/
NCHRP 20-65 Task 60 NCHRP 20-65 Task 60

NCHRP 20-65 Task 60 - PowerPoint Presentation

cheryl-pisano
cheryl-pisano . @cheryl-pisano
Follow
387 views
Uploaded On 2017-07-07

NCHRP 20-65 Task 60 - PPT Presentation

The National Mobility Management Initiative State DOTs Connecting Specialized Transportation Users and Rides Final Report Presentation March 2016 Connecting Specialized Transportation Users and Rides ID: 567567

transportation services trip linkage services transportation linkage trip level information county trips customers service vtcli state dots evaluation booking

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "NCHRP 20-65 Task 60" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

NCHRP 20-65 Task 60

The National Mobility Management Initiative:State DOTs Connecting Specialized Transportation Users and Rides

Final Report Presentation

March 2016Slide2

Connecting Specialized Transportation Users and Rides

2There are many types of transportation customers…Persons with DisabilitiesSeniorsVeteransLow-Income

General PopulationImage Credits: Nelson\Nygaard, Catawba County, WikimediaSlide3

Connecting Specialized Transportation Users and Rides

3…traveling for many different trip purposes…Work/TrainingShopping/RecreationDialysisMedical Appointments

Human ServicesImage Credits: Nelson\Nygaard, Public Domain Images, Wikimedia, Flickr (Tunstall),Slide4

Connecting Specialized Transportation Users and Rides

4…that can be served by a wide range of transportation modes and services, each with different requirements and constraints.Fixed Route and Flex TransitADA Complementary ParatransitDial-A-Ride Services

Human Services TransportationSenior TransportationVeterans TransportationTaxicabs and Livery ServicesPrivate-For-Pay Chair Car ServicesTransportation Network Companies (Lyft/Uber)Carpools/VanpoolsVoucher/Subsidy ProgramsVolunteer Driver Programs

Medicaid Non-Emergency Medical TransportationSlide5

New Linkages to Connect Users and Rides Have Emerged

5 One-stop shopping via phone or internet More transportation services all in one place More accurate information Easy to access and use Match.com services

Trip planning services Trip booking services Some using mobile technologies Slide6

Connecting Specialized Transportation Users and Rides

6Linkages can assist transportation users in finding the transportation service that will best meet their current travel needs.

Image Credits: PennDOT, Will County, 211 LA County, 211 VetlinkSlide7

NCHRP 20-65 TASK 60

7Slide8

Project Team

8 Project Administration Assisted with Literature Review Technical Lead Completed Literature Review All Other Project TasksSlide9

NCHRP 20-65 Task 60

9What has resulted from the VTCLI program investment? Slide10

Initial Linkage Services

10Human service organizations, transit agencies, and others have been connecting users with rides for decadesMany linkage services rely entirely on staff knowledge, relayed through phone calls and “static” directories of servicesImage Credits: Broward CountySlide11

119 grants awarded

$63.5 million in total awards$34.5 million in 2011 (Green)$29 million in 2012 (Blue)Veterans Transportation and Community Living Initiative (VTCLI)11Competitive grant program administered by FTA in 2011-2012

Goal to connect military families and veterans to jobs and services by improving access to transportation optionsSlide12

Veterans Transportation and Community Living Initiative (VTCLI)

1241 of 119 grants went to State DOTsState DOTs served as lead agency on 15 grants ($11 million)VTCLI Grants Led by State DOTsStateIdaho

IllinoisIowaKentuckyMarylandMinnesotaNew MexicoNorth CarolinaPennsylvaniaVermontTotal Grants3112221111

Type

Total GrantsAverage Award

Transit Agency

35

$776,000

Non-Profit

23

$205,000

MPO/COG

18

$468,000

County

17

$377,000

State DOT

15

$736,000

Municipal

8

$642,000

Other

3

$224,000

Total

119

$534,000

VTCLI Grant Administrators and AwardsSlide13

Veterans Transportation and Community Living Initiative (VTCLI)

13VTCLI grants were primarily used to create, expand, and market One-Call/One-Click programsMany agencies also purchased new technology, such as dispatching software and automatic vehicle location systemsSlide14

NCHRP 20-65 Task 60

14What approaches have been used to link users with rides?Slide15

What Did We Find in Our Research?

15New funding sources, transportation services, and technological innovations have accelerated linkage program developmentThese new linkages fall along a continuum of functionalityEach level has unique benefits, challenges, and opportunities15

342Central RepositoryMatching AssistanceTrip Planning AssistanceTrip Booking Assistance

Direct Trip BookingSlide16

Continuum of Services Linking Users and Rides

LevelNameFunctionality

Description1Central RepositoryCreation

of -- or linkage with existing --centralized repository of transportation resources

Static, hard copy listing of services and programs distributed or accessed via phone or web-site

1A

Provider Portal

+ provider portal

Service

providers

can

update their information at any time

2

Matching Assistance

+ ways

to narrow down service and program options

Customers supply search

criteria or answer “t

riage questions”

asked

by mobility specialist (call-taker)

or prompted by on-line

system to reduce providers to viable options

3

Trip Planning Assistance

+

trip

planning assistance

Customers use on-line system or call mobility specialists (who use the on-line system) to get detailed ways

to make a particular trip

4

Trip Booking Assistance

+ trip

booking by mobility specialists

M

obility specialists call provider to book trip

on behalf of the customer

5

Direct Trip Booking

+ trip

booking by customer

Via

links to paratransit systems

(One system

allows provider scheduler to schedule trip onto a partners’ vehicle run)

16Slide17

Mini-Case Studies – Levels 1-3

ProgramLevelLead Agency

Type of OrganizationGeographic ScopeNotes

Community Transportation Services Directory

1

Will County, Illinois

County Government

Will County, Illinois

Innovative matrix-based static directory design that mimics the functionality of an online interface

Getting There Guide

1

Denver Regional Mobility & Access Council

Regional Coordinating Council

Denver, Colorado Metropolitan Area

Developed new methods for distributing specialization transportation services information, including laminated placemat directories

2-1-1 LA County

2

2-1-1 LA County

Non-Profit Organization

Los Angeles County, California

Uses triage questions to

identify

search keywords. Keywords are then entered into a taxonomy database to develop a list of potentially applicable transportation programs and services.

2-1-1

VetLink

3

Inland Empire United Way

Non-Profit Organization

Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, California

Project driven by veterans organizations

Link with 2-1-1 I&R system (

iCarol

) to be implemented

Focus on understanding unmet needs

17Slide18

Level 1 Linkage – Will County

Community Transportation Services Directory Matrix #1: Residency and Eligibility18Will County, ILSlide19

Level 1 Linkage – Will County

Community Transportation Services Directory Matrix #2: Client Eligibility by Provider19Will County, ILSlide20

Level 1 Linkage – Will County

Community Transportation Services Directory Matrix #3: Provider Summaries20Will County, ILSlide21

Level 2 Linkage – 211 LA County

Step #1: Selection of Search Category (e.g. Transportation)21Los Angeles, CASlide22

Level 2 Linkage – 211 LA County

Step #2: Selection of “Taxonomy” Category22Los Angeles, CASlide23

Level 2 Linkage – 211 LA County

Step #3: Inputting Keywords (e.g., senior)23Los Angeles, CASlide24

Level 2 Linkage – 211 LA County

Step #4: Select from Service Options24Los Angeles, CASlide25

Level 3 Linkage – 211 VetLink

25Inland Empire, CASlide26

Mini-Case Studies – Levels 4-5

ProgramLevelLead Agency

Type of OrganizationGeographic ScopeNotes

MyRide

4

Ann Arbor Area Transportation Authority

Regional Transit Authority

Washtenaw County, Michigan

MyRide

mobility specialists booked 19,000 trips in FY2014 

MyRide2

4

Area Agency on Aging 1B

Area Agency on Aging

Southeast Michigan (Six Counties)

On behalf of AAA1b, the regional transit agency, SMART, has secured a VTCLI grant to allow AAA1b mobility specialist to directly book trips on over 70 providers 

Transportal

5

Jacksonville Transportation Authority

Regional Transit Authority

Jacksonville, Florida (Duval County)

All paratransit-qualified customers receive a unique login to access online paratransit booking after completing application process

Working to integrate flex-route booking to enhance demand-response options available to customers

FindMyRidePA

5

Pennsylvania Department of Transportation

State Department of Transportation

South Central Pennsylvania

(seven counties

); To be expanded statewide

Links with

Ecolane

paratransit scheduling software

Demonstrated use from kiosks and mobile apps

1-Click|UTA

5

Utah Transit Authority

Regional Transit Authority

Wasatch Front of Utah (Seven Counties)

Links

with multiple paratransit schedule software packages, including Ride Pilot open-source scheduling system

26Slide27

Level 5 Linkage – FindMyRidePA

27

PennDOT (7 Counties)Slide28

NCHRP 20-65 Task 60

28What are the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches?Slide29

Strengths, Weaknesses and Opportunities – Level 1

Provides a centralized, source of information of specialized and other transportation providers

Often difficult for customers and mobility specialists to quickly identify applicable services, especially in larger directoryDirectories are out of date almost immediately after publicationUpdating directories requires significant staff time and distribution expenditures

Hard-copy only:

directories must be physically accessed, often not widely available

Online directories only:

customers must have internet and be computer literate, or receive assistance, in order to access

Hard to maintain consistent organization

, especially as services are added, removed,

and/or modified over time (Levels 1-5)

29Slide30

Strengths, Weaknesses and Opportunities – Level 1

Directories can be placed online, allowing any customer with computer and internet access to find transportation services 24-hours a day, seven days a weekDirectories can be

designed to mimic the usability of a web-based interface, providing users with a guide to identify applicable services and easily navigate to provider informationAllows agencies to identify potential holes in available specialized transportation services in their area (Levels 1-5)Portals can be designed to more effectively leverage web analytics-based evaluation

30Slide31

Strengths, Weaknesses and Opportunities – Level 1A

Allows providers to directly update service information through an online portal

Often difficult to get providers to regularly update portal information after service changes (Levels 1A-5)Providers do not always follow entry template, leading to inconsistencies and/or descriptions that are difficult for customers to comprehend (Levels 1A-5)

31Slide32

Strengths, Weaknesses and Opportunities – Level 2

Uses triage questions to identify services that meet a customer's needs and eligibility requirements

Not linked with schedule information; customers must typically contact one or more providers to find a service that fits a specific tripPhone-based matching assistance services could follow up a customer request by sending an email with contact information and links to matched servicesSlide33

Strengths, Weaknesses and Opportunities – Level 3

Works similarly to an online trip planner by providing applicable services based on a specific trip request

Can be integrated with public transit schedules (often through GTFS), bicycling and walking directions, carpool matching, taxi databases, etc.Customers are required to contact a service provider directly if trip booking is requiredDifficult to coordinate trips that include transfers between services that require advanced booking

Mobile applications

33Slide34

Strengths, Weaknesses and Opportunities – Level 4

Mobility specialists directly contact service providers to book trips on customers behalf, including conducting three-way calls to facilitate transfer trips

Customers using online portals typically have to contact a mobility manager by phone for booking assistanceMobility specialists do not know if a service has a directly applicable trip before contacting the providerAllows agencies with lower staffing levels to leverage online application

and focus assistance on trips that are more difficult to book, such as transfers

34Slide35

Strengths, Weaknesses and Opportunities – Level 5

Customers and/or mobility specialists can view scheduled runs and directly book and/or schedule a trip without contacting the provider

Service providers within a given region often use different scheduling software/practices, requiring development of new APIs or acquisition of new softwareParatransit eligibility information can be associated with a user profileEnhance awareness of/directly schedule on alternative modes that can effectively serve paratransit-eligible trips

Integration with vehicle tracking software

to provide estimated time of arrival information to customers

Fare integration

, allowing customers to pay for multiple services directly through portal

35Slide36

NCHRP 20-65 Task 60

36How should linkage programs and services be evaluated?Slide37

How should linkage programs and services be evaluated?

37Evaluation data can be used to improve both linkage programs and specialized transportation servicesJustify program and attract additional fundingIdentify and address service gapsDevelop new features based on customer feedbackPotential evaluation criteria are in part determined by linkage functionality level

Primary Evaluation TopicsVTCLI Grants Led by State DOTsTotal usage and frequency of usage by customersAccuracy of transportation services informationTypes of trips planned (successfully and unsuccessfully)Slide38

Total usage and frequency of usage by customers

38Technology has a significant impact on how linkages can track their total usage and frequency of usageUsage statistics are important for attracting ongoing fundingVTCLI Grants Led by State DOTsLevel

Evaluation CriteriaEvaluation Question1: Central RepositoryNumber of hardcopy directories requested or distributed

Are directories accessible at locations where targeted users most frequently congregate?

3:

Matching Assistance

Number of specific trip requests

for trip planning

How many customers are planning trips using the online planner?

5: Direct Trip Booking

Number of trips scheduled onto partner providers

How many trips are directly booked through the linkage service?Slide39

Total usage and frequency of usage by customers

39Technology has a significant impact on how linkages can track their total usage and frequency of usageUsage statistics are important for attracting ongoing fundingVTCLI Grants Led by State DOTsLevel

Evaluation CriteriaEvaluation Question1: Central RepositoryNumber of hardcopy directories requested or distributed

Are directories accessible at locations where targeted users most frequently congregate?

3:

Matching Assistance

Number of specific trip requests

for trip planning

How many customers are planning trips using the online planner?

5: Direct Trip Booking

Number of trips scheduled onto partner providers

How many trips are directly booked through the linkage service?Slide40

Accuracy of transportation services information

40If information provided by linkages is inaccurate, customers won’t use itVerifying the accuracy of list transportation services can be a significant expense for linkage providersVTCLI Grants Led by State DOTsLevel

Evaluation CriteriaEvaluation Question1: Central Repository% of entries with correct information (when being verified)

When service information is verified,

how often do existing entries contain invalid information?

3:

Matching Assistance

Accuracy

of automatically updated service information (GTFS, taxi database, etc.)

Do

automatically updated data sources provide accurate service information?

5: Direct Trip Booking

Continued functionality of linked

scheduling software

Does

schedule information in the online planner accurately reflect actual provider schedules?Slide41

Types of trips planned (successfully and unsuccessfully)

41Linkages can be used to understand gaps in existing servicesProviders can use evaluation data to justify adding new services or modifying existing servicesVTCLI Grants Led by State DOTsLevel

Evaluation CriteriaEvaluation Question1: Central RepositorySatisfaction with transportation services directory (collected via manual customer survey)

Are customers satisfied with the directory? Can they successfully use the directory to plan trips?

3:

Matching Assistance

Percent

of trips that cannot be fulfilled with existing services

What are the characteristics

(time, geographic area, rider demographic, trip type) of requests that cannot be served?

5: Direct Trip Booking

Number

and type of trips directly booked through the online portal

What types

of customers directly book their trips online? What kind of trips do they take?Slide42

Sample Evaluation Data

ARCSimply Get ThereIEUW2-1-1 VetLink-to-Go

JTATransPortalPAFindMyRidePAAgencies86

15

3

Providers

37

45

27

6

Services

38

53

31

8

Total Users

570

417

1675

799

Registered Users

65

42

110

187

Logins by Registered Users

361

472

643

770

Trips

988

1086

3444

1710

Desktop

686

945

2304

1093

Tablet

32

19

161

41

Phone

24

46

785

117

Kiosk

-

-

-

295

Itineraries

12577

7694

26125

10003

Bike

79

201

146

-

Carpool

1004

-

-

-

Drive

81

323

142

-

Paratransit

6080

1919

4231

3885

Transit

5333

5251

21606

6148

Selected Itineraries

420

164

950

1321

Bike

4

0

2

-

Carpool

40

-

-

--

Drive

2

0

6

-

Paratransit

113

20

118

831

Transit

261

144

824

490

Bookings

-

-

-

315

42Slide43

NCHRP 20-65 Task 60

43What steps should State DOTs take to develop a linkage?Slide44

What steps should State DOTs take to develop a linkage?

44VTCLI Grants Ld by State DOTsToolkit for State DOTs and others available onlineIncludes seven steps for developing a linkage programUses the continuum of linkage functionality to help craft a program that best fits your market needsSlide45

What steps should State DOTs take to develop a linkage?

45VTCLI Grants Ld by State DOTs1Identify Geographic ScopeSelect Target Users, Trips, and ModesAnalyze Existing Linkage FunctionalityDetermine Desired Linkage FunctionalityDevelop Evaluation Criteria and ProcessEvaluate Sources of Funding

Create a Marketing Plan23456

7Slide46

Final Report and Toolkit Available Online

46VTCLI Grants Ld by State DOTs