Newburn. (2007):. The study of crime focuses on crimes of the powerless rather than the powerful. Timner. & . Eitzen. (1989):. Focus is always on crimes on the ‘streets’, not crimes on the ‘suites’.. ID: 566863
DownloadNote - The PPT/PDF document "White Collar Crime" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
White Collar Crime
Newburn (2007): The study of crime focuses on crimes of the powerless rather than the powerful
Timner & Eitzen (1989):Focus is always on crimes on the ‘streets’, not crimes on the ‘suites’.
Sutherland (1949) coined the term ‘White-Collar Crime’ when setting out to show that crime was not just a working-class phenomena.
White-Collar Crime refers to offences committed by middle-class individuals who abuse their work positions within organisations for personal gain at the expense of the organisation and/or clients of the organisation
My Name Is…
What might be classed as ‘White-Collar Crime?’Slide3
Worldcom (Telephone company in the USA) was forced to explain why $4 Billion was missing from it’s accounts. Shares dropped from $64 to 20 cents & investors lost millions.
As the definition of White Collar Crime is so vague it can be split into two main types:
Crime committed by companies against employees or the public.(This is explored further in a separate PowerPoint)
Crime committed against a company by an employee.
(This will be explored here)
(2001): Often doctors will falsify prescriptions and patient records to claim more funding from the NHS. One GP made over £700,000 over 5 years doing this.
In 2007, the millionaire Conrad Black (former owner of the
was jailed for 6 years after defrauding shareholders out of millions of dollars.Slide4
Ditton (1977) & Mars (1982) found that
(in a wide range of occupations), thought that it was a ‘perk’ of the job & legitimate to steal from their workplaces.
> Why might stealing from the office be seen as ok but stealing from someone’s home not be?
> How might this be linked to labelling theory?
> How might Marxists view this type of crime?
> What methodological issues might you encounter if you were to research the extent of occupational crime.Slide5
Official Statistics & White-Collar Crime
Official statistics tell us that most crime is working-class crime. White-collar crime is under-represented within these statistics and are thus misleading
Why might White- Collar crime be under-represented within official statistics?
1) Difficult to Detect - ‘Invisible Crime’.
2) ‘Victimless’ Crime.
3) Crime may benefit all involved e.g. Bribery.
4) Difficult to Investigate.
5) Lack of awareness.
6) Institutional Protection.
7) Lack of Convictions – Middle-Class offenders.
What are the implications of the under-representation of white-collar crimes in official statistics for the view that most criminals are working class?Slide6
Explaining Occupational Crime
Based on what you have learnt already, can you think of any explanations as to why occupational crime occurs?
Strain Theory & Anomie
Means & Goals
)The Sociology of Risk Taking
Control Theory (Reckless)
Market Culture, & Victimless CrimeSlide7
White-Collar Crime is linked to the following:
> Marxism> Corporate Crime> Transnational Crime> Environmental ‘Green’ Crime> State Crime> Computer-based Crime> Globalisation & Crime> The Social Construction of Crime Statistics
Based on what you now know about White-Collar Crime, how does it relate to the Marxist Theory of Crime?