PDF-A s Case NoIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIOSTATEOF OHIO On Appeal fr

TABLE OF CONTENTSPAGEEXPLANATION OF WHY THIS CASE IS A CASE OF PUBLIC2ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITIONS OF LAW . S Constitutions Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures requires police to obtain a warrant to search a cell phone The decision generated considerable comment across the country as this was the 57375rst such ruling fro Trial Division . . The Supreme Court is ranked directly above the County Court in the Victorian court hierarchy and is the highest court in the Victorian court hierarchy. It consists of two divisions: the Trial Division and the Court of . Magistrates Court. Supreme Court. Court of Appeal. Crown Court. Supreme Court. High Court (QBD). Crown Court. Appeal against conviction/sentence. Case stated appeal (Point of Law). D only. n.b. if D pleaded guilty, can only appeal against sentence. Artwork. North. Reflecting. Pool. MALCOLM COCHRAN.  American, b. 1948.  . In Principle and In Practice.  . 2006.  . Granite.  . Funded by a grant from the . Ohio State Bar Foundation. South. Reflecting. I.TABLE OF CONTENTSII. STATEMENT WHY THIS CASE IS NOT OF PUBLICOR GREAT GENERAL INTEREST . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1III. STATEMENT OF THE CASE The test to determine whether material is obscene was set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Miller v. California (1973), 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607: Explanation why thiscase isnot acaseof public or great general concernProcedural HistoryOn March 4, 2010, ten-year-old N.J. approached her guidance counselor ather younger sister on the morning of Mar cc: SUPREME COURT 2 (0) I947A In the Supreme C IN THE SUPREME COURT OFOHIOHABTAM GEBIPlaintiff-AppelleeCASE NO 2017-1791vOn Appeal from the Franklin CountyCourt of Appeals Tenth AppellateLEGESSE WORKUDistrictDefendant-AppellantAPPELLEES MEMORANDUM NOTICE OF APPEAL OF APPELLANTS PROGRESS OHIO INC SENATORMICHAEL SKINDELL AND REPRESENTATIVE DENNIS MURRAY JRThis case raises a substantial constitutional question and is of public or great generalResp INTRODUCTIONa prison termof five yearsfor each count to be served concurrently2Christnerdid not appeal his conviction and sentence Insteadhe filed fivemotions forjudicial release between August 2011 a CC 1 kox Ooaa/9 -CCZ rts vo / 1L /y fci4aVJ V 3- - IJ vr i1 rl r/c C oAa6 l21 j1f y/W /C 2 s-htL w o c Y if Lof o NOTICE OF APPEAL OF APPELLANTS GHOLAMREZA VAHDATIBANAof appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio from Judgment of the Franklin County Court ofL Matan 0012381AN WRIGHT NOBLEColumbus OH 43215ematanmgwlawcom