Global ENSOTC Teleconnection Ray Bell With thanks to Kevin Hodges Pier Luigi Vidale Jane Strachan and Malcolm Roberts RayBellMet Introduction Motivation It is important to evaluate the ability of GCMs to simulate ID: 637641
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Coupled and Uncoupled Model Simulation o..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Coupled and Uncoupled Model Simulation of the
Global ENSO-TC Teleconnection
Ray Bell With thanks to Kevin Hodges, Pier Luigi Vidale, Jane Strachan and Malcolm Roberts
@
RayBell_MetSlide2
Introduction
Motivation
It
is important to evaluate the ability of GCMs to simulate
realistic ENSO associated TC
teleconnections for seasonal forecasting and before predictions are made for TCs
and climate change using GCMs (Mori et al. 2013). Lack of studies
on simulated
ENSO-TC teleconnection worldwide
.
Research Objectives
What are the advantages and shortcomings of the simulated ENSO-TC teleconnection?
Are the key mechanisms well represented in the simulation?Slide3
Previous work
Observations
The influence ENSO on TC activity has long been observed (NATL, Gray 1984; WPAC, Chan 1985; AUS, Nicholls 1975)
Reanalysis
NCEP (‘50-’05)
GPI.
Camargo (2007)Slide4
Previous work
GCMs
First research by Wu and Lau (1992) at resolution R15.
Understanding simulation of the ENSO-TC teleconnection in the NATL Shaman and Maloney, 2011: CMIP3 GCMs coarse resolution (~2
ox 2
o)Impacts of
ENSO on
Caribbean vertical wind shear were the most poorly simulated
Murakami and Wang, 2010: AGCM 20 km
C
aptured
the broad
tropical cyclone
response to ENSO in the North AtlanticRecent AOGCM students: Iizuka and Matsuura (2008; 2009) ; Kim et al (2013); Wang et al (2013)Slide5
Idealised GCM simulation
HiGEM
UK’s
High-Resolution
Global Environmental Model (
Shaffrey
et al
, 2009
)
HiGAM
:
AMIP (atmospheric model forced with observed SST and sea ice) 1979-2002
(
Strachan
et al
, 2013
)
HiGAM with HiGEM SST
: atmosphere component forced with coupled SST
1.25
o
x0.83
o
, ∆x50N = 90 km
1/3
o ocean model
HiGEM 1.1 Present-day integration
150 yrs
N144
High-resolution climate models:
Improved representation of
ENSO (Guilyardi et al.
2009)
Improved mean-state TC climatology (Strachan et al. 2013)
Improved ENSO-teleconnections (Dawson et al. 2012) Slide6
Tracking Algorithm (TRACK)
A 20 year
time-slice
of GCM simulated tropical storms
Bengstton
et al
(2007);
Strachan
et al
(2013)
1
)
Locate and track all
centres
of high relative
vorticity
35000/yr
2
)
Apply a 2-day filter to the tracks
8000 storms / yr
3) Analyse vertical structure of storm for evidence of warm-core (tropical storm structure) 120 storms / yr
Genesis through to LysisSlide7
ENSO Composites
Niño-3.4 normalised SST anomaly for DJF >1
El Niño
; DJF <1
La Niña
NH TCs prior to event (correlation of 0.9 with ASO
SSTa
)
IBTrACS (1979-2010); ERA-Interim (1979-2010)
7
El Nino years
(82-83, 86-87, 91-92, 94-95, 97-98, 02-03, 09-10)
6
La Nina years
(84-85, 88-89, 98-99, 99-00, 07-08, 10-11)HiGEM (150 years): 31
El Ninos; 25 La
Ninas
HiGAM AMIP (1979-2002) :
6
El
Ninos
;
4 La NinasSimulation of HiGEM’s ENSO is in Shaffrey et al (2009)Slide8
HiGEM
: ENSO simulation
Shaffrey
(2009)Slide9
Present-day TC Climatology
See Strachan et al (2013): assessment of HiGAM interannual variability and
intraseasonal
variability.
Bell et al (2013): evaluation of HiGEM and response to climate change
HiGEM
:
Good distribution of TCs
Too many in SH (strong SPCZ)
Too few in
NAtL
(cool SST and strong VWS)
Lack of recurvate in WNP (cool SST) Slide10
ENSO-TC Location
Match well
Over pronounce
variabilitySlide11
ENSO-TC Location
Match well
Over
pronounce
variabilitySlide12
ENSO-TC Frequency
Greater variability in ERA-Interim vs IBT
Small var. of NATL TCs
Small var. and wrong sign of NATL TCsSlide13
ENSO-SST
SSTs extend
too far
west.
Lack of
warming near
Peru coast.
(see
Guilyardi
e
t al, 2009Slide14
ENSO-
ppt
Stronger
signal
No
teleconnection
In CaribbeanSlide15
ENSO-Walker circulation
Convection
shifts
Westward as
SSTs extend
f
urther west
Lack of
upper-level
westerliesSlide16
ENSO-vertical wind shear
Over
Pronounce in
WPAC
Lack of VWS
dipole
Di-pole
partly explain
See-saw of
Activity
NATL-
EPAC (
aiyyer
&
Thorncroft
,
2006) Slide17
ENSO-relative vorticity
Good
s
patial
pattern
Weaker.
No change
around
C.AmericaSlide18
ENSO-upper level circulation
Divergence
not
constrained
To CPAC
Causes
inc.
TC
In NATL during
El Niño Slide19
Thermodynamic vs. Dynamic influences:
North Atlantic
Niño-3.4 SST
VWS
Vor
850
-
ω
500
RH
700
Cool trop SST
b
ias in
HiGEM
TC
Count
Too high
m
ean-state
VWS
RH is well
c
aptured in
HiGAM.
VWS is
most Important(Carmargo, 2007)
JASO275-340oN, 10-20o
NAverageSlide20
Thermodynamic vs. Dynamic influences:
Western
North Pacific
VWS
VWS is not important
Vor
850
-
ω
500
RH
700
Large mean ascent
c
auses
t
oo many
TCs
TC
Count
Vor
. explains
ENSO var.
(
Carmargo
,
2007) Slide21
Discussion
Errors in atmospheric teleconnections stem from: mean-state SST biases; spatial pattern of ENSO associated SST.
ENSO-TC teleconnection is good west of PAC in HiGEM
Larger variability of ENSO-TC teleconnection in HiGAM without presence of air-sea feedbacks: Larger source of heat and stronger circulation
El Niño SST
s
hifted
west
Walker circulation
Shifted westward
Upper-tropospheric westerlies do not reach into NATL
No change in VWS
No change in TCs (HiGEM)Slide22
Conclusion
HiGEM captures the observed ENSO-TC teleconnection in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. HiGEM does not capture the response in the NATL
NATL
: mean-state VWS is most important factor. Once VWS is low enough other parameters can influence (seen in HiGAM)
WNP
: mean state -
ω
500
biases and low level
vor
. most important for
ENSO-TC
Bell et al
(
2014)
Simulation
of the global ENSO-Tropical cyclone teleconnection by a
high resolution
coupled general circulation model,
JCLIM
(in review)Bell et al (2013): TCs and climate change including TC intensity projections from coupled and uncoupled simulations, JCLIM Slide23
Conclusion
ENSO-TC
teleconnection in a 150-year present-day high-resolution AOGCM. Limitations of atmospheric component
-
AMIP experiment.
HiGEM captures the observed ENSO-TC teleconnection in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. HiGEM does not capture the response in the NATL
NATL
: mean-state VWS is most important factor. Once VWS is low enough other parameters can influence (seen in HiGAM)
WNP: mean state -
ω
500
biases and low level
vor
. most important for
ENSO-TC
Bell, R. J., Strachan, J., Hodges, K. I., Vidale, P. L. and Roberts, M. (
2014)
Simulation of the global ENSO-Tropical cyclone teleconnection by a high
resolution coupled general circulation model,
Journal of Climate
(in review)