PDF-l3jlY theibupremce Court of YjioSTATE OF OHIO ex relVINDUSTRIAL COMMIS

NOTICE OF APPEAL OF APPELLANTINDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIOIndustrial Commissionof Ohiogives noticeof appeal tothe SupremeCourt of Ohio from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Appeals Tenth2C. Legal Research Boot Camp. Chase College of Law & . University of Cincinnati College of Law. Shannon Kemen. Call Numbers. KFO Call Numbers:. . K= Law. KF = U.S. Law. KFO = Ohio. Research Guides. Artwork. North. Reflecting. Pool. MALCOLM COCHRAN.  American, b. 1948.  . In Principle and In Practice.  . 2006.  . Granite.  . Funded by a grant from the . Ohio State Bar Foundation. South. Reflecting. Chase College of Law & . University of Cincinnati College of Law. Shannon Kemen. Call Numbers. KFO Call Numbers:. . K= Law. KF = U.S. Law. KFO = Ohio. Research Guides. Research Guides. Ohio Legal Research: . I.TABLE OF CONTENTSII. STATEMENT WHY THIS CASE IS NOT OF PUBLICOR GREAT GENERAL INTEREST . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1III. STATEMENT OF THE CASE The test to determine whether material is obscene was set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Miller v. California (1973), 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607: Explanation why thiscase isnot acaseof public or great general concernProcedural HistoryOn March 4, 2010, ten-year-old N.J. approached her guidance counselor ather younger sister on the morning of Mar TABLE OF CONTENTSPAGEEXPLANATION OF WHY THIS CASE IS A CASE OF PUBLIC................................................................2ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITIONS OF LAW ....................... Presiding Judge. Jonathan Rike appeals his convictions, after a jury trial, for attempted murder with a gun specification and improperly handling firearms in a motor vehicle. Rike contends that the t IN THE SUPREME COURT OFOHIOHABTAM GEBIPlaintiff-AppelleeCASE NO 2017-1791vOn Appeal from the Franklin CountyCourt of Appeals Tenth AppellateLEGESSE WORKUDistrictDefendant-AppellantAPPELLEES MEMORANDUM FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIOHAMILTON COUNTY OHIORONALD DULAPlaintiff-AppellantvsCITY OF CINCINNATINATALIA HARRISHAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBRIAN GILLIGANGREG VENTRETHE CHRIST HOSPITALMA Dated February 25 2013 MOORE Judge Defendant-Appellant George Mose appeals from his sentence and conviction as set forth in the January 7 2011 judgment entry of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas TABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF AUTHORITIES 2ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS PROPOSITIONS OF LAW 6tree reinoval betweena utility companyand tree reinovalcompanyincludes specificationsthatpriori INTRODUCTIONa prison termof five yearsfor each count to be served concurrently2Christnerdid not appeal his conviction and sentence Insteadhe filed fivemotions forjudicial release between August 2011 a Pro Se AppelleeMalgorzata Polkowska-Sulek9600 ZyrardowPro Se Appelleeul Kapitana Hali 6 m 9 PolandPro Se Appellee99-320 Zychlinul WarynskiegoPro Se Appellee96-300 ZyrardowPro Se AppelleeTABLE OF CONTE