/
Achieving Consistency in the Multi-Mission Ocean Color Data Achieving Consistency in the Multi-Mission Ocean Color Data

Achieving Consistency in the Multi-Mission Ocean Color Data - PowerPoint Presentation

alexa-scheidler
alexa-scheidler . @alexa-scheidler
Follow
409 views
Uploaded On 2016-12-11

Achieving Consistency in the Multi-Mission Ocean Color Data - PPT Presentation

MODIS Science Team Meeting 19 May 2011 College Park MD Bryan Franz and the NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group Outline How we define a Climate Data Record How we achieve CDR quality Results of latest reprocessing effort ID: 500274

calibration seawifs consistency modis seawifs calibration modis consistency mission level water data chlorophyll modisa sensor instrument vicarious common amp

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Achieving Consistency in the Multi-Missi..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Achieving Consistency in the Multi-Mission Ocean Color Data Record

MODIS Science Team Meeting

19 May 2011 – College Park, MD

Bryan Franzand theNASA Ocean Biology Processing GroupSlide2

Outline

How we define a Climate Data RecordHow we achieve CDR quality

Results of latest reprocessing effortFuture directionsSlide3

"A climate data record is a time series of measurements of sufficient

length, consistency, and continuity to determine climate variability and change."U.S. National Research Council, 2004

What is a Climate Data Record?Slide4

1980

2000

1990

1985

2010

2005

1995

Length & continuity requires multiple missions

OCTS

SeaWiFS (NASA)

CZCS (NASA)

MODIS-Terra (NASA)

MERIS (ESA)

MODIS-Aqua (NASA)

NPP/VIIRS

Oct 2011 launchSlide5

How do we achieve consistency?Slide6

How do we achieve consistency?

Focus on instrument calibration

establishing temporal and spatial stability within each missionSlide7

SeaWiFS Sensor Degradation

3%Slide8

40%

30%

20%

10%

50%

MODIS Lunar and Solar Calibration Trends

MODIS 412nm Responsivity Changes Since Launch

Terra

0%

Gain

50%Slide9

MODIS-Terra Vicarious On-orbit Characterization

relative to preliminary MCST collection 6 calibration

RVS

Polarization

412

443

488

2000 2011

Time

Scan Pixel

Scan Pixel

Scan Pixel

-10%

+15%Slide10

10

Vicarious Instrument Recharacterization to assess change in RVS shape and polarization sensitivity

SeaWiFS 15-Day Composite nLw(

)

Vicarious calibration:

given L

w

(

) and MODIS geometry, we can predict L

t

(

)

Global optimization:

find best fit M

11

, M12, M13 to relate Lm(

) to Lt()

where Mxx = fn(mirror aoi)

per band, detector, and m-side

MODIS Observed TOA Radiances

L

m() =

M11Lt() +

M12Qt()

+ M13Ut(

) Slide11

Effect of MODIST Recharacterization on Chlorophyll

Global Deep-Water Trend

100%

Before

AfterSlide12

MODIS Lunar and Solar Calibration Trends

Terra

Terra

Aqua

Terra

40%

30%

20%

10%

50%

0%

MODIS 412nm Responsivity Changes Since Launch

GainSlide13

How do we achieve consistency?

Focus on instrument calibration

establishing temporal and spatial stability within each missionSlide14

How do we achieve consistency?

Focus on instrument calibration

establishing temporal and spatial stability within each missionApply common algorithmsensuring consistency of processing across missionsSlide15

Sensor-Independent Approach

Multi-Sensor

Level-1 to Level-2

(common algorithms)

SeaWiFS L1A

MODISA L1B

MODIST L1B

OCTS L1A

MOS L1B

OSMI L1A

CZCS L1A

MERIS L1B

OCM-1 L1B

OCM-2 L1B

VIIRS-L1B

sensor-specific tables:

Rayleigh, aerosol, etc.

Level-2 to Level-3

Level-2 Scene

observed

radiances

ancillary data

water-leaving

radiances and

derived prods

Level-3 Global

ProductSlide16

How do we achieve consistency?

Focus on instrument calibration

establishing temporal stability within each missionApply common algorithmsensuring consistency of processing across missionsApply common vicarious calibration approachensuring spectral and absolute consistency of water-leaving radiance retrievals under idealized conditions Slide17

Sensor-Independent Approach

Multi-Sensor

Level-1 to Level-2

(common algorithms)

SeaWiFS L1A

MODISA L1B

MODIST L1B

OCTS L1A

MOS L1B

OSMI L1A

CZCS L1A

MERIS L1B

OCM-1 L1B

OCM-2 L1B

VIIRS-L1B

sensor-specific tables:

Rayleigh, aerosol, etc.

Level-2 to Level-3

Level-2 Scene

observed

radiances

ancillary data

water-leaving

radiances and

derived prods

Level-3 Global

Product

vicarious calibration

gain factors

predicted

at-sensor

radiances

in situ water-leaving

radiances (MOBY)Slide18

Cumulative mean vicarious gain

It requires

many

samples to reach a stable vicarious calibration, even in clear (homogeneous) water with a well maintained instrument (MOBY)

SeaWiFS to MOBY

Franz, B.A., S.W. Bailey, P.J. Werdell, and C.R. McClain, F.S. (2007). Sensor-Independent Approach to Vicarious Calibration of Satellite Ocean Color Radiometry, Appl. Opt., 46 (22).Slide19

How do we achieve consistency?

Focus on instrument calibration

establishing temporal stability within each missionApply common algorithmsensuring consistency of processing across missionsApply common vicarious calibration approachensuring spectral and absolute consistency of water-leaving radiance retrievals under idealized conditions Perform detailed trend analyses (hypothesis testing)

assessing temporal stability & and mission-to-mission consistencySlide20

Trophic Subsets

Deep-Water (Depth > 1000m)

Oligotrophic (Chlorophyll < 0.1 mg m

-3

)

Mesotrophic (0.1 < Chlorophyll < 1)

Eutrophic (1 < Chlorophyll < 10)Slide21

How do we achieve consistency?

Focus on instrument calibration

establishing temporal and spatial stability within each missionApply common algorithmsensuring consistency of processing across missionsApply common vicarious calibration approachensuring spectral and absolute consistency of water-leaving radiance retrievals under idealized conditions Perform detailed trend analyses (hypothesis testing)

assessing temporal stability & and mission-to-mission consistencyReprocess multi-mission timeseriesincorporating new instrument knowledge and algorithm advancementsSlide22

Latest Multi-Mission Ocean Color Reprocessing

Highlights:incorporated sensor calibration updates**regenerated all sensor-specific tables and coefficientsimproved aerosol models based on AERONET

additional correction for NO2updated chlorophyll a and Kd algorithms based on NOMAD v2

Status:MODISA completed April 2010 (update in progress)

SeaWiFS completed September 2010

OCTS completed September 2010

MODIST completed January 2011

CZCS in progress

Scope:

MODISA, MODIST,

SeaWiFS,

OCTS, CZCS

http://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/WIKI/OCReproc.htmlSlide23

MODISA Rrs in good agreement with SeaWiFS

Deep-Water

solid line = SeaWiFS R2010.0

dashed = MODISA R2009.1

Rrs (str

-1

)

within 5%

at all times

412

443

488 & 490

510

531

547 & 555

667 & 670Slide24

Mean spectral differences agree

with expectations

SeaWiFS MODISAoligotrophic

mesotrophiceutrophic

488

490

547 & 555Slide25

MODIST Rrs in good agreement with SeaWiFS

412

443488 & 490

510531

Deep-Water

solid line = SeaWiFS R2010.0

dashed = MODIST R2010.0

Rrs (str

-1

)

547 & 555

667 & 670Slide26

MERIS Rrs is biased relative to SeaWiFS

Deep-Water

solid line = SeaWiFS R2010.0

dashed = MERIS R2 (2006)

412

443

MERIS 3

rd

reprocessing underway. Updated instrument calibration and new vicarious adjustment should reduce biases and trends relative to SeaWiFS.Slide27

Chlorophyll spatial variation in good agreement

SeaWiFS

MODIS/Aqua

MODIS/TerraFall 2002Slide28

Chlorophyll spatial variation in good agreement

SeaWiFS

MODIS/Aqua

MODIS/TerraFall 2008Slide29

Chla in Good Agreement with Global In situ

SeaWiFS

vsin situ

MODISAvsin situSlide30

Global Chlorophyll Timeseries

Oligotrophic Subset

Mesotrophic Subset

SeaWiFSSeaWiFSSlide31

Global Chlorophyll Timeseries

Oligotrophic Subset

Mesotrophic Subset

SeaWiFS MODISASeaWiFS MODISASlide32

Global Chlorophyll Timeseries

Oligotrophic Subset

Mesotrophic Subset

SeaWiFS MODISA MODISTSeaWiFS

MODISA

MODIST

before reprocessing

before reprocessingSlide33

Coming Soon!

Late Mission Reprocessing of MODISASlide34

We will soon have the full MERIS Level-1B datasetenabling reprocessing with NASA algorithms

ESA-NASA bulk data exchange (lead Martha Maiden)All MERIS L1B for all of MODIS and SeaWiFS (L1A on media)MERIS FR data by JuneMERIS RR data by September

redistribution rights

MERISChlorophyllOct. 2003ESA 2006ReprocessingSlide35

SummarySeaWiFS has provided the first decadal-scale climate data record for ocean chlorophyll and, by proxy, phytoplankton biomass.

MODIS/Aqua open-ocean timeseries in very good agreement, suggesting the potential to extend the CDR into the future. but biases remain that vary by bioregime (20% high in eutrophic waters)revised calibration model / reprocessing needed to fix late mission trends

MODIS/Terra in much better agreement with SeaWiFS & MODIS/Aqua, but after extensive recharacterization using SeaWiFS.not an independent climate data record beyond seasonal scaleMERIS needs reassesment after revised ESA calibration and reprocessing with common NASA algorithms.Common algorithms is an essential first step to multi-mission CDR.Slide36

characterization of instrument degradation is the primary challenge to development of ocean color climate data records

as it was for MODIS, so it will be for VIIRS ...Slide37