/
Session 2a Session 2a

Session 2a - PowerPoint Presentation

conchita-marotz
conchita-marotz . @conchita-marotz
Follow
381 views
Uploaded On 2016-03-14

Session 2a - PPT Presentation

Decision Models Prof Juran 2 Overview Sensitivity Analysis Goal Seek and Data Table Marketing and Finance examples Call Center LP More Sensitivity Analysis SolverTable Decision Models Prof Juran ID: 256074

rebate decision prof models decision rebate models prof juran price cut calls sales data current increase solution methodology 000

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Session 2a" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Session 2aSlide2

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

2

Overview

Sensitivity Analysis

Goal Seek and Data Table

Marketing and Finance examples

Call Center LP

More Sensitivity Analysis

SolverTableSlide3

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

3

Sensitivity Analysis

How do key outputs change in response to changes in inputs?

Which inputs are the most important?

How robust is our decision?Slide4

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

4

Finance Example

A European call option on a stock earns the owner an amount equal to the price at expiration minus the exercise price, if the price of the stock on which the call is written exceeds the exercise price. Otherwise, the call pays nothing.

A European put option earns the owner an amount equal to the exercise price minus the price at expiration, if the price at expiration is less than the exercise price. Otherwise the put pays nothing. Slide5

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

5

Finance Example

The Black-Scholes formula calculates the price of a European options based on the following inputs:

today's stock price

the duration of the option (in years)

the option's exercise price

the risk-free rate of interest (per year)

the annual volatility (standard deviation) in stock priceSlide6

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

6

Managerial Problem Definition

How do the parameters in Black-Scholes affect the option price?Slide7

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

7

FormulationSlide8

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

8

Solution Methodology

Notice the use of “if” statements in cells E10:E11 and B13, so that the same model can be used for both puts and calls. Slide9

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

9

Data Table

Similar to copying a formula over many cells, but better for complicated functions (e.g. Black-Scholes)

Specify Row and/or Column Input Cells

Tricky to learn, but worth itSlide10

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

10

Solution MethodologySlide11

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

11

Solution MethodologySlide12

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

12

Solution MethodologySlide13

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

13

Solution MethodologySlide14

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

14

ConclusionsSlide15

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

15

ConclusionsSlide16

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

16

ConclusionsSlide17

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

17

Marketing Example

Microsoft is trying to determine whether to give a $10 rebate, a $6 price cut, or have no price change on a software product.

Currently 40,000 units of the product are sold each week for $45.

The variable cost of the product is $5.

The most likely case appears to be that a $10 rebate will increase sales 30% and half of all people will claim the rebate.

For the price cut, the most likely case is that sales will increase 20%.Slide18

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

18

Managerial Problem Definition

Under what circumstances should Microsoft offer the rebate, and under what circumstances should they offer the price cut? (Or should they do neither?)Slide19

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

19

Formulation

Decision variables: 3 possible marketing policies.

Objective: Maximize Profit.

Constraints:

Various assumptions have been made (current sales level, current cost structure, consumer behavior in response to marketing policies).Slide20

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

20

FormulationSlide21

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

21

FormulationSlide22

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

22

FormulationSlide23

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

23

Solution Methodology

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

Inputs

Current sales

40000

Current price

$45

Unit variable cost

$5

Data on rebates

Amount of rebate

$10

Pct taking advantage

50%

Increase in sales

30.00%

Data on price cut

Amount of cut

$6

Increase in sales

20%

Profits

Current

$1,600,000

With rebate

$1,820,000

With price cut

$1,632,000

=B2*(B3-B4)

=((B2*(1+B9))*(B3-B4))-((B2*(1+B9)*B8)*B7)

=B2*(1+B13)*(B3-B12-B4)Slide24

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

24

Under current assumptions, the rebate policy appears to be optimal.

How sensitive is this result to possible errors in our assumptions?

Specifically, how wrong could we be as to the 30% assumption and still be correct in using the rebate?

What is the point of indifference between the rebate and the price cut?Slide25

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

25

Goal Seek

Similar to Solver, but simpler

Specify a Target Cell and a Changing Cell

“Value” must be a number (not a cell reference)Slide26

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

26

Goal SeekSlide27

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

27

Solution MethodologySlide28

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

28

Conclusions and Recommendations

Go with the rebate as long as the increase in sales is expected to be at least 16.57%.

Under current assumptions, Microsoft would earn $1,820,000 profit (an improvement of $220,000).Slide29

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

29

What If?

Important parameters are not known; they are only estimates.

How robust is the rebate strategy?Slide30

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

30

Two-Way Data TableSlide31

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

31

Two-Way Data Table

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

Inputs

Best policy

Rebate

Current sales

40000

Current price

$45

Unit variable cost

$5

Data on rebates

Two-way data table for best policy

Amount of rebate

$10

Increase from rebate (along side) and from price cut (along top)

Pct taking advantage

50%

Rebate

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Increase in sales

30%

15%

20%

Data on price cut

25%

Amount of cut

$6

30%

Increase in sales

20%

35%

40%

Profits

Current

$1,600,000

With rebate

$1,820,000

With price cut

$1,632,000

=IF(B16=MAX(B16:B18),"Current",IF(B17=MAX(B16:B18),"Rebate","Price cut"))

=E1Slide32

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

32

Two-Way Data TableSlide33

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

33

Two-Way Data Table

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

Inputs

Best policy

Rebate

Current sales

40000

Current price

$45

Unit variable cost

$5

Data on rebates

Two-way data table for best policy

Amount of rebate

$10

Increase from rebate (along side) and from price cut (along top)

Pct taking advantage

50%

Rebate

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Increase in sales

30%

15%

Rebate

Rebate

Price cut

Price cut

Price cut

20%

Rebate

Rebate

Rebate

Price cut

Price cut

Data on price cut

25%

Rebate

Rebate

Rebate

Rebate

Price cut

Amount of cut

$6

30%

Rebate

Rebate

Rebate

Rebate

Rebate

Increase in sales

20%

35%

Rebate

Rebate

Rebate

Rebate

Rebate

40%

Rebate

Rebate

Rebate

Rebate

Rebate

Profits

Current

$1,600,000

With rebate

$1,820,000

With price cut

$1,632,000

Unless Microsoft thinks the sales increase from a price cut

will be high

and

the sales increase from a rebate will be low,

it looks like the rebate is the way to go.

=IF(B16=MAX(B16:B18),"Current",IF(B17=MAX(B16:B18),"Rebate","Price cut"))

=E1Slide34

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

34

Conclusions and Recommendations

Unless Microsoft thinks the sales increase from a price cut will be high

and

the sales increase from a rebate will be low, it looks like the rebate is the way to go.Slide35

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

35

Call Center Example

For a telephone survey, a marketing research group needs to contact at least 150 wives, 120 husbands, 100 single adult males, and 110 single adult females.

It costs $2 to make a daytime call and (because of higher labor costs) $5 to make an evening call.

Because of a limited staff, at most half of all phone calls can be evening calls. Slide36

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

36

Call Center ExampleSlide37

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

37

Managerial Problem Definition

We want to minimize the total cost of completing the survey, subject to the various probabilities of reaching certain types of people at certain times of the day, costs of making calls, and minimum requirements for numbers of calls to certain demographic groups.Slide38

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

38

Formulation

Decision Variables

We need to decide how many evening calls and how many daytime calls to make.

Objective

Minimize the total cost.

Constraints

We need to contact 150 wives, 120 husbands, 100 single adult males, and 110 single adult females. At most half of all phone calls can be evening calls. Slide39

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

39

Formulation

Decision Variables

X

1

= Daytime Calls,

X

2

= Evening Calls

Objective

Minimize

Z

= 2

X

1

+ 5

X

2

Constraints

0.30

X

1

+ 0.30

X

2

≥ 150

0.10

X

1

+ 0.30

X

2

≥ 120

0.10

X

1

+ 0.15

X

2

≥ 100

0.10

X

1

+ 0.20

X

2

≥ 110

1

X

1

≥ 1

X

2

1

X

1

, 1

X

2

≥ 0

Slide40

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

40

Solution MethodologySlide41

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

41

Solution MethodologySlide42

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

42

Solution MethodologySlide43

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

43

Optimal Solution

Make 900 Daytime calls and 100 Evening calls.

Total cost = $2,300.Slide44

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

44

SolverTable

Similar to Data Table; works with Solver

Solves optimization problems repeatedly and automatically

One or two inputs can be variedSlide45

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

45

Example: Sensitivity to Calling Costs

Starting with the optimal solution to the initial problem, use the SolverTable add-in to investigate changes in the unit cost of either type of call.

Specifically, investigate changes in the cost of a daytime call, with the cost of an evening call fixed, to see when (if ever) only daytime calls or only evening calls will be made. Slide46

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

46

Solution MethodologySlide47

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

47

Solution MethodologySlide48

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

48

SolverTable OutputSlide49

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

49

ConclusionsSlide50

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

50

Conclusions

If daytime calls are very inexpensive, we can dispense with evening calls altogether. However, we will always have to make at least 400 daytime calls, no matter how expensive they are.Slide51

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

51

ConclusionsSlide52

Decision Models -- Prof. Juran

52

Summary

Sensitivity Analysis

Goal Seek and Data Table

Marketing and Finance examples

Call Center LP

More Sensitivity Analysis

SolverTable