/
Student Journalists Student Journalists

Student Journalists - PowerPoint Presentation

alida-meadow
alida-meadow . @alida-meadow
Follow
394 views
Uploaded On 2017-03-19

Student Journalists - PPT Presentation

1 st Amendment Rights 1 st Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redr ID: 526336

school students court speech students school speech court amendment rights free student articles paper press article private law laws

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Student Journalists" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Student Journalists

1

st

Amendment RightsSlide2

1st Amendment

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of

grievance.

There are restrictions – the 1

st

Amendment does not give ANYONE the right to say whatever they want, whenever they want.Slide3

Limits

In

a private home.

The First Amendment prohibits the government from abridging the freedom of speech, but unless an individual is acting on behalf of the government or as a government agent, she is generally free to prohibit any kind of speech she wants in her own home, or any other private setting, as long as she does so without breaking another law, such as physically assaulting someone.

In

a private workplace.

If you work for a private employer, you generally have no right to free speech in the workplace, and can be disciplined for what you say. However, your employer may run afoul of other laws, such as discrimination laws if you're fired for religious expression, or labor laws if you're fired for reporting labor violations or whistleblowing.

Social

media.

Although social media sites like Facebook might seem like an ideal public forum for posting unpopular or controversial content, as private companies, they are technically free to delete or otherwise censor any content they deem offensive.

School

activities.

Although students at public schools still have the right to First Amendment free speech, their rights may not be as extensive as the rights of adults. For example, in a 1988 Supreme Court case, the court ruled that students' free speech rights weren't violated when school administrators removed articles from a student newspaper that dealt with controversial topics.

Obscene

speech.

The First Amendment does not protect speech or expression that is considered "obscene." This is why child

pornography

is against the law. However, the exact line between obscenity and free speech is often hard to determine. For example, the filmmaker behind

a controversial viral

video was sentenced to four years in prison for making films that were considered obscene, despite his contention that they were "art" protected by the First Amendment. Slide4

Tinker Vs. Des Moines (1969)

At a public school in Des Moines, Iowa, students organized a silent protest against the Vietnam War.

Students

planned to wear black armbands to school to protest the fighting but the principal found out and told the students they would be suspended if they wore the armbands.

Despite

the warning, students wore the armbands and were suspended.

During

their suspension the students' parents sued the school for violating their children's right to free speech. A U.S. district court sided with the school, ruling that wearing armbands could disrupt learning. The students appealed the ruling to a U.S. Court of Appeals but lost and took their case to the United States Supreme Court.Slide5

In 1969 the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 decision in favor of the students. The high court agreed that students' free rights should be protected and said,

"Students don't shed their constitutional rights at the school house gates."Slide6

Hazelwood Vs. Kuhlmeier (1988)

Students enrolled in the Journalism II class at Hazelwood East High School were responsible for writing and editing the school's paper The Spectrum.

Two

of the articles submitted for publication in the final edition of the paper contained stories on divorce and teenage pregnancy.

The

divorce article featured a story about a girl who blamed her father's actions for her parents' divorce. The teenage pregnancy article featured stories in which pregnant students at Hazelwood East shared their experiences.Slide7

To ensure their privacy, the girls' names were changed in the article. The school principal felt that the subjects of these two articles were inappropriate.

He

concluded that journalistic fairness required that the father in the divorce article be informed of the story and be given an opportunity to comment. He also stated his concerns that simply changing the names of the girls in the teenage pregnancy article may not be sufficient to protect their anonymity and that this topic may not be suitable for the younger students.

As

a result, he prohibited these articles from being published in the paper.Slide8

Because there was no time to edit the paper if it were to go to press before the end of the school year, entire pages were eliminated. The student journalists then brought suit to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, alleging that their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech had been violated.Slide9

The U.S. Supreme Court held that the principal's actions

did not violate the students' free speech rights.

The Court noted that the paper was sponsored by the school and, as such, the school had a legitimate interest in preventing the publication of articles that it deemed inappropriate and that might appear to have the imprimatur of the school.

Specifically, the Court noted that the paper was not intended as a public forum in which everyone could share views; rather, it was a limited forum for journalism students to write articles pursuant to the requirements of their Journalism II class, and subject to appropriate editing by the school.Slide10

Student Press Law Center

SPLC.org

Monthly Podcasts addressing student press issues (mostly college related).

December 2015 – Student 1

st

Amendment Rights in Schools

http://

www.splc.org/multimedia/1176Slide11

Laws and Rights

Student Press

Handouts: 1

st

Amendment and Censorship

Confidentiality and Shield Law

Libel and Privacy

Copyright and Fair UseSlide12

Assignment

In the next week, do some research.

Find an example where an individuals 1

st

Amendment rights were violated (as deemed by a court case or legal proceeding).

Print the story and bring to class for next Tuesday, October 13

th

.

You do not need to write anything, but be prepared to share with the class what

you found.