PPT-Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI)

Performance Measurements Linking Quality amp Cost Eric J Weinstock MHSA CPHQ Senior Consulting Manager 1 Key Objectives This session will discuss the approaches for identifying the key populations in the BPCI in order measure results for a surgical programs key performance indicators for both Quality and Financial Reporting In addition discuss way to measure performance and the development of surgical scorecards . . Shantanu Gupta, Shuguang Feng, Amin Ansari,. Scott Mahlke, and David August. University of Michigan. (Intel, Northrup-Grumman, UIUC, Princeton). MICRO-44 December 6, 2011. 2. Status of Implementations and Operational Findings. Presentation to:. Partnership for Healthcare Payment Reform. May 22, 2012. Background and Introduction. Bailit Health Purchasing is a health care consulting firm dedicated to working with public agencies and private purchasers to expand coverage and improve health care system performance.. Michael Bailit. January 11, 2013. Questions I Plan to Address This Morning. Why payment reform, and why does it matter to employers?. What are the approaches being implemented?. Who is utilizing them nationally and in Minnesota?. 1. Being Successful Under Bundled . Payments; What . We’ve . L. earned . So Far . Models 1, 2, 3 and 4. Model 1: . inpatient . stay; discounted IPPS. Models 2 and 3: . retrospective . bundled payment arrangement; FFS with reconciliation. Clinical Assistant Professor, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth. Clinical Instructor, Tufts University School of Medicine. President, Granite . Physiatry. , PLLC, Concord, NH. The Transformers: ACO’s, Bundled Payments and Implications for Physician Practice. Quality Improvement Methods. Lecture a. This material (. Comp 10 Unit 8. ) was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award Number . Skills, Tools and Teams for Success. January . 2014. Overview . Two new frameworks. Improvement Continuum. Leadership Action Model. Four levels. Topic/microsystem. Care coordination. Defined population. Revealing the . Consequences of Bundling. M . Morris(1), R Whiting(2), S Rothenberg(1), B Saboury(1), S Boateng(1), R . Tu. (2. ) (3). (1)University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, (2)George Washington University, Washington, . Adrienne DiTommaso, MPA . Research Analyst. Jennifer Best,. Extension Educator, . Iowa State University. Extension and . Outreach, . City of Davenport . AmeriCorps. Rebecca Frazier, PhD. Gina Cardazone, PhD. Quality Improvement Methods. Lecture b. This material (. Comp 10 Unit 8. ) was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award Number . QExchange 2019. July 2019. Welcome Everyone. . . . . . . . . National Context & Approach . Suzie Bailey – Director of Leadership and OD. The King’s Fund . . July 2019. National context and approach. Healthcare-Associated Infections and More . November 10, 2011. A non-profit health quality consulting company, the federally designated Medicare Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) and the Health IT Regional Extension Center for Virginia (VHIT). . 1. Ginger Biesbrock PA-C, MPH, PA-C, AACC. Executive Vice President, Care Transformation. MedAxiom. Disclaimer. : The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) did not produce or endorse these materials nor does CMS assume responsibility for or make any guarantees of the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of any information contained herein.. Leonard D. Schaeffer Professor Health Care Policy. Harvard Medical School. February 25, 2015. Bundled Payment. Fixed payment per episode. Span site of care. Span time. Current initiatives. Public. Medicare.