Latislaw coreylatislaw Pam Selle pamasaur Feminism amp Open Source Slides Challenge old models with new thought patterns Our Goal What does it look like Writing tests ID: 413759
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Corey" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Corey Latislaw @corey_latislawPam Selle @pamasaur
Feminism & Open Source
Slides
: Slide2
Challenge old models with new thought patterns.Our GoalSlide3
What does it look like?
Writing tests
Writing
documentation
Cleaning
up bad code
Doing the Dishes
(Paying Your Dues)Slide4
SourceSlide5
AgendaFeminismCurrent ModelNew ModelWhat you can doSlide6
"Feminism is the radical notion that women are people.” -Rebecca WestOn FeminismSlide7
"the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes"What is Feminism?Slide8
Different flavors of feminismIntersectionalityIn open source
Feminism vs. FeminismsSlide9
"[Women] are not sure if other community members will treat them respectfully, prefer not to be the only woman in the group, or are uncertain about embarking on the solitary exploration typically needed to get up to speed in open source.”
-Zhurakhinskaya
Why aren't women in FOSS?Slide10
"...hindrances to participation includ[e] a lack of mentors and role models, discriminating language usage, a male–dominated competitive world view, and a lack of women–centered perspectives.”-
ReagleCurrent ModelSlide11
"Contrary to what we would like to believe, there is no such thing as a 'structureless' group. Any group of people of whatever nature coming together for any length of time, for any purpose, will inevitably structure itself in some fashion. The structure may be flexible, it may vary over time, it may evenly or unevenly distribute tasks, power and resources over the members of the group. But it will be formed regardless of the abilities, personalities and intentions of the people involved. The very fact that we are individuals with different talents, predispositions and backgrounds makes this inevitable."
-Freeman
Structureless TyrannySlide12
"Paying your dues”Traditional devaluation of women's work (teaching, art, etc.)Bias against empathy
Structureless TyrannySlide13
[O]pen source culture is not feminist. Feminism is fundamentally about equality for everyone, not just women, and designers of any gender are just as alienated as women programmers, because it’s not an equally welcoming environment. -Trapani
Open Source ≠ FeministSlide14
Low participation diverse populationsLow polishLow testingLow documentationLow engagement of users
What's the outcome?Slide15
Abrasive emailsFlamewarsRTFMHostile environmentsMicroaggressionsApathetic / silent allies
Red FlagsSlide16
How can we make this better?What’s missing?New ModelSlide17Slide18
WarmthMentorshipStewardshipUser/design focusOpen discourseOur ModelSlide19
Encourages traditionally underrepresented groups to participate.Provides a healthy space for criticism of the work product (not the people).Pathway for newbies to contribute in ways that interest them (coding, UX, PM, technical writer, etc.).Success CriteriaSlide20
"Let them know you're happy they're here, show them around the place, help them with their question or problem, and let them know how they can give back to the community.”
-Trapani
Warmth
Slide21
Clear pathways for contributionConversion of new contributors to regular contributorsPair programmingMentorshipSlide22
Answering questions and being accessible to new and regular contributors.Managing resourcesIdentifying strengths and interestsStewardshipSlide23
Architecture"Prioritize design and usability upfront, rather than accept a mess of software with plans to slap a pretty veneer on afterwards. This is been the lesson I keep having to learn and re-learn: design and usability cannot be an afterthought
."
-
Trapani
Design/User FocusSlide24
Clear communicationCommunity-approved standardsAccessible and open forums (lists, IRC, wikis)Open DiscourseSlide25
Lay out a clear path for contributionHave resources and tools for new contributorsKeep current contributors engagedCode of conduct
Healthy (Existing) CommunitiesSlide26
https://django-admin2.readthedocs.org/en/latest/contributing.htmlSlide27
What can I do?Slide28
Utopia Doesn't Exist
Conflict happensCommunities are people
Image SourceSlide29
Existing ProjectsContribute requested featuresContribute what’s missingEngage with community on IRC/listsAnswer questionsMentor new people
Improve onboardingJoin a core teamSlide30
You are an expert. You have something valuable to share.Found your own
open source project!Slide31
SummaryExisting "rules" aren't what they seemWe can do betterYou can help us do betterRock on!Slide32
Pam Selle@pamasaurthewebivore.comgithub.com/pselle
@corey_latislawcoreylatislaw.com
g
ithub.com
/
colabug
Thank you!
Corey LatislawSlide33
Bookshttp://tinyurl.com/feministreadingListshttp
://bitly.com/bundles/pamasaur/1
Reading ListSlide34
Trapani, G. “Designers, Women, and Hostility in Open Source.” http://smarterware.org/7550/designers-women-and-hostility-in-open-source
Reagle, J. “Free as in Sexist
?”
http
://
firstmonday.org
/ojs/index.php/
fm
/article/view/4291/
3381
Freeman, J
. “The Tyranny of
Structurelessness
”
http://
flag.blackened.net
/revolt/
hist_texts
/
structurelessness.html
Zhurakhinskaya
, M.
“Opening Open Source to Women”
http
://www.women2.com/opening-open-source-to-women
/
Bibliography