/
Why Streetcars are Wrong Why Streetcars are Wrong

Why Streetcars are Wrong - PowerPoint Presentation

blackwidownissan
blackwidownissan . @blackwidownissan
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2020-06-25

Why Streetcars are Wrong - PPT Presentation

For Columbia Pike Arlingtonians for Sensible Transit Supporter Meeting May 2 2013 INTRODUCTION Streetcar Cost Up 158 Percent Since 2005 Despite Eliminating Stops and Other Cost Elements From the Project ID: 786614

streetcar 000 capacity streetcars 000 streetcar streetcars capacity development passengers seats portland bus pike buses increase economic transit total

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Why Streetcars are Wrong" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Why Streetcars are WrongFor Columbia Pike

Arlingtonians

for Sensible Transit

Supporter Meeting

May 2, 2013

Slide2

INTRODUCTION

Slide3

Streetcar Cost Up 158 Percent Since 2005, Despite Eliminating Stops and Other Cost Elements From the Project

Slide4

Dulles Rail Costs

286 Percent Increase

Slide5

Norfolk Tide

56.5 Percent Increase

Slide6

The Black Hole in The Financing Plan$137.94 – $230.24 Million

Slide7

Slide8

Streetcars Have Greater Capacity

Slide9

Board and staff have repeatedly asserted that the modified streetcar has more capacity than buses. This is not true. Arlington’s own study for Columbia Pike (2005 alternatives analysis) found that, as compared with modified streetcar, BRT would: have greater overall capacity than streetcars22,490 daily passengers versus 19,860

“be a more efficient investment”

“carry more passengers per unit of capital and operating expense”

The Board is Wrong About Capacity

Slide10

Articulated Buses Have More Capacity and More Seats for Passengers

Vehicle

Capacity Per Vehicle

Seats Per Vehicle

Number of Vehicles Every 6 minutes

Total Capacity

Every 6 Minutes

Total Seats Every 6 minutes

Streetcar

United Streetcar 100 (Portland)

140

29

1*

140

29

Skoda-

Inekon

10T (Portland)

157

30

1

157

30

Artic

.

Bus

New

Flyer (Cleveland)

100

47

2**

200

94

Wright RTV (Las Vegas)

104

44

2

208

88

New Flyer (Cleveland)

100

47

3

300

141

Wright RTV (Las Vegas)

104

44

3

312

132

*Based on the County’s operational plan of 10 streetcars per peak hour

** Standard-size

b

uses currently operate with

2-3 minute frequencies on the Pike

Slide11

Articulated Buses Have More Capacity and More Seats for Passengers

Total Capacity Every 6 Minutes

32.5% increase

193% more seats

99% increase

340% more seats

Slide12

Buses Offer a Huge Increase in Daily Peak Passengers and Seats

Slide13

Many Bus Routes Exceed 30,000 Average Weekday Passengers, Some Without Dedicated Lanes

City

Bus Route

Average Weekday

Boardings

New York

M15Lcl/SBS

51,461

B46

48,197

Bx12lcl/SBS

47,087

B6

42,274

Chicago

79th

31,904

9

Ashland

30,816

San Francisco

38 Geary

33,003

Los Angeles

720

41,384

Sources:

NY MTA; LA Metro; Chicago Transit Authority; SF Muni

Slide14

Most US streetcar systems do not come close to 30,000 weekday passengers

City

Average Weekday

Boardings

Portland

11,200

New Orleans (St. Charles Line)

9,300

Seattle South Lake Union

2,812

Tacoma Link

3,870

Tucson Modern Street Car (Forecast 2013)

3,600

Tampa

900

Sources: Portland TRIMET; Seattle Streetcar; Sound Transit; Federal Transit Administration; New Orleans

RTA; TECO Streetcar

Slide15

Many Bus Routes Exceed Arlington’s Target of 30,000 Daily Passengers, Not So With Streetcars

Arlington’s Target for the Year 2030

Slide16

Streetcars Are Necessary for Economic Development

Slide17

Contrary to County assertions:There is no direct causal link between streetcars and economic developmentArlington developers have not expressed a preference for streetcars on the PikeMixed use, walkable development can be supported just as well with bus systems

The County is Wrong About Economic Development

Slide18

Portland Development Commission:“it is difficult to single out the streetcar as a key factor in the downtown’s success”Other major initiatives contributed to success around Portland streetcar routes, including:extensive streetscape and facade improvements

substantial allowable density

parking regulations

strong design guidelines and review

land write-downs

subsidies for affordable housing

economic development grants and loans

free rides on the pre-existing transit system

In other words, denser development likely occurred in Portland “irrespective of the streetcar.”

National Academies, Transportation Research Board,

Relationship Between Streetcars and the Built Environment

No Causal Link Between Streetcars and Economic Development

Slide19

Columbia Pike InitiativePike Neighborhoods Plan

Form based code

Strong developer demand

1,000 housing units and 200,000

sf

commercial added since 2008

Many public investments

Streetscape improvements

Public buildings (Arlington Mill)

Undergrounding electrical utilities

New sewer, water, and gas lines

Improved bus service

Super Stops

Replacement of the Washington Boulevard bridge

Financial Incentives

Tax Increment Public Infrastructure Fund

Partial Tax Exemptions

Loans

Columbia Pike Has Many Of The Same Conditions, Regardless Of The Streetcar

Slide20

County survey of developers64% responded that existing buses on Columbia Pike are either “very important” or “important” to their development plans60% responded that the streetcar is either “very important” or “important” to their development plans.

Streetcars Not Preferred by Arlington Developers

Slide21

Density tripled without a streetcar5 new residential buildings195,000 sf office building42,000 sf

retail

Fits County’s vision for a mixed use,

walkable

community

Served only by bus (

Shirlington

Station)

Shirlington

Slide22

Cleveland

Roughly $6 billion total projects associated with the

Healthline

BRT as of 2012

Winner, ULI Award for Excellence 2011

Source: Urban Land Institute

Slide23

Since 1997Roughly $650 million invested in corridor1950 new and renovated housing units

900 affordable

62 new business openings

Tax base grew 247%

City-wide average 146%

Winner of 2005 Great American Main Street Award by the National Trust for Historic Preservation

Boston Silver

Line, Washington

Street

Source: Boston Redevelopment Authority

Slide24

York Region (Toronto)

Downtown Markham

243 acre, master-planned community

3.4 million

sf

commercial

2 million

sf

retail and dining

10,000 luxury town homes and condos

200 room hotel

Largest collection of LEED buildings in North America

Main street open only to buses and pedestrians

Source: The Remington Group

Slide25

Other Myths

Slide26

How You Can Help

Slide27

ARLINGTONIANS FOR SENSIBLE TRANSITDRAFT BUDGET – 2013

Note: Donations to AST are not tax deductible.

BUDGET ITEM

COST

NOTES

Web Support

$10,000

Part Time Webmaster (maintain web site, coordinate supporter communications)

Media

$10,000

Newspaper and Web Ads

Office Supplies

$4,000

Flyers, Handouts

Research

$4,000

Summer Interns

Meeting Rooms

$1,000

Supporter Meetings

TOTAL

$29,000

 

(Raised to Date)

($11,000)

(100% individuals; none from organizations

CURRENT NEED

$18,000