PPT-RPKI Validation - Revisited

drafthustonrpkivalidation01txt Geoff Huston George Michaelson APNIC Slide 1 19 Motivation The current model of validation when applied to the RIR model of resource distribution has lead us to an intricate system of multiple certificates with complex transitional states with a high degree of fragility. The Diverse Learning Environments Survey. Sylvia Hurtado, Ph.D.. Marcela Cuellar. Chelsea Guillermo-Wann. Paolo Velasco. May 31, 2010. Association for Institutional Research. Chicago, IL. A project funded by the Ford Foundation. IFREMER, NERSC, NIERSC, ODL, NAVTOR, NERC. 4 Tasks, 2 Deliverables. T5.1: Validation of remote sensing products. IFREMER, NERSC, NIERSC, ODL. Months 13-24. T5.2: Validation of the wave model. IFREMER. May 19, 2005. Stephen Tuttle (RSG), Jeff Frkonja (Portland Metro),. Jack Klodzinski (FTE), Lihe Wang (FTE). Presentation Overview. ELTOD Model. Purpose. Structure. Validation Effort. Validation Data and Targets. (GMSV TAG) in SEISM Project. SCEC Software Environment for Integrated Seismic Modeling (SEISM) Project Coordination Call. Nicolas . Luco. USGS (Golden, CO). Validation . not . Verification. Verification = comparison against theoretical . The Development of Essential Practice. Richard B. Rood. University of Michigan. Wunderground.com. NOAA, ESRL, 29 February 2012. Deep Background. As a manager at NASA . I felt a responsibility to deliver a series of model products addressing a specific set of scientific capabilities, on time, on budget.. Operational Material. Outline. Topics to be covered. Uses of MORES. Intra-country validation. Regional validation. Global validation. Countries. Regional Coordinators. Global Office. Edit Checks. Consistency. Patricia Hanson, Biological Administrator I. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Food Safety Microbiology Laboratory. Introduction. 17 years in the microbiology section of the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Food Laboratory. Week 6. Agenda. 5:30 . – . Team . Stand Up. 5:45 . – Validation. 6. :20 – Activities: Validation & Business Plans. 7:25 . – . Review Assignment. Objectives. Validate Problem / Solution fit. Expert Group Meeting on National Accounts in the Caribbean. 26-28 September . 2011. Port of Spain. Outline. Intra-country Validation. Regional Validation. Global Validation. 2. Countries. Regional Coordinators. A “Two Steps” easy to follow guide, prepared by the ICP Regional Team for Western Asia Region. 1. 1-The Intra-country Validation. Devised specifically for the Machinery and equipment survey questionnaire. . A Tool for Teams. GALA Leadership Symposium. October 11, 2013. Presenter: Mindy Taylor. Session Overview. Become familiar with a group process tool called Consensus Validation. Learn the steps in doing Consensus Validation. The Development of Essential Practice. Richard B. Rood. University of Michigan. Wunderground.com. NOAA, ESRL, 29 February 2012. Deep Background. As a manager at NASA . I felt a responsibility to deliver a series of model products addressing a specific set of scientific capabilities, on time, on budget.. Focused Group Training – H2020 Legal & Financial issues. Ankara 10 November 2017. Vangelis Argoudelis / FORTH. Eligibility for funding. Status of United Kingdom (UK)? . 3. rd. countries (= not EU Member States). Job . Snijders. NTT Communications. job@ntt.net. This presentation contains projections and other forward-looking statements regarding future events or our future routing performance. All statements other than present and historical facts and conditions contained in this release, including any statements regarding our future results of operations and routing positions, business strategy, plans and our objectives for future operations, are forward-looking statements (within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). These statements are only predictions and reflect our current beliefs and expectations with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risk and uncertainties and subject to change at any time. We operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time. Given these risks and uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual events or results may differ materially from those contained in the projections or forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained herein include, without limitation: (.