PPT-Multi Node Label Routing – A layer 2.5 routing protocol

Addressing routing scalability issues NSF Ignite Project 1 Routing protocol challenges All Routing P rotocols face S calability issues dependency on network size Flooding on information changes. EETS 8316 wireless networks. . SUBMITTED BY. . ONKAR BIWALKAR SMU ID : 39603152. Attacks & Countermeasures. Chris Karlof & David Wagner, UC Berkeley. 1. st. IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols & Applications 11 May 2003. Report by Jim Gaskell. CS 577, Prof Kinicki, Fall '11. Wireshark. Rahul. Hiran. TDTS11:Computer Networks and . Internet . Protocols. 1. Note: T. he . slides are adapted and modified based on slides from the book’s companion Web site, as well as modified slides by . WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS: A . SURVEY. Presented By: . Abbas. . Kazerouni. EE 360 paper presentation, winter 2014,. EE Department, Stanford University. JAMAL N. AL-KARAKI. , . AHMED E. . KAMAL, 2004. VANETs. SAMEERA SIDDIQUI. PhD STUDENT. UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA. 0. Introduction . Problems in Routing Procedures. Classification Of Routing Protocols. Taxonomy of Previous Literature. Objective of the Project. CSE 40814/60814. Spring 2017. Infrastructure Networks. Devices on the network all communicate through a single . access . point: . a device that allows wireless devices to connect to a wired network using Wi-Fi. Niloy. . Ganguly. . IIT Kharagpur. . . Broad Topics. The Network Layer. Design Issues in the Network Layer. Routing Algorithms. Network Layer in the Internet. 2. Reference Models. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: . A. A. A. A. A. Application of the Week: Games / Art. Uncountable possibilities, below, e.g., a beer coaster that can interact with other coasters…. 19. Network Layer . (Routing Algorithms). slides are modified from . J. Kurose & K. Ross. University of Nevada – Reno. Computer Science & Engineering Department. Fall . 2011. CPE 400 / 600. Broch. et al. Presented by Brian Card. 1. Outline. Introduction. NS enhancements. Protocols:. DSDV. TORA. DRS. AODV. Evaluation. Conclusions. 2. 3. Node1. Node2. Node3. Node4. Introduction. 4. Node1. A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols MOBICOM 1998 Dallas, Texas Josh Broch , David Maltz , David Johnson, Yih -Chun Hu and Jorjeta Jetcheva Computer Simon S. Lam. The University of Texas at Austin. (Based on joint work with Chen . Qian. ). Keynote, IEEE ICNP, October 31, 2012. Multi-hop DT (Simon S. . Lam. ). 2. Delaunay triangulation (DT)?. A set of point in 2D. Spring 2018. Infrastructure Networks. Devices on the network all communicate through a single . access point: . a device that allows wireless devices to connect to a wired network using Wi-Fi. Problem:. (. 18ISCNPCWN). Dr. N. Sandeep Varma. Routing in Ad Ho Networks – Ad Hoc Environment. Dynamically . changing topology; . Absence . of fixed infrastructure and centralized administration. ;. Bandwidth .