PDF-United States Court of Appeals

Author : conchita-marotz | Published Date : 2016-06-22

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Arg ued September 24 2013 Decided February 11 2014 No 13 5061 S ABINA L OVING ET AL A PPELLEES v I NTERNAL R EVENUE S ERVICE ET

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "United States Court of Appeals" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

United States Court of Appeals: Transcript

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Arg ued September 24 2013 Decided February 11 2014 No 13 5061 S ABINA L OVING ET AL A PPELLEES v I NTERNAL R EVENUE S ERVICE ET AL A PPELLANTS. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 04-2208 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHAWN THOMAS aka FLUKEY Shawn Thomas, Appellant On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Dis LGA Regional Seminar. Winchester, Virginia. June 28, 2013. J. Patrick Taves, Esquire. Greehan, Taves, Pandak & Stoner PLLC. 14520 Avion Parkway, Suite 210. Chantilly, Virginia 20151. (703)378-5770. OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS , Judge.Defendant-appellant Brima Bumu appeals from the Hamilton County Common Pleas Court | Memorandum Decision 18A - PC - 1995 | December 20, 2018 Page 1 of 10 MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cit A TTORNEYFOR A PPELLANT Jack Kenney Stacy R. Uliana Bargersville, Indiana A TTORNEYFOR A PPELLEE Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Attorney General of Indiana Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the de fense of res judicata, collatera MEMORANDUM DECISION Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D) this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicat Indiana | Opinion 19A - PC - 694 | July 24, 2019 Page 1 of 8 A TTORNEY S FOR A PPELLANT Nancy A . McCaslin McCaslin & McCaslin Elkhart, Indiana A TTORNEY S FOR A PPELLEE Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Attor FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO , Plaintiff - Appel l ee , vs. BRIMA BUMU , Defendant - Appell ant . : : : : : APPEAL NO. C - 1 604 92 TRIAL NO. B - 0410574A O DISTRICT OF KANSAS United States of America , P laintiff , v. Case No. 0 7 - 20 099 - 18 - JWL Julio Cesar Loya - Contreras, Defendant . MEMORANDUM & ORDER In August 2009, defendant Julio Cesar Lo Thompson and Kayatta Circuit Judges David Ramos-Pagn for appellant David Christian Bornstein Assistant United States Attorney with whom W Stephen Muldrow United States Attorney Mariana E Bauz-Almont No 14--212 RJSNOEL BIDO Plaintiff -v- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DefendantNo 19-8388 RJSORDERRICHARD J SULLIVANCircuit Judge Before the Court Defendant Noel Bidos pro semotionforcompassionate re Jurisdiction Abroad abroad under several instances This is something very important for US based corporations with global operations to understand since they might be in a situation where US jurisdic ichelhe Honorable Paul Redmond Michel served on the United States Court of Appeals for the TFederal Circuit for 22 years and as its Judge Michel has been the recipient of numerous awards including the

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"United States Court of Appeals"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.