PPT-A matter of ambiguity?

Using eye movements to examine collective vs distributive interpretations of plural sets 1 Christine Boylan Dimka Atanassov Florian Schwarz John Trueswell Outline How do listeners interpret plural subjects. Ambiguity . is a word, phrase, or statement which contains more than one meaning.. Ambiguous words or statements lead to vagueness and confusion, and shape the basis for instances of unintentional humor. Ambiguity and Aphorism. Ambiguity. “The multiple meanings, either intentional or unintentional, of a word, phrase, sentence or passage”. Examples . (. unintentional. ). Examples . (INTENTIONAL, OR purposeful. Homework. Recommended Exercises. (. do the starred problems. ). 4.4.III. : 1-50. Remember. . How does each specific argument commit a fallacy of that . type. ? . . Where precisely is the offending element in the argument?. Ambiguity. (1) a statement which has two or more possible meanings.. (2) a statement whose meaning is unclear..     . Depending on the circumstances, ambiguity can be negative, leading to confusion or even disaster (the ambiguous wording of a general's note led to the deadly charge of the Light Brigade in the Crimean War). . Kenneth . Ward Church. Ambiguity Resolution . In . A Reductionist Parser. Atro. . Voutilainen. & . Pasi. . Tapanainen. Presented by Mat Kelly. CS895 – Web-based Information Retrieval. Old Dominion University. Jaime Teevan, Susan Dumais, Dan Liebling. Microsoft Research. “grand . copthorne. waterfront”. “. singapore. ”. How Do the Two Queries Differ?. grand . copthorne. waterfront. v. . singapore. CSCI-GA.2590 – Lecture 3B. Ralph . Grishman. NYU. Part-of-speech Ambiguity. Many English words have 2 (or more) parts of speech. the last fast train speeds up station schedules. produces lots of structures during parsing. Responsible Investment. Heather Hachigian. DPhil. . Candidate, School of Geography and the Environment . University of Oxford. RII Webinar, March 26, 2013. Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs). The term SWF was first used in . Fly fishing – This man embraced ambiguity because it was hard, and he didn't know if he could do it. He embraced ambiguity and he succeeded. . Embracing Ambiguity. I . embraced ambiguity when I went to a Lobo Basketball Camp and I had to walk up and down the pit stairs. I felt really uncomfortable when I was walking up and down the pit stairs because I thought I was going to miss the drill that was already going on. I embraced ambiguity because I kept trying and trying. . “With These Words, I can sell you anything”. Review the essay “With these Words, I can sell you Anything” from the class website.. What is the main point, and what are the supporting points?. Looking at Language. Chapter 3: Looking at Language. Goals for Chapter 3. Identifying emotionally charged language and euphemisms. Identifying claims that are vague or ambiguous. Identifying fallacies of equivocation. Feature or Bug?. Oliver R. Goodenough. Vermont Law School & CodeX. Future Law, Stanford Law. April 5, 2018. Will Computational Law Lack . Sufficient Ambiguity?. This is often put forward as an objection to automating legal processes. Chapter . 1. objectives. Students . will learn to:. Define critical thinking. Distinguish objective claims from subjective claims. Understand subjectivism as it relates to moral claims. Identify . issues. Matter and Energy What is matter? Matter and Energy What is matter? It's what everything that occupies space and has mass is made of And everything like that is made out of chemical elements There are 92 naturally occurring chemical elements, and a number of synthetic ones