focus areas audit outcomes 201415 Presentation to the Standing Committee on Appropriations 15 April 2016 15 April 2016 Reputation promisemission The AuditorGeneral of South Africa has a constitutional mandate and ID: 600383
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Public works sector" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Public works sector focus areas audit outcomes 2014-15Presentation to the Standing Committee on Appropriations15 April 2016
15 April 2016Slide2
Reputation promise/missionThe Auditor-General of South Africa has a constitutional mandate and, as the Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) of South Africa, exists to strengthen ourcountry’s democracy by enabling oversight, accountability and governance in the public sector through auditing, thereby
building public confidence
.Slide3
2014-15
PFMA
Discussion points
3
History of
public works focus
areas audited
Public works sector
focus areas audit outcomes
Root causes
Sector challengesSlide4
2014-15
PFMA
SECTOR FOCUS AREAS (History)
4Slide5
FOCUS AREASSector focus areas
2014-15
2013-14
2012-13
Management of accommodation for client departments
a
a
a
Project management of infrastructure projects
a
a
a
Expanded public works programme
a
a
a
2014-15
PFMA
5Slide6
2014-15
PFMA
1
Focus area 1: Management of accommodation for client departments
1
6Slide7
2014-15
PFMA
Findings on
Management of accommodation for client departments
7Slide8
2014-15
PFMA
2
Focus area 2:
Project management of infrastructure projects
2
8Slide9
2014-15
PFMA
Findings on
Project management of infrastructure projects
9
No findings
New findings
Repeat findings
Improved
Regressed
Stagnant or limited progressSlide10
2014-15
PFMA
3
Focus area
3:
Expanded Public Works Programmes
3
10Slide11
2014-15
PFMA
Findings on
Expanded Public Works Programmes
11
No findings
New findings
Repeat findings
Improved
Regressed
Stagnant or limited progress
No material findings were noted at provincial departments with regards to accounting for the Expanded Public Works Programme integrated grant for provinces; however challenges were encountered when verifying the reliability of reported performance of the EPWP.
This
was attributable to two factors.
Inadequate records management and retention by implementing bodies and deficiencies in the information system being used for reporting.
Based
on the audit of EPWP projects across the country, we were unable to obtain sufficient appropriate supporting documentation to substantiate the creation of work opportunities reported for a large number of the projects in our sample
.Slide12
2014-15
PFMA
Findings on
Expanded Public Works
Programmes (
cont
…
12
No findings
New findings
Repeat findings
Improved
Regressed
Stagnant or limited progress
Furthermore
, various control weaknesses around input validation controls and overall performance reporting were identified in the Integrated Reporting System (IRS). The IRS was used by the National Office to report on work opportunities created nationally, however as a result of the system shortcomings performance data reported was not in all instances accurate, valid and complete. Slide13
2014-15
PFMA
Findings on
Expanded Public Works
Programmes (
cont
…
13
No findings
New findings
Repeat findings
Improved
Regressed
Stagnant or limited progress
The following exceptions were identified.
Work
opportunities overstated due to deceased
beneficiaries
reportedBeneficiaries
on reporting system with invalid identity numbers, thus validity of the affected beneficiaries could not be corroborated with adequate supporting documentation in the form of identity document
.
Beneficiaries paid below minimum wage resulted in non-compliance with the ministerial determination issued by the department of labourSlide14
Public works sector budget
Budget
For the 2014-15 financial year, the
Public works sector
budget
was
R32,3 billion
2014-15
PFMA
14Slide15
2014-15
PFMA
4
Root
Causes
4
15Slide16
2014-15
PFMA
16
Root causes should be addressed
Root
CausesSlide17
Root causes should be addressed (top three)17
2014-15 PFMA
Root causes
Recommendation
Slow response in addressing the root causes of audit findings
Compilation of audit action plans addressing all material audit findings, these plans should contain deadlines and milestones as well as the party responsible for implementation. Consideration should be given to including responsibilities in performance contracts of relevant parties to ensure accountability.
Leadership in departments to drive and monitor implementation of corrective actions proposed
Internal audit to verify accuracy, completeness and validity of progress reported on action plans. Progress should be communicated to the Audit Committee and Portfolio Committee to enable oversight regarding the progress of resolving critical audit findings reported.
Key positions vacant or key officials lacking appropriate competencies
Stabilisation of leadership and appointing appropriately skilled officials in key positions should be expedited at remaining affected departments.
The sector should determine the ideal ratio of project managers to projects and in line with this devise a strategy to ensure that all departments in the sector appoint project managers with the necessary credentials to bridge the existing gap. Slide18
Root causes should be addressed (top three) cont
…
18
2014-15 PFMA
Root causes
Recommendation
Weaknesses
of
Policies and Procedures
Policies and procedures should be established or enhanced (where it already exist) to monitor and satisfy the accommodation needs of user departments. Furthermore, it should address all aspects surrounding conditional assessment and monitoring of the level of utilisation of all properties (state-owned and leased).
Adherence to these policies will assist in compiling feasible planned maintenance strategies (including the addressing of the maintenance backlog) and enabling the departments to identify all vacant, unused land and office buildings. Thus enabling optimal utilisation of the state-owned property portfolio and avoiding fruitless and wasteful expenditure.
The National Department of Public Works must provide the required oversight to ensure that policy consistency is achieved in the sector for cross cutting focus areas.Slide19
2013-14
PFMA
5
Challenges
facing
Public works
sector
5
19Slide20
Challenges facing Public works sector Poor coordination between the public works sector and client departments meant that accurate accommodation needs could not be established
.
Inability of certain departments to establish the condition, and therefore availability, of suitable state-owned properties for accommodation.
the
quality and monitoring of projects are not in all instances of the desired standard.
Effective, efficient and economic lease management is still a challenge in the sector.
Capacity constraints remained a challenge for the sector. This was mainly caused by difficulties to attract and retain people with the right skills and experience to effectively and efficiently manage infrastructure projects.
Budgetary
constraints played a part as well, given the more competitive remuneration being offered by the private sector to critical resources for example engineers, architects and project managers. Slide21
6. Consolidated audit outcomes for the education sector
Auditee
Outcomes
(2014/15)
Outcomes
(2013/14)
Movemen
t
Audit Opinion
PDOs
Non-compliance with laws and regulations
Audit Opinion
PDOs
Non-compliance with laws and regulations
National
Unqualified with findings
Yes
Yes
Unqualified with findings
Yes
Yes
Eastern Cape
Qualified
Yes
Yes
Qualified
Yes
Yes
Free
State
Unqualified
without
findings
No
No
Unqualified with findings
Yes
Yes
Gauteng
Unqualified with findings
Yes
Yes
Unqualified with findings
Yes
Yes
KwaZulu-
Natal
Unqualified with findings
No
Yes
Unqualified with findings
No
Yes
Limpopo
Qualified
Yes
Yes
Qualified
Yes
Yes
Mpumalanga
Unqualified with findings
Yes
Yes
Unqualified with findings
Yes
Yes
Northern Cape
Unqualified with findings
Yes
Yes
Unqualified with findings
Yes
Yes
North
West
Qualified
Yes
Yes
Qualified
Yes
Yes
Western
Cape
Unqualified without findings
No
No
Unqualified without findings
No
NoSlide22