PDF-Court of Appeals of

Indiana Opinion 19A PC 694 July 24 2019 Page 1 of 8 A TTORNEY S FOR A PPELLANT Nancy A McCaslin McCaslin McCaslin Elkhart Indiana A TTORNEY S FOR A PPELLEE Curtis T Hill Jr Attor. Three different ways to prove your point. Logical Appeals. (. logos. )- convincing reasons and the logical evidence that supports those reasons. Facts . Statistics. Expert opinion. Example. Factual anecdote. Three different ways to prove your point. Logical Appeals. (. logos. )- convincing reasons and the logical evidence that supports those reasons. Facts . Statistics. Expert opinion. Example. Factual anecdote. Ethos, Kairos, Logos, & Pathos. What are the rhetorical appeals?. What are rhetorical appeals?. What is…. ethos?. kairos?. logos?. pathos?. quick write. Think of a time when you were trying to persuade your parents to let you do something new or risky—a request to which they were inclined to say ‘no’ initially. How did you go about persuading them to see things your way? You may describe your speech or write it out in dialogue form, but try to be convincing as possible. Consider carefully what sort of evidence works best with your parents. . ROMANCE APPEALS. These advertisements display the attraction between the sexes.. The appeal is used to signify that buying certain products will have  a positive impact on the opposite sex and improve your romantic or love life. . Ethical. Emotional. Logical appeals (logos). Appeals to reason. Use statistics. Use cause and effect. “The National Safety Council estimated that in 2010, 28% of all crashes involved texting while driving. Therefore, a national ban on handheld devices behind the wheel would significantly reduce traffic accidents.”. I concur RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals I concur OWEN C. WILSON Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board of Contract App | Memorandum Decision 18A - PC - 1995 | December 20, 2018 Page 1 of 10 MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cit A TTORNEYFOR A PPELLANT Jack Kenney Stacy R. Uliana Bargersville, Indiana A TTORNEYFOR A PPELLEE Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Attorney General of Indiana Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the de fense of res judicata, collatera The test to determine whether material is obscene was set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Miller v. California (1973), 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607: FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO , Plaintiff - Appel l ee , vs. BRIMA BUMU , Defendant - Appell ant . : : : : : APPEAL NO. C - 1 604 92 TRIAL NO. B - 0410574A O Presiding Judge. Jonathan Rike appeals his convictions, after a jury trial, for attempted murder with a gun specification and improperly handling firearms in a motor vehicle. Rike contends that the t ichelhe Honorable Paul Redmond Michel served on the United States Court of Appeals for the TFederal Circuit for 22 years and as its Judge Michel has been the recipient of numerous awards including the INKLERDefendant-appellant Cleveland Saunders appeals his convictions for murder and carrying concealed weapons In the second of six assignments of error Saunders argues that the trial court erred by