Ethnicity Learning Objectives Identify and explain two sides of the argument regarding the criminality of ethnic minorities Origins In the 19 th Century the Irish were considered a dangerous class first links between crime and racial groups ID: 579981
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Patterns of Crime #1" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Patterns of Crime #1
EthnicitySlide2
Learning Objectives
Identify and explain two sides of the argument regarding the criminality of ethnic minorities.Slide3
Origins
In the 19
th
Century, the Irish were considered a ‘dangerous class’ – first links between crime and racial groups
.
The debate over the nature of the link between ethnicity and crime is still going strong...Slide4
Activity: Small Groups
Study the handout and answer the questions provided...
...Discuss the findings.Slide5
Patterns of Criminality
In 2004-5…
Black ethnic groups = 2.8% of the UK population, and
13.5% of the prison population
.
Asian ethnic groups = 4.7% of the population, and 5.4% of the prison population.
White ethnic groups under-represented
.
This leads to two possible conclusions:
Some ethnic minorities are more criminal than others.
The criminality of some ethnic minorities is exaggerated/misrepresented by the statistics.Slide6
ARGUMENT #1:
Ethnic Minorities are more criminal...Slide7
The Immigrant-Host Model
(Park, 1950)
Conflict between immigrant populations and host populations is due to a conflict of values and norms
e.g. East European immigrants drinking and driving.
According to functionalist theorists, this problem is temporary; it disappears once the immigrant population is fully integrated.
Does this mean immigrants
should
lose their own distinctive norms and values?Slide8
Small Groups (Discuss)
How do we fully assimilate immigrant populations into the UK, to avoid major conflicts like Islamic terrorism?
What sort of things would you consider to be ‘UK Culture’?Slide9
Discuss
Can we expect immigrants to accept a culture whose norms include binge drinking, violence and teenage pregnancy?
Are the immigrants really the problem, or is it racism in the UK that’s to blame?Slide10
1. It’s Really The Case
Capitalism generates racism, which generates crime.
Ethnic minorities are used as cheap labour; capitalists use racism to justify low wages etc.
(Castles &
Kosack
; 1973)
White working-classes blame ethnic minorities for unemployment etc. –
they
‘other’
them.
This makes minorities more likely to be victims, but also…Slide11
1. It’s Really The Case
…During economic slumps, the ethnic minority workers are first to be made
redundant
.
They thus turn to crime (drug dealing, prostitution etc) to generate income.
(This explanation supports Marxist perspective & Left
Realist ideas of relative
deprivation)Slide12
1. It’s Really The Case
Much ethnic minority crime is a reaction against racism
.
E.g. Asian crime is increasing, due to Asian males standing up for their communities and families in ways previous generations were afraid to (Desai; 1999
).
Islamophobia
may make Asian crime and violence worse (
Abbas
; 2005
).
How?Slide13
ARGUMENT #2
Ethnic Minority crime is misrepresented/distorted.Slide14
2. misrepresented
Ethnic minorities may be treated differently by the criminal justice system (e.g. Macpherson Inquiry, 1999 – re: Stephen Lawrence).
If this is the case, evidence of their criminality (and victimisation) is distorted/misrepresented.
In small groups, read through the handouts provided: What evidence is presented that ethnic minorities were mistreated (or differently treated)?Slide15
2. misrepresented
Ethnic minority groups might be more likely to be labelled as criminal to suit the needs of capitalist societies.
This exaggerates their criminality and distorts public perceptions.
What major study that we have already covered demonstrates this?Slide16
2. MISREPRESENTATION
Ethnic neighbourhoods can be over-policed, and police more militant (Phillips & Bowling; 2002)
Courts tend to give black men more – and longer - custodial sentences than white men for the same offences (Hood; 1992).Slide17
The Black Criminality ‘Myth’
Gilroy (1983)
:
British
Asians and African
Caribbeans
have historically learned to
resist
exploitation through their struggles against British Imperialism. Riots/demonstrations show them still resisting society, while black criminality is created through negative stereotyping and prejudice from the police.Slide18
The Black Criminality ‘Myth’
Lea & Young (1984)
disagree with Gilroy, as
:
Most crimes are reported by the public
.
Crime rate for Asian groups
is significantly
lower than for
African-
Caribbeans
.
Statistics show that first-generation immigrants were law-abiding
.
Police may exaggerate the ethnic crime rate, but it has increased nonetheless.Slide19
Individual Written Task
Consider both sides of the argument and write your own conclusion (single paragraph), identifying which side you find most convincing and why.Slide20
Learning Objectives
Identify
and explain two sides of the argument regarding the criminality of ethnic minorities.Slide21
Race & Victimisation
Ethnic minorities are more likely to be victims of crime than whites.
Clancy et al (2001) argues this difference can be explained in terms of social factors e.g. higher rates of unemployment within ethnic minorities.
The BCS shows that ethnic minorities have an increasing fear of crime. This could be linked to them losing faith in the criminal justice system.Slide22
Patterns of Crime #2
AgeSlide23
Age & Crime
In
England/Wales, 20% of offenders aged 10-17 and around 35% under 21 (
Newburn
, 2007
)
Peak offending ages for males are
14
(property crime)
,
16
(violent crime)
and
17
(serious offences)
. For females,
15
(serious/property)
and
16
(violent
).
(
Graham & Bowling, 1995)Slide24
Discuss
What sociological explanations have we already covered regarding why young people commit such a proportion of crime.Slide25
Relevant Sociological Theories Already Covered
Hirschi
(Bonds of Attachment/Social Control)
Matza
(Drift/Subterranean Values)Moral Panics (S. Cohen)
All the
subcultural
theories
(A. Cohen,
Cloward
& Ohlin, CCCS etc).
?Slide26
Youth Offending
Crimes such as arson are
rites of passage
; young people
’
s way of symbolically destroying adult power... (Presdee; 2004)Slide27
‘
Youth Crime
’
–
A Real Problem?The statistics ignore white collar/corporate crime, which young people tend not to be involved in.
Findings from self-report studies may not be valid
.
Fears about youth crime are often exaggerated in the media through
moral panics
.Slide28
Patterns of Crime #3
LocationSlide29
Discuss
What areas seem to have little or no crime?
What areas would you consider to be ‘high crime’?Slide30
Locality & Crime
Shaw
& McKay (1942); divided city into five concentric circles
–
linked offending to areas of
social disorganization: Places with high population turnover, poverty and poor housing
.
Non-conformist values
in these areas passed on through generations via socialisation.Slide31Slide32
Apply the concentric zone model to your own town.
Identify whether or not the ‘high-crime’ areas fit the model (use police.uk to check).
ActivitySlide33
Criticisms
Shaw & McKay don
’
t acknowledge that offences within the high-crime zones might be committed by people living outside them
(Bottoms; 2007)
Their model, based on Chicago, doesn
’
t really fit in with how most modern European cities are planned.
Wilkstrom
(1991) identified highest crime rates in city centres, poor areas and rich areas that are right next to poor areas.Slide34
Felson (2002)
Opportunity
Theory
–
crime rates relate to opportunity e.g. thieves prefer portable items, value items and items that are easy to steal without witnesses
.Slide35
Baldwin & Bottoms (1976)
Described
process of ‘tipping
’.
Antisocial behaviour develops in an area; those who can, leave – those who can’t, or who are linked to the behaviour remain. Informal controls break down – the area is ‘tipped
’.
What theory is this reminiscent of?Slide36
Sampson (1997)
Violent crime occurs when a community cannot achieve its objectives and is unable to build trust or agree on how to intervene when order is under threat.Slide37
Identify
‘
Socio-spatial criminology
’
– examines links between where offenders live and where offences happen.
Identify...
Three ways in which where an
offender
lives might influence the location in which he/she commits offences...Slide38
Other Studies
…
On average, burglars travel two miles to commit an offence
(Wiles & Costello; 2000
).
Offenders most likely to commit crimes in areas that they are
cognitively familiar
(e.g. where they work, live, play
–
and all the routes that link these places).
(
Brantingham
&
Brantingham
; 1991)Slide39
Felson (2006...again)
Routine Action Theory
–
Crimes occur where suitable targets are close to offenders. Offenders usually commit crimes close to where they live or spend time.
Routine Activities also increase likelihood of being victims: If you go drinking in Daventry town centre three nights a week, your chances of being a victim go up.Slide40
Patterns of Crime #4
Social ClassSlide41
Social Class & Crime
Crime is particularly common in the underclass (Murray; 1989)
Official statistics support the view that crime is concentrated in the working classes, but many believe these are unrepresentative.Slide42
Social Class & Crime
Those from lower class backgrounds may be more likely to be labelled than those from higher income backgrounds (Becker; 1963
–
supported by Cicourel).
There is
class bias in the law; values of capitalism encourage greed; crimes of the higher classes damage society more (Marxists)Slide43
Social Class & Crime
All classes commit crime, but some perspectives focus too much on crime of higher classes
–
we mustn
’
t ignore street crime (Left realists)Although crime occurs in all classes, typical working class crimes are different to typical upper/middle class crimes.