/
 Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) of the Ankle  Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) of the Ankle

Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) of the Ankle - PowerPoint Presentation

cheryl-pisano
cheryl-pisano . @cheryl-pisano
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2020-04-03

Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) of the Ankle - PPT Presentation

Matt Orchard Mitch Dreska What is foot drop Gait abnormality in which the patient experiences difficulty in dorsiflexion of the ankle relating to the anterior muscles of the lower leg especially the anterior tibialis ID: 774947

foot drop gait stimulation foot drop gait stimulation ankle stroke peroneal nerve afo fes electrical sensor systems fds 2015

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document " Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) of the Ankle

Matt Orchard

Mitch Dreska

Slide2

What is foot drop?

Gait abnormality in which the patient experiences difficulty in dorsiflexion of the ankle, relating to the anterior muscles of the lower leg, especially the anterior tibialisIt can be caused by underlying neurological or muscular issues. The most common being neurological due to damage of the common peroneal nerve.Foot drop leads to gait deviations including toe dragging, hip hiking, vaulting, and decreased heel strike.This causes an increase in energy consumption and fall risks

Slide3

What causes foot drop?

Muscular- traumaNerve damage from surgery common in hip and knee replacement/repairNeurologicalPeripheral nerve damage, cauda equina, spinal cord, and brain injury (stroke, TBI)Disorders including MS, ALS, Charcot-Marie-Tooth, Parkinson’s, and Diabetes

Slide4

Foot drop treatment

Physical TherapySurgeryBraces or Splints- AFOElectrical Stimulation- FES

Slide5

Ankle Foot Orthotic (AFO)

A brace made to fit the lower leg to help support the foot and ankle in proper position for gait and balance. Fights foot drop by holding the foot in a more neutral or dorsiflexed positionDifferent versions allow for more or less movement depending upon the level of function of the patient

Slide6

What is an ankle FES?

Used primarily to treat foot dropSecondary to many things such as stroke and MSUses electrical stimulation of the peroneal (fibular) nerve to activate dorsiflexors during the toe off to initial contact period (swing phase)Has several proposed benefits compared to that of a traditional ankle-foot orthosis (AFO)

Slide7

Comparison of benefits

AFOReduces foot dropImproves gait mechanicsPrevents loss of PROM

FES

Reduces foot drop

Improves gait mechanics

Prevents loss of PROM

Prevents loss of AROM

Employs active muscle contraction

Slows muscle atrophy

Promotes motor learning

Promotes neuroplastic changes

Slide8

Wired Systems

Wireless Systems

Implanted Systems

Slide9

Where to buy?

WalkAide

Uses tilt sensor to analyze movement of the leg

$4,500

XFT-2001 Foot Drop System

Uses a heel sensor to determine when to stimulate the nerve

$1,500

Bioness L300

Uses a heel sensor to determine when to stimulate the nerve

$6,000

ActiGait and STIMuSTEP

Implantable systems

Still must use heel sensor to determine when to stimulate the nerve

$20,000-25,000?

Slide10

Peroneal stimulation for foot drop after stroke: A systematic review

Clinically significant improvements in gait speed for FDS and control groups

Over 6-30 weeks FDS and AFO are effective and roughly equal in improving gait speed for those with drop foot following stroke

Clinically significant improvements in TUG, 6MWT, mEFAP, and QoL for those using a single-channel surface electrode FDS system

User satisfaction was significantly higher in the FDS group than the AFO group

Not enough evidence to see which patients would most benefit from which device

Slide11

Effect of Peroneal Electrical Stimulation Versus an Ankle-Foot Orthosis on Obstacle Avoidance Ability in People With Stroke-Related Foot Drop: Within-Subject Comparison

Subjects who regularly use AFO were fitted with FES and tested on obstacle avoidance ability

Measured by markers on their shoes and their kinematic data in relation to the objects

Success rates were higher with FES than with AFO, especially those with decreased leg muscle strength, although results were small

Level of function and strength is important to consider

Slide12

References

Dunning K, O'dell MW, Kluding P, Mcbride K. Peroneal Stimulation for Foot Drop After Stroke: A Systematic Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;94(8):649-64.

Farley, Jeremy. Controlling drop foot: Beyond standard AFOs. Lower Extremity Review Magazine.

http://lermagazine.com/article/controlling-drop-foot-beyond-standard-afos

. Published October 2009. Accessed July 17, 2016.

Dapul G, Bethoux F. Functional Electrical Stimulation for Foot Drop in Multiple Sclerosis. US Neurology. 2015; 11(1): 10-8. doi:

http://doi.org/10.17925/USN.2015/11.01.10

.

Jauch, Michael. Latest implantable and external neurostimulation technology for drop foot correction and gait rehabilitation. Advances in Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation.

http://www.acnr.co.uk/2013/09/latest-implantable-and-external-neurostimulation-technology-for-drop-foot-correction-and-gait-rehabilitation/

. Published Sept 24, 2013. Accessed July 17, 2016.

Yerworth R. Engineering Solutions to Foot Drop. University College London.

https://wiki.ucl.ac.uk/display/BECS/Engineering+solutions+to+foot+drop

. Published December 11, 2015. Accessed July 16, 2016.

Van Swigchem R, et al. Effect of Peroneal Electrical Stimulation Versus an Ankle-Foot Orthosis on Obstacle Avoidance Ability in People With Stroke-Related Foot Drop. Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association. 2012; 92(3): 398-406. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100405.