Susan Hingle MD FACP Professor of Medicine Division of General Internal Medicine Interim Chair SIU School of Medicine Session Objectives Identify the cancers in which aspirin therapy may play a role in prevention ID: 733070
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Clinical Conundrums in Cancer Chemopreve..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Clinical Conundrums in Cancer Chemoprevention: What Should You Recommend to Your Patients?
Susan Hingle, MD, FACP
Professor of Medicine
Division of General Internal Medicine
Interim Chair
SIU School of MedicineSlide2Slide3
Session Objectives
Identify the cancers in which aspirin therapy may play a role in prevention.
Learn if aspirin therapy is indicated for cancer prevention.
Learn about data on use of 5-alpha reductase therapy in prostate cancer prevention.
Recognize the indications for SERMs and AIs in breast cancer prevention.Slide4
Aspirin and Cancer Chemoprevention
Will an aspirin a day keep the oncologist away?
What you should tell your patients about aspirin use for cancer chemoprevention.Slide5
Case #1
A 52 year-old man with a past medical history of GERD and hypertension on
omeprazole
and
lisinopril
presents to the clinic for routine follow up. He read on an internet blog that he should start taking a baby aspirin weekly to reduce his risk of colon cancer. He asks for your input.
He had a screening colonoscopy at age 50 during which a small (<0.5 cm) tubular adenoma was removed. Family history is negative for colon cancer. On physical exam BP is 122/72. The remainder of his exam is normal.
What is your advice for this patient?Slide6
Aspirin and Cancer ChemopreventionPotential mechanisms of action:
Induction of cell apoptosis
Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-mediated PG production
PGs are associated with:
Tumor angiogenesis
Cell proliferation
Inhibition of immune surveillance & apoptosisSlide7
ASA Use and the Incidence of Cancer
Colorectal cancer
:
Numerous studies suggest ASA may reduce risk of CR adenomas and CR cancers (post hoc analyses):
C. Dubé et al (2007):
22% risk reduction in CRC incidence
Physicians’ Health Study Research Group (1989) & Cook et al (2005)
:
No reduction in CRC incidence at 10 years
Rothwell et al (2010)
:
Follow-up of above at 20 years showed decreased incidence of CRC
Rothwell et al (2012)
:
Analysis of 4 RCTs for ASA prevention of vascular disease, ASA therapy reduced 20-year colon cancer risk, with reduction of colon cancer risk not occurring until 8-10 year pointSlide8
Special Populations
Lynch syndrome
:
There
is only one randomized placebo-controlled trial of aspirin (CAPP2) in which colorectal cancer was a primary endpoint:
NO benefit from aspirin (600 mg/day) in 937 patients with Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer)
Short study time (2-4 years)Different cancer mechanism for Lynch syndrome
??
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP):
83
patients with FAP were randomly assigned to
celecoxib
(100 or 400 mg twice daily) or
placebo
After
six months, patients receiving the higher dose had a modest (15 percent) but statistically significant reduction in the extent of duodenal polyposis as assessed in blinded reviews of endoscopy videotapes. Slide9
ASA Use and the Incidence of Cancer
Other cancers
:
Meta-analyses of numerous RCTs
Daily aspirin therapy:
Was associated with a reduction in all cancers (up to 12% relative risk reduction)
Benefit after 4 years, independent of age, gender, tobacco use historyReduction in female reproductive tract cancers, lymphoma, and sarcoma
Long-term aspirin use may reduce cancer mortality
Several ongoing trials to be completed between now and
2019
may give us more information on this subjectSlide10
And Here Is the Bad News . . .
Adverse effects of aspirin:
Increased risk of bleeding
:
GI bleeding
Intracranial hemorrhage
Other major bleeding
Possible 50% increase in the RR of major non-fatal extracranial bleeding
Associated risk factors
:
Age, prior history of PUD
Mitigators
: PPIsSlide11
Recommendations for the PCP
Benefits of daily aspirin (75-100 mg) for cancer prevention
may
outweigh the risks in
select
patients:
Requires individualization and clinical judgmentAge >50Patient with estimated high cancer risk (e.g., using colorectal and breast cancer risk calculators) or with specific cancer syndromes [Lynch syndrome, FAP (celecoxib)]
No concomitant use of medications that increase bleeding risk
IMPORTANT
: There are no official guidelines that recommend aspirin therapy for primary cancer prevention at this timeSlide12
Back to Case #1
A 52 year-old man with a past medical history of GERD and hypertension on
omeprazole
and
lisinopril
presents to the clinic for routine follow up. He read on an internet blog that he should start taking a baby aspirin weekly to reduce his risk of colon cancer. He asks for your input.
He had a screening colonoscopy at age 50 which showed one small (<0.5 cm) tubular adenoma. Family history is negative for colon cancer. On physical exam BP is 122/72. The remainder of his exam is normal.
What is your advice for this patient?Slide13Slide14
5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors and Prostate Cancer Prevention
5-alpha reductase inhibitors make the urine flow and the hair grow, but . . .
Should primary care physicians prescribe them for prostate cancer prevention?Slide15
Case #2
A 55-year-old man with hypertension,
dyslipidemia
, and glaucoma presents for routine follow up to his PCP. He voices no complaints at the visit and has a negative ROS. Although he has no family history of it, he is concerned about getting prostate cancer, as he had a colleague who was recently diagnosed with it. VS and exam are normal.
He hands you an article on prostate cancer that he cut out of a magazine and inquires whether he can take any medications to reduce his risk of prostate cancer.
What is your advice for this patient?Slide16
Prostate Cancer
2
nd
most common cancer in men
Increasing incidence since PSA screening initiated
Most cancers are clinically indolent
Early treatment not proven to improve survivalSlide17
Why Chemoprevention Long latency period
Progression from PIN to invasive cancer takes many years
Chemoprevention might delay progression to invasive cancer
Androgen dependency
Men with congenital 5-alpha reductase deficiency do not develop prostate cancer
Blocking androgens shown to affect PIN and prostate cancer
Drugs are available that are antiandrogenicSlide18
5-Alpha Reductase InhibitorsAgents
: finasteride &
dutasteride
Block conversion of testosterone to DHT
Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial
:
1994-97 with reanalysis of data through 2011
~19K men at increased risk of prostate cancer
Finasteride 5 mg daily versus placebo
Decrease in incidence of prostate cancer in finasteride-treated group
Increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer in finasteride-treated group however
10-year survival rate after prostate cancer diagnosis in finasteride-treated group was no different than placebo-treated groupSlide19
5-Alpha Reductase InhibitorsREDUCE Trial
~8400 men at increased risk of prostate cancer
Dutasteride 0.5 mg daily versus placebo
Reduced incidence of prostate cancer in dutasteride-treated group
Increased incidence of cases with Gleason score of 7 to10
Author’s explanation
: due to
the drug’s ability to reduce the volume of the prostate, which in turn improves the ability to identify high-grade tumors in biopsy samples. They did not exclude the possibility, though, that the drug could be responsible for some high-grade tumors.
REDUCE
=
Re
duction by
Du
tasteride of Prostate
C
ancer
E
ventsSlide20
Summary:Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention
5-AR inhibitors appear reduce risk of prostate cancer
Increased risk of high-grade cancer in the treated groups
No conclusive data that these agents reduce risk of death or increase survival
Side effects may not be tolerable for most men (e.g., ED, gynecomastia, decreased libido)
No FDA approval to use either drug for prostate cancer prevention
AUA
: “Asymptomatic
men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤3.0 ng/mL who are regularly screened with PSA or are anticipating undergoing annual PSA screening for early detection of prostate cancer may benefit from a discussion of both the benefits of 5-ARIs for 7 years for the prevention of prostate cancer and the potential risks (including the possibility of high-grade prostate cancer). Men who are taking 5-ARIs for benign conditions such as lower urinary tract [obstructive] symptoms (LUTS) may benefit from a similar discussion, understanding that the improvement of LUTS relief should be weighed with the potential risks of high-grade prostate cancer from 5-ARIs (although the majority of the Panel members judged the latter risk to be unlikely
).”Slide21
Other Agents for Prostate Cancer ChemopreventionVitamin E and selenium
:
SELECT trial
(selenium & vitamin E)
Vitamin E increased incidence of prostate cancer
Selenium and selenium + Vitamin E increased incidence of prostate cancer (not statistically significant)
Physician’s Health Study IIVitamin E (nor beta-carotene, ascorbic acid, or MVI) did not reduce incidence of prostate cancer
NSAIDs
:
Planned trial with rofecoxib was canceled when rofecoxib was pulled from market
SELECT =
Sel
enium
and V
itamin
E
C
ancer Prevention
T
rialSlide22
Back to Case #2
A 55-year-old man with hypertension,
dyslipidemia
, and glaucoma presents for routine follow up to his PCP. He voices no complaints at the visit and has a negative ROS. Although he has no family history of it, he is concerned about getting prostate cancer, as he had a colleague who was recently diagnosed with it. VS and exam are normal.
He hands you an article on prostate cancer that he cut out of a magazine and inquires whether he can take any medications to reduce his risk of prostate cancer.
What is your advice for this patient?Slide23Slide24
SERMs and AIs in Breast Cancer Chemoprevention
SERMs and AIs:
What are good for fighting cancer are also good at preventing it, right
?Slide25
Case #3
A 52-year old postmenopausal
caucasian
woman with no significant past medical history comes for her annual exam. She voices no concerns, and ROS is negative. Family history is positive for breast cancer in her mother (diagnosed at age 60). She had menarche at age 11, has never been pregnant, and has never smoked. She has been getting mammograms regularly since age 40. She had one breast biopsy for a lesion seen on screening mammography at age 42, but the pathology was proliferative benign breast disease without
atypia
.
Her VS and physical exam are normal. She is concerned about getting breast cancer and wants to know if there is any medical therapy that can reduce her risk.
What advice do you give this patient?Slide26
Breast Cancer
Most common nonskin cancer in women
~232,000 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and ~40,000 died of breast cancer in 2013
Risk factors:
Age
Age at menarche
RaceAge at first childbirthFamily history (of breast OR ovarian cancer)History of atypical hyperplasia
Previous breast biopsy
Dense breast tissue
Risk assessment models are, in general, better at predicting at-risk study populations rather than at-risk individual womenSlide27
Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs) Studies
Agents
: tamoxifen &
raloxifene
Randomized controlled trials have shown they reduce the risk for
ER-positive
breast cancerSelection criteria:
Age > 60
Age > 35 with h/o LCIS, DCIS, or atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia
Women between 35 and 59 with ≥1.66% 5-year
risk
Reduced incidence by 7-9 events per 1000
post
menopausal women over 5 years
Tamoxifen reduced incidence more than
raloxifene
Tamoxifen also reduced incidence of invasive breast cancer in
pre
menopausal womenSlide28
SERMsAt-risk women
were
more likely to benefit from
chemoprevention:
Highest benefit in women who
had
≥ 3% 5-year riske.g., NCI Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (based on Gail model)
http
://www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool/
Not
recommended for women with PMH of breast cancer, history of chest radiation, or with possible family history of BRCA1 and BRCA2
mutations
Minimal benefit in women who
were not
at increased riskSlide29
Adverse Effects of SERMsDeep-venous thromboses
Endometrial cancer (tamoxifen)
Cataracts (tamoxifen)
Hot flashes
NOTE
: no increased risk of CAD or stroke was seenSlide30
Tamoxifen versus RaloxifeneTamoxifen slightly more effective
Raloxifene has lower risk of DVTs, endometrial cancer, and cataractsSlide31
Recommendations for SERMs
ASCO & USPSTF
:
Both recommend SERMs for breast cancer prevention in high-risk patients ≥ 35
ASCO: ≥ 1.66% 5-year risk (or with LCIS)
USPSTF:
≥ 3% 5-year riskTamoxifen 20 mg daily for 5 yearsPre- and postmenopausal women
Raloxifene 60 mg daily for 5+ years
*
Postmenopausal women only
*
can be used
longer than 5 years in women with osteoporosis, in whom BC risk reduction is a secondary benefit.
Contraindications
:
History of DVT/PE,
stroke, transient ischemic attack, or during prolonged immobilization.
Combination with hormone therapy
Pregnant women, women who may become pregnant, or nursing mothersSlide32
Aromatase Inhibitors
Agents
: anastrozole &
exemestane
Mechanism of action
: inhibit aromatase, which is responsible for conversion of androgens to estrogens, and hence, will reduce plasma estrogen levels
Are regularly used in breast cancer treatmentSlide33
Aromatase Inhibitors Studies
NCIC Clinical Trials Group M
ammary
Prevention.3
Trial
, 2011:
~4,500 women at high risk for breast cancerReceived exemestane or placebo65% relative reduction in invasive breast cancer with exemestane
Reduction in DCIS seen,
too
International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS-II
)
, 2013:
~
4,000
postmenopausal women at high risk for breast cancer
Received anastrozole or placebo
50% reduction in number of invasive breast cancer and DCIS with anastrozole compared to placebo
Side effects
: musculoskeletal pain, hypertension, vaginal dryness, vasomotor
symptoms, Slide34
SUMMARY:ASCO Recommendations for Breast Cancer Prevention
Tamoxifen
(20 mg per day orally for five years) should be
discussed
as an option to reduce the risk of invasive, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer in
pre
menopausal or post
menopausal
women. . . .
Raloxifene
(60 mg per day orally for five years) should also be discussed as an option to reduce the risk of invasive, ER-positive breast cancer.
. . .
Its use is limited to
post
menopausal women.
Exemestane
(25 mg per day orally for five years) should be discussed as an alternative to reduce the risk of invasive, ER-positive breast cancer in
post
menopausal
women. . . . . . While
exemestane is approved for the treatment of breast cancer, the
FDA has not yet approved its use in breast cancer prevention
.
This
recommendation is based on encouraging data from a single clinical trial that showed up to a 70 percent reduction in overall and ER-positive invasive breast cancer incidence with exemestane compared to placebo over a three year period
.
All
three agents should be discussed (including risks and benefits) with women aged
35 years
or
older
without a personal history of breast cancer who are at
increased risk of developing invasive breast
cancer (5-year risk ≥ 1.66%)
,
based on risk factors such as the woman’s age, race, and medical and reproductive history.Slide35
SUMMARY:USPSTF Recommendations for Breast Cancer Prevention
“. . . recommends that clinicians engage in shared, informed decision making with women who are at increased risk for breast cancer about medications to reduce the risk. For women, who are at increased risk for breast cancer and at low risk for medication side effects, clinicians should offer to prescribe risk-reducing medications, such a tamoxifen or raloxifene. (B recommendation)”Slide36
Back to Case #3
A 52-year old postmenopausal
caucasian
woman with no significant past medical history comes for her annual exam. She voices no concerns, and ROS is negative. Family history is positive for breast cancer in her mother (diagnosed at age 60). She had menarche at age 11, has never been pregnant, and has never smoked. She has been getting mammograms regularly since age 40. She had one breast biopsy for a lesion seen on screening mammography at age 42, but the pathology was proliferative benign breast disease without
atypia
.
Her VS and physical exam are normal. She is concerned about getting breast cancer and wants to know if there is any medical therapy that can reduce her risk.
What advice do you give this patient?
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment ToolSlide37
Take-Home Points
Aspirin may be beneficial for colorectal adenoma and cancer prevention in certain populations
No formal recommendations to use aspirin for cancer prevention yet
5-alpha reductase inhibitors appear to reduce the incidence of prostate cancer at the risk of increasing high grade cancers
ASCO/AUA guidelines suggest consideration in select men
SERMs are recommended for breast cancer prevention in high-risk women ≥ 35 by ASCO & USPSTF:
Tamoxifen: pre and postmenopausal women
Raloxifene
: postmenopausal women only
AIs can be considered for breast cancer prevention in high-risk women ≥ 35:
Exemestane
: postmenopausal women (not FDA approved)Slide38
Bibliography
Chen WY. Selective estrogen receptor modulators and aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer prevention
. In: UpToDate, Basow DS (Ed), UpToDate, Waltham, MA. (Accessed on January 15, 2014.)
Cook NR et al. Low dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cancer: the Women’s Health Study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005;294:47.
Cook NR et al. Alternate-day, low-dose aspirin and cancer risk: Long-term observational follow-up of a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:77-85.
Crawford ED . Chemoprevention strategies in prostate cancer.
In
: UpToDate, Basow DS (Ed), UpToDate, Waltham, MA. (Accessed on
January 15
,
2014.)
Dubé C et al. The use of aspirin for primary prevention of colorectal cancer: a systematic review prepared for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:365.
Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians’ Health Study. Steering Committee of the Physicians’ Health Study Research Group. N Engl J Med 1989;321:129.
Fortmann SP et al. Vitamin and mineral supplements in the primary prevention of car
Goss PE. Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2381-91.
Klein EA et al. Vitamin E and the risk of prostate cancer: the selenium and vitamin E cancer prevention trial (SELECT). JAMA 2011;306:1549.
Moyer VA. Medications for risk reduction of primary breast cancer in women: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. An Intern Med. 2013;159:698-708.
Rothwell PM et al. Long-term effect of aspirin on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 20-year follow-up of five randomized trials. Lancet 2010;376:1741.
Rothwell PM et al. Short-term effects of daily aspirin on cancer incidence, mortality, and non-vascular death: analysis of the time course of risks and benefits in 51 randomized controlled trials. Lancet 2012;379:1602.
Spencer FA and Guyatt G. Aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease
and cancer. In: UpToDate, Basow DS (Ed), UpToDate, Waltham, MA. (Accessed on January 15, 2014.)
Sutcliffe P et al. Aspirin for prophylactic use in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: a systematic review and overview of reviews. Health Technol Assess 2013 Sep;17(43):1-253.
Thompson IM et al. Long-term survival of participants in the prostate cancer prevention trial. N Engl J Med 2013;369:603.
Visvanatha K et al. Use of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2013 Aug 10;31(23):2942-62.
Wolin KY and Colditz GA. Cancer prevention. In
: UpToDate, Basow DS (Ed), UpToDate, Waltham, MA. (Accessed on
January 15, 2014.)