PPT-The competition Act, 2002 & Anti-competitive agreement

By Dr Subir Kumar Roy Associate Professor Department of Law amp Registrar Addl Charge Bankura University The competition Act mainly focuses upon Prohibition of anti competitive agreements. Mutually negative interaction between two species in the same guild or . trophic. level. Changes in abundance, fitness, or some fitness component (growth, feeding rate, body size, survival). Topics for today. Allan . Fels. , Professor of Government, The Australia and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG). Overview. Horizontal agreements. Cooperation, collusion, and cartels. Per se prohibitions. Other anti-competitive agreements. Case Study 25 May 2014 Page 1 of 3 * ( Anti competitive Agreements ) Forum: Competition Commission of India 1 Legislative Provisions R eferred: Competition Act, 2002 2 - 1. Section 3(3)(a) - Any ag OECD, 17 . June. 2015. Prof. . Nicolas PETIT. Outline. Conceptual framework. The State-related firm as defendant. The State-related firm as complainant. The State as “third party”. Debiasing. tools. Allan . Fels. , Professor of Government, The Australia and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG). Overview. Horizontal agreements. Cooperation, collusion, and cartels. Per se prohibitions. Other anti-competitive agreements. ACTS. - . BIRDS. OF A FEATHER. ?. by. Thula. . Kaira. . - CEO. Presentation. to the . Zambian. Anti-Corruption Commission/. DCEC. . Gaborone. Thursday, . 6. th. . June. 2013. PRESENTATION OUTLINE. (Fair Competition . F. or . G. reater . G. ood). Ranchi . 28.01.2018. Presented by. . Manoj. . Pandey. AdvisEr. (LAW) . Competition commission of . india. . Agenda for discussion. Brief Background of Competition Law in India . . development. . perspective. Tihamér Tóth, . Phd. .. The menue: coverage of EU competition law. Antitrust. Rules applicable to MSs. Anti-competitive agreements. Abuse of dominance. M & A. State aid. LEVEYECompetition in Weapon SystemAcquisitionK A Archibald A J Harman M A HesseJ R Hiller G K SmithIla T-tii IftOThe research described in this report was sponsored by the Office of the UnderSecretar ex DG, CCI. . 31.10.2014. WS for PS Reps . Yangon, Myanmar. Mergers & Acquisitions-GOs. Session V. Anticompetitive effects of mergers. Effect on businesses of anticompetitive mergers. It should be noted that there are two rules of interpretation, which are applicable in law relating to anti-competitive agreements.. The rule of Reason. The . per se . rule . Rule of Reason. It is a legal approach where an attempt is made to evaluate the pro-competition effect in order to decide whether the practice should be prohibited or not. . By Dr . Pramod. Kumar. Historical Development of Competition Law. Sherman Act, 1890. Clayton Act, 1914. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP), 1969. . The Competition Act, 2002. Sherman Act, 1890. Alice Pham. 31. . October 2014. Main prohibitions of competition laws. Competition law generally prohibits three main practices: (. i. ) . anti-competitive agreements. ; (ii) abuse of a dominant position or a monopoly; (iii) anti-competitive mergers. It can also have provisions related to unfair commercial practices.. (Fair Competition . F. or . G. reater . G. ood). Ranchi . 28.01.2018. Presented by. . Manoj. . Pandey. AdvisEr. (LAW) . Competition commission of . india. . Agenda for discussion. Brief Background of Competition Law in India .