PDF-Cite as State v Mose 2013Ohio635STATE OF OHIO IN THE COURT OF AP

Dated February 25 2013 MOORE Judge DefendantAppellant George Mose appeals from his sentence and conviction as set forth in the January 7 2011 judgment entry of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas. Formation of Ohio. Ohio was once a part of the Northwest Territory. The Land Ordinance of 1785. The ordinance discussed how the government would measure, divide, and distribute the land it had acquired from Great Britain at the end of the American Revolution.. A -0005 - vs - EARL ZIMMERMAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Civil Appeal from the Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2011 CV 103. Judgment: Affirmed. Malcom Stewart Douglas, 525 Lake D E C I S I O N Rendered on December 2, 2008 W. Joseph Edwards, for appellant. Gretchen M.R. Lipari, for appellee. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas. TYACK, J. On A FINDINGS OF FACT 1) Plaintiff, Richard Lonero, an inmate incarcerated at defendant, Lebanon Correctional Institution (LeCI), filed this complaint maintaining that LeCI personnel honored a forged $100. • isitor Center is open Thursday through Monday from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The grounds days a year. • An entrance fee is required. • All plants, animals and park property are protect Fort Mose Historical Society, Inc.
Statement ofAssets & Liabilities Resulting from Cash Transactions
Years Ended June 30, 2013 & June 30, 2012
Year Ended 2013 2012 Assets Cash:
Checkin The test to determine whether material is obscene was set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Miller v. California (1973), 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607: Rendered on the ___23rd___ day of ____October____, 2015. . . . . . . . . . . . RYAN L. BRUNK, Atty, Reg. No. 0079237, 125 W. Main Street, New Lebanon, Ohio 45345 Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee OURT OF HIObiased against the father or that she has prejudged the merits of the underlying proceeding. TABLE OF CONTENTSPAGEEXPLANATION OF WHY THIS CASE IS A CASE OF PUBLIC................................................................2ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITIONS OF LAW ....................... Presiding Judge. Jonathan Rike appeals his convictions, after a jury trial, for attempted murder with a gun specification and improperly handling firearms in a motor vehicle. Rike contends that the t OURT OF HIONASCAR filed a petition for reassessment with appellee the tax commissioner On January 5 2015 the commissioner issued his final cting NASCARs arguments and affirming the assessment NASCAR IN THE SUPREME COURT OFOHIOHABTAM GEBIPlaintiff-AppelleeCASE NO 2017-1791vOn Appeal from the Franklin CountyCourt of Appeals Tenth AppellateLEGESSE WORKUDistrictDefendant-AppellantAPPELLEES MEMORANDUM Rendered on November 20 2008 Ron OBrien Prosecuting Attorney and Steven L Taylor for appellee Carpenter Lipps Leland LLPKort Gatterdam for appellant APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pl