/
Mapping four decades of psychology’s disunity Mapping four decades of psychology’s disunity

Mapping four decades of psychology’s disunity - PowerPoint Presentation

briana-ranney
briana-ranney . @briana-ranney
Follow
378 views
Uploaded On 2016-03-26

Mapping four decades of psychology’s disunity - PPT Presentation

H istorical bibliometric analysis Ivan Flis PhD Candidate Utrecht University ivanflis iflisuunl In both our applied work and general scientific work psychology requires combined not parallel labors from our ID: 269641

journals research map psychology research journals psychology map variance concepts abstracts psychologists object disciplines common bibliometric science ariance theory

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Mapping four decades of psychology’s d..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Mapping four decades of psychology’s disunity

Historical bibliometric analysis

Ivan Flis

PhD

Candidate

,

Utrecht

University

@

ivanflis

i.flis@uu.nlSlide2

‘In both our

applied work and general scientific work, psychology requires combined, not parallel, labors from our two historical disciplines. In this common labor, they will almost certainly become one, with a common theory, a common method, and common recommendations for social betterment… We will come to realize that

organism and treatment are an inseparable pair and that no psychologist can dismiss one or the other as error of variance.

Because of delay in developing methodology, he [Clark Hull] said,

individual differences have played little part in behavior theory, and a ‘sizeable segment of behavioral science remains practically untouched.’ This untouched segment contains the question we really want to put to Nature, and she will never answer until our two disciplines ask it in a single voice.’

Cronbach, L. (1957).

The two disciplines of scientific psychology.

The American Journal of Psychology

,

15

(1), 72–101. Slide3

Sitting on the opposite sides of variance.

Treatment

v

ariance

as object

of researchIndividual variance as

object of researchSlide4

Did psychologists mend the schism in the following three decades?

Bibliometric

analysis of psychological journals in that period.

Do

C

ronbach’s

two disciplines exist in 1950s?Slide5

PsycINFO

>3.7

million

entries

2561 journals

Basic framework for

bibliometr

i

c analysisSlide6

Map 1950-1959

Concepts:

2489Journals: 77Abstracts: 27.912Slide7

Map 1960-1969

Concepts:

5723

Journals:

188

Abstracts:

51.588Slide8

Map 1970-1979

Concepts:

1900

Journals:

375

Abstracts:

114.639Slide9

Map 1980-1989

Concepts:

2004

Journals:

735

Abstracts:

192.515Slide10

Sitting on the opposite sides of variance.

Treatment

v

ariance

as object of

research

Individual

v

ariance

as object of researchSlide11

1960-1969

19

5

0-19

591970-197

9

1980-1989Slide12

The Go-To Science

“Curiosity is part of human nature. One of the first questions children learn to ask is ‘

why?’ As adults, we continue to wonder. Using empirical methods, psychologists apply that universal curiosity to collect and interpret research data to better understand and solve some of society’s most challenging problems.It’s difficult, if not impossible, to think of a facet of life where psychology is not involved. Psychologists

employ

the scientific method — stating the question, offering a theory and then constructing rigorous laboratory or field experiments to test the hypothesis. Psychologists apply the understanding gleaned through research to create evidence-based strategies that solve problems and improve lives.

The result is that psychological science unveils new and better ways for people to exist and thrive in a complex world.”

American

Psychological

Association

website

,

retrieved

June 2015: http://www.apa.org/action/science/index.aspxSlide13

Source/tool

criticismCan large scale

bibliometric maps be valid historical sources?If yes, can they tell us something new?Slide14

On

that pessimistic note, thank you for your attention!

@ivanflisivanflis.silvrback.com [blog]

i.flis@uu.nl