Transforming Californias Transportation Sector and Potential Effects on the Power Sector PANC Monthly Luncheon Meeting February 17 2015 Commissioner Janea A Scott California Energy Commission ID: 374460
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document " 374460" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Transforming California’s Transportation Sector and Potential Effects on the Power SectorPANC Monthly Luncheon MeetingFebruary 17, 2015
Commissioner Janea A. ScottCalifornia Energy Commission
1Slide2
Commission ResponsibilitiesEnergy Analysis: develop key energy metrics and archive historic dataPermitting: review and permit thermal power plants >= 50 megawatts (MW)
R&D: research and development program administration (e.g. PIER and EPIC)Energy Efficiency: promulgate appliance and building energy efficiency regulations (Title 20 & 24)Transportation: support deployment of alternative vehicles and renewable fueling infrastructureRenewable Energy: administer renewable incentive programs, provide certification, and verification of renewable generation, and promulgate POU RPS regulations Contingency Planning: state energy emergency planning and oversight
Integrated Energy Policy Report: publication of the “IEPR,” the State’s official source of energy policy guidance2Slide3
California Transportation: Nation-State StatisticsPopulation: 38 millionGDP: $2.0 trillion - 8th largest global economyGHG Emissions: 458 MMT (2012)Transportation accounts for 40 % of all GHG emissionsAir Pollution: Severe Non-Attainment for OzoneSan Joaquin and South Coast Air BasinsVehicles: 27.5 million cars + 0.9 million trucksAnnual Fuel Consumption: 18.1 billion gallons14.5 billion gallons gasoline + 3.6 billion gallons dieselPrimary Roadways: 170,000 miles3Slide4
Key California Energy Policies & GoalsAssembly Bill 32 2006 legislation reducing GHG emissions to or below 1990 levels by 2020 .Executive Order S-3-05GHG EmissionsIssued by Gov. Schwarzenegger, establishes goal to reduce GHG emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050.Energy Action Plan’s Preferred Loading OrderIssued in 2003 and 2008, prioritizes cost effective investments in: 1st) EE and DR; 2nd) renewables and DG; and 3rd
) clean fossil fuel sources and infrastructure improvements .Clean Energy Jobs Plan Established in 2010 by Gov. Brown, directs production of 20 gigawatts (GW) of new renewables by 2020, 12 GW of distributed energy, and 6.5 GW of CHP.Senate Bill X1-22011 legislation requiring all electricity retailers to meet 33% of retail sales with renewable energy resources by 2020. CPUC Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan Sets efficiency goals, including zero net energy (ZNE) goals for new homes by 2020, and for new commercial buildings by 2030
Executive Order B-18-2012Green State Buildings Issued by Gov. Brown, directs efficiency improvements in new or renovated state buildings larger than 10,000 square feet; sets ZNE and GHG reduction goals. Governor Brown’s ZEV Executive Order (B-16-2012)
Issued by Gov.
Brown, sets long-term target of reaching 1.5 million zero-emission vehicles (ZEV) by 2025;
establishes goal to reduce GHG emissions from
transportation sector
to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050.
Governor Brown’s Inaugural
Address January 2015
By 2030: 1) Increase from one-third to 50 percent our electricity derived from renewable sources;
2)
Reduce today’s petroleum use in cars and trucks by up to 50 percent; and 3)
Double the efficiency of existing buildings and make heating fuels cleaner.Slide5
Support for Zero-Emission Vehicles Governor’s Zero-Emission Vehicle Action Plan goal of 1.5 million zero-emission vehicles in 2025Greater adoption will require:Additional incentives Strategic investments in infrastructure and planning More directed research and innovative funding partnerships Fuel pathways for zero- and near-zero vehicles include:Natural gasElectric drive Hydrogen fuel cell electric driveHybrid and range extender combinations
5Slide6
Advanced Technology Funding
6Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) 2015-2017 Investment Plan makes $388 M availableSupports research and development of pre-commercial technologies in the electricity sectorAlternative and Renewable Fuel and
Vehicle Technology Program (ARFVTP)Up to $100 M annually Invests in a portfolio of alternative low-carbon and renewable fuels and advanced vehicle technologiesSlide7
Alternative Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program (ARFVTP)Established by Assembly Bill 118 (Nunez, 2007)Funding extended through January 1, 2024 by Assembly Bill 8 (Perea, 2013)“…develop and deploy innovative technologies that transform California’s fuel and vehicle types to help attain the state’s climate change policies.” (Health and Safety Code Section 44272(a))7Slide8
Investing in a portfolio of projects that have the potential to be transformative8Investment Areas Funding Amount(in millions)Percent of Total (%)
Number of AwardsBiofuels $156
2954Electric Drive
$161
30
129
Natural
Gas
$85
15
178
Hydrogen
$94
18
27
Workforce Development
$25
5
55
Market
& Program Develop.
$14
3
17
Total
$535
100
460Slide9
Existing Agreements: 2009-20159Current through Jan. 15, 2015Slide10
Total EVSE Funding: $38.3 millionTotal Funded = 9,369 chargersCommercial = 3,373Residential = 5,127Workplace = 756DC Fast = 11310Plus 21 Regional Readiness Planning Grants = $5.1 MElectric Vehicle SupportTotal CVRP Support: = $49 million Over 21,000 vouchersSlide11
If you build it, they will come…120,000 PEVs20 models+5,473 public charging outlets and 170 DC Fast Chargers21 Regional PEV Readiness Plansto California….11Slide12
PEV Sales Through Dec. 2014Slide13
Following Recent Developments: CPUC Regulatory Proceeding 13-11-007December 2014 Decision:Establishes a balancing test to evaluate utility proposals: “weighs benefits of utility ownership of charging infrastructure against competitive limitation…”CurrentUtility ProposalsSDG&ESCEPG&E# of Chargers5,50030,00025,000Cost$103M$346.1M$654.8MMarket SegmentsMulti-unit Dwellings and Workplaces
Multi-unit Dwellings and WorkplacesMulti-unit Dwellings, Workplaces, and Public FacilitiesSlide14
Incubating Innovation in Medium and Heavy-Duty Advanced Technology Vehicles 38 projects to demonstrate advanced technologies, including electric, hybrid electric, fuel cell, and advanced natural gas enginesOver $70 million to design, develop, and deploy medium- and heavy-duty range-extended and all electric drive14Slide15
Supporting Manufacturing in California18 manufacturing projects, primarily for electric drive-related batteries, components, and vehiclesARFVTP: $4.1M to Motiv Power SystemsPurpose: Design & construct a production line in Silicon Valley to assemble medium-and heavy-duty all electric drive trucks and shuttles15Slide16
Aligning Clean Technology Investments with Economic Development$25 million invested in 39 workforce training agreements to help develop skills and knowledge in clean technologyARFVTP: $756,000 to Tesla MotorsPurpose: Training in advanced manufacturing techniques at Tesla’s Fremont factory.16Slide17
Growth of Electric Vehicle Charging Presents Both Opportunities and Challenges to the Electric Grid Vehicle to Grid Integration Technologies and Electric Vehicle Batteries: Opportunities to reduce impact of power supply fluctuations, store energy, and reduce magnitude of fast ramping needed from baseload sources.Potential challenges are related to impact vehicles may have on electric grid distribution infrastructureSlide18
Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC)Created by CPUC in 2011Funded by rates charged to electricity customers of PG&E, SDG&E, and SCE“…to provide public interest investments in applied research and development, technologydemonstration and deployment, market support, and market facilitation, of clean energy technologies and approaches…” (CPUC Decision 12-05-037)Slide19
Demonstration Projects to Advance Vehicle To Grid and Vehicle Battery IntegrationLA Air Force Base Activities (Full V2G Demo and Battery Agreement)Vehicles and charging stations on site, evaluating both new and used electric vehicle batteries, actual performance data for warranty, estimating
battery 2nd life potential Moffett Field (Army/PG&E Demo)Expanded use for electric vehicles, vehicle to building, additional grid services (demand response, spinning reserve)Slide20
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Proposed award of $1,993,355 To develop and demonstrate a smart charging control system for 50 of Alameda County’s fleet PEVs and corresponding ChargePoint charging stations in 10 locations throughout the countrySlide21
Proposed award of $1,495,650To locate seven to nine vehicles consisting of Nissan LEAFs and Honda Accord Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles with bi-directional capability at 7 locations on and near the University of California San Diego campus. NRG Energy, Inc.Slide22
Proposed award of $1,989,432To develop and deploy advanced smart and bidirectional PEV charging infrastructure that will enable smart charging, vehicle-to-building, and vehicle to grid to support demand response participation.University of California Los AngelesSlide23
Adoption of IEPR recommendations will be considered by Energy Commission next week Key recommendations for actionProvide joint agency forum to continue exploring smart charging options and opportunities for integration Move forward with planned VGI research, development and demonstration proposed in the 2015-17 EPIC Investment PlanAssist in implementing activities highlighted in CAISO Vehicle-Grid Integration RoadmapMoving Forward: 2014 IEPR Recommendations Transportation Nexus with the Electricity SectorSlide24
Thank YouJanea A. Scott, CommissionerCalifornia Energy CommissionJanea.Scott@energy.ca.gov(916) 654-4930