thomas Grade 2 Stage 1b / Grade 3 WPRT vs Vault Brachytherapy – No survival advantage,Does not lead to better cure Pelvic recurrences: curable with radiotherapy risks:benefit. First do no harm! Keep as Plan B. Especially in patients under age 60yrs with no LVSI – GOG and Portec seem to suggest!

23. ChallengesStage 111 and 1V diseaseStage 1V: Adequate cyto reduction – microscopic disease – determinant of survivalOther determinants: Age less than 58yrs, good performance status (Bristow)Recurrent disease – Role of surgery

24. Chemotherapy for ECAdvanced / recurrent endometrial cancer settingHormonal therapy – hormone receptor positive tumours (low grade) - (11 to 25% response rates) Medroxy - Progesterone, lower doses as effective - Down regulation of receptorsAromatase inhibitors / SERMS- little dataCombinations: Doxorubicin and CisplatinumAddition of PaclitaxelToxic regimes: already elderly/ medically unwell patients

25. Targeted therapies

26. Cell growth regulationProto- oncogenes – Encourage cell growth and inhibit cell death. Mutation – Oncogenes leading to accelerated and disorderly cell growth. Dominant genesTumour suppressor genes / anti- oncogenes– prevent cell growth and encourage apoptosis: regulate transcription, DNA repair and cell to cell communication.

27.

28. TKRTKRTKR+PPAKTIntracellular eventsProliferationMetastasisNew vessel formationDecreased apoptosisKRASRAFPI3KPIP2PIP3Cell MembraneKeyHormone ligandGrowth factor ligandProstaglandin PTEN✚✚TKR extracellular domain TKR intracellular domain+P-PFOXO1mTorMAPKType One endometrial cancers

29. Molecular targetsGrouping of cancers looking at prognosisWhat causes diseasesWhat might be manipulated to alter risk / cure disease Design therapeutics

30. Targeted treatments (the future)Molecular profilingTargets cancer pathwaysPrevention of cancer

31. TKRTKRTKRPPAKTmTorIntracellular:ProliferationMetastasisNew vessel formationDecreased apoptosisBRAFMAPKPI3KPIP2PIP3Cell MembraneKeyHormone ligandGrowth factor ligandProstaglandinBevacizumab – VEGF LenvatinibVemurafenib Evorelimus

32.