PDF-OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

The test to determine whether material is obscene was set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Miller v California 1973 413 US 15 93 SCt 2607. vs Cale nda r Da te Loc at ion AC KNO WLED GMEN T A ND DE SI GNA TI ON OF AR GUI NG COU NS EL Rec ei pt a ck nowl ed ge d by Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ninth Judicial District elements of negligence. Accordingly, appellant Judicial Branch . Laws and Jurisdiction. Some background information . Origin of law. Case law: . Court decisions that inform judicial ruling. Constitution. : outline the structure of the American government (or state). Artwork. North. Reflecting. Pool. MALCOLM COCHRAN.  American, b. 1948.  . In Principle and In Practice.  . 2006.  . Granite.  . Funded by a grant from the . Ohio State Bar Foundation. South. Reflecting. I concur RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals I concur OWEN C. WILSON Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board of Contract App OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS , Judge.Defendant-appellant Brima Bumu appeals from the Hamilton County Common Pleas Court 1 - Week of 7 / 1 7 /1 7 Note: Th is is not a comprehensive list of every case released this week. First Appellate District of Ohio State v. Stephens , 2017 - Ohio - 5868 Dangerous Dogs: Sentencing F D E C I S I O N Rendered on December 2, 2008 W. Joseph Edwards, for appellant. Gretchen M.R. Lipari, for appellee. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas. TYACK, J. On A Explanation why thiscase isnot acaseof public or great general concernProcedural HistoryOn March 4, 2010, ten-year-old N.J. approached her guidance counselor ather younger sister on the morning of Mar TABLE OF CONTENTSPAGEEXPLANATION OF WHY THIS CASE IS A CASE OF PUBLIC................................................................2ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITIONS OF LAW ....................... IN THE SUPREME COURT OFOHIOHABTAM GEBIPlaintiff-AppelleeCASE NO 2017-1791vOn Appeal from the Franklin CountyCourt of Appeals Tenth AppellateLEGESSE WORKUDistrictDefendant-AppellantAPPELLEES MEMORANDUM Dated February 25 2013 MOORE Judge Defendant-Appellant George Mose appeals from his sentence and conviction as set forth in the January 7 2011 judgment entry of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas INTRODUCTIONa prison termof five yearsfor each count to be served concurrently2Christnerdid not appeal his conviction and sentence Insteadhe filed fivemotions forjudicial release between August 2011 a NOTICE OF APPEAL OF APPELLANTINDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIOIndustrial Commissionof Ohiogives noticeof appeal tothe SupremeCourt of Ohio from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Appeals Tenth2C