/
CESAREAN Most common major surgical procedure in the UNITED STATES:1/3 of births CESAREAN Most common major surgical procedure in the UNITED STATES:1/3 of births

CESAREAN Most common major surgical procedure in the UNITED STATES:1/3 of births - PowerPoint Presentation

cady
cady . @cady
Follow
345 views
Uploaded On 2022-06-08

CESAREAN Most common major surgical procedure in the UNITED STATES:1/3 of births - PPT Presentation

70 Of cesarean deliveries in the UNITED STATES are primary cesareansthree common indication are 1Failure to progress during labor 35 2Nonreasurring fetal status 24 3Fetal malpresentation19 ID: 915344

delivery incision transverse uterine incision delivery uterine transverse fetal skin operative prior subcutaneous cesarean infection cefazolin fetus time segment

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "CESAREAN Most common major surgical proc..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

CESAREAN

Slide2

Slide3

Most common major surgical procedure in the UNITED STATES:1/3 of births

70% Of cesarean deliveries in the UNITED STATES are primary cesareans;three common indication are:

1.Failure to progress during labor (35%)

2.Non_reasurring fetal status (24%)

3.Fetal malpresentation(19%)

Slide4

Williams:

1.Maternal

Prior cesarean delivery

Abnormal placentation

Maternal request

Prior classical hysterotomy

Unknown uterine scar type

Uterine incision dehisence

Prior full thickness myomectomy

Genital tract obstructive mass

Invasive cervical cancer

Slide5

Prmannet

cercelage

Prior

pelvc reconstructive sugery

Prior

significan perineal trauma

PELVIC DEFORMITY

Hsv OR HIV infection

CARDIAC OR PULMONARY DISease

Cerebral aneurysm or arteriovenous mlformation perimortem cesarean delivery

Slide6

Maternal Fetal

Cephalopelvic disproportion

Failed operative vaginal delivery

Placenta previa or placental abruption

Slide7

FETAL

Non reasusuring fetal status

Malpresentation

Macrosomia

Congenital anomaly

Abnormal umbilical cord duppler study

Thrombocytopenia

Prior neonatal birth trauma

Slide8

Preoperative

Planned term cesarean delivery at 39 or 40 w of

gestation

Sedative may be given at bed time the night before surgery

Solid food intake stopped at least 6 – 8 hours before surgery (uncomplicated patients moderate amount of clear liquid up to 2 hours before surgery)

Admit the day of surgery

Antacid is given shortly before the analgesia (

Bicitra

, 30ml, orally in a single dose)

Left lateral tilt

Five minute tracing of fetus. Minimum fetal heart rate sound.

Electrosurgical pad on the lateral thigh.

Intra operative

normothermia

lowes

wound infection rate

Slide9

Preoperative

Anesthesia

consultation

Baseline

Hb (one month), blood

type,antibody

screen indirect coombs

AB Prophylaxis:without AB 5-20 Fold greater greater risk of infection compared with vaginal birth/Narrow sperctrum AB within 60 min before incision such as cefazolin or ampicillin

Women<120 kg=CEFAZOLIN 2 gr (Williams 1 gr)

WOMEN>=120 kg= CEFAZOLIN 3 gr

Half life CEFAZOLIN>AMPICILLIN/Extra doses

(excessive blood loss,duration of sugery >two half lives of thec drug

CEFAZOLIN+AZITHRIMYCIN 500 mg IV=IN labor or ROM FOR AT LEAST 4 H

ALLERGY:CLINDAMYCIN 900mg+Gentamycin 5mg/kg IV

Thrombo

phylaxy

Slide10

Fetal presentation and placental location

Bladder catheterizationHair removal

Skin preparation

Vaginal preparation

Slide11

Skin

incision

Choice

of incision — 

transverse skin

incision:

a better cosmetic appearance and possibly less postoperative pain and hernia formation .

we rarely perform a vertical midline incision, we often select this approach when:

The

incision-to-delivery time is critical

A

transverse incision may not provide adequate exposure

The

patient has a bleeding diathesis and thus is at increased risk of subcutaneous or subfascial hematoma

formation

Patients with high infection risk

Neurovascular structures (

ilioinguinal

and

iliohypogastric

nerves and superficial and inferior epigastric vessels)

Obese patients

Slide12

Transverse incision

Pfannenstiel

:

common

JOEL –Cohen

Maylard

incision (rectus

andominies

transected) (inferior epigastric

arterie

)

Slide13

Pfannenstiel

Level of pubic hair line (3 cm about superior border of symphysis pubis)

12-15 cm

Sharp dissection through the subcutaneous to the fascia (superficial epigastric vessel)

Anterior abdominal

fascial

= aponeurosis external oblique muscle fused layer transverse

abdominies

+ internal oblique

Fascial

separation

cephalad

8 cm

Slide14

vertical midline incision

2 to 3 cm above the superior margin of the symphysis

12 to 15 cm

Sharp dissection through the subcutaneous layer

Extended first superiorly then inferiorly

Other stages are similar

to

Pfannenstiel

Slide15

Subcutaneous tissue

layerFascial layer

 

Rectus muscle

layer

Opening the peritoneum

Slide16

Slide17

Slide18

Slide19

Slide20

Hysterotomy

Transverse

incision

Monro Kerr or Kerr

incision

Low uterine segment vertical

 (Kronig, DeLee, or Cornell

)

classical incisions

Fundal or posterior incision (placental accrete)

The generally accepted indications for considering a vertical uterine incision are:

●Poorly developed lower uterine segment when more than normal intrauterine manipulation is anticipated (eg, extremely preterm breech presentation, back down transverse lie).

●Lower uterine segment pathology that precludes a transverse incision (eg, large leiomyoma, anterior placenta previa or accreta).

●Densely adherent bladder.

●Postmortem delivery.

●Delivery of a very large fetus (eg, anomalous, extreme macrosomia) when there is high risk of extension of a transverse incision into uterine vessels or a T or J extension may be required to extract the fetus

.

Slide21

Kerr

Easier to repair

Less incision-site bleeding

Promote less bowel or

omentum

adherence to

myometrial

incision

Less likely to rupture during subsequent pregnancy

Slide22

Slide23

Palpate the fundus to identify uterine rotation

Moist sponge

to pack protruding bowel

Peritoneal edge is elevated and incised laterally

Bladder flap shorter skin incision to delivery time

Slide24

Uterine incision

Digital palpation to find the physiological border between firmer upper segment and more flexible lower segment.

Advanced cervical dilation

hysterotomy

is higher

1 to 2 cm

Comparing blunt and sharp expansion: blunt associated with fewer unintended incision extension, shorter operative time and less blood loss.

Slide25

Delivery of the fetus

Push (dislodge)

Pull

Fetal pillow

Round head (difficult)

Encircled umbilical cord

Slide26

Slide27

20 units of oxytocin per liter (10 ml/min)

Delivery of the placenta

Slide28

Uterine repair

Uterus is lifted

One or two layers of continues 0 no. 1 absorbable suture: chromic catgut

/

Vicryl

Single layer is faster

Individual bleeding site: figure of 8 or mattress

Slide29

Scaring can be reduced by handling tissues delicately achieving hemostasis and minimizing tissue ischemia infection foreign body reaction

No benefit to peritoneal closure

No benefit of adhesion barrier

Slide30

Abdominal closure

Irrigation (greater intra operative nausea)

Muscle approximated by 0 or no. 1 Chromic figure of 8 gut

sucure

.

Overlying rectus fascia: continues nonlocking with delayed absorbable suture

Subcutaneous tissues if less than 2 cm thick need not be closed

Skin closed with 4-0 delayed

bsorbable

Slide31

Joel-Cohen and Misgav

ladach techniques

Differ from Kerr by their initial incision and greater use of blunt dissection

Joel-Cohen Technique: Straight 10 cm transverse skin incision 3 cm below the level of anterior superior iliac spine. Subcutaneous tissue is opened sharply.

Misgav

ladach

technique defers in that peritoneum is interred bluntly

Shorter operative time, less blood loss and post operative pain

Difficult

in women with adhesion or fibrosis

Slide32

Slide33

Slide34

Slide35

Slide36

Slide37

Slide38

Slide39

Slide40

Slide41

Uncomplicated cesarean delivery of fetus in cephalic presentation

Slide42

UTERINE CLOSURE

Exteriorizing the uterus