/
A Case study of Severe Winter Convection in the Midwest A Case study of Severe Winter Convection in the Midwest

A Case study of Severe Winter Convection in the Midwest - PowerPoint Presentation

danika-pritchard
danika-pritchard . @danika-pritchard
Follow
353 views
Uploaded On 2018-09-25

A Case study of Severe Winter Convection in the Midwest - PPT Presentation

Written by Brian P Pettegrew Patrick S Market Raymond A Wolf Ronald L Holle and Nicholas WS Demetriades Presentation by Marcello Andiloro Introduction and Background On the evening of 11 Feb 2003 a line a severe thunderstorms moved through southeast Iowa and northwest and central ID: 679408

front cold severe analysis cold front analysis severe surface hpa line utc feb illinois iowa wind synoptic cape region

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "A Case study of Severe Winter Convection..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

A Case study of Severe Winter Convection in the Midwest

Written by;

Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades

Presentation by;

Marcello AndiloroSlide2

Introduction and Background

On the evening of 11 Feb. 2003 a line a severe thunderstorms moved through southeast Iowa and northwest and central Illinois with winds in excess of 50

kt

.

Storms were associated with a passing cold front and resembled a small squall line.

Along with the wind gusts, they produced brief heavy snow, causing blinding conditions.

First severe thunderstorm warning was issued in Marshall County, Illinois at 0002 UTC on Feb. 12.Slide3

Introduction and Background

Why is this case important?

It resembled a warm season convective squall line, but was in the cold season.

There is little in the way of literature explaining events like this that occur in the cold season.

This specific case was atypical to

thundersnow

cases because it was not a case of elevated convection.

Resembled warm season severe weather rooted in the planetary boundary later.Slide4

Synoptic-scale Analysis

Bulk of precipitation started out behind the cold front, then as the storms started to grow the storms pushed ahead of the cold front.

There was a high pressure gradient both behind the cold front as well as in the warm sector.

Indications of cold front passage:

Several stations showed the passage of cold front with temperatures dropping along with dew points.

Thirty-three minute intense snow shower and clearing of skies under and hour after the shower at Davenport, Iowa.Slide5
Slide6

Synoptic-scale Analysis

Polar jet analysis:

A 300

hPa

polar jet flowed southward out of central Canada with a centered core over the Ohio Valley and wind speeds of up to 135

kt

.

Southern Iowa and central Illinois were toward the left entrance region, which is atypical for the ideal occurrence of severe weather.

Where strong mass convergence below and strong mass divergence aloft are preferredSlide7

Synoptic –scale Analysis

A low amplitude shortwave trough axis was present at 500

hPa

from just west of Hudson Bay, southwest through Wisconsin revealed a significant slope into the cold air, consistent with a strong cold front.

Circular absolute

vorticity

maximum in base of shortwave trough suggested

quasigeostrophic

forcing for ascent downstream across eastern Iowa and northern Illinois.

Q-vector convergence over central Illinois at 0000 UTC supported evidence of

midtropospheric

forcing for ascent.Slide8

Synoptic-scale Analysis

Trough at 850

hPa

running parallel to surface cold front extending from Great Lakes to Iowa and Missouri. Along trough axis, dew point depressions were low, indicating a moist environment.

Temps behind trough dropped drastically, indicating a front at this level.

Evidence of prefrontal moisture and a frontal lifting mechanism were present at this level.Slide9

Mesoscale Analysis

At 2100 UTC Feb. 11 925

hPa

frontogenesis

was found along and behind the location of the surface cold front (using the 20-km RUC initial fields).

Along with significant region of

ω

along the frontal zone of values less than -15

μ

bs

-1

As well as CAPE values blossoming and maximized in area and magnitude, exceeding 50 Jkg

-1

over a large area coincident with the area where

ω

were less than -10

μ

bs

-1

This arrangement coincided with the area of the bulk of the precipitation at this time.Slide10

Mesoscale Analysis

Hourly analyses showed a gradual decrease in CAPE.

However, vertical motion values of -20

μ

bs

-1

were collocated with the small area of CAPE and the region ahead of the front where

precip

was occurring along with whiteout conditions.

These analyses depicted a dynamically forced region of ascent immediately along and ahead of the surface cold front capable of raising near surface parcels to their LCL.Slide11
Slide12

Sounding Analysis

Lincoln, Illinois

Davenport, Iowa

Feb. 11 1200 UTC flew under mostly cloudy skies. Very cold temperatures existed in the lowest 100

hPa

.

The wind profile showed significant veering in lowest 100

hPa

.

Weakly sheared unidirectional flow above boundary layer.

Feb 12 0000 UTC revealed much warmer, moister environment in lowest 200

hPa

Noteworthy that the atmospheric profile was nearly dry adiabatic from 860~625.

Feb. 11 1200 UTC similar to Lincoln, very cold air near surface.

Similar unidirectional shear signature

Feb. 12 0000 UTC also in parallel with Lincoln

Significant 12-h warming in the lowest 200

hPa

, and 12-h moistening in the lowest 100

hPa

.

In contrast, cooling and drying in the

midtroposphere

which encouraged the creation of potential instability.Slide13

Radar Analysis

The strongest reflectivities were located along a line parallel to the fast-moving surface cold front.

Max

dBZ

values never exceeded 40-45.

Storm tops also never exceeded 3.7 km and the highest reflectivities were restricted to the lower portions of the strongest cells.

Showed no traits of traditional severe weather producing squall lines

No rear-inflow jet, no

stratiform

precip

region, or front-to-rear flow

Nor did it evolve through the stages of squall-line evolution.Slide14

Radar Analysis

Instead we see a convective line along the cold frontal zone that most closely resembled the parallel

stratiform

mesoscale

convective system.

But no

stratiform

precip

developed. There was no tendency even for cell decay on the left flank or new cell generation on the right as would be expected with the parallel

stratiform

MCS.

Furthermore, the convective line was found to tilt slightly down shear that was likely due to the lack of CAPE.

Therefore, the severe winds were a result of vertical mixing associated with the

mesoscale

and synoptic systems.Slide15

Lightning Analysis

A total of 101 cloud-to-ground flashes were detected by

Vaisala’s

National Lightning Detection Network.

Four of which were positive strikes.

The 26 flashes that were associated with the severe wind reports were all negative cloud-to-ground strikes.

This fact contrasted the larger body of work on winter lightning where most winter lightning documented was of positive polarity.

These results actually validated the work of Taniguchi et al. (1982) and Brooke et al. (1982) that shear in the cloud layer may have some control over the polarity of a given lightning flash. Slide16

Summary

This was a unique winter storm event:

Strong background pressure gradient and winds

Significant low-level

frontogenesis

Presence of modest near-surface CAPE

Dry-adiabatic near-surface layer .

This all allowed for shallow convection and the subsequent mixing of winds to the surface in excess of the severe criterion.

Therefore, a severe thunderstorm warning was the best response to this event as opposed to a high wind warning.