/
Is atlantoaxial TB different? Its altered biomechanics and treatment strategies Is atlantoaxial TB different? Its altered biomechanics and treatment strategies

Is atlantoaxial TB different? Its altered biomechanics and treatment strategies - PowerPoint Presentation

caitlin
caitlin . @caitlin
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2022-06-08

Is atlantoaxial TB different? Its altered biomechanics and treatment strategies - PPT Presentation

Dr Nandan Marathe Spine Fellow Toronto Western Hospital Prof Sudhir Srivastava Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital Presenter Nandan Marathe TB in Atlantoaxial segment Unique Critical Junctional area ID: 914941

grade patients group collar patients grade collar group involvement months akt traction unstable conservative years axial follow stable iii

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Is atlantoaxial TB different? Its altere..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Is atlantoaxial TB different? Its altered biomechanics and treatment strategies

Dr. Nandan Marathe: Spine Fellow, Toronto Western HospitalProf. Sudhir Srivastava: Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital

Slide2

Presenter: Nandan

Marathe

Slide3

T.B in Atlanto-axial segment - Unique

Critical Junctional area

Inherently prone for instabilityUnique pathoanatomy

Tumbling of the heavy skull

“Hat on Hook” in spine

Slide4

Slide5

Grade

I

(Early involvement)

Grade

II

(Moderate involvement)

Grade

III

(Significant involvement)

AKT, collar , traction

AKT, collar , traction

AKT, collar , traction

Improved (stable)

Unstable

Stable

Unstable

Concentric collapse

Unstable

Continued conservative management

Operative intervention

Occipito-cervical fixation and fusion

Transarticular screw fixation and fusion

Slide6

Slide7

Slide8

Results

All 108 patients underwent a minimum follow-up of 18 months

Mean follow-up: 50.23±24.46 months (range, 18–153 months)64 males and 44 females

5 patients: lesions at multiple sites

6 cases of MDR TB

Age of patients: 4 to 60 years

40 patients being less than 18 years of age.

Slide9

Results

CONSERVATIVE GROUP

Clinically appreciable tilt = 6

Axial settling = 10

No functional disability

SURGICAL GROUP

No neurological deterioration

All 8 patients of clinical grade III - 7 ambulatory

2 patients loss of correction (occipito cervical group)

Slide10

Conclusion

Early detection/ prevention of complications: always a desirable goal

Neurological recovery is usually achieved by canal re-alignment and neural decompression

Assessment of reducibility, extent of bony destruction and meticulous planning

Sound and long lasting result in CVJ tuberculosis