PPT-FedRAMP & DAP Case Study Part 2: Reporting and Decision-Making

Author : clyde527 | Published Date : 2024-11-05

See how the FedRAMP team assessed their analytics objectives and key performance indicators KPIs prior to the launch of their redesigned site fedrampgov 1 Overview

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "FedRAMP & DAP Case Study Part 2: Reporti..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

FedRAMP & DAP Case Study Part 2: Reporting and Decision-Making: Transcript

See how the FedRAMP team assessed their analytics objectives and key performance indicators KPIs prior to the launch of their redesigned site fedrampgov 1 Overview Second webinar in a 2 part series. Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program Industry Day. June 4, 2014 Industry Day. Agenda. Topic. Speaker. Time. Welcome. Kathy Conrad. 1:00 – 1:05. FedRAMP Update. Maria Roat. 1:05 – 1:40. Involvement. in Health Decisions. Bryan G. Feenstra. , . RN, . M. ScN. Committee. : . Dawn Stacey. Margaret Lawson. Denise Harrison . Systematic Review. Objective. To . explore the characteristics and effectiveness of interventions that support the decision making needs of children who are actively considering a health-related decision. . How does the Government make . d. ecisions?. Tom . Worsley. Visiting Fellow. 15. th. April. The Question. Are the decisions made by Government;. Transparent?. Logical?. Consistent?. Accountable?. National Pediatric Nighttime Curriculum. Written by Noemi Adame, MD. University of TX Health Science Center San Antonio. Learning Objectives. Upon completion of this module, the learner will be able to independently:. Prof. Dr. . . Y. İlker TOPCU. www.ilkertopcu.. net. . www.. ilkertopcu. .org. . www.. ilkertopcu. .. info. facebook.com/. yitopcu. . twitter.com/. yitopcu. instagram.com/. yitopcu. Credits: 3+0. Figure 1. The same end-of-life decision-making survey is judged to introduce different risks in the group of (a) acutely bereaved family members, (b) newly diagnosed patients with terminal illness, and (c) patients in a support group for the terminally ill.. APS Training 2015. Peter A. Lichtenberg, . Ph.D. , ABPP. Director IOG and Professor of Psychology . Wayne State University Institute of Gerontology. p.lichtenberg@wayne.edu. Acknowledgements. Research team at WSU APS. Statin Choice Decision Aid Share-Decision Making SCIP Shared Decision Making Shared Decision Making Glasziou and Haynes ACP JC 2005 Promote a process where patients and clinicians make a choice together. its impact . on . decision making. Uresha . Walpitagama. Dr.. Anne Stafford . Dr.. Danny Chow. Mario Abela . Prof.. Ron Hodges . Financial reporting and its impact on decision-making. Mario Abela. DDDM. “The practice of basing decisions on the analysis of data rather than purely on intuition.” Equally succinctly, data science “as the connective tissue between data-processing technologies (including those for . How Medicare Can Improve the Quality of Patient Decision Making and Reduce Unnecessary Care A Synopsis John E Wennberg MD MPH Annette M O146Connor PhD E Dale Collins MD MS James N Weinstein DO MS A Monitoring Performance Management GuideVersion 21February 21 2018iDOCUMENT REVISION HISTORYDATEVERSIONPAGESDESCRIPTIONAUTHOR07/22/201510AllInitial documentFedRAMP PMO01/06/2016116AddedFormal CAP for s Figure 1. The same end-of-life decision-making survey is judged to introduce different risks in the group of (a) acutely bereaved family members, (b) newly diagnosed patients with terminal illness, and (c) patients in a support group for the terminally ill.. See how the FedRAMP team assessed their analytics objectives and key performance indicators (KPIs) prior to the launch of a redesigned site.. 1. Overview. This is the first webinar in a 2 part series we’re giving in partnership with the FedRAMP...

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"FedRAMP & DAP Case Study Part 2: Reporting and Decision-Making"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.