Sarah Loquist SCAESIC 618 General Counsel Panel Members Dr Christy Skelton SCAESIC 618 Assistant Director David Jennings USD 266 Principal Mike Lowers CKCIE Director Curtis Stevens USD 305 Principal ID: 786896
Download The PPT/PDF document "Lessons Learned from Due Process" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Lessons Learned from Due Process
Sarah Loquist,
SCAESIC #618 General Counsel
Panel Members:
Dr. Christy Skelton, SCAESIC #618 Assistant Director
David Jennings, USD 266 Principal
Mike Lowers, CKCIE Director
Curtis Stevens, USD 305 Principal
Slide2Spotting the Iceberg Before Impact
Slide3Grieving the Loss
Shock, disbelief, anxiety, fear, despair
Similar to trauma of a death
Disappointment
Feel alone and isolated
Incomprehensible disparity
Grieve dreams for lost child
expected
Slide4Denial of Disability
Denial
Anger
Fear
Guilt
Confusion
Powerlessness
Disappointment
Rejection
Center
for Parent Information and Resources (10-6-16). You are not alone: For parents when they learn their child has a disability, Newark, NJ, McGill Smith, P.
Slide5Conflict with Staff
Slide6Student-Based Decision Making
Losing
Ground by Conceding
Parent Refusal to
Agree
Keep Team Focused on Needs of the Student
Slide7Try Breaking the Ice
Slide8Compromises that KeepFAPE & LRE Intact
Use
your staffing meetings for strategic planning
What compromises can you offer the parents that will not impair FAPE for the student
?
FAPE means
special education
&
related services that—
Are
provided at public expense, under public supervision and direction,
&
without charge;
Meet
the standards of the
SEA;
Include
an appropriate preschool, elementary school, or secondary school
education;
and
Are
provided in conformity with an individualized education program (IEP) that meets the requirements of §§ 300.320
through 300.324
.
LRE means
(
i
) To the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities, including children in public or private institutions or other care facilities, are educated with children who are nondisabled;
and (ii
) Special classes, separate schooling, or other removal of children with disabilities from the regular educational environment occurs only if the nature or severity of the disability is such that education in regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily.
Slide9Compromises that KeepFAPE & LRE Intact
Evaluations – Can be helpful when parents want additional services, typically costs much less to do evaluation than to fight
Use of Outside Evaluators – May be useful with parents who do not trust school personnel
Independent
Educational Evaluation – 34 C.F.R. §
300.502
Parents only get 1 each time the agency conducts evaluation with which parents disagrees
Either provide IEE or file due process to defend your evaluation
Parent-initiated evaluation: Have to consider
Slide10Appeasing the Parent & Potential Impact
Pros
Avoids conflict
Everyone happy
Cons
Appeasement can’t continue forever
Runs risk that student won’t receive FAPE
How
will staff answer to this on
the witness
stand
in due process or
in a
formal complaint
response?
Focus must remain on the student’s needs
Slide11Requests for Private Placement
34 C.F.R. §
300.325 – Placement by School
Before private school placement, must have IEP meeting
Must have rep from private school present
After placement, IEP meetings can be called and held by private school at discretion of school district, but school district remains liable for compliance
Slide12Requests for Private Placement
34 C.F.R. §
300.148 – Placement by parents
If disagree re FAPE, parents can seek reimbursement through due process if HO finds that FAPE was not made available & that private school placement is appropriate
Reimbursement can be reduced or denied if (1) parents did not reject school placement at most recent IEP meeting; OR (2) did not give written notice of intent to remove student at lest 10 business days in advance; OR (3) school gave notice of intent to evaluate & parent did not make child available; OR (4) there is a judicial finding of unreasonableness re parent’s actions.
Slide13Sounding the Alarm! When Impact
Can’t Be Avoided
Slide14Mediation
Can be utilized at any time – not just after due process has been
filed
Usually win-win
Not
cost prohibitive with
staff, money, or
resources
Provided free of charge by the state
Often more effective because neutral third party who understands the law is explaining offers to the
parents
34 C.F.R. § 300.506
Slide15Resolution – 34 C.F.R. § 300.510
Required by
statute – within 15 days of complaint
Delays start of the 45 day due process time period
Can be used to reach agreement and avoid hearing, but often not effective due to trust
issues
Often requires participation of entire IEP team
Resolution can be waived by agreement of BOTH parties or can agree to use mediation instead
Still need to develop a written settlement agreement
District attorney CANNOT attend unless parent attorney attends so you will need to work with attorney in advance or by phone/email during meeting to come up with settlement agreement
Remember – agreement can be voided within 3 business days by either party per regulation
Include dismissal of due process case as part of agreement!
Slide16Due Process
Can be filed by either party, but most frequently filed by parents
Have to send letter with list of hearing officers within 5 business days
Sufficiency of complaint – if contested, must notify HO and other party within 15 days of receipt
LEA Response to Due Process Complaint – unless LEA has already sent a prior written notice on the issues raised in the complaint, must submit response to parents & HO within 10 days of receipt of complaint
HO usually not appointed yet. Send copy after appointment.
Slide17Due Process
By statute, to be completed within 45 days, but can be extended by hearing officer for good cause (except for expedited hearings which must be completed within 20 days) – usually extended
Can be very costly
District has to pay for hearing officer and for transcripts for hearing officer & parents
HO has 10 days after close of hearing to issue decision – usually won’t close hearing until after receive proposed findings of fact & conclusions of law
Slide18Due Process
After HO decision, either party can appeal to state review officer by filing notice of appeal within 30 days with commissioner of education. KSA 72-974(b). Appeal is based upon the record. Very rare that additional evidence is allowed.
State review officer’s decision can be appealed to state district court or federal district court. Special education case law is federal so federal court is best.
Student remains in stay-put pending appeal unless parties agree otherwise.
Slide19Formal State Complaint
Instead of filing for due process, parents can file an administrative formal complaint with the state
State Department of Education assigns investigator
Submit response with documentation
Investigator issues
decision
If found to be out of compliance, corrective action is
ordered
Can
stipulate to some/all issues and offer self-created corrective actions
Slide20Office for Civil Rights Complaint
Another administrative remedy available to parents which does not cost them anything
Although OCR does not have jurisdiction over IDEA issues, OCR will often use Section 504 to pursue the issue instead
While there is no cost to parents, this will involve substantial time and resources on behalf of the district. Call your friendly KASB attorney for assistance if you get one of these!
Slide21Sailing Your Lifeboat to Dry Land: Starting Over Again
Slide22Rebuilding Your Ship
Can’t
hold parent actions against student
Must remain professional with parent
Consider reassigning staff members who have difficulty maintaining professional relationship with
parents
If student is at or near a natural change, such as moving to a new grade level, consider assigning new staff members to positions for which the parents have held the most animosity
If you do this, make your choices wisely. Do NOT assign a brand new staff member to work with difficult parents unless you want to run the staff member off.
Slide23Questions???
Sarah
Loquist –
sloquist
@sped618.org
THANK YOU FOR COMING!!!