/
FNAIGlobal Rank:G3/G4 FNAIGlobal Rank:G3/G4

FNAIGlobal Rank:G3/G4 - PDF document

alida-meadow
alida-meadow . @alida-meadow
Follow
380 views
Uploaded On 2016-07-30

FNAIGlobal Rank:G3/G4 - PPT Presentation

FNAIState RankS2S4 Federally Listed Species in SFL5 State Listed Species in SFL38 ends of Everglades teardrop islands and hydric hammocksWales Ridge was cleared so that the rich muck soil could ID: 425287

FNAIState Rank:S2/S4 Federally Listed Species

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "FNAIGlobal Rank:G3/G4" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

FNAIGlobal Rank:G3/G4 FNAIState Rank:S2/S4 Federally Listed Species in S.FL:5 State Listed Species in S.FL:38 ends of Everglades teardrop islands, and hydric hammocksWales Ridge was cleared so that the rich muck soil couldseepage swamps have been damaged by hydrologicalpollution from agricultural or urban runoff. Water levelmanipulations in the Everglades have stressed bayheadsLarge numbers of cabbage palms (natural landscape buffers are the most critical long-term SynonymySeepage Swamps include FNAI’s hydric hammock,baygall, and bog (bayhead); NRCS’s wetland hardwoodhammocks, and shrub bog and; Society of AmericanForesters’(SAF) southern red cedar, cabbage palmetto,slash pine-hardwood, sweetbay-swamp, and tupelo-redbay. Distribution Page3-499 Seepage Swamps topographic relief is sufficient to create slopes. (Most of them have now beenaccumulation in the absence of severe fire. They are also abundant in theEverglades, where they characteristically grow on organic soil built up Topography and Geologyaccumulated in a depression. The peat may fill the depression or be an islandor isolated mass floated into position by high water. Hydric hammocks occuron low, flat, wet sites where limestone is often at or near the surface.organic material that, although generally saturated, are inundated only for shortVegetative StructureBaygalls and bayheads are dense evergreen forests or shrub thickets with aspongy understory of sphagnum moss and ferns. The canopy is composed oftall, densely packed, generally straight-boled evergreen hardwoods dominatedMagnolia virginiana) red bayGordonia lasianthus). There is typicallyQuercus laurifolia) mixed with other hardwoods. They often haveVegetative CompositionIn baygalls and bayheads, the typical plant species include: red bay, sweetbay,loblolly bay, red maple (), VirginiaItea virginica Page3-500SEEPAGE SWAMPSMulti-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Page3-501SEEPAGE SWAMPS Multi-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Figure 1.The occurrence of seepage swamps in South Florida (adapted from USGS-BRD 1996) Page3-502SEEPAGE SWAMPSMulti-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Toxicodendron radicansWoodwardiaWoodwardia areolataTypical hydric hammock plants include cabbage palm, laurel oak, redmaple, swamp bay, sweetbay, water oak (Quercus nigraSerenoa repens), poison ivy, royal fern (Osmunda regalisAmpelopsis arboreaBerchemia scandens), Virginia creeperWildlife DiversityTypical baygall and bayhead animals include Florida black bear southeastern shrew, short-tailed shrew brevicauda), (Hyla squirella), Sciurus carolinensis),Anolis carolinensis).Wildlife Species of Concern), Kirtland’s warbler (Dendroica kirtlandiiDrymarchon corais couperi). Tanner (1942) reported that the ivory-is state listed as threatened. This species utilizes amixed hardwood hammocks (Maehr 1992). The black bear has a large homerange, low population density, and a low reproductive rate. Theseconcern. Because the Florida black bear’s diet varies temporally andfloodplain forest, vegetated margins of rivers and lakes, hardwood hammocks, Page3-503SEEPAGE SWAMPS Multi-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida . 1996). Their diet consists offorage plants and their own physiological needs, altered hydrology, pollution,. 1996). The limpkin’s apparent dependence on the apple snail isits chief vulnerability. The limpkin will probably remain locally whereverapple snails are abundant. Limpkins forage by sight and touch when wading onswamps provide optimal water depths for limpkin foraging. The State ofPlant Species of ConcernCheiroglossa palmataPeperomia humilisand Tampa vervain ((Cheiroglossa palmata)the hydric hammock. Without this warmth and humidity, it is vulnerable todroughts and freezes. The fires that typically maintain cabbage palm standsusually destroy hand ferns, however. This means that hydric hammocks with Original photographby Betty Wargo. Page3-504SEEPAGE SWAMPSMulti-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Hydrologyaction that draws water up from below. Significant surface flooding is rare inHydric hammocks typically flood for brief periods seasonally, but thehydroperiod seldom exceeds 60 days per year. If the water table is lowered, acommunities is probably 50 to 100 years or more. After a fire, bay trees usuallybaygall into a different community. If only a small amount of surface peat isremoved, this may become a wet flatwoods community. If the ground surfaceis lowered considerably, willows may invade, followed by a cypress-gumcommunity. With recurrent fire, the site will become a shrub bog.150 years is probably a more reasonable estimate.cover, hydric hammocks rarely burn. Those with abundant cabbage palms arean exception, however. In these communities, the flammable palm frondscomponents of the hammock flora. This feedback loop results in the palm- Status and TrendsFlorida’s total forested area declined by 27 percent (Knight and McClure 1982forests remain. The percentage of these remaining forested wetlands in Florida Page3-505SEEPAGE SWAMPS Multi-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Comparative analysis of 1986 and 1991 Landsat imagery showed that St.In the Lake Placid-Sebring area, 607 ha (1,500 acres) of Lake Wales RidgeChanges in the landscape matrix affect seepage swamps. Conversion ofamount of runoff that must be absorbed by the remaining wetlands. DrainageIn the United States, agricultural practices account for greater than 87 percentAgricultural runoff also poses a contamination threat. Not only does itbyproducts, such runoff can also be a source of toxic waste contamination.and impact seepage swamp hydrology. Conversely, bayheads may be transformedSchinus terebinthifoliusLygodium japonicumSus scrofademand for timber, many materials are occasionally harvested from these habitats.Deer, hogs, and other game animals are hunted here, which affects herbivore-vegetation and predator-prey relationships. Collection of medicinal herbs iscommon practice. Large numbers of mature palms are dug from South Floridahydric hammocks and shipped to urban areas as far away as south Texas. Page3-506SEEPAGE SWAMPSMulti-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Beekeeping practices may have serious effects on pollinator ecology. Exoticaffects native pollinators and the reproduction of native plants is unknown. ManagementLand ProtectionPreservation of seepage swamps in intact landscape matrices with securehydrological regimes is the highest land protection priority.Table 1 listsRegulatory Mechanismscounty and state development permitting policies, pollution control andvegetation management regulations, and DEPand water management districtpond swamps. Underfunded enforcement programs limit the effectiveness ofthese regulations, however. Better enforcement of existing regulations is moreRestoration Projects and ProgramsHistorically, most wetlands restoration efforts have been directed at marshForested wetland restoration efforts have been focused on two types ofhas been to replace the full spectrum of tree species and undergrowthor not a project will be successful. They are hydrology, substrate stabilization,rooting volume, soil fertility, control of noxious plants, and herbivore control.Specifically, cooperation among engineers, hydrologists, and soil scientistssynchronous with the natural systems being emulated (Clewell and Lea 1990). Flood tolerance varies widely among different species and among different sizeTopographic relief should be planned with substrate stabilization in mind,establishment of trees and undergrowth (Clewell and Lea 1990).Management Strategies and Techniquesthrough wetlands. Various types of web mats can be used to stabilize suchOsceola County. Page3-507SEEPAGE SWAMPS Multi-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Page3-508SEEPAGE SWAMPS Multi-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Kuchler112/Southern mixed forestDavis2/Pine flatwoodsSCS12/Wetland hardwood hammocksSAF85/Slash pine-hardwoodFLUCCS611/Bay swamps614/Titi swamps BAYGALL Other synonyms include seepage swamp, bayhead, bay swamp, sandhill bog. Kuchler113/Southern floodplain forestDavis8/Swamp forestsSCS12/Wetland hardwood hammocksMyers & EwelTemperate hammocks-hydric hammocksSAF73/Southern red cedarFLUCCS617/Mixed wetland hardwoods Synonymy Tables: Page3-509SEEPAGE SWAMPSMulti-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida BOG(INCLUDES BAYHEAD): Other synonyms include bog swamp, shrub bogs, evergreen shrub bogs, wet Kuchler112/Southern mixed forestDavis8/Swamp forests, mostly of hardwoods?SCS22/Shrub bogMyers & EwelFreshwater swamp forests-shrub bogsFLUCCS310/Herbaceous Synonymy Tables: Where associated with the above types, the following GFC’s GAPanalysis community 3I.A.3.N.f.010Magnolia virginianaChrysobalanus icaco forest9I.A.4.N.e.020Sabal palmetto-Quercus virginianaFlooded Forest Alliance (equivalent to the fire-53III.C.2.N.e.Saturated mixed evergreen-cold-deciduous shrubland22I.C.2.N.c.Seasonally flooded mixed broad-leaved evergreen- The following GFC’s GAPanalysis categories are included within Seepage 36III.A.1.N.c.030Shrubland Alliance Page3-510SEEPAGE SWAMPS Multi-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Table 1.Proposed conservation lands important to seepage swamps Bright Hour WatershedCypress Creek/Trail1997 CARLBargain 15, 1997 CARLBargain 2, to be evaluated) 1997 CARLPriority 22, 1997 CARLPriority 20 and 1997CARLLOF 1, SJWMD SOR and P-project. The McDaniel family willhammock with tropical components to the flora. This area has beenaffected by grazing and soil subsidence.ditch along the north side of the highway. Most of the historic sloughhas been done. The Carlton lands include an impressive stand ofvirgin cypress (FNAI Basin Swamp EOR # 066). There are bayheadsand cypress domes and a band of hydric hammock (Van SwearingenCreek) in the Trail Ridge area along the west side of Bluefield Road.emergent marshes, willow thickets, baygalls, and openwater pondsand runs. New CARLboundaries include valuable matrix of dry andJahna property owned by sand mining company, but associateduplands have been cleared. The Overstreet tract in the southwestCreek, then into the Withlacoochee River.of evergreen trees such as loblolly bay, sweetbay, and magnolia,This site includes major cypress strands including two virgin standsgrading into a large area of hydric hammock in a healthy mosaic withexpanses of marsh and wet prairie. The best natural areas are ONSERVATIONOTESONONSERVATIONOTESON Page3-511SEEPAGE SWAMPSMulti-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Table 1. North Fork St. LucieParker-PoincianaWatershed1997 CARLBargain 20, 1997 CARLBargain 14, 1997 CARLLOF 4, SJWMD SORstrategy.Wet flatwoods and hydric hammocks, dominated by live oaks andIncludes mesic flatwoods, a large cypress/bay head, logged-overthrough western Osceola County, from the boundary of the Reedynorth and then southeasterly to Lake Hatchineha. The project areaof which are within the Southwest Florida Water Managementbecause of its large size and inaccessibility. Unless high-densitypermitted in the future, the swamp should be able to buffer itself.hydrologic restoration will be necessary. The natural habitats withinalthough development has destroyed some scrub areas. The size ofremain buffered from activities along the ridge. ONSERVATIONOTESONONSERVATIONOTESON Page3-512SEEPAGE SWAMPS Multi-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Table 2.Managed areas important to seepage swamps Avon Park Air Force RangeCollier-Seminole State ParkThree Lakes Wildlife Management AreaTriple N Ranch Wildlife Management Area Page3-513SEEPAGE SWAMPS Multi-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Bedinger, M. S. 1979. Wetland function and values: The State of Our Understanding.American Water Resources Association; Minneapolis, Minnesota.Clewell, A. F., and R. Lea. 1990. Creation and restoration of forested wetlandvegetation in the southeastern United States. Pages 195-232 J. A. Kusler and M.E. Kentula, eds. Wetland creation and restoration: The status of the science. IslandPress, Washington, D.C.Cox, J., R. Kautz, M. MacLaughlin, and T. Hoehn. 1997. Preservation 2000 Act Study:Biodiversity conservation analysis. Florida Game and Fresh Water FishCommission; Tallahassee, Florida.Davis, J. H. 1967. General map of natural vegetation of Florida. AgriculturalExperiment Station, Circular S-178, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences,Dept. of Transportation, S. T. B., Thematic Mapping Section. 1985. Florida Land Use,Thematic Mapping Section. 1985. Florida Land Use,Duever, L. C., D. W. Hall, J. M. Brooks, and R. Mora. 1992. Wetland and uplandhabitat inventory: St. Lucie County, Gainesville, Florida, KBN Engineering andApplied Sciences, Inc. (Final report to St. Lucie County Board of Commissioners.)Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Societyof American Foresters, Washington, D.C.Florida Natural Areas Inventory [FNAI] and Florida Department of Natural ResourcesAreas Inventory [FNAI] and Florida Department of Natural Resourcesof Natural Resources; Tallahassee, Florida.Kautz, R. S., D. T. Gilbert, and G. M. Mauldin. 1993. Vegetative cover in Florida basedon 1985-1989 Landsat thematic mapper imagery. Florida Scientist 56:135-154.Knight, H. A., and J. P. McClure. 1982. Florida’s forests. U.S. Forest Service,Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States. inMaehr, D. S. and J. R. Brady. 1982a. Fall food habits of black bears in Baker andMaehr, D. S. and J. R. Brady. 1984a. Food habits of Florida black bears. JournalWildlife Management 48:230-235.Maehr, D. S. and J. R. Brady. 1984b. Comparison of food habits in two north FloridaMaehr, D. S. 1992. Pages 26S. R. Humphrey, ed. Rare and endangered biotaof Florida. Volume I. Mammals. University Presses of Florida; Gainesville,Meyer, K. D., and M. W. Collopy. 1990. The status, distribution, and habitatrequirements of the American swallow-tailed kite (Wildlife Program; Tallahassee, Florida.Miller, C. B. 1997. Caladiums for a tropical touch. Horticulture, April, 1997. Pages 46- Literature Cited Page3-514SEEPAGE SWAMPSMulti-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Miller, K. E. 1993. Habitat use by white-tailed deer in the Everglades: Tree islands inNelson, J. 1989. Agriculture, wetlands, and endangered species: The Food Security Actof 1985. Endangered Species Technical Bulletin 14:1,6-8.Noss, R. F., E. T. LaRoe III, and J. M. Scott. 1995. Endangered Ecosystems of theUnited States: Apreliminary assessment of loss and degradation. U.S. Departmentof the Interior, National Biological Service, Washington, D.C.Rodgers, J.A. Jr., H.W. Kale II, and H.T. Smith. 1996. Limpkin. Pages 485-496 in Rareand endangered biota of Florida. Volume V. Birds. University Press of Florida;Department of Agriculture; Gainesville, Florida.United States Geological Survey-Biological Resources Division [USGS-BRD]. 1996.Classification of 1993/94 Landsat TM imagery. Florida Cooperative Fish andWildlife Research Unit, University of Florida; Gainesville, Florida. Page3-515Community-level Restoration Actions1.Prevent furtherdestruction ordegradation of existing communities.1.1.Acquire threatened seepage swamps.Table 2 presents land acquisition proposals that incorporate important seepageunusual coastal variation of the community.Baygall in Osceola County, east of Lake Davenport (FNAI EOR #016). This site alsoHydric hammock in Osceola County, parallel to Bull Creek (FNAI EOR #027).swamps, should be regarded as high priorities for local conservation efforts. and biodiversity. Restoration and maintenance of water sources and hydrological regimes is critical. tracts and remaining high-quality habitat has been developed and implemented; (2) seepage swamps arerestoration actions through funded management programs can be expected to re-establish community Seepage Swamps Page3-516SEEPAGE SWAMPS Multi-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida 1.2.Promote conservation easements and landowneragreements. 1.3.Enforce regulatory protection. Wetlands are seldom adequately monitored toadherence to the law. Increased funding for regulatory monitoring and enforcement1.4.Prevent degradation of existing preserves. 2.Manage seepage swamps within the context of restoration objectives.2.1.Restore natural fire regimes. to burn into the edges of wetlands naturally.Control exotic plants and animals. Restore ecosystem structure and composition by manipulating existing2.4.Protect seepage swamps from point source and non-point source pollution. communities so that wetlands are buffered from agricultural and urban runoff.3.Maintain seepage swamps in a natural condition.3.1.Provide analogs forecosystem functions such as fire regimes.3.2.Continue to control exotic plants and animals in perpetuity.3.3.Monitorforextirpations and extinctions, imperilled species, including pollinators, dispersers and soil organisms.3.4.Monitorand correct forboth point source and non-point source pollution.4.Restore seepage swamps where they have been destroyed. Florida Institute of Phosphate Research, the University of Florida Center for Wetlands, and others4.1.Restore ecosystem structure including soils and soil organisms, hydrology, plants,4.2.Restore ecosystem functions4.3.Restore ecosystem composition4.4.Protect seepage swamps from both point-source and non-point-source5.Connect appropriate habitats.5.1.Connect ecological systems. Pal-Mar, a project in northern Palm Beach andsouthern Martin counties, is a critical connection between J.W. Corbett WMAand Page3-517SEEPAGE SWAMPSMulti-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Jonathan Dickinson SP. When acquired, this would complete a 50,587 ha (125,000Okeechobee to Jonathan Dickinson SP.5.2.Protect/restore landscape matrix. seepage swamps. Change wetland permitting regulations so that upland recharge5.3.Assure maintenance of linkages critical to key species and functions6.Conduct research.6.1.Determine distribution of remaining seepage swamp habitat.6.1.1.Develop strategies forgathering, synthesizing, and groundtruthing6.1.2.Assess and supplement available data.6.2.Improve reference ecosystem information regarding community composition,biodiversity, and site-to-site variability.6.3.Investigate roles of pollinators, mycorrhizae, seed dispersers, and othercriticalorkeystone species.6.4.Evaluate predator-prey relationships in landscape context.7.Monitorcommunity-level processes, community structure, and community compositionincluding rare and keystone species.8.Increase public awareness. be difficult to understand that they are wetlands. Page3-518