Military Intervention the Tragic and Rescuing the Human Daniel M Bell Jr CGSCF Ethics Symposium 2016 Niccolo Machiavelli Many men have imagined republics and principalities that never really existed at all Yet the way men live is so far removed from the way they ought to live ID: 551013
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Between Nihilism and Utopianism" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Between Nihilism and Utopianism:Military Intervention, the Tragic and Rescuing the Human
Daniel. M. Bell, Jr.
CGSCF Ethics Symposium 2016Slide2
Niccolo Machiavelli Many
men have imagined republics and principalities that never really existed at all. Yet the way men live is so far removed from the way they ought to live that anyone who abandons what is for what should be pursues his downfall rather than his preservation; for a man who strives after goodness in all his acts is sure to come to ruin, since there are so many men who are not good. Hence it is necessary that a prince who is interested in survival learn to be other than good, making use of this capacity or refraining from it according to the need.Slide3
Introduction: What Matters More?Reflect on intervention in terms of our moral identity, in terms of the best that we claim to be about.Offer an account of the
American experiment
that asserts the primacy of the moral / the good in politics against realism, while avoiding the pitfall of utopian idealism.
Reclaiming tragedy, which is crucial
both to
honoring the good in this world where indeed, as Machiavelli says, so many are not
good, and to rescuing
the human.Slide4
1. Never Again, and Again, and Again…
Things That
Matter More
(
S. Power
“A Problem from Hell” America and the Age of Genocide
)
1
. National Sovereignty
2
. Geopolitical Influence and Foreign Relations
3
.
American
Lives
4
.
Domestic
Politics
5
. National InterestSlide5
1. Never Again, and Again, and Again…The 20th
Century:
A
Success Story
“Before I began exploring America’s relationship with genocide, I used to refer to U.S. policy toward Bosnia as a “failure.” I have changed my mind. It is daunting to acknowledge, but this country’s consistent policy of nonintervention in the face of genocide offers sad testimony not to a broken American political system but to one that is ruthlessly effective. The system, as it stands now,
is working
.”
“The real reason the United States did not do what it could and should have done to stop genocide was not a lack of knowledge or influence but a lack of will. Simply put, American leaders did not act because they did not want to. They believed genocide was wrong, but they were not prepared to invest the military, financial, diplomatic, or domestic capital needed to stop it.”Slide6
2. Just Who In This Hell Are We?“This is not just a vote about Bosnia. It’s a vote about America. It’s a vote about what we stand for.
About
our humanity and our principles
.”
Realism’s
Dance with the Devil
Hans
Morgenthau: “political ethics is indeed the
ethics
of doing evil.”
The
Primacy of Politics: Ethics Subordinated to Interests
National
interest is the standard for political actionSlide7
2. Just Who In This Hell Are We?The American Experiment and Justice for
All
(2 visions of America)
Realism
:
America
is a collection of possessive, self-interested individuals –
egoists
.
Civic Republican: Human
ends (not interests but life, liberty,
“
happiness”)
as
a project shared with
all
of humanity. Requires
governments and
power.
Declaration
of Independence
&
Constitution
A
vision of a moral politics, which includes the moral use of
power/force
.
“
Justice for all” ~ people united in a common moral project of
shared
welfare and flourishing that embraces all of humanitySlide8
2. Just Who In This Hell Are We?The Primacy of Morality and Military Intervention
American
experiment – America embodying a moral project of ordered liberty for all – foregrounds deliberations regarding military intervention.
Recognizes
the primacy of morality in politics.
Contrasts
with 20
th
cent.
utopianism, which ignored power.Slide9
3. The Tragic Between Nihilism and UtopianismRealism, Nihilism, and the Loss of the Human
Realists
often claim the mantle of tragedy against utopians: Human imperfection
Realism
is not tragic but fatalistic. Resignation. Despair. = Nihilistic
Deficient
understanding of the human:
A
beast with a bad conscienceSlide10
3. The Tragic Between Nihilism and UtopianismThe Irony of Realism
Cannot openly admit
nihilism and rejection of American experiment.
Therefore
, cynically
feeds
utopianism / American
exceptionalism
- perfectionSlide11
3. The Tragic Between Nihilism and UtopianismDefining Tragedy
Tragedy
recognizes imperfection of humanity
But
also
recognizes that
good
is a genuine possibility
Genuinely
tragic politics = has a real possibility of achieving good but is vulnerable to missing the mark.
The
American experiment is just such a tragic politics.
Seeks a genuine good
But does not ignore possibility of falling short.Slide12
3. The Tragic Between Nihilism and UtopianismJust War and Reasonable Chance of Success
Tragic
politics rejects Crusade in favor of Just War
Just
War: aims at good, recognizes possibility of corruption / failure
Example
: Reasonable Chance of Success
Tragic
sense that sometimes we cannot attain the
good we desire.Slide13
Conclusion: Tragedy and Rescuing the HumanRealism, and the utopian offspring of its cynicism, cannot deal
with
the human.
Cannot
deal with less than perfect results, failure, etc.
Example: Wounded warriors
Only
tragic vision can face human suffering and act to overcome
it.
Recognizes
failure and limits but does not despair.
Also
recognizes the
good.
More than Beasts…Slide14
Hu
m
a
n Nat
u
r
e
Politi
c
s
A
m
er
i
c
a
W
a
r
R
e
a
lism
(Ni
h
ilis
m
)
Corr
u
p
t and evilEgoists seeking domination This is permanent condition Fatalistic
Morality subordinate to Politics National Interest is primary Struggle of wills for power
Collection of egoists
Ends Justify Means
Tragedy
Imperfect: can fail + limited Therefore power necessaryGood is possible
Morality primary in politics Human ends are shared mission
Experiment in Justice for All Capable of good but need power,checks & balances
Just War: pursue good, recognize need for restraint
Reasonable Chance of Success: May not be able to do all the good that we desire
Utopianism
Humans are goodbecomes good v evil Don’t need powerbecomes crusade
Morality primary Isolationbecomes crusade
American Perfectionbecomes Exceptionalism
P
ac
ifist
b
ec
o
m
e
s Cr
u
s
a
d
e
r
n
o
r
e
str
a
int