PDF-Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court Filed January 22 2018 Case No

IN THE SUPREME COURT OFOHIOHABTAM GEBIPlaintiffAppelleeCASE NO 20171791vOn Appeal from the Franklin CountyCourt of Appeals Tenth AppellateLEGESSE WORKUDistrictDefendantAppellantAPPELLEES MEMORANDUM. S Constitutions Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures requires police to obtain a warrant to search a cell phone The decision generated considerable comment across the country as this was the 57375rst such ruling fro Artwork. North. Reflecting. Pool. MALCOLM COCHRAN.  American, b. 1948.  . In Principle and In Practice.  . 2006.  . Granite.  . Funded by a grant from the . Ohio State Bar Foundation. South. Reflecting. Case: 5:10-cv-01151-BYP Doc #: 29 Filed: 11/30/12 21 of 35. PageID #: 666 Case: 5:10-cv-01151-BYP Doc #: 29 Filed: 11/30/12 34 of 35. PageID #: 679 Case: 5:10-cv-01151-BYP Doc #: 29 Filed: I.TABLE OF CONTENTSII. STATEMENT WHY THIS CASE IS NOT OF PUBLICOR GREAT GENERAL INTEREST . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1III. STATEMENT OF THE CASE TABLE OF CONTENTSPAGEEXPLANATION OF WHY THIS CASE IS A CASE OF PUBLIC OR GREATGENERAL INTEREST AND INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . The test to determine whether material is obscene was set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Miller v. California (1973), 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607: TABLE OF CONTENTSPAGEEXPLANATION OF WHY THIS CASE IS A CASE OF PUBLIC................................................................2ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITIONS OF LAW ....................... Page 1 of 2 CONSENT FINDINGS AND ORDER The formal charges of misconduct upon which this Findings and Order is based arose from information obtained from the selfreport of Respondent Iris L. Muke. Page 1of 2CONSENT FINDINGS AND ORDERThe formal charges of misconduct upon which this Findings and Order is based arose from information obtained from the selfreport of Respondent Iris L Muke Ms Muke Case 510-cv-01151-BYP Doc 29 Filed 11/30/12 21 of 35 PageID 666Case 510-cv-01151-BYP Doc 29 Filed 11/30/12 34 of 35 PageID 679Case 510-cv-01151-BYP Doc 29 Filed 11/30/12 15 of 35 P INTRODUCTIONa prison termof five yearsfor each count to be served concurrently2Christnerdid not appeal his conviction and sentence Insteadhe filed fivemotions forjudicial release between August 2011 a CC 1 kox Ooaa/9 -CCZ rts vo / 1L /y fci4aVJ V 3- - IJ vr i1 rl r/c C oAa6 l21 j1f y/W /C 2 s-htL w o c Y if Lof o TABLE OF CONTENTS iCases iConstitutional Provi sions Statutes and Rules Pro Se AppelleeMalgorzata Polkowska-Sulek9600 ZyrardowPro Se Appelleeul Kapitana Hali 6 m 9 PolandPro Se Appellee99-320 Zychlinul WarynskiegoPro Se Appellee96-300 ZyrardowPro Se AppelleeTABLE OF CONTE