/
Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy Developmental origins of disinhibition boldness Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy Developmental origins of disinhibition boldness

Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy Developmental origins of disinhibition boldness - PDF document

celsa-spraggs
celsa-spraggs . @celsa-spraggs
Follow
448 views
Uploaded On 2015-02-25

Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy Developmental origins of disinhibition boldness - PPT Presentation

PATRICK DON C FOWLES AND ROBERT F KRUEGER University of Minnesota University of Iowa and Washington UniversitySt Louis Abstract The clinical concept of psychopathy psychopathic personality is generally considered to entail persistent behavioral devi ID: 39284

PATRICK DON FOWLES

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Triarchic conceptualization of psychopat..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Triarchicconceptualizationofpsychopathy:Developmentaloriginsofdisinhibition,boldness,andmeannessCHRISTOPHERJ.PATRICK,DONC.FOWLES,ROBERTF.KRUEGERUniversityofMinnesota;UniversityofIowa;andWashingtonUniversity–St.LouisAbstract PreparationofthisarticlewassupportedbyGrants Thetraditionalcounterparttopsychopathyinthegeneralchildpsychopathologyliterature,precedingtheintroductionofspecificinventor-iesfortheassessmentofpsychopathyinyouth,hasbeentheconceptof“externalizing”psycho-pathology(cf.Achenbach&Edelbrock,1978).Thephenomenonofpsychopathycanbecon-sidereddistinctfromtheconceptofexternaliz-inginthatitentailsadeficiencyratherthananexcessofaffectivereactivity.Thatis,psychop-athyisdistinguishedfromgeneralexternalizingby“emotionaldetachment,”whichisalackofnormalemotionalsensitivityandsocialrelated-ness(Cleckley,1976;Lykken,1995;McCord&McCord,1964;Patrick,Bradley,&Lang,1993).Fromthisperspective,understandingthephenomenonofpsychopathyrequireseluci-dationoffactorsthatgiverisetodisinhibitedbehaviorinthecompanyofemotionaldetach-ment(i.e.,distinctivemanifestationsofexter-nalizingdeviancyinwhichemotionaldetach-mentissalient).Towardthisend,considerableefforthasbeendevotedoverthepast15yearstothestudyofpsychopathyinchildhoodandadolescence.Themajorfocusofworkinthisareahasbeenonso-called“downwardextensions”oftheadultpsy-chopathyconstruct(e.g.,Forth,Kosson,&Hare,1996;Frick&Hare,2001;Lynam,1997).Thisworkhasyieldedimportantadvances,butun-certaintiesremainregardingwhatpsychopathyinyouthentails,howitshouldbemeasured,andhowitintersectswithnormalandabnormaldevelopment.Wearguethatworkinthisareacanbeadvancedbyconceptualizingpsychopathyintermsofmoreelementalphenotypicconstructswithclearerpsychologicalandneurobiologicalreferents.Further,webelievethatprogressinthisareacanbeadvancedbyconsideringhowestablishedconceptsandfindingsfromthegen-eraldevelopmentalliteraturewithpotentialrele-vancetothesekeyphenotypicconstructscanbe“upwardlyextended”toinformthepsychopathyliterature.Thus,oneobjectiveofthecurrentreviewistodescribecontemporaryresearchpertainingtotheassessmentofpsychopathyinadultsaswellasyouthasabasisfordefiningcorepheno-typicconstructsofdisinhibition,and.Asecondmajorobjectiveistodis-cusshowestablishedconceptsandfindingsfromthegeneraldevelopmentalliteraturecanbetiedtothesecorephenotypicconstructs.HistoricalPerspectivesonPsychopathyEarlyaccountsofthesyndromeofpsychopathyassignedprominentemphasistoviolentandan-tisocialbehavior,presumablyowingtothesa-lienceofsuchbehaviorinotherwiserational-appearingindividuals.Explosive,impulsive,reckless,andirresponsibleactions,whichwereoftenaccompaniedbyalcoholordrugproblems(e.g.,Partridge,1928a,1928b;Prichard,1835)andsometimesbysuicidalbehavior(e.g.,Par-tridge,1928a;Pinel,1962),emergedrepeatedlyasthemes.Asdescribedfurtherbelow,thesefeaturesreflectthedisinhibitory(Gorenstein&Newman,1980)orexternalizing(Kruegeretal.,2002;Patrick,Hicks,Krueger,&Lang,2005)componentofpsychopathyincludedinmodernconceptualizations.ForPinel(1962),explosiveviolence(“abstractandsanguinaryfury”)wasthemostsalientclinicalfeature.Par-tridge’s(1928a,1928b)descriptionofthe“so-ciopathic”individualinparticularemphasizedtendenciestowardemotionalinstability,feel-ingsofinadequacyorinferiority,alienation,andangryaggression.Thispatternofemotionalvolatilityandimpulsive–reactiveviolenceap-pearscharacteristicofhighexternalizingindi-viduals(cf.Patrick&Bernat,2009)ratherthanindividualswhowouldbeconsideredpsycho-pathicaccordingtocontemporarydefinitions.Asecondsetofattributesemphasizedintheseearlyaccounts,whichappearssomewhatatoddswiththefeaturesjustmentioned,consistsofcharm,self-assurance,interpersonaldominance,attentionseeking,persuasiveness,andaffectiveshallowness.Forexample,asubgrouplabeled“swindlers”byKraepelin(1904)werecharacter-izedasglibandcharmingbutlackinginbasicmoralityorloyaltytoothers;theytypicallyspe-cializedinfraudulenceandconartistryandin-variablyaccumulatedlargedebtsthatwentun-paid.“Self-seeking”psychopathsasdescribedbySchneider(1934)weredescribedaspleasantandaffable,butegocentric,demandingofatten-tion,andsuperficialintheiremotionalreactionsandtheirrelationswithothers.LikeKraepelin’sswindlers,Schneider’sself-seekingtypeswerepathologicallydeceitfulandpronetofraudulentC.J.Patrick,D.C.Fowles,andR.F.Krueger behavior.Asdescribedbelow,thissetoffeatureswascentraltoCleckley’s(1976)conceptionofpsychopathicpersonality.Athirdprominentemphasisinearlyhistori-calaccountsconsistsoffeaturesrelatingtobru-tality,emotionalcoldness,andcallousexploi-tationofothers.Forexample,oneofthreeillustrativecasespresentedbyPinel(1962)wascharacterizedasefficaciousandsuccessfulinhisfinancialdealingsbutself-centeredandviciouslyantagonisticinhisinteractionswithothers.Rush(1812)emphasizedcrueltyandvicious-nessinhisaccountofthepsychopathandpos-itedthatadeep-rooted“moraldepravity”layatthecoreofthedisorder.Schneider’s(1934)“activeaffectionless”typewascharacterizedasunscrupulous,cold,andunfeeling.Schnei-derattributedthesetendencies,whichhesawasemergingearlyinlife,toacoredeficitinemotionalsensitivityratherthantoaweaknessinmoraljudgment.Cleckley’sclassictreatiseTheMaskofSanity(1976)servedasthefoundationformoderncon-ceptualizationsandmeasuresofpsychopathy.CentraltoCleckley’saccount,whichwasbasedonhisdirectexperienceswithpsychopathicindividualsinalargeinpatientpsychiatricfacil-ity,wastheideathatpsychopathyentailsthepre-senceofsevereunderlyingpathologymaskedbyanoutwardappearanceofrobustmentalhealth.Incontrastwithotherpsychiatricpatientswhopresentasirrational,agitated,dysphoric,sociallywithdrawn,orotherwisedisturbed,psy-chopathsimpressasconfident,personable,andpsychologicallywelladjustedonfirstcontact.Itisonlythroughcontinuedobservationacrossarangeofsettingsthatthepsychopath’sunder-lyingpathologyrevealsitself.Toprovideabasisfordiagnosticclarityandspecificity,Cleckleysetforthalistof16specificcriteriaforthedis-order,whichcanbegroupedintothreecategor-ies(Patrick,2006):(a)positiveadjustmentindi-cators(goodintelligenceandsocialadeptness,absenceofdelusionsorirrationality,absenceofnervousness,andlowincidenceofsuicide);(b)behavioraldevianceindicators(“unreliabil-ity,”i.e.,irresponsibility,sexualpromiscuity,impulsiveantisocialacts,failuretolearnfromexperience,absenceofanyclearlifeplan,andenhancedrecklessnesswhenintoxicated);and(c)indicatorsofemotionalunresponsivenessandimpairedsocialrelatedness(lackofremorseorshame,povertyinaffectivereactions,ego-centricityandinabilitytolove,deceitfulnessandinsincerity,absenceofloyalty,anddeficientinsight).Notably,Cleckley(1976)didnotdescribepsychopathicpatientsasantagonistic,violent,orcruel,andfew(only3of15)ofhisclinicalcaseexamplesshowedstrongindicationsofinterpersonalaggressiveness.Indeed,Cleckleymaintainedthatthecharacteristicemotionalunre-sponsivenessofpsychopathsmitigatesagainstangry,vengefulreactions.Furthermore,Cleck-ley’sconceptofpsychopathyextendedbeyondindividualswhoengagedrepeatedlyinantisocialactsthatcausedthemproblems.Cleckleyalsodescribedexamplesof“successfulpsychopaths”whoestablishedcareersasphysicians,scholars,orbusinessmen.Hisperspectiveontheetiologyofpsychopathywasthatitreflectedadeep-rootedimpairmentinemotionalprocessingakintose-manticaphasia(intherealmoflanguagepro-cessing)orcolorblindness(intherealmofpercep-tualprocessing;cf.Maudsley,1874).Fromthisperspective,itwastheoccurrenceofthiscoreunderlyingimpairmentthatdefinedthepresenceofthedisorder,asopposedtoaparticularovertbe-havioralexpression.However,incontrast,otherwritersofCleck-ley’stimeconcernedwithpsychopathyincrim-inaloffendersamplespresentedasomewhatdifferentpictureofthedisorder.McCordandMcCord’s(1964)volumeThePsychopath:AnEssayontheCriminalMindemphasizedfea-turesofemotionalcoldness,socialdetachment,anddangerousness,alongwithbehavioraldis-inhibition.LikeCleckley,McCordandMcCordconsideredpsychopathstobedeficientinanxi-etyandemotionalresponsiveness.However,intheirview,theseaffectiveimpairmentswereareflectionofprofoundsocialdisconnected-ness(“lovelessness”and“guiltlessness”)ratherthanofaglobaldeficitinaffective-motivationalcapacity.Inparticular,McCordandMcCordmaintainedthatpsychopathicindividuals,lack-inginsocialconscienceandinhibitionsagainstaggression,characteristicallyrespondedwithrageasopposedtofearinfrustratingorthreaten-ingsituations.Thus,incontrastwithCleckley,whodescribedpsychopathicinpatientsasneither“deeplyvicious”nor“volcanicallyexplosive,”Triarchicconceptualizationofpsychopathy McCordandMcCordcharacterizedpsychopathiccriminalsascold,vicious,andpredatory.WritersofCleckley’seraconcernedwithpsy-chopathyincriminalsamplesalsohighlightedcrueltyandaggressivenessasfeatures.Lindner(1944)characterizedcriminalpsychopathsastruculentandantagonistic.Craft(1966)iden-tifieda“vicious”criminalpsychopathicsubtype,whomhedescribedas“affectionless,impulsive,andpersistentlyaggressive.”(p.212).Robins(1966,1978)likewiseemphasizedearlyandper-sistentaggressiveantisocialityinherempiricalaccountsofmaladjustedyouthwhodevelopedintoadult“sociopaths.”Robins’workservedasthecornerstoneforthemodernnotionofantiso-cialpersonalitydisorder(APD)includedinthethirdandfourtheditionsoftheDiagnosticandStatisticalManualofMentalDisordersDSM-IIIDSM-IV;AmericanPsychiatricAssociation,1980,2000),whichemphasizesaggression,de-structiveness,andotherformsofdelinquencyinchildhoodandbehavioralevidenceofimpul-sivity,deception,recklessness,aggressiveness,andcriminaldeviancyinadulthood.Intermsofcorephenotypicconstructsdis-cussedindetailbelow,Cleckleyandhiscon-temporariessimilarlyhighlighted(pronenesstoexternalizingbehavior)intheiraccountsofpsychopathy,butdifferedintheemphasistheyassignedtoboldnessversusinconceptualizingthedisorder.ThemostobviousexplanationforthisdifferenceisthatCleckley’spsychopathiccaseexamplesconsistedofpsychiatricinpatientsratherthanincarceratedcriminaloffenders.Theantisocialactstheyperpetratedweregenerallyofalesser,nonviolentnatureandappearedirrational(“un-motivated”)inwayssuggestiveofanunderly-ingmentaldisorder.Inaddition,Cleckley’spatientstendedtocomefromhigherratherthanlowersocioeconomicbackgroundsandinmanycasespossessedfamilialandothersourcesofsocialsupportthatbufferedthemagainstlegalconsequences.Incontrast,writersofCleckley’stimeconcernedwithyouthfulandadultcrim-inalssoughttodelineateaspecificsubgroupwhoseantisocialdeviancywasdistinguishedbyitsamorality,severity,persistence,andrecalcitrancetotreatment.Individualsofthiskindwereno-tablefortheiraggressiveness,emotionalcold-ness,indifferencetothefeelingsandwelfareofothers,andpredatoryvictimization.Theytendedtocomefromimpoverished,abusiveback-grounds(e.g.,McCordandMcCordidentifiedparentalabuseandneglectasdistinctivelypatho-genicforcriminalpsychopathy)andengagedinseriousformsofantisocialbehaviorthatpro-vokedharshlegalpenalties.Differingconceptualizationsofpsychopathyareevidentinhistoricaccountsofthedisorder.Oneperspective,advancedbyCleckleyinhisaccountofhospitalinpatientsconsideredtobepsycho-pathic,portraysthedisorderasaparadoxicalconditioninwhichanoutwardveneerofpositiveadjustment(absenceofobviousmentaldistur-bance,highsocialefficacy,emotionalresiliency)masksasevereunderlyingpathologymanifestedbypersistentimpulsive,irresponsiblebehaviorwithoutregardforconsequencestooneselforothers.Asdiscussedinthenextsection,thiscon-ceptualizationappearstobeoperationalizedlesseffectivelybyassessmentinstrumentsthatindexpsychopathyasaputativelyunitary(unidimen-sional)construct,andmoreeffectivelybyinstru-mentsthatmeasurepsychopathyintermsofsepa-ratecomponents.Incontrastwiththis,theothermajorperspectiveevidentinhistoricwritingsisofpsychopathyasadistinctlyaffectionlessandpredatoryformofcriminaldeviancy(cf.McCord&McCord,1964).IncontrastwithCleckley’sportrayalofpsychopathicpatientsaspersonableandostensiblywellmeaningbutfecklessandun-trustworthy,thislatterperspectiveconceptualizespsychopathicindividualsascold,abrasive,andaggressivelyexploitativeintheirinteractionswithothers.Asdiscussedinthenextsectionbelow,contemporaryclinicaldiagnosticinstru-mentsfortheassessmentofpsychopathyinyouthandadultsreflectthisconceptualizationofpsy-chopathymoreso.Assessmentinstrumentsofthiskind,althoughdesignedtoassesspsychop-athyasaunitaryconstruct,nonethelessevidencedistinguishableaffective–interpersonalandbe-havioraldeviancefactors.ContemporaryApproachestoConceptualizingandAssessingPsychopathyTable1providesasummaryofmajorcurrentinventoriesfortheassessmentofpsychopathyC.J.Patrick,D.C.Fowles,andR.F.Krueger inadultandyouthfulparticipantsamples.Rel-evantempiricalfindingsforeacharereviewedbelow.PsychopathyinadultoffendersamplesCurrently,thedominantinstrumentforassess-ingpsychopathyinadultcriminaloffendersamplesisHare’s(2003)PsychopathyCheck-list—Revised(PCL-R).BeforethePCL-Rwasdeveloped,Hare’sempiricalresearchem-ployedaglobalratingapproachinwhichadiag-nosticratingfrom1to7wasassignedtoindi-catetheparticipant’sdegreeofresemblancetoCleckley’sdescriptionoftheprototypicpsy-chopath(1clearlynonpsychopathicinitelypsychopathic).TheoriginalPCL,whichconsistedof22items,wasdevelopedtoclarifyandsystematizetheassessmentofpsychopathyincorrectionalandforensicsamplesbasedonCleckley’sconceptualization.TheitemsofthePCLweredistilledfromalargercandidatepoolbyselectingthosethatbestdiscriminatedbetweenhighversuslowscorersonthe1–7CleckleyGlobalScale.Twoitemswereomittedfromtherevisedversion(Hare,1991,2003)andthescoringcriteriafortheremaining20itemsweremodifiedinvariousways.RegardingtheitemcontentofthePCL-R,theaffective–inter-personalandbehavioralmaladjustmentfeaturesdescribedbyCleckleyarewellrepresented.However,thepositiveadjustmentfeaturesarenot.Inparticular,absenceofnervousness/neu-roticismisnotpartofthePCL-R,noris“ab-senceofdelusionsorirrationality”orimmunitytosuicide.Further,althoughostensiblysimilartoCleckley’s“superficialcharmandgoodin-telligence,”“glibnessandsuperficialcharm”inthePCL-R(Item1)isdefinedinamorede-viantmanner,thatis,reflectinganexcessivelytalkative,slick,andinsinceredemeanor.Patrick(2006)attributedthisomissionofpos-itiveadjustmentindicatorstothestrategythatwasusedtoselectitemsfortheoriginalPCL.Itemswerechosentoindexpsychopathyasauni-taryconstructincriminaloffendersusingoverall Table1.SummaryofinventoriesfortheassessmentofpsychopathyindifferingparticipantSample/InventoryRatingFormatTotalItemsFacets/FactorsAssessedPCL-RInteviewer20Interpersonal,affective,lifestyle,PPISelf-report187Fearlessdominance,impulsiveYouthPCL:YVInterviewer18Interpersonal,affective,lifestyle,APSDParent/teacher20Impulsive/conductproblems,CPSParent/teacher41Affective–interpersonal,behavioraldevianceYPISelf-report53Grandiose–manipulative,impulsive–irresponsiblePCL-R,PsychopathyChecklist—Revised(Hare,2003);PPI,PsychopathicPersonalityInventory(Lilienfeld&An-drews,1996);PCL:YV,PsychopathyChecklist:YouthVersion(Forthetal.,2003);APSD,AntisocialProcessScreeningDevice(Frick&Hare,2001);CPS,ChildPsychopathyScale(Lynam,1997);YPI,YouthPsychopathicTraitsInventory(Andershedetal.,2002).Self-reportversionavailablealso.Separatesintodistinct“impulsive”and“narcissistic”subfactorsinsomework(e.g.,Frick,Boden,&Barry,2000).Triarchicconceptualizationofpsychopathy Cleckleyprototyperatingsasthecriterion,anditemswereretainedthatdemonstratedhighinter-nalconsistencywithoneanotheraswellaseffec-tivediscriminationbetweenlowandhighCleck-leygroups(Hare,1980).BecausemoreofCleckley’scriteriareflectdeviancy(12of16)asopposedtopositiveadjustment(4of16)andbecauseparticipantsinthePCLdevelop-mentsamplewerecriminalsratherthannon-incarceratedpatientsornonpatients,itseemslikelythattheinitialcandidatepoolincludedmanymoredeviance-relateditems,suchthatpositiveadjustmentindicatorsdroppedoutintheselectionprocess.TheresultisthatthePCL-R,comparedwithCleckley’soriginaldi-agnosticcriteria,containsitemsthatareuni-formlyindicativeofdeviancyandpsychologi-calmaladjustment.Inaddition,theoverallscoresonthePCL-Rshowrobustpositiverela-tionswithvaryingmeasuresofdeviancyandmaladjustmentincludingextentandseverityofcriminalacts,antagonismandaggression,andalcoholanddrugproblems,butnegligibleasso-ciationswithmeasuresofpositiveadjustmentsuchasverbalability,anxiousness,internaliz-ingsymptoms,andsuicideimmunity(Hall,Benning,&Patrick,2004;Hare,2003;Lynam&Derefinko,2006;Smith&Newman,1990;Verona,Patrick,&Joiner,2001).However,despitethefactthatthePCL-Rwasdevelopedtoindexpsychopathyasauni-tarysyndrome,factoranalyticandcorrela-tional-validationresearchindicatesthatitnone-thelesstapsdistinguishablecomponentfactors.Thebest-knownstructuralmodelofthePCL-Risthetwo-factormodel(Harpur,Hakstian,&Hare,1988;Hareetal.,1990),inwhichFactor1encompassestheinterpersonalandaffectivefeaturesofpsychopathyandFactor2encom-passestheantisocialdeviancyfeatures.How-ever,CookeandMichie(2001)proposedanal-ternativethree-factormodelinwhichFactor1isparsedintotwocomponents(“arrogantandde-ceitfulinterpersonalstyle,”markedbycharm,grandiosity,deceitfulness,andmanipulation;and“deficientaffectiveexperience,”consistingofabsenceofremorse,callousness,shallowaf-fect,andfailuretoacceptresponsibility)andFactor2ispareddowntoan“impulsive–irre-sponsiblebehavioralstyle”factorconsistingoffiveitems(boredomproneness,parasitism,impulsivity,irresponsibility,andabsenceofgoals)consideredtoreflectunderlyingtraitsasopposedtobehavioraloutcomesassociatedwiththosetraits.Inaddition,HareandNeu-mann(2006)advancedafour-factormodelinwhichFactor1isparsedintotwo“facets”mirror-ingCookeandMichie’sinterpersonalandaffec-tivefactors,andFactor2isdividedintoa“life-style”facetidenticaltoCookeandMichie’simpulsive–irresponsiblefactorandan“antisocial”factorencompassingaggressiveness,earlybehav-iorproblems,juveniledelinquency,revocationofconditionalrelease,andcriminalversatility.Reflectingtheunitaryconceptionofpsy-chopathythatguidedthePCL-R’sdevelop-ment,constituentfactorswithineachofthesefactormodelsshowmoderate(.5)correlationswithoneanother.Nonetheless,theseseparablefactorsalsoshowdivergingrelationswithvar-iousexternalcriterionmeasures.Inthetwo-factormodel,highscoresonFactor1areassoci-atedwithhigherscoresonindicesofselfishnessandexploitativenesssuchasnarcissismandMachiavellianism(Harpur,Hare,&Hakstian,1989;Hare,1991;Veronaetal.,2001),height-eneduseofproactive(instrumental/premedi-tated)aggression(Patrick&Zempolich,1998;Porter&Woodworth,2006),andlowerscoresonmeasuresofempathy(Hare,2003).Inaddi-tion,scoresonFactor1(inparticular,thevar-ianceinFactor1thatisunrelatedtoFactor2)showsomerelationshipwithadaptivetenden-cies.Forexample,Factor1showspositivecor-relationswithmeasuresofsocialdominance(Hare,1991;Harpuretal.,1989;Veronaetal.,2001)andnegativecorrelationswithmeasuresoffearfulness,distress/anxiety,anddepression(Harpuretal.,1989;Hicks&Patrick,2006).Evidenceofdiminishedphysiologicalrespon-sivenesstofearfulandaversivestimulihasalsobeenreportedspecificallyinrelationtoFactor1ofthePCL-R(cf.Patrick,1994,2007).Incontrast,Factor2ofthePCL-Rshowsselectivepositiverelationswithtraitmeasuresofaggression,impulsivity,andgeneralsensa-tionseeking(Harpuretal.,1989;Hare,1991),aswellaschildsymptomsofAPD,andiscorrelatedtoamarkedlyhigherdegreethanFactor1withadultAPDsymptomsandvari-ablesreflectingfrequencyandseverityofcrim-inaloffending(Hare,2003;Veronaetal.,2001).C.J.Patrick,D.C.Fowles,andR.F.Krueger IncontrastwithFactor1,Factor2isassociatedmorewithangry-reactiveformsofaggression(Patrick&Zempolich,1998;Porter&Wood-worth,2006).Factor2alsoshowsrobustpositiveassociationswithmeasuresofalcoholanddrugdependence,whereasFactor1showsnegligiblerelations(Hare,2003;Smith&Newman,1990).Studiesoftheexternalcorrelatesofcompo-nentsofthePCL-Ridentifiedbythethree-andfour-factormodelshavealsobeguntoappear.Skeem,Mulvey,andGrisso(2003)reportedthattheimpulsive–irresponsible(“Lifestyle”)factorwasmostrelatedtooverallfrequencyandseverityofcriminaloffending,incidenceofpropertycrimes,andsubstance-relateddisor-ders.TheAffectivefactorwasmostrelatedtohistoricandfutureviolenceandcrimesagainstpeople,andtheInterpersonalfactorwasassoci-atedtoalesserdegreewithpastandfuturecrim-inaldeviancythaneithertheAffectiveorLife-stylefactors.Halletal.(2004)reportedthattheInterpersonalfactoraccountedforaforemen-tionedassociationsbetweenPCL-RFactor1andmeasuresofsocialefficacyandemotionalresilience.TheuniquevarianceintheInterper-sonalfactor(i.e.,thatunrelatedtotheAffectiveandLifestylefactors)wasassociatedpositivelywithfive-factormodel(FFM)extraversion,openness,andconscientiousness,andnega-tivelywithFFMneuroticism.Thisfactoralsoshoweddistinctivepositiveassociationswithverbalintelligenceandpersonalandparentalsocioeconomicstatus.Incontrast,scoresontheLifestylefactorshowedselectiverelationswithvaryingmeasuresofexternalizingde-viancyandmaladjustmentincludingtraitsofimpulsivity,sensationseeking(disinhibitionandboredomfacets,inparticular),anger,alie-nation,highneuroticismanddysphoria/dis-tress,andlowconscientiousnessandachieve-mentmotivation;fightinginchildhoodandadulthood;drugandalcoholproblems;andlowpersonalsocioeconomicstatus.ReplicatingSkeemetal.(2003),scoresontheAffectivefac-torwereassociatedselectivelywithviolentcriminaloffending(includingincidenceofas-sault,weaponspossession,kidnapping,andmurder).Themostsalientpersonalitycorrelatesofthisfactorwereaggressiveness,lowagree-ableness,andlowaffiliation(lowsocialclose-ness/communality).Scoresonthisfactoralsopredictedareducedincidenceofspecificfears.TheantisocialfacetofthePCL-R(cf.Hare&Neumann,2006),althoughgenerallyparallel-ingthelifestylefacetinitsassociationswithcri-terionmeasures,showedhighercorrelationswithaggression-relatedthanimpulsivity-re-latedpersonalitytraitsandstrongerassociationswithviolentcriminalcharges.Inotherworkwithfemaleoffenders,Verona,Hicks,andPat-rick(2005)reportedtheantisocialand(toalesserdegree)lifestylefacetsofthePCL-Rtobepositivelyassociatedwithpastsuicidalat-tempts,whereastheinterpersonalfacetshowedaselectivenegativeassociationwithsuicidality.SimilarresultswerereportedbyDouglasetal.(2008)foramaleoffendersample.Summary.Hare’sPCL-Rwasdevelopedtoas-sessthesyndromeofpsychopathyasdescribedbyCleckleyinadultcriminaloffendersamples.ThedevelopmentstrategyforthePCL-Rem-phasizedmeasurementofpsychopathyasauni-taryconstruct,resultinginagenerallyinterre-latedsetofbehavioralindicators.Nonetheless,factoranalysesofthePCL-Ritemsindicatethepresenceofdistinctive(albeitcorrelated)af-fective–interpersonalandbehavioraldeviancefactors.Intermsofconceptsdiscussedbelow,theitemcontentofthePCL-Rappearstotapdisinhibitionandmeannessprimarily,andboldnessonlysecondarily.Inparticular,thepositiveadjustmentfeaturesofpsychopathyemphasizedbyCleckley(e.g.,absenceofpsy-choticsymptoms;lackofanxietyornervous-ness;immunitytosuicide)areweaklyrepre-sentedinthePCL-R.Themeannessanddisinhibitioncomponentsofpsychopathy(preferentiallyreflectedinFac-tors1and2ofthePCL-R,respectively)areimportanttodistinguishbecauseresearchonpsy-chopathyinyouth(cf.Frick&Marsee,2006;Frick&Morris,2004;seebelow)indicatesthatthesecomponentshavedifferentetiologicsub-strates,withtheformertheorizedtoderive(atleastinpart)fromdiminishedfearcapacity,andthelatterfromimpairmentsininhibitorycontrol.PsychopathyinadultnoncriminalsamplesTodate,onlyafewstudieshavebeenconductedinwhichadultsfromthecommunityhavebeenTriarchicconceptualizationofpsychopathy assessedforpsychopathyusingclinicaldiag-nosticprocedures(Ishikawa,Raine,Lencz,Bihrle,&lacasse,2001;Raineetal.,2004;Van-man,Mejia,Dawson,Schell,&Raine,2003;Widom,1977).However,participantsidentifiedaspsychopathicinthesestudiesevidencedhighlevelsofantisocialdeviancyandthuscouldmoreaccuratelybelabeled“subclinical”than“noncriminal”or“successful”(cf.Hall&Ben-ning,2006).Someotherpublishedstudieshaveassessedpsychopathyinstudent(e.g.,Forthetal.,1996),civilpsychiatric(e.g.,Skeem,Miller,Mulvey,Tiemann,&Monahan,2005),orat-riskcommunitysamples(e.g.,Farringtonetal.,2006)usingascreeningversionofthePCL-R(PCL:SV;Hart,Cox,&Hare,1995).However,therangeofPCL:SVscoresingeneralcommunitysamplestendstobehighlyrestricted,andconcernshavebeenraisedregardingthesen-sitivityofPCL-basedratingsforassessingcorefeaturesofpsychopathyinnonincarceratedindi-viduals,particularlyinviewofthestrongem-phasisoncriminaldeviancyinthescoringofmostPCLitems(Skeem&Cooke,inpress;Wi-diger,2006;seealsoWidigeretal.,1996).Theothermajorassessmentapproachthathasbeenusedtoidentifypsychopathicindividualsinnonincarceratedadultsamplesisself-report.Avarietyofself-reportmeasureshavebeende-velopedandutilizedovertheyears(Lilienfeld&Fowler,2006),butforthemostpartthesein-dexmainlytheantisocialdeviance(Factor2)componentofpsychopathy(Hare,1991,2003;Harpuretal.,1989;Lilienfeld&Fowler,2006).AnotableexceptionisthePsychopathicPersonalityInventory(PPI;Lilienfeld&An-drews,1996;Lilienfeld&Widows,2005),whichwasdevelopedtoassesspsychopathyasde-scribedbyCleckleyinnonincarceratedsamples.UnlikethePCL-R,thePPIwasnotdevelopedtoindexpsychopathyasaunitaryconstruct.In-stead,aninclusivepersonality-basedapproachwastakenwiththeaimofcapturingthefullspectrumoftraitconstructsembodiedinCleck-ley’sdescription.Eightunidimensionalsub-scalesweredevelopedtoassessthesevaryingconstructs,andexploratoryfactoranalysesofthesesubscaleshaverevealedtwodistincthigherorderfactors(Benning,Patrick,Hicks,Blonigen,&Krueger,2003;Benning,Patrick,Salekin,&Leistico,2005;Ross,Benning,Pat-rick,Thompson,&Thurston,2009).Socialpo-tency,stressimmunity,andfearlessnesssub-scalesloadpreferentiallyononefactor(PPI-Iandimpulsivenonconformity,blameexternali-zation,Machiavellianegocentricity,andcare-freenonplanfulnesssubscalesloadonasecondfactor().Benning,Patrick,Blonigen,Hicks,andIacono(2005)labeledthesefactorsfearlessdominanceimpulsiveantisocialityUnlikePCL-RFactors1and2,whicharemod-eratelycorrelated,thetwohigherorderfactorsofthePPIareuncorrelated.TheeighthPPIsub-scale,coldheartedness(reflectinglowsenti-mentalityandimaginativecapacity,andlowre-sponsivenesstoothers’distress),doesnotloadappreciablyoneitherPPIfactorbutinsteadde-finesaseparatefactorinanexpandedthree-fac-torsolution(Benningetal.,2003).LikethetwoPCL-Rfactors,thehigherorderfactorsofthePPIshowmeaningful,divergingre-lationswithavarietyofexternalcriterionvari-ables(Benningetal.,2003;Benning,Patirck,Bloigen,etal.,2005;Benning,Patrick,Salekin,etal.,2005;Blonigenetal.,2005;Douglasetal.,2008;Patrick,Edens,Poythress,&Lilien-feld,2006;Rossetal.,2009).Ingeneral,thecor-relatesofPPIFactors1and2mirrorthoseoftheuniquevarianceinPCL-RFactor1(itsinterper-sonalcomponent,inparticular)andofFactor2,respectively.Thatis,highscoresonPPI-Iareas-sociatedwithpositivepsychologicalandsocialadjustmentaswellaswithtendenciestowardnar-cissism,thrillseeking,andlowempathy,whereasscoresonPPI-IIaremoregenerallyindicativeofpsychologicalandbehavioralmaladjustment,in-cludingimpulsivityandaggressiveness,childandadultantisocialbehavior,alcoholanddrugprob-lems,highanxiousnessandsomaticcomplaints,andsuicidalideation.ThetwohigherorderfactorsofthePPI,despitetheirindependencefromoneanotheranddifferentialrelationswithexternalcriteria,showcomparablerobustasso-ciationswithscoresonMiller,Lynam,Widiger,andLeukefild’s(2001)FFMpersonality-basedpsychopathyprototype(Rossetal.,2009),indi-catingthatthePPIfactorscapturedifferingele-mentsoftheprototypicpsychopathdefinedintermsofFFMconstructs:PPI-Iisassociatedwithlowneuroticism(N)andagreeableness(A)andhighextraversion(E)andopenness(O);PPI-IIisassociatedwithhighN,lowA,andC.J.Patrick,D.C.Fowles,andR.F.Krueger lowconscientiousness(C).Notably,thecold-heartednesssubscaleofthePPI(which,asmen-tioned,isrelativelyindependentofPPI-IandII)alsoevincesarobustpositiveassociationwithFFMprototypescores,thebasisoftheassocia-tionbeinglowN,lowE,lowA,andlowO(Rossetal.,2009).Despiteshowingparallelassociationswithcriterionmeasures,thetwofactorsofthePPIdifferinessentialwaysfromPCL-RFactors1and2(e.g.,theyareassessedviaself-reportvs.clinicalrating;theyareuncorrelatedvs.moder-atelycorrelated;theyshowstronger,moredirect,i.e.,zeroorder,associationswithadjustment-relatedvariables),anddirectcomparisonsofthePPIandPCL-Rfactorshaverevealedonlymodestandsomewhatasymmetriccorrespon-dence.PPI-Iisrelatedmainlytotheinterper-sonalcomponentofthePCL-R,toamodestde-gree(.3;Benning,Patrick,Blonigen,etal.,2005).ScoresonPPI-IIshowasomewhatstrongerrelationshiptoPCL-RFactor2scoresasawhole(.4;Benning,Patrick,Blonigen,etal.,2005).RegardingthePPIColdhearted-nessscale,whichasnotedappearstotapsome-thingdistinctfromPPI-IandII,availabledataindicatethatthisscaleshowsmoderateandmodestassociations(.37and.21),respectively,withPCL-RFactors1and2(Poythress,Edens,&Lilienfeld,1998).Summary.Historically,measuresofpsychopa-thydevelopedforuseinadultnonoffendersam-pleshavefocusedmainlyonthesalientbehav-ioraldeviancycomponentofthesyndrome(Lilienfeld&Fowler,2006).AnotableexceptionisthePPI,whichwasdesignedtocomprehen-sivelyassesstraitconstructsembodiedinCleck-ley’sdescriptiveaccountofthedisorder.Incon-trastwiththePCL-R,thesubscalesofthePPIweredevelopedwithoutassumingorrequiringcoherencearoundaunitaryhigherordercon-struct.ConsistentwithCleckley’sportrayalofpsychopathyasaconfigurationofdisparateten-dencies,structuralanalysesofthePPIsubscalesrevealtwobroad,largelyuncorrelatedfactors:onereflectingsocialefficacy,imperturbability,andtoleranceofdanger,andtheotherreflectingimpulsivity,rebelliousness,alienation,andag-gression.Intermsofconceptsdiscussedbelow,PPI-I(theFearlessDominancefactor)predomi-nantlyreflectsboldness,whereasPPI-II(theIm-pulsiveAntisocialityfactor)reflectsdisinhibitionandtoalesserextentmeanness.AneighthPPIsubscale,Coldheartedness,doesnotloadprefer-entiallyoneitherofthesebroadfactors;thissub-scalecanbeviewedastappingelementsofmean-nessnotcapturedbyPPI-II(i.e.,elementsreflectingalackofempathicconcern).Theboldnesscomponentofpsychopathy,whichistappedweaklyandincompletelybytheitemsofthePCL-R,isimportanttodistin-guishinturnfromthemeannesscomponent,whichiswellrepresentedinthePCL-R.OnereasonisthatthedistinctionbetweenboldnessandmeannessiscrucialtoreconcilingCleck-ley’sconceptionofpsychopathywiththatad-vancedbymorecriminologicallyorientedtheor-ists(e.g.,McCord&McCord,1964;Robins,1966).Anotheristhatboldness,althoughphe-notypicallydistinctfrommeanness,appearstoshareakeyetiologicsubstrate(i.e.,diminishedfearcapacity).Thisraisestheimportantdevel-opmentalquestion,discussedinthelastmajorsectionbelow,ofwhatintersectingetiologicfac-torsgiverisetomeannessasopposedtobold-nessintemperamentallyfearlessindividuals.Yetanotherreasonisthattheconstructofbold-nessislikelytobeofuniqueimportanceinun-derstandingso-called“successfulpsychopaths”:individualsexhibitinghighlevelsofcharm,per-suasiveness,imperturbability,andventuresome-nesswhoachievesuccessinsocietyasmilitary,political,orcorporate-industrialleaders(cf.Lykken,1995).Psychopathyinconduct-disorderedyouthHistorically,researchonpsychopathyinchild-hoodandadolescence(e.g.,Robins,1966,1978)hasemphasizedthebehavioraldeviance(externalizing)featuresofpsychopathymoresothanthecoreaffective–interpersonalfeatures.However,researchersoverthepast15yearshavedevotedsystematicefforttoindexingthesecorefeaturesinordertoidentifyadistinctsub-groupofconduct-disorderedyouthwhoqualifyaspsychopathic.Muchofthisworkhasem-ployedyouth-adaptedversions(or“downwardextensions”;Salekin,2006)ofHare’sPCL-R.TheearliestofthesewasthePCLYouthVer-sion(PCL:YV;Forth,Brown,Hart,&Hare,Triarchicconceptualizationofpsychopathy 2003;Forthetal.,1996),amodified18-itemvariantofthePCL-Rdevelopedforusewithadolescentoffendersages13–18.ResearchfindingstodateindicatethatthePCL:YVlargelyparallelsthePCL-Rintermsofitsfactorstructureandassociationswithexternalcriter-ionmeasures(Forthetal.,2003).Frickandcolleagues(Frick&Hare,2001;Frick,O’Brien,Wooten,&McBurnett,1994)developedtheAntisocialProcessScreeningDe-vice(APSD)toassesspsychopathictendenciesinyoungerchildren(ages6–13years)withcon-ductproblems.TheAPSDconsistsofa20-itemratingscalecompletedbyparentsorteachers.(Anewerself-reportversionforusewithadoles-centsaged13–18isalsoavailable;Loney,Frick,Clements,Ellis,&Kerlin,2003.)ItsitemcontentwaspatternedafterthePCL-Rwiththegoalofrepresentingallfeaturesofpsy-chopathyembodiedinthePCL-Rthatcouldbeassessedmeaningfullyinchildren(Fricketal.,1994).AninitialstructuralanalysisoftheitemsoftheAPSD(Fricketal.,1994)revealedtwodistinctivefactors:anImpulsive/ConductProb-lems(I/CP)factorreflectingimpulsiveness,be-havioraldeviancy,andinflatedself-importance;andaCallous–Unemotional(CU)factorreflect-ingtendenciestowardemotionalinsensitivityandinterpersonalcallousness.Scoresonthesetwofactorswerecorrelatedmoderately(.5).Sub-sequentworkbyFrick,Boden,andBarry(2000)suggestedthattheI/CPfactorcouldbeparsedintodistinctive“impulsive”(e.g.,boredeasily,actswithoutthinking,failstoplan)and“narcissistic”(e.g.,highself-importance,brags,uses/consoth-ers)subfactors.Anextensiveliteraturehasaccumulatedre-gardingpsychologicalandbehavioraldiffer-encesbetweenimpulsiveconduct-disordered(i.e.,highI/CP)childrenexhibitinglowversushighlevelsofCUtendencies(forrecentre-views,seeFrick&Dickens,2006;Frick&Marsee,2006;Frick&White,2008).Com-paredwithnoncliniccontrolchildrenandhighCUclinic-referredyouth,highI/CPchildrenwithlowlevelsofCUfeaturesshowevidenceofintellectual(inparticular,verbalIQ)impair-mentanddifficultyinregulatingtheiremotions(e.g.,enhancedreactivitytonegativeemotionalstimuliofvaryingtypesandhigherreportedlevelsoftraitanxiety).Inaddition,theyarepronetoreactive(angry–impulsive)aggression,butnotproactive(instrumental–strategic)ag-gression.Bycomparison,childrenhighinCUaswellasI/CPtendenciesscoreloweronself-reportmeasuresofanxietyandneuroticism,areattractedtoactivitiesentailingnoveltyandrisk,showreducedbehavioralresponsivenesstothreateningoraffectivelydistressingstimuliofvarioustypes,andexhibitimpairmentsinpassiveavoidancelearning(i.e.,reducedabilitytoinhibitbehaviorthatresultsinpunishment).Inaddition,comparedwithcontrolchildren,highCUconduct-problemchildrenexhibithighlevelsofproactiveaswellasreactiveag-gression.Relatedly,thereisevidencethatthepresenceofCUtraitsprospectivelypredictsla-terincidenceofaggressionandviolenceoverandaboveI/CPtendencies(Frick,Stickle,Dan-dreaux,Frrrell,&Kimonis,2005).AthirdapproachtocapturingthePCL-RconceptofpsychopathyinyouthwithconductproblemsisthatofLynamandcolleagues.Ly-nam’s(1997)ChildPsychopathyScale(CPS)wasdevelopedbyidentifyingitemsfromtwoestablishedchildbehaviorprobleminventoriesthatappearedtotapfeaturessimilartoitemsofHare’sPCL-R.Itemanalyticprocedureswereusedtonarrowthesecandidateindicatorsdowntoasetof41thatprovidedcoverageof13ofthe20PCL-Ritemswithhighinternalcon-sistency.AfactoranalysisoftheseitemsintheCPSdevelopmentsample(430boysfromthePittsburghyouthstudy,acohortthatin-cludedahighproportionofindividualsatriskfordelinquency;Lynam,1997)revealedevi-denceoftwodistinguishableitemsubsetsthatparalleledtheaffective–interpersonalandbe-havioraldeviancefactorsofthePCL-R.How-ever,incontrastwiththePCL-Rfactorswhicharecorrelatedonlymoderately(.5),thetwofactorsoftheCPSwerecorrelatedveryhighlyLynam(1997)reportedthathighoverallscoresontheCPSdistinguishedasubgroupofstable,seriouslydelinquentboys.OverallCPSscoreswereassociatedpositivelywithscoresonvariousself-report,other-report,andbehavioralmeasuresofimpulsivity,andwithself-andteacher-reportedlevelsofaggression,delinquency,andexternalizingproblems.Inad-dition,controllingforlevelsofexternalizingC.J.Patrick,D.C.Fowles,andR.F.Krueger psychopathology,higherscoresontheCPSwereassociatedwithlowerlevelsofanxiety,withdrawal,andinternalizingproblems.Morerecently,Lynametal.(2005)examinedrela-tionsofself-andmother-reportedscoresonarevised55-itemversionoftheCPSwithFFMpersonalitytraits.ThetwofactorsoftherevisedCPSwerenotsohighlyinterrelatedinthisstudysample(whichconsistedoftwoseparateco-hortsfromthePittsburghYouthStudy),andthuscorrelationswerereportedseparatelyforCPSfactorscores(affective–interpersonal,be-havioraldeviance)andtotalscores.OverallscoresontheCPS(whetherbasedonself-ormotherreport)showedmarkednegativeassocia-tionswithFFMAandC,andmodestpositiveandnegativeassociations,respectively,withNandopenness.Inoneofthetwostudycohorts,overallCPSscoresbasedonmotherreportshowedasig-nificantnegativeassociationwithextraversion(E).Inaddition,hierarchicalregressionanalysesrevealedthat,acrossinformantsandcohorts,theuniquevarianceintheaffective–interpersonalfactoroftheCPS(i.e.,thatunrelatedtothebehav-ioraldeviancefactor)wasassociatednegativelywithAand(consistently,buttoalesserdegree)N.Incontrast,theuniquevarianceintheantiso-cialdeviancefactoroftheCPSwasassociatedpositivelywithN,andnegativelywithCand(consistently,buttoalesserdegree)A.Summary.Thebest-knowninventoriesforas-sessingpsychopathictendenciesinchildrenandadolescents(PCL:YV,APSD,CPS)wereconstructedtoemulatetheitemcontentofthePCL-R.LikethePCL-R,theseyouth-orientedpsychopathyinventoriesappeartotapcon-structsofdisinhibitionandmeannessprimarily,withlimitedrepresentationofboldness;thesamecanbesaidoftheself-reportbasedYouthPsychopathyinventory,describedinthenextsubsection.ThegrowingliteratureondistinctexternalcorrelatesoftheFearlessDominancefactorofthePPI(PPI-I),whichincludeaspectsofpositiveadjustment(e.g.,reducedincidenceofinternalizingdisordersandsuicidalbehav-ior)aswellasdeviancy(e.g.,narcissism,thrillseeking,anddeficientempathicconcern),pointtoassessmentofdispositionalboldnessasaripeareaofopportunityinthechildpsychopathyliterature.Somekeyquestionsofinterestthatmightbeaddressedthroughtheconstructionofdevelopmentallyappropriatemeasuresofboldnessare:whatfactorsearlyinlifecontrib-utetotheemergenceofdispositionalboldnessversusmeannessintemperamentallyfearlessindividuals?Whatdevelopmentalinterplayex-istsbetweeneachofthesedistinctphenotypicstylesanddisinhibitory(externalizing)tenden-cies?Whatmoderatingfactorscontributetosuccessfulversusunsuccessfuloutcomesinhighboldindividuals?Istherealate-onsetformofpersistentcriminalityassociatedselec-tivelywithhighdispositionalboldness?Theyouthpsychopathymeasurethathasbeeninvestigatedmostextensivelytodate,theAPSD,includesdistinguishableI/CPandCUfactors.Youthhighonbothofthesefactorsshowreducedemotionalreactivity,greaterphysicaldaring,andhighlevelsofproactiveag-gressioncomparedwithyouthwhoscorehighontheI/CPfactoralone.Asdiscussedinthenextmajorsectionbelow,theuniquevarianceintheCUfactoroftheAPSDcanbeconceptu-alizedastappingmeanness,whereastheI/CPfactorcanbeconsideredanindexofgeneraldisinhibition.Thefinalmajorsectionconsidersdevelopmental–etiologicprocessesthatgiverisetothesetwodistinctivecomponentsofpsy-chopathy,alongwithfactorsthatmaycontrib-utedistinctivelytotheboldnesscomponent.PsychopathyinnondelinquentyouthAsistrueofresearchtodateonpsychopathyinadults,thestudyofpsychopathyinchildrenandadolescentshasfocusedpredominantlyonindividualswithconductproblems,andthephe-nomenonofpsychopathyinnondelinquentyouthremainsunderstudied.Aninventorydevelopedquiterecentlyforassessingpsychopathictenden-ciesinnondelinquentaswellasdelinquentyouthisthe50-item,self-reportbasedYouthPsycho-pathicTraitsInventory(YPI;Andershed,Kerr,Stattin,&Levander,2002).TheitemcontentoftheYPIwasdesignedtocapturethecoherenttraitdomainsrepresentedinCookeandMichie’s(2001)three-factormodelofthePCL-R:arro-gant–deceitfulinterpersonalstyle,deficientaf-fectiveexperience,andimpulsive–irresponsiblebehavior.LiketheitemsofthePCL-R,theitemsoftheYPIarelargelyindicativeofdeviancy(i.e.,Triarchicconceptualizationofpsychopathy dishonesty,grandiosity,lying,manipulation;cal-lousness,unemotionality,remorselessness;im-pulsivity,thrillseeking,irresponsibility),withfactoranalysisrevealingdistinctbutmoderatelyinterrelatedinterpersonal(“grandiose–manipula-tive”),affective(“callous–unemotional”),andbehavioral(“impulsive–irresponsible”)factors(Andershedetal.,2002).Aninitialinvestigationofnondelinquentyouthrevealedsignificantasso-ciationsforallthreeYPIfactorswithvariouscri-terionmeasuresofexternalizingdeviancy.Re-searchwithclinic-referredyouth(Andershed,Hodgins,&Tengstrom,2007)hasdemonstratedmoderatestatisticalconvergencebetweenthefac-torsoftheYPIandthecorrespondingfactorsofthePCL:YV.Otherworkwithdelinquentyouth(Poythress,Dembo,Wareham,&Greenbaum,2006)hasreplicatedthefindingofrobustassocia-tionsforallthreeYPIfactorswithmeasuresofexternalizingdeviancy.ParallelingresultsforthePCL-R(Hicks&Patrick,2006),thisworkalsorevealedevidenceofsuppressoreffectsfortheinterpersonal(andtoalesserdegree,affec-tive)factoroftheYPIinrelationswithinternal-izingproblems.ConceptualintegrationThePCL-R,whichwasdevelopedtoassesspsychopathyasaunitaryconstructincriminaloffendersamples,indexesadistinctlydifferentphenotypicvariantofpsychopathythanthatemphasizedbyCleckleyinhisclinicaldescrip-tionsofpsychopathichospitalinpatients(cf.Patrick,2006).HighscoresonthePCL-Rasawholeareassociatedwithaggressiveexternal-izingtendenciesincludinglowFFMagree-ableness(highantagonism),lowaffiliation/communality,lowempathy,Machiavellianism,impulsivesensationseeking,andpersistentvio-lentoffending(Hare,2003;Harpuretal.,1989;Lynam&Derefinko,2006;Veronaetal.,2001).ThisdescriptivepictureismoreinlinewiththeconceptionofcriminalpsychopathyadvancedbyCleckley’scontemporariesthanwithCleckley’sownportrayalofpsychopathicinpatientsascharmingne’er-do-wellswhoharmothersincidentallyratherthandeliber-ately.Atthesametime,factoranalyticstudiesindicatethatthePCL-Ritemsettapsdistin-guishableinterpersonal,affective,andimpul-sive–irresponsiblecomponents(Cooke&Mi-chie,2001;Hare&Neumann,2006;Patrick,Hicks,Nichol,&Krueger,2007)thatexhibitdivergingrelationswithexternalcriterionTheuniquevarianceintheinterper-sonalcomponent(thatassociatedwiththe“glibness/charm”and“grandioseself-worth”itemsinparticular;Patricketal.,2007)appearstocapturesomeoftheadaptiveelementsofpsychopathyemphasizedbyCleckley.Fur-thermore,subtypingstudies(Hicks,Markon,Patrick,Krueger,&Newman,2004;Skeem,Johansson,Andershed,Kerr,Eno,&Louden,2007)haverevealedthathighPCL-Rscorerscomprisetwodistinctsubgroups:a(smaller)lowanxious,surgentsubgroupakintothetypedescribedbyCleckleyanda(larger)aggres-sive,unconstrained,sociallydetachedsubgroupmoreakintothatdescribedbyMcCordandMcCord.Thebest-knowninstrumentsforassessingpsychopathyinchildrenandadolescents,whichweredevisedforusewithadjudicatedandclinic-referredpopulations,wereconstructedtomirrortheitemcoverageofthePCL-R.Accordingly,overallscoresontheseinventoriesappeartotapthesameaggressive–externalizingvariantofpsychopathyindexedbyoverallscoresonthePCL-R.Again,however,theseinstrumentscontaindistinctivesubsetsofitemsthatexhibitdivergingrelationswithexternalcriterionmea-sures.ThechildpsychopathyinventorythathasbeenstudiedmostextensivelyintermsofitsdistinctivefactorsisFrick’sAPSD.WhereastheI/CPfactoroftheAPSD(parallelingFactor2ofthePCL-R;Patricketal.,2005)appearstoin-dexgeneralexternalizingtendencies,theCUfactorisassociateduniquelywithalackofanx-ietyandnegativeemotionalreactivityandwithventuresomeness,thrillseeking,anduseofpro-active(strategic,goal-oriented)aggression.Inaddition,researchwiththeAPSDhasreliablydemonstratedthatconductproblemchildrenwithhighlevelsofCUtraitsarelessresponsive 1.ItemsassociatedwiththeantisocialcomponentofthePCL-RincludedinHareandNeumann’s(2006)four-factormodelappeartotapthebroadaggressive–external-izingdimensionunderlyingthePCL-Rasawhole,asopposedtoadistinctivesubdimension(Patricketal.,C.J.Patrick,D.C.Fowles,andR.F.Krueger totreatmentandmorelikelytopersistintheirdeviantbehavior;inparticular,behaviorentail-ingviolencetowardothers(Frick&Dickens,2006).BasedontheemotionalandbehavioralcorrelatesoftheCUfactor,Frickandcolleagueshavepostulatedthatthisphenotypiccomponentofchildpsychopathyreflectsthepathologicex-pressionofanunderlyingfearlesstemperament.IncontrastwiththePCL-Randitsyouth-adaptedvariants,thePPI,whichwasdevelopedtocomprehensivelyassesstraitconstructsem-bodiedinCleckley’sconceptualization,indexespsychopathyintermsoftwoorthogonalhigherorderfactors:onereflectingsocialdominance,stressimmunity,andfearlessness,andtheotherreflectingexternalizingdeviancy.Asdiscussedinthenextsectionbelow,thefirstPPIfactorap-pearstoreflectapurer,morebenignexpressionofunderlyingtemperamentalfearlessness(termed“boldness”)thanFactor1ofthePCL-RortheCUfactoroftheAPSD,whichcanbeviewedastapping“meanness”moresothanboldness.TheconstructofboldnessindexedbyPPI-Iislikelytobeparticularlyrelevanttotheconceptu-alizationandmeasurementofpsychopathyinnon-criminalsamples,includingidentificationofindi-vidualswithpsychopathictendencieswhoascendtopositionsofleadershipandinfluenceinsociety(cf.Cleckley,1976;Lykken,1995).DistinctPhenotypicComponentsofPsychopathy:Disinhibition,Boldness,andMeannessTheforegoingreviewofhistoricandcontempo-raryeffortstoconceptualizethesyndromeofpsychopathyrevealsthreeprominentrecurringthemes,whichforeaseofreferencecanbedesig-nateddisinhibition,boldness,andmeanness.Considerationofthebroaderpersonality,psy-chopathology,andneurobiologicalliteraturesin-dicatesthatthesethreeconstructs,althoughinter-relatedatsomelevelsempiricallyandintermsoftheirmutualconnectionswiththephenomenonofpsychopathy,havedistinctivephenotypiciden-titiesandcanbeconceptualized,measured,andunderstoodseparately.Ourviewisthatthesethreephenotypicconstructsrepresentthekeytounderstandingpsychopathyinitsvaryingmanifestations:criminalandnoncriminal,pri-mary,andsecondary(cf.Karpman,1941;Lykken,1957,1995;Skeemetal.,2007),stableandag-gressive(Hicksetal.,2004),unsuccessfulandsuccessful(Hall&Benning,2006).Below,weconsidereachofthesekeyconstructsinturn.DisinhibitionTheterm“disinhibition”isusedheretodescribeageneralphenotypicpropensitytowardimpulsecontrolproblemsentailingalackofplanfulnessandforesight,impairedregulationofaffectandurges,insistenceonimmediategratification,anddeficientbehavioralrestraint.Relatedcon-ceptsincludeexternalizing(Achenbach&Edel-brock,1978;Kruegeretal.,2002),disinhibitorypsychopathology(Gorenstein&Newman,1980;Sher&Trull,1994),andlowinhibitorycontrol(Kochanska,Murray,andCoy,1997).Inper-sonalityterms,disinhibitioncanbeviewedasthenexusofimpulsivityandnegativeaffectivity(Krueger,1999a;Sher&Trull,1994).Promi-nentbehavioralmanifestationsofdisinhibitionincludeirresponsibility,impatience,impulsiveactionleadingtonegativeconsequences,aliena-tionanddistrust,aggressiveactingout(inpartic-ular,angry–reactiveaggression),untrustworthi-ness,pronenesstodrugandalcoholproblems,andengagementinillicitorothernorm-violatingactivities(Krueger,Markon,Patrick,Benning,&Kramer,2007).Historicconceptualizationsofpsychopathyhaveemphasizedthisexternalizingcomponenttovaryingdegrees,andtoanimportantextent,differencesofopinionregardingtheappropriatedefinitionandboundariesofthepsychopathyconstructcanbetracedtothiscomponent.Exter-nalizingencompassesabroadrangeofpatho-logicbehavioralphenomenaincludingchildcon-ductproblems,adultcriminaldeviance,angryaggression,andaddictivebehaviorsofvaryingsorts(Kruegeretal.,2002,2007;Young,Stal-lings,Corley,Krauter,&Hewitt,2000).Somehistoricwritersdefinedpsychopathybroadlyto 2.ThetermdisinhibitionasusedherediffersfromKagan’s(1994)conceptionofdisinhibitedtemperamentinchildren,whichconnotesalackoftimidityinnovelsituationsandisassociatedprospectivelywithareducedincidenceofanxi-ety-relatedproblems(Kagan&Snidman,1999).Thiscon-ceptionismoresimilartotheconstructofboldnessde-scribedhere.Triarchicconceptualizationofpsychopathy includesubstance-relatedaddictionsandothernonnormativebehaviors(e.g.,sexualdeviancyofvaryingkinds)thatintersectwiththeexter-nalizingspectrum(e.g.,Prichard,1835);otherwriterscharacterizedpsychopathyintermsthatappearmoreapplicabletoexternalizingindi-viduals(e.g.,Arieti,1963,1967;Partridge,1928a,1928b);andothersdescribedsubtypesofpsychopathswhowouldmoreaptlybeclassifiedashighexternalizers(e.g.,Craft,1966;Kraepelin,1915).Thetraditionalnotionofthe“symptomatic”orsecondarypsychopath(Karpman,1941;Lykken,1957)appearsconsis-tentwiththeclinicalpresentationofthehighexternalizingindividual.Contemporaryresearchdemonstratesthatthedistinctvarianceasso-ciatedwiththeantisocialdeviance(Factor2)componentofthePCL-Rlargelyreflectstheexternalizingfactor(Patricketal.,2005)andtheimpulsiveantisocialitycomponentofthePPI(PPI-II)exhibitsarobustgeneticassociationwithscoresontheexternalizingfactor(Blonigenetal.,2005).Basedonitsknowncorrelates,theI/CPcomponentofFrickandHare’s(2001)APSDalsoappearstoindextheexternalizingfactor.However,contemporaryresearchersinthefieldwouldgenerallynotviewdisinhibitionorexternalizingasequivalenttopsychopathy.Inparticular,asmentioned,externalizingisassoci-atedwithheightenednegativeaffectivityasop-posedtoanabsenceofanxietyorfear.Highexternalizingisalsoassociatedwithanin-creasedratherthanreducedincidenceofinter-nalizing(anxiety,mood)problemsinchildhoodandadulthood(Achenbach&Edelbrock,1978;Krueger,1999b)andwithahigherratherthanlowerincidenceofsuicidalbehaviorinadultoffendersandcommunityparticipants(Verona&Patrick,2000;Verona,Sachs-Ericsson,&Joiner,2004).Itiswhenexternalizingtenden-ciesarecoupledwithdispositionalboldnessormeannessthatadiagnosisofpsychopathywouldbeconsideredapplicable.Thetermboldisusedheretodescribeapheno-typicstyleentailingacapacitytoremaincalmandfocusedinsituationsinvolvingpressureorthreat,anabilitytorecoverquicklyfromstress-fulevents,highself-assuranceandsocialeffi-cacy,andatoleranceforunfamiliarityanddan-ger.Termsrelatedtoboldnessincludefearlessdominance(Benning,Patrick,Blonigen,etal.,2005),daringness,audacity,indomitability,re-siliency(Block&Block,1980),andhardiness(Kobasa,1979).Inpersonalityterms,boldnesscanbeviewedasthenexusofsocialdominance,lowstressreactivity,andthrill–adventureseek-ing(Benningetal.,2003;Benning,Patrick,Blo-nigen,etal.,2005).Prominentbehavioralman-ifestationsofboldnessincludeimperturbability,socialpoise,assertivenessandpersuasiveness,bravery,andventuresomeness.Asusedhere,boldnessisnotconsideredsynonymouswiththeterm“fearless.”Rather,fearlessnessisconceptualizedasanunderlyingconstitutionallybased(genotypic)dispositionentailingreducedsensitivityofthebrain’sdefen-sivemotivationalsystemtocuessignalingthreatorpunishment(Fowles&Dindo,2006;Patrick&Bernat,2006,inpress).Boldnessisonewayinwhichgenotypicfearlessnesscanbeex-pressedphenotypically.However,asdiscussedinthenextsubsection,genotypicfearlessnessmayalsocontributetophenotypicmeanness.Cleckley’sconceptualizationofpsychopathyemphasizedphenotypicboldnesstogetherwithdisinhibitory(externalizing)tendencies.Bold-nesswasevidentinhiscasedescriptionsanddi-agnosticcriteriaintermsofpoiseandhighsocialefficacy,absenceofanxietyorneuroticsymp-toms,diminishedemotionalresponsiveness,im-perviousnesstopunishment(“failuretolearnbyexperience”),andlowsuicidality.Otherhistoricwritersconcernedwithpsychopathyinpsychiat-ricpatientsasopposedtocriminalsamples(e.g.,Kraepelin,Schneider)alsoidentifiedboldexter-nalizingtypes.Morecontemporaneously,fear-lessness,andunresponsivenesstopunishmentcueswereemphasizedprominentlyinHare’sclas-sicpsychophysiologicalstudiesofthe1960sand1970s(cf.Hare,1978)ininfluentialtheoriesofpsychopathyadvancedbyFowles(1980)andLykken(1995).Lilienfeld’sself-reportPPI,whichwasde-velopedtoindextraitsembodiedinCleckley’sconception,includesabroadfactor(PPI-I)thatdirectlyreflectstheconstructofboldness.Thesubscalesthatdefinethisfactorarestressimmu-nity,socialpotency,and(toalesserdegree)C.J.Patrick,D.C.Fowles,andR.F.Krueger Notably,thisfactorofthePPIisuncorrelatedwithtendenciestowardimpulsiveantisocialdeviancetappedbyPPI-II.Inthisre-spect,theconstructofboldnesstappedbyPPI-Icanbeviewedasindexingamorebenignex-pressionofdispositionalfearlessness:onethatisphenotypicallydistinctfromaggressiveex-ternalizingdevianceandlikelyofimportancetoconceptualizingpsychopathyinnonviolent,noncriminalsamples(cf.Lykken,1995).TheconstructofboldnessalsoappearstobetappedsomewhatbyFactor1ofthePCL-R(Benning,Patrick,Blonigen,etal.,2005),inparticular,byitemscomprisingitsinterpersonalfacet,mostnotablyItems1(charm/glibness)and2(gran-diosesenseofself-worth;Patricketal.,2007).However,thePCL-Rinterpersonalfacetover-lapswiththePCL-R’sAffective,Lifestyle,andAntisocialfacets,indicatingthatthePCL-Rin-dexestheconstructofboldnesslessdirectlyandlessdistinctivelythanthePPI-I.Asde-scribednext,Factor1ofthePCL-Rasawholeap-pearstoindexmeannessmoresothanboldness.Thetermmeandescribesaconstellationofphenotypicattributesincludingdeficientempa-thy,disdainforandlackofcloseattachmentswithothers,rebelliousness,excitementseeking,exploitativeness,andempowermentthroughcruelty.Termsrelatedtomeannessincludecal-lousness(Fricketal.,1994),coldheartedness(Lilienfeld&Widows,2005),andantagonism(Lynam&Derefinko,2006).Withrespecttoba-sicdimensionsofinterpersonalbehavior(Leary,1957;Wiggins,1982),meannesscanbeviewedasoccupyingapositionmidwaybetween(high)dominanceand(low)affiliation(Blackburn,2006;Harpuretal.,1989).Consistentwiththis,Saucier(1992)identifiedaconstructakintomeanness(representedbyadjectivedescriptorssuchasrough,tough,unemotional,andinsensi-tive)asthenexusofhighdominance,lowaf-filiation,andlowneuroticism(highemotionalstability);notably,thisconfigurationoftraitsmirrorstheFFMcorrelatesofPPIcoldhearted-ness,whichincludelowA,lowE,andlowN(aswellaslowO;Rossetal.,2009).Fromthisperspective,meannesscanbeviewedasagenticdisaffiliation,whichisamotivationalstyleinwhichpleasureandsatisfactionareac-tivelysoughtwithoutregardforandattheex-penseofothers(cf.Schneider’s,1934,“activeaffectionless”type).Incontrastwithsocialwithdrawal,whichentailspassivedisengage-mentfromothers(“movingawayfrompeople”;Horney,1945),meannessentailsactiveexploi-tativenessandconfrontation(“movingagainstpeople”;Horney,1945).Characteristicbehav-ioralmanifestationsincludearroganceandver-balderisiveness,defianceofauthority,lackofclosepersonalrelationships,aggressivecom-petitiveness,physicalcrueltytowardpeopleandanimals,predatory(proactive,premeditated)aggression,strategicexploitationofothersforgain,andexcitementseekingthroughdestruc-tiveness.Thenotionofmeannessiscentraltoconcep-tionsofpsychopathyincriminalanddelinquentsamples.McCordandMcCord(1964)identifiedlovelessnessandguiltlessnessascentraltocrim-inalpsychopathy.Quay(1964)listedlackofconcernforothers,anabsenceofnormalaffec-tionalbonds,anddestructiveandassaultivebe-haviorascharacteristicfeaturesofpsychopathy(laterdubbed“undersocializedaggressivedelin-quency”;Quay,1986)injuvenileoffenders.TheaffectivefacetofHare’sPCL-RconsistsofitemsthatcoverMcCordandMcCord’slovelessness(Item7,“shallowaffect,”whichincludesrefer-encetoalackofgenuineattachments/loverela-tionshipswithothers;andItem8,“callous/lackofempathy,”whichencompassescruel/sadistictreatmentofothers,contemptuousness,andde-structiveness)andguiltlessness(Item6,“lackofremorseorguilt,”andItem16,“failuretoac-ceptresponsibilityforownactions”).Notably,theinterpersonalitemsofthePCL-Ralsoin-cludeelementsofmeannessintheirdefinitions: 3.InadditiontoloadingtoalesserdegreethaneitherstressimmunityorsocialpotencyonPPI-I,thefearlessnesssubscaleofthePPIalsocross-loadsreliablyonPPI-II.ThelikelyexplanationappearstobethatPPIfearless-nesscontainsvariancerelatedtoboredomsusceptibilityanddisinhibitionfacetsofsensationseeking,aswellasthrill–adventureseekingandexperience-seekingfacets(cf.Zuckerman,1979);thethrill–adventureseekingcomponentofPPIfearlessnessinparticularaccountsforitsassociationwithPPI-I,whereastheboredomsus-ceptibilityanddisinhibitioncomponentsaccountforitsassociationwithPPI-II(cf.Benning,Patrick,Blonigen,etal.,2005).Triarchicconceptualizationofpsychopathy Item1(“glibnessandsuperficialcharm”)in-cludesreferencetoexcessiveslicknessandisas-signedascoreof1(outof2)incaseswheretheexamineeexhibitsa“macho”or“toughguy”de-meanor;Item2(grandiosesenseofself-worthincludesreferencetoarroganceandasenseofsuperiorityoverothers;thecriteriaforItem4pathologicallying)describeanindividualwhoisroutinelydeceptiveininterpersonalinter-actionsandwhoenjoysdeceivingothers;Item5conning/manipulative)referstopredatoryex-ploitationofothersforpersonalgainwithoutconcernforthewelfareofvictims.Thebest-knowninstrumentsforassessingpsychopathyinyouth(PCL:YV,CPS,andAPSD)weremod-eledafterthePCL-Randlikewiseemphasizemeanness(socialandemotionaldetachment,callousness,andexploitativeness)intheiraffec-tive–interpersonalitems.Akeyquestioniswhethermeannesscanbemeasuredseparatelyfromcriminalorantisocialbehavior.InthecaseofthePCL-R,ahierarchical(bifactor)analysisrevealedthatthemajorityofitsitemsareprimarilyindicatorsofageneraloverarchingfactorthatreflectsaggressiveexter-nalizingdeviancy(Patricketal.,2007).Thestrongestandpurestindicatorsofthisfactorwereitemsreflectingaggressivecriminalbehav-ior(i.e.,itemsassociatedwiththeantisocialfacetofthePCL-R):earlybehavioralproblems,poorbehavioralcontrols,criminalversatility,andjuveniledelinquency.Inaddition,mostoftheaffectiveandinterpersonalitemsofthePCL-Ralsoloadedappreciablyonthisgeneralfactorwithtwooffouritemsfromeachfacetloadingmorestronglyonthegeneralfactorthanondistinguishableaffectiveorinterpersonalsubfactors.Specifically,thepathologicallyingandconning/manipulativeitemsloadedmorestronglyonthegeneralfactorthanontheinter-personalsubfactor(onwhichglibness/charmandgrandiosityshowedtheirprimaryloadings),andtheshallowaffectandcallous/lackofempa-thyitemsloadedmorestronglyonthegeneralfactorthanontheaffectivesubfactor(onwhichlackofremorseandfailuretoacceptresponsibil-ityshowedtheirprimaryloadings).Asnotedear-lier,theheavysaturationofmostPCL-Ritemswithexternalizingdeviancyreflectsthefactthatthescoringcriteriaformostofitsitemsin-cludereferencetoantisocialbehavior.However,recentresearchonthescopeandstructureoftheexternalizingspectrumsuggeststhatthemeannesscomponentofpsychopathycanbedisaggregatedfromitsdisinhibitory(ex-ternalizing)component.Specifically,usingdatacollectedacrossmultipleiterativewavesfromsamplesincludingmaleandfemaleprisonersaswellasnonincarceratedmenandwomen,Krue-geretal.(2007)developedself-reportscalestocomprehensivelyindexthedomainofexternaliz-ingproblemsandtraitsintermsofelementalcon-structs.Unidimensionalscalesweredevelopedtomeasure23separateconstructsincluding:vary-ingfacetsofimpulsivity,differingformsofag-gression(physical–reactive,relational–proactive,anddestructive),irresponsibility,rebelliousness,excitementseeking,blameexternalization,andalcohol,drug,andmarijuanause/problems.Con-firmatoryfactoranalysesofthese23scalesyieldedevidenceofasuperordinatefactor(exter-nalizing)onwhichallsubscalesloadedsubstan-tially(.45orhigher),andtwosubordinatefactorsthataccountedforresidualvarianceinparticularsubscales.Thestrongestandpurestindicatorsoftheoverarchingexternalizingfactorwerescalesindexingirresponsibilityandproblematicimpul-sivity(i.e.,pronenesstoimpulsiveactsresultinginharmtooneselforothers).Oneofthetwosub-ordinatefactorswasdefinedbyresidualvarianceinsubscalesmeasuringcallousness,aggression(relational/proactiveanddestructive,inparticular;physical/reactiveaggressionloadedmoresub-stantiallyonthesuperordinateexternalizingfac-tor),excitementseeking,rebelliousness,and(low)honesty.Theothersubfactorwasdefinedbyresidualvarianceinsubscalesindexingalco-hol/druguseandsubstance-relatedproblems.Itisimportanttonotethatthevariancedefiningeachofthesesubfactorsconsistedofvarianceincommonamongspecificscalesthatwasunrelated(orthogonal)tothebroadexternalizingfactor.Thesefindingsindicatethataseparatepro-pensityentailinglowempathyandstimulation-seekingtendencies,distinguishablefromthegeneralexternalizingfactor,contributesinde-pendentlytoaggressivebehavior,particularlyaggressionthatinvolvesinstrumentalcoercionandabuseofothers.Othervariablesthatloadedtosomeextentonthiscallous–aggressionsub-factorincludeddishonestyandrebelliousness.Notably,theseindicatorvariablescloselyparallelC.J.Patrick,D.C.Fowles,andR.F.Krueger theitemcontentandknowncorrelatesoftheCUfactoroftheAPSD.Specifically,(a)theitemsoftheAPSDCUfactorreflectlackofconcernforthefeelingsofothers,disregardforformalre-sponsibilities(schoolwork),shallowaffectandinsincerity,lackofguilt,andlying/conning(Fricketal.,1994);and(b)amongyouthexhibit-ingsymptomsofconductdisorder(CD),thosehighinCUtraitsshowincreasedlevelsofproac-tiveaggression(alongwithcomparablelevelsofreactiveaggression)andenhancedthrill-seekingtendenciescomparedwiththoselowinCUtraits(Frick&Dickens,2006;Frick&White,2008).Inturn,theknownexternalcorrelatesoftheAPSDCUfactorpointtolowdispositionalfearasonecontributortophenotypicmeanness.Specifically,asnotedearlier,higherscoresonthisfactoroftheAPSDareassociatedwithlowerscoresonmeasuresofanxietyandneurot-icism,diminishedresponsivenesstothreateningandaffectivelydistressingstimuli,andheight-enedtoleranceofunfamiliarityandrisk(Blair,2006;Frick&Dickens,2006;Frick&White,2008;Marshetal.,2008).However,totheex-tentthatmeannessconstitutesaphenotypicex-pressionofunderlyingfearlessness,itisama-lignantexpressionoflowfearincomparisonwithboldness.EstablishedDevelopmentalConstructsRelevanttoanUnderstandingofTheseDistinctivePsychopathyComponentsAssuggestedabove,itispotentiallyvaluabletoexamineestablishedconceptsandfindingsfromthedevelopmentalpsychopathologylitera-turethatbearonthephenotypicconstructsofdis-inhibition,boldness,andmeanness.Insodoing,onemustexpectcomplexityratherthansimplerelationships.Theconstructsofequifinalityandmultifinality(Cicchetti&Rogosch,1996),fun-damentaltodevelopmentalpsychopathology,underscorethatmultiplepathwaysleadtoagivenphenotype(equifinality)andthatearlyetiologi-calriskfactorsinteractwithotherinfluencesincomplexcausalchainstoyieldvariedpheno-types(multifinality)(e.g.,Hinshaw,2008).Sim-ilarly,etiologicalpathwaysinvolveahostofcomplexmechanismssuchasgene–environmentinteractions,gene–geneinteractions,reciprocalormutuallyinteractiveindividual–environmentprocesses,gene–environmentcorrelations,ge-neticandenvironmentalinfluencesongeneex-pression,geneticeffectsonenvironments,andenvironmentalinfluencesonbraindevelopment(plasticity),makingitmoreappropriatetothinkintermsofriskfactorsthancausalfactorsandtoexpectmodestcontributionsfromanygivenriskfactor(Hinshaw,2008;Rutter,2006).AnimportantcontextforthisliteratureisMoffittandLynam’s(e.g.,Moffitt,1993;Ly-nam,1998;Moffitt&Lynam,1994)distinctionbetweenearly-onsetandadolescent-onsetanti-socialbehaviorinwhichearlyonsetisassoci-atedwithariskoflife-coursepersistentantiso-cialbehavior,includingsomeindividualswhomeetadultcriteriaforpsychopathy.Theearly-onsettrajectoryinvolvesoppositionaldefiantdisorderthat“matures”intoCDaroundage10andisassociatedwithcomorbidattention-deficit/hyperactivitydisorder(ADHD)involv-inghyperactivity(i.e.,notthepredominantlyinattentivesubtype).Oneverylargeandonesmallerliteratureattemptstoarticulatetwotem-perament-basedpathwaystosevereconductproblemsinchildren.FrickandMorris(2004)provideacomprehensivereviewoftheselitera-tures,andthecurrentsummaryisadaptedfromtheirreviewunlessotherwisenoted.Thelargerliteratureencompassesthenotionof“difficulttemperament”ininfants,andsomewhatinterre-lateddevelopmentalconceptsof“failureofse-cureattachment”and“coerciveexchanges.”Theseconcepts,discussedinthefirstsubsec-tionbelow,appearmostrelevanttophenotypicconstructsofdisinhibitionandmeanness.Thesmaller,morerecentliteraturefocusesondispo-sitionalfearlessnessasapathwaytopsycho-pathy.Thisconceptappearsmostrelevanttophe-notypicconstructsofboldnessandmeanness.FactorscontributingtodisinhibitionandDifficulttemperament.Thedevelopmentalcon-ceptof“difficulttemperament”isacomplexoneinvolvinghighnegativeaffectandirritabil-ity,highactivity,withdrawalfromnovelstim-uli,poorperformancewheresustainedattentionisrequired,anddifficultyadaptingtochangesintheenvironment,characteristicsfoundtobeassociatedwithariskofconductproblemsTriarchicconceptualizationofpsychopathy thatbeginearlyinchildhoodwithariskoflife-longantisocialbehavior.FrickandMorris(2004)suggestthattheintensenegativeemo-tionalreactionsofangerandfrustrationarethecoreriskfactor,consistentwiththeclinicalpictureofirritability,lowtoleranceforfrustra-tion,andangryoutburstsinoppositionaldefiantdisorder,theearlychildhoodsyndromeassoci-atedwithahighriskofearlyonsetconductproblemsandchronicantisocialbehavior.Al-mostbydefinition,theseexcessivenegativeemotionalreactionspointtodifficultiesinemo-tionregulation,ormorespecificallyregulationofanger.Thedevelopmentofemotionregula-tionabilitiesinvolvesbothchildcharacteristicsandtheeffortsofparentsandothersocializingagentstohelpthechildlearntomanageemo-tions(e.g.,Cole&Hall,2008;Frick&Morris,2004;Thompson,2001).Animportant,relativelyrecentdistinctionbe-tweenautomaticandeffortfuldimensionsofemo-tionalresponsivenessisimportanttoappreciatingthemultipleinfluencesonemotionregulation.Automaticreactivityreferstoinvoluntaryorpas-sivereactionstoemotionalstimuliwithseparatedimensionsforreactionstocuesforpositive(re-wards)andnegative(punishment,threateningemotionalstimuli)events.Effortfulorvoluntarycontrolreferstoinhibitingdominantorprepotentbehavioralandemotionalresponsesandtodirect-ingattentioninadaptivewaysinordertoregulatebehaviorandemotions.Giventhateffortfulcon-trolhelpstoinhibitatendencytostrongautomaticnegativereactivity,bothdimensionsarerelevanttoemotionregulation.Themostseveredifficulttemperamentwillinvolveacombinationofstrongautomaticnegativereactivitywithweakeffortfulcontrol.Theseparateassessmentofautomaticandeffortfulresponsivenessisnotwelldeveloped,althoughFrickandMorrisoffersuggestionsastohowtoachieveit.Becauseeffortfulcontrolstrategiesoftenareseenascomponentsofthebroaderconceptofexecutivefunctions,itisnotclearwhetherdifficultyinregulatingangerandhostilityisthecoreriskfactorforconductprob-lemsorwhetherabroaderdeficitinexecutivefunctionsisthecriticalriskfactor.Thedeficitinemotionregulationincreasestheriskofconductproblemsinavarietyofways:in-terferingwiththeacquisitionofappropriateso-cialcognitionsandbehavior,increasingpeerre-jectionwithsubsequentreductioninpositivesocializingexperiencesandincreaseddeviantpeerassociation,facilitatingthedevelopmentofreactiveaggressionregardingpeers,producingexcessivelystrongnegativeaffecttopunishmentthatunderminestheefficacyofskilledmaternalgentlediscipline,andincreasingtheprobabilityofmutuallycoerciveexchangeswithparents.Thus,difficulttemperamentinvolvingpooremo-tionregulationand/orpoorexecutivefunctions(attributesembodiedintheconstructofdisinhibi-tion)increasestheriskofsevereantisocialbehav-iorandaversiveinteractionswithcaretakersandpeers,settingthechildonapathwaythatmayde-velopintobehaviorthatmeetsthecriteriaforpsy-chopathyasdefinedbythePCL-Rinadulthood.Failureofsecureattachment.Asecondrelevant(andoverlapping)literatureconcernsthedevelop-mentalconceptof“secureattachment”(Camp-bell,1998),assessedat1yearofageandviewedasprovidingtheinfantwithasecurebaseforex-ploringtheenvironmentandamajorsourceofcomfortwhendistressed,fearful,orill.Thislitera-ture,too,focusesondifficulttemperamentasariskfactor,buttheissueofsecureattachmentisap-plicabletoanyfactorsthataffectearlyparentingandithasdirectimplicationsforrelationshipswithothers.Thebasicmodelsuggeststhatadiffi-culttemperamentisachallengefortheparent,re-quiringmuchgreaterparentingskillthaninfantswithapleasant,happy,andeasilysoothabletem-perament.Absentsuchunusuallygoodparentingskillorstrongsocialsupport,adverseeffectsonparent–infantinteractionsarelikelytoresultinaninsecureor“anxiousorambivalentattachmentcharacterizedbyexcessiveanger,clinging,and/oravoidancebehavioronthepartoftheinfant”(Campbell,1998,p.13).Contextualfactorsofpovertyandstressfullifeeventsincreasetheriskofinsecureattachment(probablybydisruptingparenting).Extremeenvironmentssuchasabuseandneglectorchronicmaternalpsychopathologycanproduceinsecureorevendisorganizedattach-ments(moreseverethaninsecureattachment),quiteapartfromtheinfant’stemperament.Thereissome,butmixed,evidencethatat-tachmentproblemsatageoneyeararepredic-tiveoflaterinternalizingandexternalizingproblems(Campbell,1998).TheprimarypointinthepresentcontextisthattemperamentalandC.J.Patrick,D.C.Fowles,andR.F.Krueger otherfactorsthatchallengeordisruptoptimalparent–childinteractionsduringthefirstyearlikelyhaveanadverseimpactontheinfant’sat-tachmenttotheprimarycaregiver.Thisdevel-opmentishypothesizedtoproduce“internalworkingmodels”ofsocialinteractionsthatarelessadaptive,coloringtheinfant’ssubse-quentsocialinteractions.Optimalenviron-mentsprobablyeffectivelyreverseorattenuatethiseffect,butthedevelopmentofpoorattach-mentsininfancysetsthestageforfurtherfail-urestodeveloppositiverelationshipswithoth-ers.Therangeofnegativeorientationstoothersinpsychopaths(i.e.,hostile,angry,callous,ex-ploitive)canbearguedtoreflectatleastinpartafailuretodeveloppositiveattachments.Ifso,thefailureofsecureattachmentconstitutesariskfactorforsomeoftheaffective–interper-sonalaspectsofpsychopathy,thatis,thoseem-bodiedintheconceptofmeanness.Coerciveexchanges.AmajorlineofresearchonthedevelopmentofantisocialbehaviorbyPatter-sonandhiscolleagues(e.g.,Dishion,French,&Patterson,1995;Patterson,Reid,&Dishion,1992;Patterson,Reid,andEddy,2002;Snyder,Reid,Patterson,2003)focusedonthe“coercionhypothesis.”Accordingtothisnowwell-estab-lishedmodel,whenthereisconflictbetweenpar-entandchild(e.g.,theparenturgesthechildtostopsomethingthechildwantstodoortodosomethingthechilddoesnotwanttodo),ifthechild’scoerciveresponse(e.g.,noncompliance,tempertantrums,generallyaversivebehavior)causestheparenttogivein,thechild’scoercivere-sponseisnegativelyreinforced.Similarly,whentheparentgivesinandthechildterminatesthecoercion,theparentisnegativelyreinforced.InPatterson’ssociallearningmodel,thousandsofthesecoerciveexchangesproducearesponsere-pertoireinwhichcoercionisadominantandstronglyreinforcedbehavior.Coerciveexchangesgeneralizetopeersandteachers,withsubsequentimmediaterewardsbutdelayednegativeconse-quencesintheformofrejection.Thecombinationofcoercivebehaviorandrejectionbynormalpeersfacilitatesassociationwithdeviantpeersandsub-sequentsocializationintoawiderangeofantiso-cialbehaviors.Theseinvestigatorsviewaninfanttempera-mentassociatedwithariskfordevelopingADHDinvolvinghyperactivityasariskfactorforcoerciveexchanges(Patterson,DeGarmo,&Knutson,2000).Intheactualstudy,astructuralequationmodelwaspresentedtosupporttheirhy-pothesisthatthecomorbidityofADHDandCDreflectsanearly(ADHD)andlate(CD)manifes-tationofasharedprocess.Althoughtheirownresearchhasinvolvedolderchildren,theseauthorshypothesizethatthecombinationofanextremelyactiveanddifficult(irritable)infantandanonre-sponsive(noncontingent)caretakerinitiatethisprocess,whichprobabilisticallyresultsincoerciveandsociallyunskilledbehaviorbyage24months,consistentwithadiagnosisofhyperactivitybe-tweentheagesof2and4years.Thus,theliteratureoncoercionpointstoatemperamentstronglysim-ilartothatdescribedabovefordifficulttempera-mentandforpooremotionregulation,anditfo-cusesontheetiologyofcoercive,antagonisticsocialinteractions,followedbysocializationintoanantisocialsubculturebydeviantpeers.LiketheFrickandMorrisreview,Pattersonandcol-leagueslinkthisdevelopmentalmodeltoearly-on-set,chronicsevereantisocialbehavior.Insummary,thisdevelopmentalapproachcombinesahyperactive,irritabletemperament,parentingthatisnotuptothechallengeofsuchatemperament,familyinteractionsthatfacili-tatethecharacteristicsofhyperactivity,comor-bidityofADHDandantisocialbehavior,andtheearly-onsetofantisocialbehaviorassociatedwithlaterpsychopathybyMoffittandLynam.LowfearasasubstrateformeannessandboldnessGiventheemphasisonaffective–interpersonal(Factor1)featuresinclassicviewsofpsychop-athyandtheassociationofthosefeatureswithlowfearintheadultpsychopathyliterature,thereshouldbeanadditionaletiologicalpath-wayformoreclassic,emotionallydetachedpsychopathsinthechildhoodliterature.Asde-scribedearlier,theAPSDdevelopedbyFrickandcolleaguescanbeusedtoidentifyyouthhighonCUtraits,whichcapturemanyoftheaf-fective–interpersonalfeaturesofpsychopathyandarecharacterizedbysuchlowfearattributesaslowscoresonanxietyandneuroticismscales,reducedsensitivitytostressfulstimuliandsituations,andadominanceofreward-seekingTriarchicconceptualizationofpsychopathy approachoverpassiveavoidanceofpunishmentinconflictsituations(cf.Frick&Morris,2006).HighCUyoutharecharacterizedbyhighlevelsofinstrumental,premeditated,orproactiveag-gression(directedtowardacquisitionofgoods,services,ordominance)aswellasbyhighlevelsofreactive,hostile,orimpulsiveaggres-sion(usuallyanangryresponsetothreatorprovocation),whereasantisocialyouthlowonCU(thosewith“difficulttemperaments,”asde-scribedabove)showpredominantlyreactiveag-gression.Ofinterestinthepresentcontext,Frick(Frick&Marsee,2006;Frick&Morris,2004)citesresearchonthedevelopmentofinternalizedconscienceinchildrenbyKochanskaandhercolleagues(1993,1995,1997;Kochanska,Gross,Lin,&Nichols,2002)asrelevanttothelowfearpathwayforpsychopathy.Basedoninitialclassificationsoffearfultemperamentattoddlerage,Kochanskaiden-tifiedtwopathwaystothedevelopmentofinter-nalizedconsciencebyage4.Usingamediansplitforfearfultemperament,maternalgentlediscipline(“good”discipline:parentalgentledisciplinedeemphasizingpowerandcapitaliz-inginsteadoninternaldiscomfort)predictedinternalizedconscienceforfearfulbutnotfear-lesschildren.Thus,thisdiscipline-basedpath-waywasineffectiveforfearlesschildren,con-sistentwiththehypothesisthatpoorfearconditioningimpairsmildpunishment-basedsocialization.Incontrast,securityofattachment(astand-inforaclose,mutuallypositivepar-ent–childrelationship)predictedinternalizedconscienceforfearlesschildren.Theseresultsdemonstratethatalowfeartemperamentdoesnotinevitablyleadtoafailureofconsciencede-velopment.Withsufficientskillonthepartoftheparent,amutuallypositiverelationshipcapitalizesonthechild’sfullyfunctionalre-ward-basedlearningtopromotesocialization,aprocesslikelytofosterboldnessasopposedtomeanness(seenextsection).Quitepossibly,however,extremelylowfearmaymakethechildmoredifficulttocontrolwithapotentialforconflictthatwouldinterferewiththedevel-opmentofamutuallypositiverelationship.Combinedwithotherriskfactors(e.g.,lowge-notypicaffiliativeness;parentalabuseorne-glect),thismaypushgenotypicfearlessnessinthedirectionofphenotypicmeanness.ImplicationsforConceptualizingPathwaystoPsychopathyAlthoughthedevelopmentalpsychopathologyliteraturedoesnotdirectlyaddresstheimplica-tionsoftheaforementionedetiologicfactorsfordistinctivephenotypiccomponentsofadultpsy-chopathy(disinhibition,boldness,meanness),somereasonableextrapolationsfromexist-ingdatacanbeadvanced.Figure1providesagraphicdepictionofinterrelationsamongthesedistinctphenotypicconstructs,andillustratesaforementionedideasastohowfactorsofdiffi-culttemperamentandlowdispositionalfearpresumablycontributetothesephenotypicout-comes.Theremainderofthissectionelaboratesfurtheroncontributoryprocesses/pathways.Onenotablepoint,impliedintheforegoingsection,isthatboththeattachmentandcoerciontrajectoriesprobablycontributetopsychopathicoutcomesinlowfearaswellasdifficulttem-peramentyouth,bypromotingtendenciestowardantagonismandcallousness(i.e.,meanness).Totheextentthatalowfeartemperamentcreatesachallengeforparents,theremaywellbeinterfer-encewiththedevelopmentofpositive(secure)at-tachmentsandemergenceofcoerciveprocesseswithinthefamilythatthengeneralizetopeersandteachersandresultindeviantpeerassociation,consistentwiththeprincipleofequifinality.Thus,thesedevelopmentalinfluenceswillbecommontothetwotemperament-basedriskfactors,andwilltendtoproduceoverlappingphenotypesinimportantrespects(i.e.,individualsexhibitingtendenciestowardinterpersonalantagonismandexploitativebehavior).Tobesure,theaffectivecomponentswilldifferinclearcases,butpoorat-tachments,coerciverepertoires,andexploitativeattitudeswouldcharacterizebothgroups.Asecondpoint,alsoalludedtoearlier,isthatthedifficulttemperamentinvolvingpooremotionregulation/poorexecutivefunctionsmapsmostclearlyontothephenotypeofdisinhibitionorex-ternalizing.Theineptorunskilledimpulsivityandtheirritablehighnegativeaffectcombinewithde-velopmentalexperiencesofadversarialinterac-tionswithcaregivers,peers,andteacherstopro-motehighlevelsofanger,hostility,fighting,drugandalcoholproblems,academicandoccupa-tionalfailure,andsoforth,inthecontextofhighscoresonanxietyandneuroticism.TodistinguishC.J.Patrick,D.C.Fowles,andR.F.Krueger theconceptofdifficulttemperamentfromthatoffearlesstemperament,whichasnotedcanalsobeconstruedas“difficult,”andtohighlightitsrele-vancetothephenotypicconstructofdisinhibitiondescribedearlier,weadvocateuseofthealterna-tiveexpression“disinhibitedtemperament.”Althoughtherearefewdirectdatainthedevel-opmentalliteraturethatspeakstoalternativephe-notypicoutcomesofboldnessversusmeanness,therecanbereasonablespeculation.Consistentwithaforementionedsuggestions,onehypothesisisthatboldnessreflectsaphenotypicorientationthatevolvesmorenaturallyfromthelowfearge-notype(“apurer,morebenignexpressionofun-derlyingtemperamentalfearlessness”),whereasmeannesslikelyreflectsanoverlaybecauseofdevelopmentalexperiencesgoneawry.Thelowstressreactivityelementofboldnesscanbeviewedasadirectmanifestationoflowdefense-systemsensitivity,withhighsocialdominanceandthrill–adventureseekingrepresentingaffili-atedphenotypicexpressionsofrewardseekingunrestrainedbyfearandanxiety.Incontrast,themeannessattributesofdeficientempathy,disdainforandlackofcloseattachmentswithothers,rebel-liousness,exploitativeness,andempowermentthroughcrueltycanbeviewedasoutcomesofalowfeartemperament(fearlessgenotype)inwhichtheprocessesofsocializationhavefailed.Assuggestedabove,thefailureofpositiveattach-mentcombinedwiththeexperienceofcoerciveinteractionswithothersislikelytopromoteacal-lous,exploitiveattitudetowardothers,andtheseattitudesarelikelytobesupportedandstrength-enedthroughdeviantpeerassociation.However,thesefeaturesmayalsobeassociatedwiththe Figure1.Aschematicdepictionofhypothesizedinterrelationsamongphenotypicconstructsofdisinhibi-tion,boldness,andmeanness(circles)andcontributionsmadetoeachbyunderlyingetiologic-dispositionalfactorsofdifficulttemperamentandlowfear(arrows),asdescribedinthedevelopmentalliterature.Disin-hibitionandmeannessaredepictedasmoderatelyinterrelated,basedonfindingsforvariousexistingpsy-chopathyinventoriesthatincludecoverageoftheseconstructs.Difficulttemperamentisdepictedascontrib-utingtoeachoftheseconstructs,asdiscussedinthefinalsectionofthemaintext.Disinhibitionandboldnessaredepictedasminimallyinterrelated,basedonfindingsforthePsychopathicPersonalityInventory,inwhichfearlessdominance(boldness)representsaseparatefactorfromimpulsiveantisociality.Meannessandboldnessaredepictedassomewhatinterrelated,basedonevidenceforacontributionoflowdisposi-tionalfeartoeach(seetext).Thetriarchicmodelconceivesofpsychopathyasencompassingthesethreedis-tinctphenotypicdispositions.Thesyndromeofpsychopathyasdefinedclinicallyentailsdisinhibitioninconjunctionwitheitherboldnessormeanness.Cleckley’s(1941,1976)conceptualizationofpsychopathemphasizedboldnessmoresothanmeanness.Criminologicconceptions,andinstrumentsdevelopedtoas-sesspsychopathyinadultcriminalsanddelinquentyouth,emphasizemeannessmoresothanboldness.Lyk-ken’s(1995)conceptionofthesuccessful(highachieving,or“heroic”)psychopathplacespredominantem-phasisonboldness.Triarchicconceptualizationofpsychopathy disinhibited(“difficult”)developmentaltrajec-tory,causingablurringofphenotypes.Consistentwiththetraditionaladultliterature,whenassoci-atedwithalowfeartemperamenttheinterper-sonalcallousnessandexploitationwilloccurinthecontextofemotionalcoolnessandindiffer-ence,whereasinassociationwithadisinhibitedtemperamenttheywilloccurwithstrongeremo-tions,especiallypronouncedangerandhostility.Finally,itcannotbeemphasizedtoostronglythatcontinuousratherthandiscretevariablesandprocessesareinvolved.Consequently,pa-rametersoftemperamentandofvariousdevel-opmentalexperiencesvarycontinuously,pro-ducingabroadarrayofphenotypicoutcomes.Thus,thephenotypeswillvarynotonlyinse-veritybutalsoinconfiguration.Forexample,shoulddeviantpeerassociationbeminimized,consequencesofthatdevelopmentalexperiencewillalsobeminimized,orshouldparentalreac-tionsbeespeciallyharsh(abuse),theconse-quencesofthoseexperienceswillbegreater.ReferencesAchenbach,T.M.,&Edelbrock,C.S.(1978).Theclassifi-cationofchildpsychopathology:Areviewandanalysisofempiricalefforts.PsychologicalBulletin,1275–AmericanPsychiatricAssociation.(1980).Diagnosticandstatisticalmanualofmentaldisorders(3rded.).Wash-ington,DC:Author.AmericanPsychiatricAssociation.(2000).Diagnosticandstatisticalmanualofmentaldisorders(4thed.,textrevision).Washington,DC:Author.Andershed,H.,Kerr,M.,Stattin,H.,&Levander,S.(2002).Psychopathictraitsinnon-referredyouths:Anewas-sessmenttool.InE.Blau&L.Sheridan(Eds.),Psycho-paths:Currentinternationalperspectives(pp.131–158).Amsterdam:Elsevier.Andershed,H.,Hodgins,S.,&Tengstrom,A.(2007).Con-vergentvalidityoftheYouthPsychopathicTraitsInven-tory(YPI):AssociationwiththePsychopathyCheck-list:Youthversion.,144–154.Arieti,S.(1963).Psychopathicpersonality:Someviewsonitspsychopathologyandpsychodynamics.Comprehen-sivePsychiatry,301–312.Arieti,S.(1967).Theintrapsychicself:Feeling,cognition,andcreativityinhealthandmentalillness.NewYork:BasicBooks.Benning,S.D.,Patrick,C.J.,Blonigen,D.M.,Hicks,B.M.,&Iacono,W.G.(2005).Estimatingfacetsofpsy-chopathyfromnormalpersonalitytraits:Asteptowardcommunity–epidemiologicalinvestigations.Assessment,3–18.Benning,S.D.,Patrick,C.J.,Hicks,B.M.,Blonigen,D.M.,&Krueger,R.F.(2003).FactorstructureofthePsy-chopathicPersonalityInventory:Validityandimplica-tionsforclinicalassessment.PsychologicalAssess-,340–350.Benning,S.D.,Patrick,C.J.,Salekin,R.T.,&Leistico,A.R.(2005).Convergentanddiscriminantvalidityofpsy-chopathyfactorsassessedviaself-report:Acomparisonofthreeinstruments.Assessment,270–289.Blackburn,R.(2006).Othertheoreticalmodelsofpsychop-athy.InC.J.Patrick(Ed.),Handbookofpsychopathy(pp.35–57).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Blair,R.J.R.(2006).Subcorticalbrainsystemsinpsychop-athy:Theamygdalaandassociatedstructures.InC.J.Patrick(Ed.),Handbookofpsychopathy(pp.296–312).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Block,J.H.,&Block,J.(1980).Theroleofego-controlandegoresiliencyintheorganizationofbehavior.InW.A.Collins(Ed.),TheMinnesotasymposiumonchildpsy-chology:Vol.13.Developmentofcognition,affect,andsocialrelations(pp.39–101).Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum.Blonigen,D.,Hicks,B.,Patrick,C.,Krueger,R.,Iacono,W.,&McGue,M.(2005).Psychopathicpersonalitytraits:Heritabilityandgeneticoverlapwithinternalizingandexternalizingpathology.PsychologicalMedicine,637–648.Campbell,S.B.(1998).Developmentalperspectives.InT.H.Ollendick&M.Hersen(Eds.),Handbookofchildpsychopathology(3rded.,pp.3–35).NewYork:Ple-numPress.Cicchetti,D.,&Rogosch,F.A.(1996).Equifinalityandmultifinalityindevelopmentalpsychopathology.velopmentandPsychopathology,597–600.Cleckley,H.(1941).Themaskofsanity(1sted.).St.Louis,MO:Mosby.Cleckley,H.(1976).Themaskofsanity(5thed.).St.Louis,MO:Mosby.Cole,P.M.,&Hall,S.E.(2008).Emotiondysregulationasariskfactorforpsychopathology.InT.P.Beauchaine&S.P.Hinshaw(Eds.),Childandadolescentpsychopa-(pp.265–298).Hoboken,NJ:Wiley.Cooke,D.J.,&Michie,C.(2001).Refiningtheconstructofpsychopathy:Towardsahierarchicalmodel.Psycholog-icalAssessment,171–188.Cooke,D.J.,Michie,C.,&Hart,S.D.(2006).Facetsofpsychopathy:Towardclearermeasurement.InC.J.Pat-rick(Ed.),Handbookofpsychopathy(pp.91–106).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Craft,M.(1966).Conclusions.InM.Craft(Ed.),Psycho-pathicdisordersandtheirassessment(pp.206–226).NewYork:PergamonPress.Dishion,T.J.,French,D.C.,&Patterson,G.R.(1995).Thedevelopmentandecologyofantisocialbehavior.InD.Cicchetti&D.J.Cohen(Eds.),Developmentalpsycho-pathology:Vol.2.Risk,disorder,andadaptation(pp.421–471).NewYork:Wiley.Douglas,K.S.,Lilienfeld,S.O.,Skeem,J.L.,Poythress,N.G.,Edens,J.F.,&Patrick,C.J.(2008).Relationof 4.Analternativeperspectiveemphasizedbysomewriters(e.g.,Lykken,1995)isthatmeanness(callousexploita-tiveness)representsthemorenaturaloutcomeofgeno-typicfearlessness,withprotectivefactorssuchasaboveaverageintelligence,talent,privilegedsocioeconomicstatus,and/orhighlyskilledparentingrequiredforbold-nesstoemergeinstead.C.J.Patrick,D.C.Fowles,andR.F.Krueger antisocialandpsychopathictraitstosuicide-relatedbe-havioramongoffenders.LawandHumanBehavior,511–525.Farrington,D.P.,Coid,J.W.,Harnett,L.,Joliffe,D.,Soter-iou,N.,Turner,R.,&West,D.J.(2006).Criminalca-reersuptoage50andlifesuccessuptoage48:NewfindingsfromTheCambridgeStudyinDelinquentDe-velopment(HomeOfficeResearchStudyNo.299).London:HomeOffice.Forth,A.E.,Brown,S.L.,Hart,S.D.,&Hare,R.D.(1996).Theassessmentofpsychopathyinmaleandfe-malenoncriminals:Reliabilityandvalidity.PersonalityandIndividualDifferences,531–543.Forth,A.E.,Kosson,D.S.,&Hare,R.D.(2003).ThePsy-chopathyChecklist:YouthVersionmanual(2nded.).Toronto:Multi-HealthSystems.(Originalworkpub-lished1996)Fowles,D.C.(1980).Thethreearousalmodel:ImplicationsofGray’stwo-factorlearningtheoryforheartrate,elec-trodermalactivity,andpsychopathy.Psychophysiology,87–104.Fowles,D.C.,&Dindo,L.(2006).Adualdeficitmodelofpsychopathy.InC.J.Patrick(Ed.),Handbookofpsy-chopathy(pp.14–34).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Frick,P.J.,Boden,D.S.,&Barry,C.T.(2000).Psycho-pathictraitsandconductproblemsincommunityandclinic-referredsamplesofchildren:Furtherdevelop-mentofthePsychopathyScreeningDevice.Psycholog-icalAssessment,382–393.Frick,P.J.,&Dickens,C.(2006).Currentperspectivesonconductdisorder.CurrentPsychiatryReportsFrick,P.J.,&Hare,R.D.(2001).AntisocialProcessScreeningDevice.Toronto:Multi-HealthSystems.Frick,P.J.,O’Brien,B.S.,Wooten,J.M.,&McBurnett,K.(1994).Psychopathyandconductproblemsinchildren.JournalofAbnormalPsychology,700–707.Frick,P.J.,&Marsee,M.A.(2006).Psychopathyandde-velopmentalpathwaystoantisocialbehaviorinyouth.InC.J.Patrick(Ed.),Handbookofpsychopathy(pp.353–374).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Frick,P.J.,&Morris,A.S.(2004).Temperamentandde-velopmentalpathwaystoconductproblems.ofClinicalChildandAdolescentPsychologyFrick,P.J.,Stickle,T.R.,Dandreaux,D.M.,Farrell,J.M.,&Kimonis,E.R.(2005).Callous–unemotionaltraitsinpredictingtheseverityandstabilityofconductproblemsanddelinquency.JournalofAbnormalChildPsychol-,471–487.Frick,P.J.,&White,S.F.(2008).Theimportanceofcal-lous–unemotionaltraitsfordevelopmentalmodelsofaggressiveandantisocialbehavior.JournalofChildPsychologyandPsychiatry,359–375.Gorenstein,E.E.,&Newman,J.P.(1980).Disinhibitorypsychopathology:Anewperspectiveandamodelforresearch.PsychologicalReview,301–315.Hall,J.R.,&Benning,S.D.(2006).The“successful”psy-chopath:Adaptiveandsubclinicalmanifestationsofpsychopathyinthegeneralpopulation.InC.J.PatrickHandbookofpsychopathy(pp.459–478).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Hall,J.,Benning,S.D.,&Patrick,C.J.(2004).Criterion-relatedvalidityofthethree-factormodelofpsychopa-thy:Personality,behavior,andadaptivefunctioning.,4–16.Hare,R.D.(1978).Electrodermalandcardiovascularcorre-latesofpsychopathy.InR.D.Hare&D.SchallingPsychopathicbehavior:Approachestoresearch(pp.107–143).Chichester:Wiley.Hare,R.D.(1980).Aresearchscalefortheassessmentofpsychopathyincriminalpopulations.PersonalityandIndividualDifferences,111–119.Hare,R.D.(1991).TheHarePsychopathyChecklist—Re-.Toronto:Multi-HealthSystems.Hare,R.D.(2003).TheHarePsychopathyChecklist—Re-(2nded.).Toronto:Multi-HealthSystems.Hare,R.D.,Harpur,T.J.,Hakstian,A.R.,Forth,A.E.,Hart,S.D.,&Newman,J.P.(1990).TheRevisedPsy-chopathyChecklist:Reliabilityandfactorstructure.PsychologicalAssessment,338–341.Hare,R.D.,&Neumann,C.S.(2006).ThePCL-Rassess-mentofpsychopathy:Development,structuralproper-ties,andnewdirections.InC.J.Patrick(Ed.),ofpsychopathy(pp.58–88).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Harpur,T.J.,Hakstian,A.R.,&Hare,R.D.(1988).FactorstructureofthePsychopathyChecklist.JournalofCon-sultingandClinicalPsychology,741–747.Harpur,T.J.,Hare,R.D.,&Hakstian,A.R.(1989).Two-factorconceptualizationofpsychopathy:Constructva-lidityandassessmentimplications.PsychologicalAs-,6–17.Hart,S.,Cox,D.,&Hare,R.D.(1995).ManualforthePsy-chopathyChecklist:Screeningversion(PCL:SV).To-ronto:Multi-HealthSystems.Hicks,B.M.,Markon,K.E.,Patrick,C.J.,Krueger,R.F.,&Newman,J.P.(2004).Identifyingpsychopathysub-typesonthebasisofpersonalitystructure.Psychologi-calAssessment,276–288.Hicks,B.M.,&Patrick,C.J.(2006).Psychopathyandnegativeaffectivity:Analysesofsuppressoreffectsre-vealdistinctrelationswithtraitanxiety,depression,fearfulness,andanger-hostility.JournalofAbnormalPsychology,276–287.Hinshaw,S.P.(2008).Emotiondysregulationasariskfac-torforpsychopathology.InT.P.Beauchaine&S.P.Hinshaw(Eds.),Childandadolescentpsychopathology(pp.3–26).Hoboken,NJ:Wiley.Horney,K.(1945).Ourinnerconflicts.NewYork:W.W.Norton.Ishikawa,S.S.,Raine,A.,Lencz,T.,Bihrle,S.,&Lacasse,L.(2001).Autonomicstressreactivityandexecutivefunctionsinsuccessfulandunsuccessfulcriminalpsy-chopathsfromthecommunity.JournalofAbnormalPsychology,423–432.Karpman,B.(1941).Ontheneedforseparatingpsychopa-thyintotwodistinctclinicaltypes:Symptomaticandidiopathic.JournalofCriminologyandPsychopathol-,112–137.Kagan,J.(1994).Galen’sprophecy:Temperamentinhu-mannature.NewYork:BasicBooks.Kagan,J.,&Snidman,N.(1999).Earlychildhoodpredic-torsofadultanxietydisorders.BiologicalPsychiatry,1536–1541.Kobasa,C.S.(1979).Stressfullifeevents,personality,andhealth:Aninquiryintohardiness.JournalofPersonal-ityandSocialPsychology,1–11.Kochanska,G.(1993).Towardasynthesisofparentalso-cializationandchildtemperamentinearlydevelopmentofconscience.ChildDevelopment,325–347.Kochanska,G.(1995).Children’stemperament,mothers’discipline,andsecurityofattachment:Multiplepath-waystoemerginginternalization.ChildDevelopment,597–615.Kochanska,G.K.(1997).Multiplepathwaystoconscienceforchildrenwithdifferenttemperaments:Fromtod-Triarchicconceptualizationofpsychopathy dlerhoodtoage5.DevelopmentalPsychology,228–Kochanska,G.K.,Gross,J.N.,Lin,M.H.,&Nichols,K.E.(2002).Guiltinyoungchildren:Development,determi-nants,andrelationswithabroadersystemofstandards.ChildDevelopment,461–482.Kochanska,G.,Murray,K.,&Coy,K.C.(1997).Inhibitorycontrolasacontributortoconscienceinchildhood:Fromtoddlertoearlyschoolage.ChildDevelopment,263–267.Kraepelin,E.(1904).Psychiatrie:Einlehrbuch(7thed.).Leipzig:Barth.Kraepelin,E.(1915).Psychiatrie:Einlehrbuch(8thed.).Leipzig:Barth.Krueger,R.F.(1999a).Personalitytraitsinlateadolescencepredictmentaldisordersinearlyadulthood:Aprospec-tive–epidemiologicalstudy.JournalofPersonalityKrueger,R.F.(1999b).ThestructureofcommonmentalArchivesofGeneralPsychiatry,921–926.Krueger,R.F.,Hicks,B.,Patrick,C.J.,Carlson,S.,Iacono,W.G.,&McGue,M.(2002).Etiologicconnectionsamongsubstancedependence,antisocialbehavior,andpersonality:Modelingtheexternalizingspectrum.nalofAbnormalPsychology,411–424.Krueger,R.F.,Markon,K.E.,Patrick,C.J.,Benning,S.D.,&Kramer,M.(2007).Linkingantisocialbehavior,sub-stanceuse,andpersonality:Anintegrativequantitativemodeloftheadultexternalizingspectrum.JournalofAbnormalPsychology,645–666.Leary,T.(1957).InterpersonaldiagnosisofpersonalityNewYork:RonaldPress.Lilienfeld,S.O.,&Andrews,B.P.(1996).Developmentandpreliminaryvalidationofaselfreportmeasureofpsychopathicpersonalitytraitsinnoncriminalpop-ulations.JournalofPersonalityAssessment,488–Lilienfeld,S.O.,&Fowler,K.A.(2006).Theself-reportassessmentofpsychopathy:Problems,pitfalls,andpromises.InC.J.Patrick(Ed.),Handbookofpsychopathy(pp.107–132).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Lilienfeld,S.O.,&Widows,M.R.(2005).PsychopathicPersonalityInventory—Revised(PPI-R)professional.Odessa,FL:PsychologicalAssessmentRe-sources.Lindner,R.M.(1944).Rebelwithoutacause:Thestoryofacriminalpsychopath.NewYork:Grune&Stratton.Loney,B.R.,Frick,P.J.,Clements,C.B.,Ellis,M.L.,&Kerlin,K.(2003).Callous–unemotionaltraits,impul-sivity,andemotionalprocessinginantisocialadoles-JournalofClinicalChildandAdolescentPsy-chiatry,66–80.Lykken,D.T.(1957).Astudyofanxietyinthesociopathicpersonality.JournalofAbnormalandClinicalPsychol-,6–10.Lykken,D.T.(1995).Theantisocialpersonalities.Hills-dale,NJ:Erlbaum.Lynam,D.R.(1997).Pursuingthepsychopath:Capturingthefledglingpsychopathinanomologicalnet.ofAbnormalPsychology,425–438.Lynam,D.R.(1998).Earlyidentificationofthefledglingpsychopath:Locatingthepsychopathicchildinthecur-rentnomenclature.JournalofAbnormalPsychology,566–575.Lynam,D.R.,Caspi,A.,Moffitt,T.E.,Raine,A.,Loeber,R.,&Stouthamer-Loeber,M.(2005).Adolescentpsy-chopathyandtheBigFive:Resultsfromtwosamples.JournalofAbnormalChildPsychology,431–444.Lynam,D.R.,&Derefinko,K.J.(2006).Psychopathyandpersonality.InC.J.Patrick(Ed.),Handbookofpsy-chopathy(pp.133–155).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Marsh,A.A.,Finger,E.C.,Mitchell,G.V.,Reid,M.E.,Sims,C.,Kosson,D.S.,etal.(2008).Reducedamyg-dalaresponsetofearfulexpressionsinchildrenandado-lescentswithcallous–unemotionaltraitsanddisruptivebehaviordisorders.AmericanJournalofPsychiatry,712–720.Maudsley,H.(1874).ResponsibilityinmentaldiseaseLondon:KingPublishers.McCord,W.,&McCord,J.(1964).Thepsychopath:Anes-sayonthecriminalmind.Princeton,NJ:VanNostrand.Miller,J.D.,Lynam,D.R.,Widiger,T.A.,&Leukefeld,C.(2001).Personalitydisordersasextremevariantsofcommonpersonalitydimensions:Canthefive-factormodeladequatelyrepresentpsychopathy?JournalofPersonality,253–276.Moffitt,T.E.(1993).Adolescence-limitedandlife-course-persistentantisocialbehavior:Adevelopmentaltaxon-omy.PsychologicalReview,674–701.Moffitt,T.E.,&Lynam,D.,Jr.(1994).Theneuropsychol-ogyofconductdisorderanddelinquency:Implicationsforunderstandingantisocialbehavior.InD.Fowles,P.Sutker,&S.Goodman(Eds.),Progressinexperimentalpersonalityandpsychopathologyresearch1994.Spe-cialfocusonpsychopathyandantisocialbehavior:Adevelopmentalperspective(pp.233–262).NewYork:Springer.Partridge,G.E.(1928a).Astudyof50casesofpsycho-pathicpersonality.AmericanJournalofPsychiatryPartridge,G.E.(1928b).Psychopathicpersonalitiesamongboysinatrainingschoolfordelinquents.AmericanJournalofPsychiatry,159–186.Patrick,C.J.(1994).Emotionandpsychopathy:Startlingnewinsights.Psychophysiology,319–330.Patrick,C.J.(2006).Backtothefuture:Cleckleyasaguidetothenextgenerationofpsychopathyresearch.InC.J.Patrick(Ed.),Handbookofpsychopathy(pp.605–617).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Patrick,C.J.(2007).Gettingtotheheartofpsychopathy.InH.Herve&J.C.Yuille(Eds.),Psychopathy:Theory,research,andsocialimplications(pp.207–252).Hills-dale,NJ:Erlbaum.Patrick,C.J.,&Bernat,E.(2009).Frommarkerstomech-anisms:Usingpsychophysiologicalmeasurestoelu-cidatebasicprocessesunderlyingaggressiveexter-nalizingbehavior.InS.Hodgins,E.Viding,&A.Plodowski(Eds.),Persistentviolentoffenders:Neuro-biologyandrehabilitation(pp.223–250).Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.Patrick,C.J.,&Bernat,E.(inpress).Neurobiologyofpsy-chopathy:Atwo-processtheory.InG.G.Berntson&J.T.Cacioppo(Eds.),Handbookofneuroscienceforthebehavioralsciences.NewYork:Wiley.Patrick,C.J.,&Bernat,E.(2006).Theconstructofemotionasabridgebetweenpersonalityandpsychopathology.InR.F.Krueger&J.Tackett(Eds.),Personalityandpsychopathology(pp.174–209).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Patrick,C.J.,Bradley,M.M.,&Lang,P.J.(1993).Emotioninthecriminalpsychopath:Startlereflexmodulation.JournalofAbnormalPsychology102,82–92.Patrick,C.J.,Edens,J.F.,Poythress,N.,&Lilienfeld,S.O.(2006).ConstructvalidityofthePPItwo-factormodelwithoffenders.PsychologicalAssessment204–208.C.J.Patrick,D.C.Fowles,andR.F.Krueger Patrick,C.J.,Hicks,B.M.,Krueger,R.F.,&Lang,A.R.(2005).Relationsbetweenpsychopathyfacetsandex-ternalizinginacriminaloffendersample.JournalofPersonalityDisorders,339–356.Patrick,C.J.,Hicks,B.M.,Nichol,P.E.,&Krueger,R.F.(2007).AbifactorapproachtomodelingthestructureofthePsychopathyChecklist—Revised.JournalofPer-sonalityDisorders,118–141.Patrick,C.J.,&Zempolich,K.A.(1998).Emotionandag-gressioninthepsychopathicpersonality.AggressionandViolentBehavior,303–338.Patterson,G.R.,Reid,J.B.,&Dishion,T.J.(1992).socialboys.Eugene,OR:Castalia.Patterson,G.R.,Reid,J.B.,&Eddy,J.M.(2002).AbriefhistoryoftheOregonmodel.InJ.B.Reid,G.R.Patter-son,&J.Snyder(Eds.),Antisocialbehaviorinchildrenandadolescents:Adevelopmentalanalysisandmodelforintervention.(pp.3–21).Washington,DC:Ameri-canPsychologicalAssociation.Patterson,G.R.,DeGarmo,D.S.,&Knutson,N.(2000).Hyperactiveandantisocialbehaviors:Comorbidortwopointsinthesameprocess.DevelopmentandPsy-chopathology,91–106.Pinel,P.(1962).Atreatiseoninsanity(D.Davis,Trans.).NewYork:Hafner.(Originalworkpublished1806)Porter,S.,&Woodworth,M.(2006).Psychopathyandag-gression.InC.J.Patrick(Ed.),Handbookofpsychopa-(pp.481–494).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Poythress,N.G.,Edens,J.F.,&Lilienfeld,S.O.(1998).Criterion-relatedvalidityofthePsychopathicPersonal-ityInventoryinaprisonsample.PsychologicalAssess-,426–430.Poythress,N.G.,Dembo,R.,Wareham,J.,&Greenbaum,P.E.(2006).ConstructvalidityoftheYouthPsycho-pathicTraitsInventory(YPI)andtheAntisocialProcessScreeningDevice(APSD)withjustice-involvedadoles-CriminalJusticeandBehavior,26–55.Prichard,J.C.(1835).Atreatiseoninsanityandotherdisordersaffectingthemind.London:Sherwood,Gilbert&Piper.Quay,H.C.(1964).Dimensionsofpersonalityindelin-quentboysasinferredfromthefactoranalysisofcasehistorydata.ChildDevelopment,479–484.Quay,H.C.(1986).Classification.InH.C.Quay&J.S.Werry(Eds.),Psychopathologicaldisordersofchild-(3rded.,pp.1–42).NewYork:Wiley.Raine,A.,Ishikawa,S.S.,Arce,E.,Lencz,T.,Knuth,K.H.,Bihrle,S.,etal.(2004).Hippocampalstructuralasym-metryinunsuccessfulpsychopaths.BiologicalPsychia-,185–191.Robins,L.N.(1966).Deviantchildrengrownup.Balti-more,MD:Williams&Wilkins.Robins,L.N.(1978).Sturdypredictorsofadultantisocialbehaviour:Replicationsfromlongitudinalstudies.Psy-chologicalMedicine,611–622.Ross,S.R.,Benning,S.D.,Patrick,C.J.,Thompson,A.,&Thurston,A.(2009).FactorsofthePsychopathicPer-sonalityInventory:Criterion-relatedvalidityandrela-tionshiptotheBIS/BASandFive-Factormodelsofpersonality.,71–87.Rush,B.(1812).Medicalinquiriesandobservationsuponthediseasesofthemind.Philadelphia,PA:Kimber&Rutter,M.(2006).Genesandbehavior:Nature–nurturein-terplayexplained.Malden,MA:Blackwell.Salekin,R.T.(2006).Psychopathyinchildrenandadoles-cents:Keyissuesinconceptualizationandassessment.InC.J.Patrick(Ed.),Handbookofpsychopathy(pp.389–414).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Saucier,G.(1992).Benchmarks:IntegratingaffectiveandinterpersonalcircleswiththeBig-Fivepersonalityfac-JournalofPersonalityandSocialPsychology,1025–1035.Schneider,K.(1934).Diepsychopathischenpersonlichkei-(3rded.).Vienna:Deuticke.Sher,K.J.,&Trull,T.(1994).Personalityanddisinhibitorypsychopathology:Alcoholismandantisocialpersonalitydisorder.JournalofAbnormalPsychology103,92–102.Skeem,J.L.,&Cooke,D.J.(inpress).Isantisocialbehav-ioressentialtopsychopathy?Conceptualdirectionsforresolvingthedebate.PsychologicalAssessmentSkeem,J.L.,Johansson,P.,Andershed,H.,Kerr,M.,&EnoLouden,J.(2007).TwosubtypesofpsychopathicviolentoffendersthatparallelprimaryandsecondaryJournalofAbnormalPsychology,395–Skeem,J.L.,Miller,J.D.,Mulvey,E.P.,Tiemann,J.,&Monahan,J.(2005)Usingafive-factorlenstoexploretherelationbetweenpersonalitytraitsandviolenceinpsychiatricpatients.JournalofConsultingandClinicalPsychology,454–465.Skeem,J.L.,Mulvey,E.P.,&Grisso,T.(2003).Applic-abilityoftraditionalandrevisedmodelsofpsychopathytothePsychopathyChecklist:ScreeningVersion.Psy-chologicalAssessment,41–55.Smith,S.S.,&Newman,J.P.(1990).Alcoholanddrugabuse-dependencedisordersinpsychopathicandnon-psychopathiccriminaloffenders.JournalofAbnormalPsychology,430–439.Snyder,J.,Reid,J.,&Patterson,G.(2003).Asociallearn-ingmodelofchildandadolescentantisocialbehavior.InB.B.Lahey,T.E.Moffitt,&A.Caspi(Eds.),ofconductdisorderandjuveniledelinquency(pp.27–48).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Thompson,R.A.(2001).Childhoodanxietydisordersfromtheperspectiveofemotionregulationandattachment.InM.W.Vasey&M.R.Dadds(Eds.),Thedevelopmentalpsychopathologyofanxiety(pp.160–182).NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.Vanman,E.J.,Mejia,V.Y.,Dawson,M.E.,Schell,A.M.,&Raine,A.(2003).Modificationofthestartlereflexinacommunitysample:Dooneortwodimensionsofpsy-chopathyunderlieemotionalprocessing?PersonalityandIndividualDifferences,2007–2021.Verona,E.,Hicks,B.M.,&Patrick,C.J.(2005).Psychop-athyandsuicidalityinfemaleoffenders:Mediatingef-fectsoftemperamentandabusehistory.JournalofConsultingandClinicalPsychology,1065–1073.Verona,E.,&Patrick,C.J.(2000).Suicideriskinexternal-izingsyndromes:Temperamentalandneurobiologicalunderpinnings.InT.E.Joiner(Ed.),Suicidescience:Expandingtheboundaries,pp.137–173.Boston:KluwerAcademic.Verona,E.,Patrick,C.J.,&Joiner,T.E.(2001).Psychop-athy,antisocialpersonality,andsuiciderisk.JournalofAbnormalPsychology,462–470.Verona,E.,Sachs-Ericsson,N.,&Joiner,T.E.(2004).Suicideattemptsassociatedwithexternalizingpsychopathologyinanepidemiologicalsample.AmericanJournalofPsy-chiatry,444–451.Widiger,T.A.(2006).Psychopathyandpsychopa-thology.InC.J.Patrick(Ed.),Handbookofpsychopa-(pp.156–171).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Widiger,T.A.,Cadoret,R.,Hare,R.,Robins,L.,Ruther-ford,M.,Zanarini,M.,etal.(1996).personalitydisorderfieldtrial.JournalofAbnormalPsychology,3–16.Triarchicconceptualizationofpsychopathy Widom,C.S.(1977).Amethodologyforstudyingnoninsti-tutionalizedpsychopaths.JournalofConsultingandClinicalPsychology,674–683.Wiggins,J.S.(1982).Circumplexmodelsofinterpersonalbehaviorinclinicalpsychology.InP.C.Kendall&J.N.Butcher(Eds.),Handbookofresearchmethodsinclinicalpsychology(pp.183–221).NewYork:Wiley.Young,S.E.,Stallings,M.C.,Corley,R.P.,Krauter,K.S.,&Hewitt,J.K.(2000).Geneticandenvironmentalin-fluencesonbehavioraldisinhibition.AmericanJournalofMedicalGenetics(NeuropsychiatricGenetics)Zuckerman,M.(1979).Sensationseeking:Beyondtheop-timallevelofarousal.Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum.C.J.Patrick,D.C.Fowles,andR.F.Krueger