/
Ch. 4 Civil Liberties Ch. 4 Civil Liberties

Ch. 4 Civil Liberties - PowerPoint Presentation

celsa-spraggs
celsa-spraggs . @celsa-spraggs
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2020-01-26

Ch. 4 Civil Liberties - PPT Presentation

Ch 4 Civil Liberties You must memorize the Bill of Rights there will be a quiz down the road National Judiciary Reading Understanding the Federal Court System Historical Overview The 14 th Amendment Reading ID: 773929

amp case amendment religious case amp religious amendment www read watch court schools school rights act cases freedom religion

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Ch. 4 Civil Liberties" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Ch. 4 Civil LibertiesYou must memorize the Bill of Rights; there will be a quiz down the road…

National Judiciary ReadingUnderstanding the Federal Court System

Historical Overview: The 14 th Amendment ReadingRead the 14 th Amendment/Section 1 of the Constitution and dissect it. Look for equal protection clause, due process clause and the definition of citizenship .Meant to strengthen the 5 th AmendmentConcerns over inclusion of blacksRead: Historical Overview: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Selective Incorporation of the Bill of RightsAnswer the questions that followhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKK5KVI9_Q8&list=PL8dPuuaLjXtOfse2ncvffeelTrqvhrz8H&index=29

Ruth Bader Video The 14th AmendmentComplete the questions as you watch the video

Civil Liberties Defined What are civil libertiesEssential ingredient for a democracyLegal and constitutional protections against the government!

Bill of Rights First enacted in 1791http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/the-story-of-the-bill-of-rights Protect basic libertiesIntended to be protection against the national government only1 st Amendment: Congress shall make no law Barron v. Baltimore : 1833-restrained national government onlyGitlow v New York : 1925: now restrains states as well under the Fourteenth AmendmentWhat words in the 14th Amendment force states to protect rights written in the Bill of Rights?Incorporation Doctrine: Started with Gitlow: Extending Bill of Rights to states is still controversial…What has not been incorporated? 3rd, 7th right to a jury trial in civil cases, grand jury indictment in misdemeanor cases in 5 th, and protection against excessive bail in 8 th … https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mp3tgW5MlPU&index=24&list=UUxuKNfL50oOfjLtUw73gmiA

Freedom of Religion Establishment Clause: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. Free exercise clause: prohibits the abridgment of citizens’ freedom to worship or not to worship as they please. Wall of Separation…what is your view? Aid to religious school: Vouchers Johnson said it is funding students not schools. What does this mean? https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8dI1GTWCk4&list=PL8dPuuaLjXtOfse2ncvffeelTrqvhrz8H&index=24

Lemon v. Kurtzman TestIn order to receive funding they must meet the following criteria:Secular purpose onlyHave primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religionNo religious entanglement/Can be spent on building, textbooks, computers, equipment, lunches, transportation/Can not be spent on field trips, teacher pay…Why?

More Cases Agostini v. Feldman: public schools can send teachers into religious schools to teach remedial programs and supplemental programs for needy children.Zelman v. Simmons-Harris: school vouchers to pay tuition Can public schools be used for religious purposes? Under what circumstances? Legally how is this possible? Equal Access Act: What does this say? What can not be done in schools? Under more scrutiny if money is used to support education…

School Prayer: Most Controversial (1962) Engel v. Vitale: no school led prayer in public schools (government is neutral in religion) Case Reading/School Prayer Debate2014 Poll: 61% support daily prayerSchool District of Abington v. Shempp : no school required Bible reading in schools Can students pray in schools? Under what circumstances? What is not allowed? How do you feel about this? What about a moment of silence?Ten Commandments displayed?

Fundamentalist Christians: What role have they played in the religion in school debate? What role do you think religion should play in schools? Why? Darwin’s Theory: Should it be taught in schools? Can it be taught? Religious Symbols: Okay as long as they have secular purpose with little or no religious benefit: nativity scenes must appear with secular (Santa Claus)

Free Exercise Clause Should have right to practice religion as you choose but becomes complicated quicklyBelieve what you want but can’t always practice…What is not protected and why? “compelling interest:” Up until 1988 states needed to have a compelling interest before a government could even indirectly limit or prohibit religious practiceEmployment Division v. Smith: State laws interfering with religious practices but not aimed at them are constitutional as long as law does not single out and ban religious practices for religious reasons.

Free Exercise Clause Government, prior to this ruling, had not allowed religious freedom to be an excuse for any and all behaviors:Polygamy: ForbiddenProhibited business activity on SundayNative American sacred ground; allowed building a roadProhibited Air Force captain from wearing a Yarmulke What is protected: Amish children and their education: Wisconsin v. Yoder Flag saluting by Jehovah’s witnesses

Religious Freedom of Restoration Act Passed by Congress to overturn Employment Division v. Smith but was overturned by the S.C. (use of peyote)Compelling interestIntrusion on states’ prerogative to regulate health and welfare of citizens.

Prior Restraint Censorship: government preventing something from being published; way to limit the press in other countries but considered violation of first amendment in U.S.Near v. Minnesota 1931: State closed down newspapers and SC ordered it re-opened! State can sue after something has been published! Read New York Times v. U.S. https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vtpd0EbaFoQ&list=PL8dPuuaLjXtOfse2ncvffeelTrqvhrz8H&index=26

Free Speech and Public Order Read Schenck v. U.S., 1919: Wendell Holmes said gov. could limit speech if it was a “clear and present danger.” (impeding the war effort) Read Cases Smith Act 1940: Against subversion and violent overthrow of the government. Used by McCarthy against communist. S.C. upheld sentences. (Changed in the 1960s/abstract overthrow permissible). Numerous organized rallies against Vietnam in 1960s that strained constitutional meaning of free speech. (burning draft cards, disruptions of the peace, building takeovers). Private property is protected! Courts today support protest, petitions…https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zeeq0qaEaLw&list=PL8dPuuaLjXtOfse2ncvffeelTrqvhrz8H&index=25

Obscenity Miller v. California 1973: Set standards for obscenity. What are they?Based on average community valuesDifficult to define lewd and offensiveChild pornography: Define?Why do women and Christian groups fight pornography?

Symbolic Speech Texas v. Johnson 1989: Flag burning at Republican National ConventionRead Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District 1969: Arm bans: S.C. says its okayDiscuss/Read

Bong Hits for Jesus Court Case Read the court case and then write either your concurring or dissenting opinion regarding this issue.

Patriotic Clothes at School? Read Case and annotateWith your partner, write an argument/claim for the Supreme Court final decision. It must be outlined as follows:Circumstances of the Case Constitutional Issues Majority Opinion (you decide the outcome) Dissenting Opinion (predict the dissenting opinion regarding your majority opinion) Use precedent and the 1 st amendment to support your claims regarding student rights

Freedom of Assembly Right to AssembleCan regulate the time, place, and mannerCan’t refuse permit based on content/messageAbortion:Demonstrators have right to protest S.C. set limits on how close demonstrators can beCan’t picket in front of physician’s home

Right to Associate NAACP v. Alabama 1958: Alabama wanted NAACP to turn over their membership listS.C. ruled it violated their 1st Amend. Right to assemble!

Search and Seizure Read Mapp v. Ohio-Exclusionary Rule-Suspected for illegal gambling activities and thought a fugitive was there; found cache of obscene material; no warrant Read Case Applied exclusionary rule to states using 14 th and 4th AmendmentReasoning: the Constitution is to protect the accused, not the guiltyRead New Jersey v. T.L.O. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4O1OlGyTuU&index=27&list=PL8dPuuaLjXtOfse2ncvffeelTrqvhrz8H

Good Faith Exception 1980s U.S. v. Leon 1984: LA police thought they had a proper warrant; wasn’t their fault1987: Maryland officers mistakenly searched the wrong apt. and found drugs. Honest mistakeCan use evidence that they obtained illegally if they would have found it anyway.Read Ms. Montoya case p. 120

Self-Incrimination p. 121 Should people be forced to testify against themselves?Should people be offered immunity for their testimony?What case protects 5th Amendment rights? What 3 rights are protected? Do you think the Miranda ruling should be overturned? What is entrapment? Give an example. Miranda v. Arizona Read Case

Gideon v. Wainwright 6th AmendmentU.S. v. Nixon: 5 th / 6 th Amendment Answer the questions as you watch the video!Consider: Should criminals have the right to an attorney provided by the state? Should plea bargaining be allowed?https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyHWRXAAgmQ&list=PL8dPuuaLjXtOfse2ncvffeelTrqvhrz8H&index=28

Death Penalty Gregg v. Georgia 1976McCleskey v. Kemp 1987

Abortion Cases Roe v. Wade: Privacy right; regulate only with “compelling interest” such as health of the motherWebster v. Reproductive Services: Court rules state funding of abortion is not required and upholds "life begins at conception" preamble Planned Parenthood v. Casey: states may regulate abortions so as to protect the health of the mother and the life of the fetus, and may outlaw abortions of "viable" fetuses (after 20 weeks). Changed standard to “undue burden” Federal Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act State Regulations/Fetal Pain Lawshttp://www.pewforum.org/2013/01/16/a-history-of-key-abortion-rulings-of-the-us-supreme-court/

U.S.A. Patriot Act Fed. Gov. has broad new powers to engage in wiretapping and surveillance when investigating terrorism suspectsCan examine a terrorist suspect’s records held by third parties such as doctors, universities, and Internet service providers.Search private property without probable cause and without notifying the owner until after the search

War on Terror U.S. Patriot Act Sept. 2001NSA: monitor international phone calls and e-mails of people inside the U.S.FISA Court: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, allows officials to use broad warrants to eavesdrop on large groups of foreign suspects and doesn’t require officials to obtain a warrant for each individuals suspect as long as they wire tap only communications to and from foreigners that pass through A. telecommunications. NSA tracked A. calls using numbers that had not been vetted in accordance with court-ordered procedures Intelligence court judges said it did not violate 4 th Amend.Also collected and stored all phone records of A. citizens and tracked their use of Internet and financial transactions. USA Freedom Act: June 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLlKojPit0o https://judiciary.house.gov/issue/usa-freedom-act/

Court Case Comparison FRQ Death PenaltyAbortionReligious RightsFree Speech

Free Response Trial by jury is a fundamental right of the accused, but criminal cases in the U.S. are rarely decided by the dramatic jury trials seen on television. Most cases are settled through plea bargaining.Describe the plea-bargaining processExplain why prosecutors and defendants agree to use this method rather than a full trialIdentify at least one criticism of the plea bargaining process

Free Response Ch. 4 #2 Religion has been a controversial matter in American politics since the colonial period, and continues to be today, in part because the 1st Amendment does not establish a simple “freedom of religion” but rather two provisions that sometimes conflict.Introduction: Background Information with Thesis Describe the two provisions in the First Amendment which pertain to the issue of religion (Examples) Choose one of the S.C. cases listed below:Lemon v. KurtzmanEngel v. VitaleEmployment Division v. Smith For the case you choose, identify which part of the first Amendment pertains to this case.For the case you choose, describe the ruling the S.C. made in this case. (Provide background information of the case to set the stage).