PPT-A DEATH FORETOLD: MOTIFS AND ALLUSIONS

LATI 50 Introduction to Latin America STORY LINE Stranger Bayardo San Román comes to town looking for a bride settles on Angela Vicario Discovers on wedding night that she is not a virgin thus provoking crisis of honor. Oona and Aleel brPage 6br A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man The Wars of the Roses Recogniazbility of allusions they say Potential strategies for allusions brPage 7br brPage 8br Conclusion brPage 9br References Abrams M H 1971 A Glossary of Li 1 2 with the AttentionDeficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders. Just to give you an idea: last June, I was in Canada for a conference, and the weekend edition of a major Canadian newspaper ran an art “Why cover the same ground again? ... It goes against my grain to repeat a tale told once, and told so clearly.” . -Homer, The Odyssey. What is an allusion?. An . allusion is a . reference. . within a literary work. in . The Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. by James Joyce. Omobolade Teriba, Stella Tse, Jessica Radoncic, and Grace Wolf. Mini-Lesson: Allusion. Aim: What are allusions and how does James Joyce employ them in his novel to enhance the story?. Ms. Wolf – Language Arts Class . Agenda for Thursday 2.14.13. Warm-Up: Grammar – pages 84-90 GUM Book . Connection to a Clip- Dead Poet’s Society . Allusions Notes and Examples . Create your Own Poem . I can identify and explain allusions in Fahrenheit 451.. A1 and B2: I can identify figurative language and its effect on F451.. General Bell Ringer. What do you think are some of the most powerful or memorable stories, fiction OR non-fiction, in our culture? Why? . Vocabulary Words. remote. e. scort. interpreter. vegetation. undergrowth. venomous. withstood. foretold. Inflicting a poisonous wound.. remote. e. scort. interpreter. vegetation. undergrowth. venomous. I was thinking about how I was going to teach my students allusion, when suddenly an idea hit me like a blast from the gun of . optimus. Prime himself: I would teach allusion by writing a short story filled with them. Top that, Socrates!. RL.4.4. What is mythology?. Some people use the word myth to mean fake, but…. A myth . is a . actually traditional . story, . especially . one concerning the early history of . people . or explaining some natural or social phenomenon, and typically . An . allusion. . is a brief and indirect reference to a person, place, thing or idea of historical, cultural, literary or political . significance “. It . does not describe in detail the person or thing to which it refers. . Group Investigation. Purpose. To develop an interpretation of various ambiguities in CDF. Why wasn’t Santiago . Nasar. warned of his impending murder?. Why did Angela accuse SN? . Who was the real victim?. Deception-trickery, concealment of one’s feelings. Honor verses Shame-humiliation, violation of social expectations. Love- Romantic and Filial (Duty to family). Gender expectations- roles of men and women. This groundbreaking book explains prognosis from the perspective of doctors, examining why physicians are reluctant to predict the future, how doctors use prognosis, the symbolism it contains, and the emotional difficulties it involves. Drawing on his experiences as a doctor and sociologist, Nicholas Christakis interviewed scores of physicians and searched dozens of medical textbooks and medical school curricula for discussions of prognosis in an attempt to get to the core of this nebulous medical issue that, despite its importance, is only partially understood and rarely discussed.Highly recommended for everyone from patients wrestling with their personal prognosis to any medical practitioner touched by this bioethical dilemma.—Library Journal, starred review[T]he first full general discussion of prognosis ever written. . . . [A] manifesto for a form of prognosis that\'s equal parts prediction-an assessment of likely outcomes based on statistical averages-and prophecy, an intuition of what lies ahead.—Jeff Sharlet, Chicago Reader[S]ophisticated, extraordinarily well supported, and compelling. . . . [Christakis] argues forcefully that the profession must take responsibility for the current widespread avoidance of prognosis and change the present culture. This prophet is one whose advice we would do well to heed.—James Tulsky, M.D., New England Journal of Medicine This groundbreaking book explains prognosis from the perspective of doctors, examining why physicians are reluctant to predict the future, how doctors use prognosis, the symbolism it contains, and the emotional difficulties it involves. Drawing on his experiences as a doctor and sociologist, Nicholas Christakis interviewed scores of physicians and searched dozens of medical textbooks and medical school curricula for discussions of prognosis in an attempt to get to the core of this nebulous medical issue that, despite its importance, is only partially understood and rarely discussed.Highly recommended for everyone from patients wrestling with their personal prognosis to any medical practitioner touched by this bioethical dilemma.—Library Journal, starred review[T]he first full general discussion of prognosis ever written. . . . [A] manifesto for a form of prognosis that\'s equal parts prediction-an assessment of likely outcomes based on statistical averages-and prophecy, an intuition of what lies ahead.—Jeff Sharlet, Chicago Reader[S]ophisticated, extraordinarily well supported, and compelling. . . . [Christakis] argues forcefully that the profession must take responsibility for the current widespread avoidance of prognosis and change the present culture. This prophet is one whose advice we would do well to heed.—James Tulsky, M.D., New England Journal of Medicine