/
Expanded Gambling in Georgia: Expanded Gambling in Georgia:

Expanded Gambling in Georgia: - PowerPoint Presentation

briana-ranney
briana-ranney . @briana-ranney
Follow
375 views
Uploaded On 2016-08-16

Expanded Gambling in Georgia: - PPT Presentation

Social and Economic Impacts to Consider Public Hearing Comments Atlanta GA 10 December 2015 Douglas M Walker PhD Professor of Economics College of Charleston Charleston SC USA About me ID: 449269

economic gambling casinos tax gambling economic tax casinos taxes revenues social industry casino costs potential research market benefits state

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Expanded Gambling in Georgia:" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Expanded Gambling in Georgia: Social and Economic Impacts to ConsiderPublic Hearing CommentsAtlanta, GA10 December 2015

Douglas M. Walker, Ph.D.

Professor of Economics

College of Charleston

Charleston, SC, USASlide2

About meProfessional BackgroundCollege of Charleston (2007-present)Georgia College (1998-2007)Research on socio-economic impacts of gambling2 booksMore than 50 journal articles and book chapters

Consultant for state government agencies, including

Florida Legislature

Maryland State Lottery and Gaming Control AgencyMassachusetts Gaming CommissionMissouri Office of the Attorney General…and various research agencies and industry groups

2Slide3

Interest in GeorgiaGeorgia resident for 9 yearsGA casino expansion would represent large expansion in SE, and could affect politics in South CarolinaInteresting perspectives, outdated research cited during Savannah meeting in Nov.

3Slide4

1 Economic perspective on gamblingEveryone has a perspective, or bias… Economics focuses on voluntary, mutually beneficial transactionsConsumers are sovereign and rational‘Gambling’ is putting something of value at risk on the outcome of an uncertain event

Enjoyable and entertaining to some people, not to others

Since the expected value of all casino bets, lotteries, etc., is negative, gambling must provide entertainment value

Psychologists generally view the issues from the perspective of minimizing potential harms from expanded gambling…

4Slide5

Disordered gamblingResearch suggests that 0.4 – 2.0% of the adult population has a gambling disorderNot ‘rational’ – inability to control behaviorSuffer financial stress, problems with family, friends, career‘Social costs’ are attributed to pathological gamblers

Common view that ‘vice

’ goods with potential for addiction should

be regulatedGov’t role to protect vulnerable populationsGambling is viewed differently from ice cream, shoes, etc.

5Slide6

2 Economic benefitsMeasurable benefits include:Tax revenues Employment & wagesEconomic growth/developmentLess-measurable benefits:

Consumer benefits

More entertainment firms competing => lower prices

Higher quality ‘entertainment’ optionsIncreased variety‘Counterfactual’ is important What industry might have otherwise expanded?

6Slide7

Tax revenuesTaxes are technically transfers of wealthTax revenues are the primary reason for legalization in the U.S.Tax rates on GGR range from 6% to over 60%

CT tribal casinos pay 25% slot revenues to state

DE tax on VLT revenue 62%

ME taxes 16% table games, 39-46% on slotsMD slots taxed at 67%; 20% on table gamesPA slots taxed at 55%Then casinos pay income taxes…Lower tax rates are likely to encourage larger capital investment

7Slide8

Tax revenues, cont.2011 study showed slightly negative effect of casino revenues on state tax revenuesBut effect is positive when tourism and economic growth effects are considered – indirect tax revenues attributable to casinos

States tax GGR at much

higher

rates (25-30% avg) than sales taxes (6% avg)1-to-1 substitution in spending => casinos increase tax revenues

Lottery ‘tax’ is about 30

%

Lottery and casinos will raise more tax revenue than either alone

8Slide9

Market saturation?Is the NE market ‘saturated’?Closure of 4 of 12 Atlantic City casinosShould a particular state care about regional saturation?Are casino companies willing to build more?

A great market test of a saturated market

Regulations may need to consider potential future competition

Discussion of lower tax rates in DE, INOther regulatory changes to help stabilize industry

9Slide10

Casino revenues in NE states10Slide11

Casino taxes paid in NE states11Slide12

12Slide13

Casino taxes & politicsTaxes from gambling (casinos + lotteries) represent < 5% of revenue in most statesGov’t allows industry to exist, enforces monopoly‘Defensive legalization’Why not keep $ at home?Gambling taxes are ‘voluntary’

‘regressivity’ question is interesting

Fiscal

stress reliefAvoid cutting spending or raising other taxes13Slide14

Employment & wagesDo casinos create new jobs or ‘cannibalize’ jobs in other industries?County-level analysis shows a positive employment effect and minor wage effect from casinosPositive impacts concentrated in entertainment & hospitality sectorsEffect size depends on county size

14Slide15

Casinos and economic growthSome markets clearly see significant economic growth due to casinosLas VegasMacaoMississippi Gulf CoastIntuition: increased economic activity is the source of economic growthImpacts in other markets not as obvious

15Slide16

Consumer benefitsRarely discussed in political debate over casinosBenefits mentioned earlierLower prices More variety Higher qualityTourism: new option for potential tourists

Entertainment isn’t tangible, but it benefits consumers

Baseball game tickets

Critics: gambling is a ‘sterile transfer of money’

16Slide17

3 Economic costs‘Industry cannibalization’Evidence that casinos harm lottery salesRelationship to other industries: ‘market competition’Little evidence of an overall negative impact on other industriesResults could be market-specificAdditional infrastructure requirements

Regulations/taxes typically require casinos to pay for

17Slide18

Net (measurable) economic impactConsidering just the economic benefitsTax revenuesEmployment & wage effectsConsumer benefitsAnd economic costsInter-industry competition

Gambling industries

Non-gambling industries

Infrastructure costsVery likely to be positive

18Slide19

4 Social costs of gamblingSocial costs are mostly attributed to pathological gamblersIncome lost from missed workCrime Corruption of public officials Divorce caused by gambling

Bankruptcy

Most ‘costs’ defy monetary measurement

But they’ve been estimated at $10,000Critics claim: Cost:Benefit ratio is 3:1But policymakers need data to help inform decisions…

19Slide20

ComorbidityMost pathological gamblers have other disordersPetry, Stinson, and Grant (2005, p. 569) find:

74.2% have alcohol use disorders

38.1% have drug use disorders

41.3% have anxiety disorders28.5% have obsessive-compulsive personality disorderHow can ‘social costs of gambling’ be measured when most

pathological gamblers have multiple disorders?

Most

social cost studies ignore this issue

Result is an exaggeration of the social costs attributable to gambling.

20Slide21

5 Casinos and crimeKey concern about casinos is the potential link to crimePathological gamblers are more likely to commit crimesCasinos attract potential victims with cash and potential criminalsEvidence is mixed, and appears to be dependent upon how ‘crime rate’ is measuredInclude or exclude ‘visitors’?

Reno studies showed areas near casinos are safer

21Slide22

6 Other concerns Other important concerns defy measurement in cost-benefit analysesCitizens may have concerns about gambling changing the cultureNIMBYMoral concerns about gamblingShould the state condone casino gambling?

What about lottery gambling?

Beer with > 5% ?

Individual freedom and the role of government in restricting industry?These are real considerations that often get ignored in the face of seemingly precise and authoritative data

22Slide23

Summary of researchGood data, ability to measure economic benefitsEmployment Wages Tax revenuesDifficult to measure consumer benefitsEconomic costs (e.g., industry cannibalization) are more difficult, but still measurable

Social costs are very difficult to measure

Research should focus on

types of harms and their prevalence – not estimating social costs in $23Slide24

Contact InformationDoug WalkerProfessor of EconomicsCollege of Charleston5 Liberty St., Rm. 427

Charleston, SC 29401

Tel: (843) 953-8192

Email: dougwalker2@gmail.comWeb: walkerd.people.cofc.edu

casinonomics.net

Casinonomics

(2013)

24