PPT-Routing Security Roadmap

Job Snijders NTT Communications jobnttnet This presentation contains projections and other forwardlooking statements regarding future events or our future routing performance All statements other than present and historical facts and conditions contained in this release including any statements regarding our future results of operations and routing positions business strategy plans and our objectives for future operations are forwardlooking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended These statements are only predictions and reflect our current beliefs and expectations with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risk and uncertainties and subject to change at any time We operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment New risks emerge from time to time Given these risks and uncertainties you should not place undue reliance on these forwardlooking statements Actual events or results may differ materially from those contained in the projections or forwardlooking statements Some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forwardlooking statements contained herein include without limitation . Attacks & Countermeasures. Chris Karlof & David Wagner, UC Berkeley. 1. st. IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols & Applications 11 May 2003. Report by Jim Gaskell. CS 577, Prof Kinicki, Fall '11. Aaron Johnson. U.S. Naval Research Laboratory. DC-Area Anonymity, Privacy, and Security Seminar. Onion Routing. u. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. d. User . u. running client. Internet destination . d. Onion routing relays. 1. Outline. IPsec. Security in Routing. DDoS at Network Layer and IP Traceback. IPv6 Security. 2. Network Layer: IP Security Overview. RFC 1636: “Security in the Internet Architecture”. Issued in 1994 by the Internet Architecture Board (IAB). Deployment. Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?. 1. Robert Lychev Sharon Goldberg Michael . Schapira. Georgia . Tech. Boston University. Boston University. Hebrew University. General Theme. 2. Many widely used communication protocols on the Internet were not originally designed with security considerations in mind. In Final Exam. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). What is XSS?. A vulnerability in Web applications that lets attackers inject client-side scripts into third-party Web pages. Browsers of other visitors of compromised Web page run the script – expose any data browser handles. 1. Outline. IPsec. Security in Routing. DDoS at Network Layer and IP Traceback. IPv6 Security. 2. Network Layer: IP Security Overview. RFC 1636: “Security in the Internet Architecture”. Issued in 1994 by the Internet Architecture Board (IAB). IS-IS Routing Attacks. Supervisor. Gabi Nakibly, Ph.D.. Students. Bar Weiner, Asaf Mor. Spring . 2012. Project Description. In this project we found exploits in the IS-IS routing protocol that will allow attackers to disrupt the normal behavior of any AS running this protocol.. Arun. . Venkataramani. Univ. Massachusetts Amherst. arun@cs.umass.edu. Architecture: . Design Goals. Host + network mobility. No global root of trust. Intentional data receipt. Byzantine robustness. Routing Distance Vector (DV) Routing Sets up minimum distance routes to all nodes in a network Routing tables created at each node with following fields: The core algorithm is based on ‘ Bellman Ford shortest path algorithm Geoff Huston. APNIC. The Internet’s routing system works by rumour. “I tell you what I know, and you tell your mates, and your mates tell their mates, and …”. But what if I tell you a lie? . Or someone maliciously alters what I’m trying to tell you?. Moustafa. . elansary.mam@gmail.com. . Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Egypt. . 24 . March 2016 | RIPE NCC / . MENOG 16. MSR. : A Multipath Secure Reliable Routing Protocol for WSNs. Robert Marcoux. 01/13/2013. Science DMZ Requirements. The Science DMZ Model addresses several key issues in data intensive science, including:. Reducing or eliminating the packet loss that causes poor TCP performance. Ravi . Ravindran and Asit Chakraborti. Huawei. (IETF/ICNRG, Yokohama, 94). [ravi.ravindran@huawei.com]. [asit.chakraborti@huawei.com]. Agenda. Draft Objectives. Terminology. Why ID/Locator Split in CCN. Trainer: [Name]. Overview of this module. Building on the results of the previous group . work. Examples of NAP coordination structures from other countries . Examples of NAP roadmaps from other countries.