/
Gambling Harm Reduction: Are You Serious? Gambling Harm Reduction: Are You Serious?

Gambling Harm Reduction: Are You Serious? - PowerPoint Presentation

alida-meadow
alida-meadow . @alida-meadow
Follow
461 views
Uploaded On 2016-06-30

Gambling Harm Reduction: Are You Serious? - PPT Presentation

Jim Orford School of Psychology University of Birmingham UK Gambling Watch UK Harm Minimisation in Gambling Conference Responsible Gambling Trust London December 11 th 2013 Forms of harm from gambling ID: 383589

harm gambling evidence family gambling harm family evidence problems research policy industry health high community financial members impulses strong affected pgsi problem

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Gambling Harm Reduction: Are You Serious..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Gambling Harm Reduction: Are You Serious?

Jim Orford

School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, UK

Gambling Watch UK

Harm Minimisation in Gambling Conference

Responsible Gambling Trust, London, December 11

th

2013Slide2

Forms of harm from gambling

Form of harm

Harm to individuals who gamble

A continuum of risky and harmful gambling

Harm to their family members

Financial, relational and emotional harm

Harm to the community

Harm to the quality of the high street, financial

drain, community health affected

Harm to society

Normalisation of gambling, risks to young people, contributes to inequalitySlide3

The gambling risk/harm continuum according to the Canadian Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI)

PGSI score 0 Non-problem gambler

PGSI score 1-2 At risk (low)

PGSI score 3-7

At risk

(moderate )

PGSI score 8 plus Problem gamblerSlide4

The gambling control continuum according to Dickerson and O’Connor,

Gambling as an Addictive Behaviour

, Cambridge University Press, 2006

Never strong impulses, no problems

Sometimes strong impulses, easily resisted, no problems

Sometimes strong impulses, can resist with effort, no problems

Often strong impulses, difficult to resist, few minor problems

Strong impulses, difficult but not impossible to resist, several problems

Frequent strong impulses, impossible to resist, several significant distressing problemsSlide5

Natasha Schüll

,

Addiction

by Design: Machine Gambling in Las

Vegas

(2012, Princeton

University

Press)

By

the mid-1990s, the gambling industry had already grasped... that a medical diagnosis linked to the excessive consumption of its product by some individuals could serve to deflect attention away from the product's potentially problematic role in promoting that consumption, and onto the biological and psychological vulnerabilities of a small minority of its

customers

(page 261).Slide6

Martin Young, Statistics, scapegoats and social control: A critique of pathological gambling prevalence research,

Addiction Research and Theory, 2013, 21, pp.1-11

… the industry is dependent on the pathological gambler to … absolve itself from the harm it produces…

… problem gambling prevalence surveys… construct and mobilise the pathological gambler as the object of policy and interventionSlide7

Forms of harm from gambling

Form of harm

Harm to individuals who gamble

A continuum of risky and harmful gambling

Harm to their family members

Financial, relational and emotional harm

Harm to the community

Harm to the quality of the high street, financial

drain, community health affected

Harm to society

Normalisation of gambling, risks to young people, contributes to inequalitySlide8

Affected family members: a group with no voice

It is the nature of emotional disorders that when one member of the family is afflicted, the effects are felt by all the others. There are few, however, in which the impact is felt with such severity as in the case of compulsive gambling

’ (

When Luck Runs Out

, Custer & Milt, 1985).

‘… we have had a monster living with our family – a monster in the shape of a fruit-machine. Practically every penny my husband earned went into that machine’ (a wife cited by Barker & Miller, 1968). Slide9

Forms of harm from gambling

Form of harm

Harm to individuals who gamble

A continuum of risky and harmful gambling

Harm to their family members

Financial, relational and emotional harm

Harm to the community

Harm to the quality of the high street, financial

drain, community health affected

Harm to society

Normalisation of gambling, risks to young people, contributes to inequalitySlide10

A sample of British attitudes towards gambling in 2010 (percent agree or disagree)Slide11

Types of gambling harm reduction measures

Reduce gambling by reducing demand

Reduce gambling by reducing supply

Harm reduction that does not require a reduction in gambling

Education campaigns

Limit availability

Reduce criminality by legalisation

Controls on advertising

Limit accessibility

Help for affected family members

Player-centred e.g. pre-commitment, self-exclusion

Modify gambling features

On-site crisis interventionSlide12

Three types of evidence (Glasby

, 2011) and their relevance to High Stake-High Prize Electronic Gambling Machines (HS-HP EGMs) such as Fixed Odds Betting Terminals (FOBTs)

Theoretical evidence

HS-HP EGMs

have features that would lead us to expect them to have high harm potential

Experiential evidence

Gamblers and their family members are telling us that HS-HP EGMs are causing particular harm

Empirical evidence

Evidence from the 2007 and 2010 BGPSs support

the conclusion that HS-HP EGMs are specially harmfulSlide13

Gross Gambling Yield (GGY) from some different forms of British Gambling 2010-11 and losses attributable to People with Gambling Problems (PGPs) 2010

GGY % of losses amount of losses

£m from PGPs from PGPs £m

 

FOBTs in betting shops 1,295 23 297

 

Table games in casinos 685 11 76

 

Betting on dog races 275 27 75

 

Betting on horse races 810 7 57

 

Slot machines in arcades 396 12 47

 

Football pools 324 6 18

 

Bingo 386 4 16Slide14

Models of the evidence and policy relationship(Monaghan,

Evidence versus politics

, The Policy Press, 2011)

Linear or rational model

:

a linear process from defining a

problem to

identifying missing knowledge to acquiring research, interpreting it

and

then making a policy choice

Enlightenment model

:

a process of 'indirect diffusion' whereby an entire body of research or evidence, accumulating over time, sensitises policymakers to new issues

Evolutionary model

:

'survival of the fittest': ideas that fit the interests of powerful groups will be picked up and those that do not, will not

Political or tactical model

:

new research is unlikely to have a bearing on predetermined positions allied to various interests and

political ideologies

Interactive, dialogic or

processual

models

: concepts

and therefore knowledge are inherently contested and meaning emerges from negotiation and dialogue between relevant constituentsSlide15

Two contrasting policy perspectives

Gambling is seen as an ordinary entertainment product

In Government, the department responsible for Culture and Sport should take the lead

The industry should sit at the policy table and fund prevention, treatment and research (PT&R)

Gambling is seen as a commodity dangerous to health

In Government, the department responsible for Health should take the lead

Policy formation should be independent of the industry and PT&R should be funded by governmentSlide16

Dr Margaret Chan, Director General World Health Organization, Doctors and the alcohol industry: an unhealthy mix?

British Medical Journal, 2013

In the view of WHO, the alcohol industry has no role in the formulation of alcohol policies, which must be protected from distortion by commercial or vested interests.Slide17

Responsible Gambling Strategy BoardStrategy 2012

… whether bespoke harm-prevention measures might be effective… player-centred measures tailored to a gambler’s actual machine play… in contrast to the current across-the board regulatory controls, such as limits to stakes and prizes and number and location of gaming machines (

para

49)

… wider societal risks… recession… low income groups… important contextual considerations… probably too broad and complex to prioritise for research (

para

52)Slide18
Slide19
Slide20

www.gamblingwatchuk.org