/
Negotiating Pharmacy's Role Negotiating Pharmacy's Role

Negotiating Pharmacy's Role - PowerPoint Presentation

cheryl-pisano
cheryl-pisano . @cheryl-pisano
Follow
379 views
Uploaded On 2017-05-28

Negotiating Pharmacy's Role - PPT Presentation

From a Position of Strength Objectives Define Accountable Care Organizations ACO Define Pioneer ACO Define Transitions of Care Determine the Opportunities for implementation of the Pharmacy Practice Model Initiative in an ACO setting ID: 553546

health care quality aco care health aco quality patients population cost patient risk based pioneer management performance physician high measures transitions admission

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Negotiating Pharmacy's Role" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Negotiating Pharmacy's Role

From a Position of StrengthSlide2

Objectives

Define Accountable Care Organizations (ACO)

Define Pioneer ACO

Define Transitions of Care

Determine the Opportunities for implementation of the Pharmacy Practice Model Initiative in an ACO settingSlide3

What are the core elements of ACO’s?

Accountable for health, quality, and costs of care over the full continuum of their patients’ care

Collaborate, share information and manage patient health for a population of patients (physicians, acute care hospitals, wellness, home care, long term care, pharmacies, et al)

Focus on improving health and reducing overall costs for a population of patients

Able to measure and report improvements in patient health and overall costs

Integrate financially to accept and distribute bundled payments and incentive payments or penalty retractionsSlide4

Health Care Reform formalizes the Accountable Care Organization (ACO) model

Beginning 1/1/2012, hospitals-physician entities may provide ACO services

Beginning in 2013, Voluntary bundled payment pilot programs

FTC expected to waive restrictions that prohibit effective formation of ACOs.

5 guiding principles:

ACOs have a strong foundation of primary care

ACOs report reliable measures to support quality improvement and eliminate waste and inefficiencies to reduce costACOs are committed to improving quality, improving patient experience and reducing per capita costsACOs work cooperatively towards these goals with stakeholders in a communityACOs create and support a sustainable workforceSlide5

Accountable Care Objectives

Create efficient teams of hospitals, primary care physicians and specialists

Reduce or eliminate duplication of services and fragmented care

Reduce costs – Shared savings

Improve quality

Bundle paymentsSlide6

P

U

B

L

I

C

HEA

L

T

H

Care Transitions InfrastructureSlide7

Accountable Payment at Risk

Care Transformation

Lower unnecessary utilization for

the ACO population.

Have sufficient

ACO population.

Careful not to undermine non-

ACO revenues.

Efficient Delivery System Transformation

Inadequate physician alignment.

High cost pathways.

Poor analytics for measurement

Financial

Care Delivery

Synchronizing change

Are you on the Road to Accountable Care ?

a. ACO Pioneer b. Commercial ACO c. Don’t knowSlide8

Some Elements of Care Common to Most of the Transitions Models

Medication Management

Assessing Patient's Understanding/Ability to Follow Care Plan

Discharge Support

Coaching for Primary Care Physician Visit

Use of Home Visits Screening for cognitive ability

Use of Centralized Health RecordInvolving Family and other CaregiversArranging Community-Based Support ServicesFrom: The Lewin Group, December 16, 2009 Care Transitions Workgroup and ASHP Ambulatory Practice GroupSlide9

What is the Pioneer Program?

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010)

Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI)

Separate from Medicare Shared Savings Program

Accountable Care Organizations (ACO)

Triple Aim

Quality and cost efficiency = valueSteward’s community care model is considered an ACOSlide10

What is the Pioneer

Program? (cont’d.)

Pioneer ACOs will be held financially accountable for the care provided to their aligned beneficiaries

The Pioneer program begins on January 1, 2012 and continues for three, one-year performance years. There is an option to extend for two additional years.

60-day termination provision and no settlement if effective within first 6 months of performance yearSlide11
Slide12
Slide13
Slide14

ACO Pioneer Project

Demonstration project for certain entities to start Pioneer ACO in 2012

More flexibility than traditional ACO program

Assignment of patients, for example

Quality reporting measures similar to ACO

CMS named 30 Pioneers – 5 in MassachusettsSlide15

Institution A as a Pioneer

Accountable Care Organization

Health Care Reform (Insurance Reform)

Treat patients in best location

Avoid unnecessary admissions

Requires physician groups and hospitals to collaborate

Focus on chronic careFocus on preventative careRefer internallyExperience with transitions of care modelReduces cost and adds valueSlide16

Institution A as a

Pioneer ACO - Infrastructure

Physician groups and hospital are in the same pool together for all risk contracts

Institution A - 10 hospitals (1,980 beds)

Institution A - 149 physician sites (2,200 physicians)

Institution A

Owned physiciansInstitution ANon – owned, affiliated physiciansTreat 1.2 million Patients AnnuallySlide17

Commercial ACO Model Contracts

Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) 66,000 members choosing Steward - BCBS AQC – Since 2009

5 year AQC design based on total costs

Member opt in

Quality Measures

X Health Plan 30,000 members that choose a PCP – Since 2012

Based on PMPM Quality MeasuresXX Health Care 38,000 members that choose a PCP – Since 2012Based on PMPM Quality MeasuresSlide18

Institution A’s Business Strategy

4th year

5 - 6

7 - 10

Per Unit Cost

Utilization

Where We

Are Today

Infrastructure

Redefine “Health Care”

&

shift the focus to

VALUE

V

alue

: Quality, Access and Costs (TME –Time & Materials Estimate)

Lower

annual rate of TME (unit price

and

utilization

)

Drive

provider efficiency

Coordinate

care and keep it “in the community”

Improve quality, enhance patient experience

Keep cost trend low, affordable

Build

scale: enhance services, apply efficiencies across entire delivery

system

Create

better value for patients and

employers

Creative

disruptions in the market, where needed

Budget as Medical Loss Ratio

Slide19

19

Value: keep care in right place, at right time, at right cost

Academic / Tertiary / Quaternary

Community Hospital

Physician office / Clinic

Home

There is a 20% --

25% drop in cost as you move care from high cost, to low cost settingsSlide20

Community Care Model:

The Role of Payment Reform

Value is the new paradigm

Keep appropriate care local

Payment Reform is a tool not the goal

Move away from FFS (volume)

Alignment of Key Stakeholders: CI and FIHospitals, LTAC*s, Rehab, FQCHCProvidersPayersEmployersConsumers / PatientsThe role of risk contracts

Commercial: BCBS, THP, HPHC all risk contracts

Pioneer

Avoids mixed mode and aligns key stakeholders

*LTAC

Long Term Acute Care

Affordability

Access

Quality

ValueSlide21

Key Strategies for Success: Population Health Management

Analyze population to identify patients health status and drive the most appropriate and effective care interventions

Population Identification and Stratification

Evidence based clinical pathways and protocols to define and deliver the most appropriate intervention for all patients based on their identified health status

Deliver Care Interventions

Improve ability to measure population health to the patient level, disease/condition level and physician level

Measure & Track Performance

IT and communication infrastructure to enable improved care delivery

Optimize Care & Physician Communication

Primary prevention initiatives including cultural compatibility and community education outreach

Community & Patient EngagementSlide22

Distribution of Complexity and Costs

Biggest opportunity is managing medical costs for complex and complex prevention categoriesSlide23

Focus Area: Patients with Heart Failure And Its

Co-morbidities

TOP 10% Most Costly Members

HF

COPD

CAD

Diabetes

Asthma

Members with HF and at least the Condition

6,357

2,873

4,559

4,008

924

Avg. Cost PMPM

$16,252

$15,546

$16,120

$17,622

$15,791

Avg. Acute IP Admits

4.1

4.6

4.2

4.2

4.8

Avg. All IP Admissions

5.2

6.0

5.3

5.4

6.0

Avg. ER Visits

1.6

1.9

1.7

1.7

2.3

* CAD is the most prevalent Disease Management co-morbid condition

* Diabetes is the most expensiveSlide24

Initial Analysis and Identification

Population Identification and Stratification

Population is analyzed to identify patients and group by health status:

High Risk($)

Impactable

Facility based care, re-admissions, etc

Active, high current claims

At Risk Patients

Diabetes, CHF, CAD, COPD, IVD, HBP etc.

All Beneficiaries

Quality, wellness, prevention

Palliative Care and/or End of Life Care Slide25

Key Strategies for Success

Quality

Pioneer ACOs who fail to achieve certain minimal quality standards may be terminated from the program

High quality scores can mitigate potential losses and maximize sharing in successful performance years.

The Quality Score is based on 33 measures comprising four domains, weighted equally at 25% each

ACOs must meet minimum attainment level of the 30th percentile or 30 percent to earn points on given quality measure

ACOs not eligible for savings unless achieve the quality performance standard on at least 70% of measures within each domainException: Meeting the EHR measure is required in order to be eligibleSlide26

Pioneer Quality Measures (N=33): Four Domains

Patient/Caregiver Experience

(

N=7)

Care Coordination/Patient Safety (N=6)

Includes meaningful use of Electronic Health Record

Preventive Health (N=8)At-Risk Populations (N=12, 5 are “all-or-nothing”)DiabetesHypertensionIschemic Vascular diseaseHeart FailureCoronary Artery disease

Year

Pay-for-Performance

Pay-for-Reporting

PY1 (2012)

0

33

PY2 (2013)

25

8

PY3 (2014)

32

1Slide27

Top Down and

Bottom Up Approach to Readmission PreventionSlide28
Slide29

CHF Care mapSlide30
Slide31

Percentage Re-admission Rates - MedicareSlide32

Percentage Re-admission Rates –All PayersSlide33

Percentage Re-admission Rates -AMISlide34

Re-admits by MSDRGSlide35

Pay For PerformanceSlide36

Pay For PerformanceSlide37

HCAHP’s Inpatient HospitalSlide38

HCAHP’s Inpatient Hospital

Pharmacist

RoleSlide39
Slide40

STAAR Initiative

Effective Interventions to Prevent Readmissions

RED – Re-Engineered Discharge

Education, Discharge Follow-up, Med plan

Transitional Care Model

Pre, post discharge coordinated care for high risk – Steward Healthy Transitions

Care Transitions ProgramSelf management skills training – “Red Zones”Evercare™ - Care ModelAimed at LTC, Chronic conditions, hospice, palliative careCare in home settingPhone follow-upSlide41

Patient Discharge Information

in Nine LanguagesSlide42

Conclusions

Evaluation of ACO readiness is critical

ACO organizations must have sufficient numbers of risk patients

Value proposition of ACO differs from FFS

Pharmacists are part of the care team

Pharmacist reimbursement for services is part of the bundle not FFS

Pharmacists have a role in the success of the ACO in both inpatient and outpatient settingsSlide43

Appendix

Readiness as an ACO

Strategies for Success

Re-Admission Prevention

Care Maps

Data collectionSlide44

Barriers to Effective Care Transitions

Structural

Lack of integrated care systems

Lack of longitudinal responsibility

Lack of standardized forms and processes

Incompatible information systems

Lack of care coordination and team-based trainingLack of established community linksProceduralIneffective communicationFailure to recognize cultural, educational or language differences

Processes are not patient-centered nor longitudinal

Performance Measurement and Alignment

Underuse of measures to indicate optimal transitions

Compensation and performance incentives not aligned with care coordination and transitions

Payment is for volume of services rather than outcomesSlide45

Initial Analysis and Identification

Population Identification and Stratification

Population is analyzed to identify patients and group by health status:

High Risk($)

Impactable

Facility based care, re-admissions,

etc.

Active, high current claims

At Risk Patients

Diabetes, CHF, CAD, COPD, IVD,

HBP,

etc.

All Beneficiaries

Quality, wellness, prevention

Palliative Care and/or End of Life Care Slide46

Key Strategies for Success

Population Health Management (cont’d.)

Develop a real-time understanding of physicians who are managing the populations effectively in terms of quality and cost efficiency

Cluster patients with chronic disease and co-morbidities with physicians and care teams who demonstrate expertise in management

Team based care and practice redesign

Care management tool enables the development and delivery of evidence based clinical pathways and protocols based on the health status of all patientsSlide47

Key Strategies for Success

Ambulatory-driven care management program

Improve care coordination and care management through disease management for complex and chronic conditions, ER readmissions, homecare VNAs, SNFs, hospice and palliative care programs

Since the ACO is responsible for the total cost of care of aligned beneficiaries, it is essential that Steward look to improve coordination along the entire continuum of care

One of the largest opportunities for achieving shared savings arises from enhanced post-acute care that reduces readmissions

Medically complex beneficiaries also offer significant opportunities to improve care coordination and realize immediate savings

Telephonic and embedded case management Slide48

ReadmissionsSlide49
Slide50

Pneumonia Care MapSlide51

Pneumonia Care MapSlide52

Institution A

Readmissions Summary

October 2009 – December 2011Slide53

Percentage Re-admission Rates – All CauseSlide54

Percentage Re-admission Rates - PneumoniaSlide55

Percentage Re-admission Rates – HF – All Cause