/
2D histogram The number of pairs of adjacent pixels with value 2D histogram The number of pairs of adjacent pixels with value

2D histogram The number of pairs of adjacent pixels with value - PowerPoint Presentation

classyshadow
classyshadow . @classyshadow
Follow
344 views
Uploaded On 2020-07-04

2D histogram The number of pairs of adjacent pixels with value - PPT Presentation

and in the input image   C ONTRAST E NHANCEMENT BASED ON L AYERED D IFFERENCE R EPRESENTATION Chulwoo Lee Chul Lee and ChangSu Kim wiserain kayne changsukim ID: 795590

layer image korea contrast image layer contrast korea gray relationship enhancement input level proposed optimization vol trans difference ieee

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "2D histogram The number of pairs of adja..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

2D histogramThe number of pairs of adjacent pixels with value and in the input image.

 

C

ONTRAST

E

NHANCEMENT BASED ON

L

AYERED

D

IFFERENCE

R

EPRESENTATION

Chulwoo Lee,

Chul

Lee, and Chang-Su Kim

{

wiserain

,

kayne

,

changsukim

} @ korea.ac.kr

School of Electrical Engineering, Korea University , Seoul, Korea

Overview

Basic Concept

Intra-Layer Optimization

Elementary Properties

[1]

Q. Wang

and R. K. Ward, “Fast Image/Video Contrast Enhancement Based on Weighted

Thresholded

Histogram Equalization,”

IEEE Trans.

Consum

. Electron.

,

vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 757–764, 2007.

[2]

T.

Arici

, S.

Dikbas

, and Y.

Altunbasak

, “A Histogram Modification Framework and Its Application for Image Contrast Enhancement,”

IEEE Trans. Image Process.

,

vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1921–1935, 2009.

Experimental Results

(a) Original

(b) WTHE

[1]

(c) WAHE

[2]

(d) Proposed

Input

WTHE

[1]

WAHE

[2]

Proposed

AMBE

-

6.482

7.647

5.208

DE

2.154

2.144

2.135

2.113

EME

9.878

9.485

9.265

12.811

PixDist

26.315

33.164

32.694

34.125

Proportional relationship

: Normalizing constant

Estimation of

 

By summing up

for all possible

’s,

 

At layer 1

At layer 2

At layer

 

By

, we have a linear equation,

 

Global contrast enhancement

Gray-level difference

Proposed approach

Conventional approach

Gray-level intensity

Relationship between

and

for

Relationship between

and

Inter-Layer Aggregation

First, we need to smooth the obtained by the Gaussian kernel

: user-controllable parameter, e.g.

For example,

A large

Frequent gray-level pairs

 

Input image

Increase

difference variable

 

Image contrast is

enhanced

Output image

Constrained optimization problem

Solution to the problem

Quadratic cost function

The active-set method

Then, we aggregate by the weighted averaging process

Objective assessment

Subjective assessment