PDF-OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

INKLERDefendantappellant Cleveland Saunders appeals his convictions for murder and carrying concealed weapons In the second of six assignments of error Saunders argues that the trial court erred by. Judicial Branch . Laws and Jurisdiction. Some background information . Origin of law. Case law: . Court decisions that inform judicial ruling. Constitution. : outline the structure of the American government (or state). Artwork. North. Reflecting. Pool. MALCOLM COCHRAN.  American, b. 1948.  . In Principle and In Practice.  . 2006.  . Granite.  . Funded by a grant from the . Ohio State Bar Foundation. South. Reflecting. OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS , Judge.Defendant-appellant Brima Bumu appeals from the Hamilton County Common Pleas Court 1 - Week of 7 / 1 7 /1 7 Note: Th is is not a comprehensive list of every case released this week. First Appellate District of Ohio State v. Stephens , 2017 - Ohio - 5868 Dangerous Dogs: Sentencing F D E C I S I O N Rendered on December 2, 2008 W. Joseph Edwards, for appellant. Gretchen M.R. Lipari, for appellee. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas. TYACK, J. On A The test to determine whether material is obscene was set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Miller v. California (1973), 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607: FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO , Plaintiff - Appel l ee , vs. BRIMA BUMU , Defendant - Appell ant . : : : : : APPEAL NO. C - 1 604 92 TRIAL NO. B - 0410574A O TABLE OF CONTENTSPAGEEXPLANATION OF WHY THIS CASE IS A CASE OF PUBLIC................................................................2ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITIONS OF LAW ....................... IN THE SUPREME COURT OFOHIOHABTAM GEBIPlaintiff-AppelleeCASE NO 2017-1791vOn Appeal from the Franklin CountyCourt of Appeals Tenth AppellateLEGESSE WORKUDistrictDefendant-AppellantAPPELLEES MEMORANDUM Ronald E Dula pro se Andrew W Garth Interim City Solicitor and Jacklyn Gonzales Martin and Marva K Benjamin Assistant City Solicitors for Defendants-Appellees City of Cincinnati and Natalia Harris Jos PORTERWRIGHTCOM 1Ahmad has defended large and mid-sized companies in a variety of high-stakes disputes including matters arising out of alleged breaches of purchase-and-saleagreements license agreeme Dated February 25 2013 MOORE Judge Defendant-Appellant George Mose appeals from his sentence and conviction as set forth in the January 7 2011 judgment entry of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas TABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF AUTHORITIES 2ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS PROPOSITIONS OF LAW 6tree reinoval betweena utility companyand tree reinovalcompanyincludes specificationsthatpriori Pro Se AppelleeMalgorzata Polkowska-Sulek9600 ZyrardowPro Se Appelleeul Kapitana Hali 6 m 9 PolandPro Se Appellee99-320 Zychlinul WarynskiegoPro Se Appellee96-300 ZyrardowPro Se AppelleeTABLE OF CONTE