PPT-Language Conversation Groups

Combining Learning with Fun Beth Kupper Herr Leeward Community College Hawaii Lets start with an icebreaker Beth KupperHerr Leeward CC 2 What the groups are all about Who What. used in same-sex and mixed talk. Positive Politeness Strategies. juxtaposing criticism with . compliments. establishing common . ground. in-group jargon and . slang. nicknames. Can anyone give me any examples? . Moderator training for community dialogue. Right from the start vision and purpose. Why, despite our best efforts, do we still have children in Connecticut entering school behind their peers, not fully ready to learn and succeed? . vocab. tool. Matthew Absalom & Andrew McGregor. The University of Melbourne. Where are we going today?. Learning vocab – what the research says. What we did. How we did it. What did we find out?. to Support Communication . in Aphasia. . Cordelia. Peters, MS, CCC-SLP . Jeannine Alleva, MS, CCC-SLP. BIAMD Conference March 23, 2017. Learning Objectives. Identify 3 different ways to support expression in persons with aphasia (PWA). CPSC 599.81. Anthony Tang. Punchlines. Designing for groups is challenging. Evaluating systems for groups can be challenging. Systems are embedded with our values, and our assumptions about how people (should/will) interact. Ray Wilkinson. Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit University of Manchester. ALF, . Nyborg. Strand, March 2012. Overview of presentation. 1. . Why focus aphasia assessment therapy on conversation?. Gospel Conversations. The big reason we don’t talk to. unbelievers about Jesus is because we don’t talk. to each other about Jesus.. Alvin Reid. The message of the Gospel…. We are more sinful than we ever dared believe…. Read the following sentences. . Then, answer the questions below.. “And when Mother and I are at dinner with the Fury, you are both to remain in your rooms very quietly. There is to be no running around, no sliding down banisters’ –and here he looked very . DAVID Dalley. Background to the research . The current study. Methodology . Analysis. Findings. Discussion and implications . Questions . Overview of presentation . Health . care professional - patient . Megan Anderson Reilly. Academic Conversations. Overall Objectives. Determine the purpose for academic conversations (WHY). Identify characteristics of Academic Conversations (WHAT). Implement strategies for supporting academic conversations (HOW). Social and Digital Trends Analysis. January 1, 2018 – March 31, 2018. Executive Summary | . January 1, 2018 – March 31, 2018. Conversation Size. 74K mentions . of chicken and chicken welfare-related topics from January 1, 2018 to March 31, 2018.. The research described in this book shows that conversation analysis can effectively model dialogue. Specifically this work shows that the multidisciplinary field of communicative ICALL may greatly benefit from including Conversation Analysis. As a consequence this research makes several contributions to the related research disciplines such as conversation analysis second-language acquisition computer-mediated communication artificial intelligence and dialogue systems.The book will be of value for researchers and engineers in the areas of computational linguistics intelligent assistants and conversational interfaces. Conversational analysis is an approach to discourse dealing with the linguistic analysis of conversation, and strongly associated with ethnomethodology (Johnson and Johnson, 1998: 89). Richards et al. suggest that conversational analysis refers to the analysis of natural conversation in order to discover what the linguistic characteristics of conversation are and how conversation is used in ordinary life (1992: 106). . Common Triggers and Challenges. Delay / lack of speech . development (age and stage). Lack of response to other’s speech (including own name. ) . Stereotyped and repetitive use of language. Pronoun reversal (saying ‘you’ for ‘I’).