The Rhetoric of Disagreements When disagreeing with someone be sure to criticize THE IDEA and not THE PERSON or DELEGATION Bad example Estonia believes that Malaysia has a bad idea Good example ID: 204772
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Agreeing to Disagree" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Agreeing to Disagree
The Rhetoric of DisagreementsSlide2
When disagreeing with someone, be sure to criticize THE IDEA and not THE PERSON or DELEGATION.
Bad example
: Estonia believes that Malaysia has a bad idea.
Good example:
Estonia believes that Malaysia’s idea of a outsourcing could be improved. Slide3
Also, be TACTFUL and POLITE when criticizing their idea. You should give a reason WHY you disagree with their idea.
Malaysia’s idea is dumb and doesn’t make sense.
Malaysia’s idea doesn’t make sense to me because it will only benefit their countries and not anyone else. Slide4
Criticizing without POSITIVE ALTERNATIVES is just complaining and accomplishes little. Be sure to end your criticism with a POSITIVE suggestion.
Malaysia’s idea doesn’t make sense because it will only benefit their country and not anyone else. We believe that outsourcing should occur in as many country’s as possible so we can all benefit. Slide5
Your TONE OF VOICE is also very important.
There is no such thing as a WRONG opinion, just different ones. We must remember to always be RESPECTFUL of each other’s different points of view. Slide6
McDonalds or Burger King???