/
UWF CONTRACTS WORKSHOP UWF CONTRACTS WORKSHOP

UWF CONTRACTS WORKSHOP - PowerPoint Presentation

alida-meadow
alida-meadow . @alida-meadow
Follow
421 views
Uploaded On 2017-05-06

UWF CONTRACTS WORKSHOP - PPT Presentation

Professional amp Construction Services Procurement and Project Delivery Methods An Overview of the University of West Florida Capital Projects Procurement Process Dave OBrien AVP amp Chief Contracting Officer ID: 545065

public amp evaluation contracts amp public contracts evaluation uwf procurement project construction contract process criteria florida firm negotiate services professional solicitation university

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "UWF CONTRACTS WORKSHOP" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

UWF CONTRACTS WORKSHOP

Professional & Construction Services Procurement and Project Delivery Methods

An Overview of the University of West Florida Capital Projects Procurement Process

Dave O’Brien, A.V.P. & Chief Contracting Officer

Jim Barnett, A.V.P. Facilities Development & Operations

UWF Administrative Services Division Pensacola, Florida

(850) 473-7075Slide2

The Three Principles Of UWF Public ContractingSlide3

Pillar I Laws, Regulations & Policies

Pillar II Procedures

Pillar III Auditors Prospective bidders/proposers are often confused between Pillar’s I & II with respect to UWF’s flexibility.

UWF Procurement & Contracts has some flexibility regarding the adaptation of Procedures (Pillar II) to support different types of projects to provide “Best Value” to the University.The tenants under Pillars I & III are usually quite explicit and not subject to change or adaptation without Legislative action or Boards of Governors and Trustees prior approval.

Three Pillars of Public

ContractingSlide4

Private Owners have fewer procurement & legal restraints than Public Owners.

Private Owner is the ultimate authority.

Private Owners can “play favorites” and are not bound by competition. Private Owners have more flexibility to creatively negotiate favorable contract terms.

Private vs. Public OwnersSlide5

Public contracts derive from statutes, regulations, policies, etc.

Public sector contracts normally require competitive procurement. Contracting officers cannot commit the University beyond their authority.

Public contracts are standardized with less room for negotiations.

Private vs. Public ContractsSlide6

Florida Statutes

http://

www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/?CFID=231372660&CFTOKEN=34444173Florida Board of Governors Regulations http://www.flbog.org/about/regulations/regulations.php

UWF Board of Trustees Regulations & PoliciesUWF Procurement & Contracts Procedures

UWF Procurement RequirementsSlide7

Competition Is The Cornerstone To Procurement In Florida

Florida has statutory requirements that Public sector contracts be awarded based on a competitive solicitation.

The Florida State Supreme Court has put forth their opinion that, since the State Government (including State Universities) are major employers and are political in nature, there is the potential for public assumption that there may be impropriety and that the government cannot be trusted to meet and negotiate suitable terms without at least the appearance of impropriety or special favor.

Competitive bidding helps to mitigate against the appearance of favoritism toward a particular contractor and provides a level playing field for all to participate.Slide8
Slide9

Invitation to Bid (ITB)

Request for Proposals (RFP)

Request for Quotation (RFQ)Invitation to Negotiate (ITN)Request for Information (RFI)Professional Qualifications Solicitation (PQS)

Solicitation MethodsSlide10

Competitive Process for Qualifications Based Solicitations

(Professional Qualifications Solicitations)CCNA-FS 287.055 - Architects, Engineers, Surveyors

QBS Process is also used for Continuing, CM@Risk & Design-Build Contracts Three step process

Public Announcement

Typically the public announcement is the scope of the project

Competitive Selection Process

The criteria for selection is contained and published in the solicitation document (PQS/RFP/ITN)

The agency (UWF) will choose the three most-qualified firms for a particular project to make an oral presentation to the evaluators.

Competitive Negotiation

The agency (UWF) may then negotiate with the top ranked firm for services.

Fees will not be discussed until this stepSlide11

Qualifications Based Process

Public Announcement

In accordance with Florida Statutes and Board of Governors

Regulations, UWF publicly announces each occasion when following services are required:

Professional services for a project, with estimated construction costs exceeding $250,000 unless a competitively awarded continuing contract is used;

Professional services for planning or study activity when the fee is expected to exceed $50,000 unless a competitively awarded continuing contract is used;

Construction projects estimated to exceed $200,000 unless a competitively awarded continuing contract is used;

Continuing contracts for professional services or construction services. There is no limit on the total value of the continuing contract, but no single construction project may exceed $2,000,000 and no single study or plan may exceed $200,000.

Note:

Projects are announced in the Florida Administrative Weekly

and in the Pensacola News Journal

. Slide12

Evaluation & Selection

Responses are reviewed to ensure that each is responsive to submission requirements.

Responsive submittals are referred to an Evaluation Committee for review and evaluation. Scores are converted to a ranking order of responses. Evaluator rankings are aggregated to establish an overall ranking for each response.   Typical Evaluation Criteria include:

Firm experienceDemonstrated understanding of overall concept Approach to development of projectExperience of Proposed Team and Personnel assigned to project

Ability to respond/location

 

The 3-4 top-ranked firms are invited to make oral presentations. The Evaluation Committee provides a list of topics to be addressed in presentations. A new set of evaluation criteria is developed based on the topics provided by the committee.

Weights of criteria will vary depending on the needs of the project. However, the weight for ability to respond is generally set at 10% but has been as much as 20% for trade contracts.Slide13

Contract Negotiation

Following the presentations, evaluators score and rank each of the short-listed firms against criteria provided in the invitation to present. Ranking from the evaluation of responses has no bearing on the final ranking following the presentation.

Following the interviews and the final evaluation meeting, the University will negotiate with the top ranked firm.

If the University is unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with the top ranked firm, it will terminate negotiations with that firm and undertake negotiations with the next highest ranked firm. This process will continue until the University is able to negotiate a satisfactory contract.

 

If unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with one of the short-listed firms, the University

may select additional firms for negotiation,

reinstate negotiations following the original order of priority,

award without negotiation, or

may withdraw the solicitation and pursue an alternate delivery method.

All decisions shall be based on the course of action deemed to be in the best interest of the University. Slide14

Construction Manager @ Risk

Best Used

With Multi-Year Appropriations and Multi-Phase ProjectsKey Components:Pre-Construction FeeCost of Work

General Conditions including staffingCM Managed ContingencyCM FeeSlide15

Design-Build Delivery

Best Used With

Limited Schedule; Pre-Engineered Components, and Specialty Construction – Residence HallsOwner holds single contract with an entity responsible cradle-grave for design and construction of the project.The Design-Builder “DB” could be an A/E, a Contractor or a joint venture organized for delivery of the project. Slide16

Design-Build Delivery

Key Components

:Pre-Construction FeeCost of WorkGeneral Conditions including staffing

D/B Managed ContingencyD/B FeeSlide17

Design-Bid-Build

Best Used

With One Phase & Funding Year; Building of Moderate Difficulty or Infrastructure Project.Owner holds separate contracts with: - Design Professional - General Contractor (GC) A/E selected via Qualifications Based Selection CCNA – Negotiated Fee.

GC selection resulting from Sealed Bid.Slide18

Putting Your Best Foot Forward

Perform a thorough review of the solicitation documents to identify questions and concerns.

Be fully responsive to minimum requirements.Prepare response to address the evaluation criteria.Do not contact or “lobby” UWF staff outside of Procurement & Contracts.

Attend and participate in pre-bid conferences DELIVER BID/PROPOSAL BY DEADLINE!!!Slide19

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes one proposal better than another?

The degree your submittal addresses the Evaluation Criteria and following the format specified in the proposal is the key.Our firm has done work at UWF in the past. Do we have to submit to the level of detail we would for a new client?Yes! Each and every procurement must stand on its own. In fairness to all, only information contained in the written submittal will be used.How much detail is required in my submittal?Enough information to prove you meet or exceed expectations. To simply paraphrase a UWF requirement is not sufficient. Examples work best.

How do we know our submittal will be given full consideration?Following the format specified, making it easy to read and make sure you address the evaluation criteria.Slide20

F. A. Q. CONTINUED

The best Dog & Pony show wins in the Oral Presentation. Right?

No! BUT. . . firms reaching the oral presentation phase are very close in the evaluators’ eyes so putting your best foot forward by being organized and by communicating in a clear and concise manner is important. It has been our experience that more proposals have been lost due to lack of preparation in this phase of the evaluation. Remember: Preparation is the key.Our firm lost. What’s the point of attending a debriefing?The debriefing is an opportunity to learn of your submittals strengths & weaknesses in the eyes of the evaluators and improve your ability to compete for the next solicitation.

We have concerns with the fairness of the process, whom should we tell?Please contact the procurement professional listed in the solicitation document or the Chief Contracting Officer at UWF. Our experience has been that most firms who debriefed with us may have left disappointed in the outcome but did not feel they were treated unfairly by the process.Slide21

Questions